Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0007222 (cardiovascular disease)
 65,817 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Hypertension (HTN) is a significant problem in pediatric renal transplant (TP) recipients, predisposing the individuals to the development of cardiovascular disease and graft dysfunction. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) are considered excellent agents to treat post-TP HTN. We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of the two most commonly prescribed CCBs in our pediatric renal TP population: nifedipine (Procardia, or P) and amlodipine (Norvasc, or N). All patients (n = 24) had been started on a CCB for systolic (SBP) and/or diastolic BP (DBP) > 95%. There were no other changes in adjunctive antihypertensive medications or doses during the cross-over period. Post-TP, pretreatment (pretx) SBP was 137.6 +/- 10.9 mmHg. The post-treatment SBP were (in mmHg): 128.5 +/- 11.9 (all patients, n = 24) (p = 0.009 vs. pretx); 126.4 +/- 10.0 (P alone, n = 15) (p = 0.007 vs. pretx); 132.8 +/- 14.4 (P + other antihypertensive(s), n = 9) (p = 0.331, NS vs. pretx). The post-TP, pretreatment DBP was 88.2 +/- 11.1 mmHg. The post-treatment DBP were (in mmHg): 78.5 +/- 6.9 (all patients, n = 24) (p = 0.03 vs. pretx); 77.2 +/- 7.4 (P alone, n = 15) (p = 0.008 vs. pretx); 80.7 +/- 6.1 (P + other antihypertensive(s), n = 9) (p = 0.063, NS vs. pretx). P and N were equally effective in reducing SBP (p = 0.843, NS) and DBP (p = 0.612, NS). Cyclosporin A (CyA) dose (p = 0.81) and trough levels (p = 0.19) were similar in P- and N-treated patients. Calculated GFR was virtually identical in P- and N-treated patients (p = 0.89). Patients (or parents of) reported a higher incidence of various side-effects while receiving P, including headache, flushing, dizziness and leg cramps. Furthermore, 22/24 (91.7%) reported some degree of gingival hyperplasia during treatment with P, and all these patients reported a stabilization or reduction of hypertrophy after the switch from P to N. We conclude that CCBs (N) are efficacious drugs for the purpose of BP control and renal protection in pediatric renal TP recipients.
 ...
PMID:Use of calcium-channel blockers in pediatric renal transplant recipients. 1056 73

Calcium antagonists, particularly the newer, longer-acting agents, are clearly effective in reducing elevated blood pressure with minimal to modest adverse effect profiles, and are therefore used extensively. The goal of antihypertensive therapy, however, is not simply to reduce blood pressure, but also to reduce vascular injury due to hypertension. Prospective controlled clinical trials evaluating cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are needed to test calcium antagonists in patients with hypertension. This review summarises the design and, in some cases, the results of 7 trials (5 of them still ongoing) that have provided insight into the effects of moderate- to long-acting calcium antagonists on mortality and target-organ damage in patients with hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial studied 4695 elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, and demonstrated significant reductions in stroke and all fatal and nonfatal cardiac end-points in patients randomised to nitrendipine versus placebo. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) compares the effects of standard diuretic treatment with 3 alternatives (amlodipine, lisinopril, and doxazosin) on the incidence of fatal coronary artery disease and nonfatal myocardial infarction in more than 42,000 hypertensive patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors. The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) compares the effects of amlodipine +/- perindopril with atenolol +/- bendrofluazide on fatal coronary artery disease and nonfatal myocardial infarction in 18,000 high risk patients. The Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular End-points (CONVINCE) study is assessing the incidence of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, and cardiovascular disease-related death in patients on controlled-onset extended-release verapamil compared with a standard regimen of hydrochlorothiazide or atenolol. The Nordic Diltiazem Study (NORDIL) also compares a calcium antagonist (diltiazem) with conventional antihypertensive drug treatment (diuretics or beta-blockers) with add-on therapy as needed, in preventing cardiovascular mortality or morbidity. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT) tests a similar hypothesis, examining the effects of amlodipine on atherosclerotic lesions. The African-American Study of Kidney Disease (AASK) trial is evaluating the effects of amlodipine in hypertensive patients with renal disease. These important clinical trials of different classes of antihypertensive agents are critical for optimising the treatment of hypertensive patients in order to prevent coronary artery disease and other vascular diseases in this new millennium. Importantly, these randomised trials are free of the major problems of observational studies, i.e., confounding by indication, and should fully address the concerns raised by observational studies and small, under-powered, randomised trials that calcium antagonists may have adverse effects on myocardial infarction, bleeding and cancer. To date, these trials in progress have provided no evidence to support these concerns.
 ...
PMID:[Calcium antagonists in cardiovascular disease. Clinical evidence from morbidity and mortality trials]. 1100 56

