Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0008031 (chest pain)
 17,248 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In general, severe hyperkalaemia produces classic electrocardiographic manifestations including tenting of T waves, widening of the QRS complex, loss of P waves, and eventually, sine waves and asystole. This report concerns a patient with chronic renal failure on maintenance haemodialysis who developed a severe hyperkalaemia associated with chest pain, manifested electrocardiographically by elevation of the S-T segment resembling acute myocardial infarction. After haemodialysis, serum potassium decreased and the electrocardiogram returned to normal. We review the literature and discuss the possible physiology of this electrocardiographic alteration.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 1989
PMID:Electrographic alterations induced by hyperkalaemia simulating acute myocardial infarction. 211 56

The intradialytic symptoms that can be linked to components of the extracorporeal circuit of greatest clinical importance are the Type A (anaphylactoid) reactions. Most of these are IgE-mediated reactions due to ethylene oxide and are preventable by adequate degassing of the dialyzer by the manufacturer and by adequate rinsing of the dialyzer just prior to use. AN69-associated reactions are a second group, and are probably mediated by membrane-induced bradykinin generation coupled with ACE-inhibitor induced prolongation of bradykinin half-life. Type A reactions occur in a reuse setting, alos, and these may be related to some as yet poorly understood interaction between bleach, reuse sterilants, and certain dialyzer membranes, again, with ACE inhibitors playing an amplifier role. There is no compelling evidence linking membrane-induced complement activation to type A dialyzer reactions. However, there is a large body of evidence in animal models that exposure to complement fragment-releasing membranes can increase the pulmonary artery pressure and increase thromboxane formation. Thus, at least in principle, a case can be made for using unsubstituted cellulose membranes with caution in patients with a history of atopy or eosinophilia, particularly if acetate dialysate is to be used. Such a caution, however, must be viewed as conjectural in the absence of definitive evidence. Type B dialyzer reactions (mild back and chest pain 20-60 min into the dialysis session) is a phenomenon that is in the process of vanishing. The reason why is unclear. These reactions may have been due to some sort of dialyzer contaminant, or they may have been due to complement fragment release and required the use of acetate dialysate as a cofactor. In any event, recent well designed studies fail to find any differences in symptoms between unsubstituted cellulose and synthetic membranes. Membrane-induced complement fragment release also may play a minor role in dialysis hypoxemia, but evidence is conflicting in this area. Again, the use of acetate dialysate appears to be an important cofactor. Post-dialysis events which may be conceivably linked to the delayed effects of complement fragment releasing membranes need to be evaluated in controlled studies. Studies suggesting increased post-dialysis catabolism with use of unsubstituted cellulose membranes need to be confirmed in dialysis patients, and symptomatic correlates should be sought and evaluated.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 1994
PMID:Adverse effects of dialyzers manifesting during the dialysis session. 806 4

A crossover study to compare the effects of seven different dialysers on intradialytic symptoms in 37 patients during dialysis with acetate-containing dialysate was performed at five centres in four countries. The same manufacturing lot of each dialyser and of blood line sets were used by all centres. The same clinical data (duration of dialysis, blood pressure, weights, temperature, drugs, symptoms, and treatments) and technical data (blood flow, dialyser clearance, and ultrafiltration rate) were collected. Kt/V for urea was used to determine dialysis prescribed. Intradialytic symptoms and signs were measured hourly or when observed by staff using the haemodialysis treatment form (see Introduction). After each week of treatment with a particular dialyser, patients completed a questionnaire relating to the presence and severity of symptoms. (Only presence or absence of symptoms are presented.) Wide differences in dialysis duration and blood flow between centres were noted. These may have contributed to the differences between centres in relationship to staff reported responses to different dialyser: Dialysers with the lowest incidence of both signs and symptoms and of chest pain, back pain, and itching (arbitrarily designated bioincompatibility symptoms) were the Duo-Flux and Filtral, with the G120 M, the CD 4000, and the T 150 having the highest incidence. By patient questionnaire the most biocompatible dialysers were the T 150, F 60, and the Filtral, with the most symptom producing being the G120 M and the G10-3N. Perceptions of symptoms between patients and staff differed substantially overall and between centres. Hypersensitivity reactions were noted in two patients, both occurring with cuprammonium cellulose hollow-fibre dialysis, despite adherence to manufacturers' instructions concerning saline priming and removal. Both patients showed antibody titres greater than 1:160 against ethylene oxide-HSA. Ethylene oxide was not detected (limit of detection 1 part per million) in dialysers, blood line sets, or fistula needles. The study suggests that dialysis symptom reporting is complicated by individual perceptions, staff reactions, and the efficiency of recording. In this study ethnic and cultural differences must be added to the haemodynamic differences and other prescription-related elements in influencing symptoms. Despite these problems a hierarchy of dialyser-related symptoms and signs could be discerned which largely paralleled laboratory findings of biocompatibility. Future comparative studies relating symptomatology to membrane and dialyser structure should consider the variables identified as influencing symptoms and their reporting.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 1993
PMID:Relationship between dialyser type and signs and symptoms. 827 50

Aortic valve stenosis occurs 10-20 years earlier in patients on dialysis compared with the general population. This is likely related to the exposure of the valve to a milieu that predisposes to calcification as well as increased shear stress across the valve. Objective assessment of stenosis severity is largely made using echocardiography though accurate interpretation requires an understanding of the potential pitfalls of the technique and the influence of cardiac output upon the gradient measured across the valve. Timing of valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis is predominantly guided by exercise-induced symptoms (breathlessness, chest pain and [pre] syncope), which are often difficult to assess in the dialysis population who may have limited exercise capacity and symptoms due to renal failure and other comorbidities. Finally, treatment of aortic stenosis remains a constantly evolving area with advances in both conventional surgery and percutaneous techniques.
Semin Dial 2017 05
PMID:Aortic Stenosis in Dialysis Patients. 2823 94