Calcium antagonists are currently considered first-choice agents for treating hypertension. They are also active antianginal drugs. Their protective effects against ischaemia and their antiatherogenic potential, which have been demonstrated in various experimental models, may contribute to their preventive effect against the early atherosclerotic processes. However, their effects on survival and cardiovascular events have been inconsistent and controversial. Recent studies have suggested that mortality may be increased by short-acting agents. The effects of certain long-acting calcium antagonists may be different. In early clinical trials, nifedipine and nicardipine did not alter the progression of significant coronary artery narrowing, but did reduce the development of new atherosclerotic lesions. Nevertheless, the number of cardiovascular events was not decreased. The Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS) showed a higher incidence of angina and more frequent cardiovascular events in patients treated with isradipine. In the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial (PREVENT), after 3 years' follow-up, progression of significant atherosclerotic lesions and the development of new lesions were not significantly altered by treatment with amlodipine. However, it would appear that quantitative angiography may not be appropriate for monitoring the progression of atherosclerosis. Because of arterial remodelling, angiographic images may not show changes in the arterial lumen, in arteries where intravascular ultrasound may detect important atherosclerotic plaques. High resolution B-mode ultrasonography of the carotid artery may be more informative, since carotid intima media thickness is strongly correlated with cardiovascular risk factors, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, and the presence of atherosclerotic lesions at other arterial sites. In the PREVENT trial, carotid ultrasonography showed that intima media thickness was stabilised in the amlodipine group, while progression was uninterrupted in the placebo group. The mechanism of amlodipine in slowing the progression of intima media thickness may be related to its antiatherogenic effect, as well as to its effect on cellular growth and hyperplasia of the arterial wall. It is interesting to note that, as a secondary objective of the PREVENT trial, patients treated with amlodipine had fewer ischaemic events than those treated with placebo. The beneficial effects of amlodipine on arterial thickening and on the prevention of ischaemic events suggest that amlodipine may be recommended for the management of all patients with stable angina. A larger trial with a longer follow-up period should be performed in order to confirm the promising results of PREVENT.
 ...
PMID:[Effects of calcium antagonists on atherosclerosis progression and intima media thickness]. 1100 57

The objective of this analysis was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of amlodipine therapy in patients with coronary artery disease in Sweden. It is hypothesised that treatment with amlodipine will have an impact on overall cardiovascular disease treatment costs, resulting in a positive cost-effectiveness profile. A Markov cohort simulation model was constructed to simulate event-related and procedure-related health economic outcomes of coronary artery disease populations on amlodipine versus those on placebo. Patient level data from the Prospective Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial was used to populate the model. The total number of adverse cardiovascular clinical outcomes experienced over a three-year period was lower for patient on amlodipine than for those on placebo. The rate of hospitalisation per patient due to angina, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction in the placebo cohort was 64.7%, while the rate in the amlodipine cohort was 46.9%. The cost per patient was Swedish kroner (SEK)26,600 for amlodipine patients and SEK27,400 for placebo patients. The use of amlodipine resulted in improved clinical outcomes as well as a slight savings in cost over a three-year period.
 ...
PMID:A cost-effectiveness evaluation of amlodipine usage in patients with coronary artery disease in Sweden. 1192 9

In 2002, the World Health Organization estimated that over 58% of cardiovascular disease in North America is due to 'both blood pressure and cholesterol higher than optimal'. Unfortunately, less than a third of patients with both conditions are identified, and fewer than one in ten reach the treatment goals for both factors. Adherence to treatment is notably improved when therapy is initiated simultaneously. Combination therapy of amlodipine besylate (Norvasc, Pfizer Ltd) with atorvastatin calcium (Lipitor, Pfizer Ltd), marketed as Caduet (Pfizer Ltd) is the first dual-therapy compound designed to treat hypertension and/or angina and dyslipidemia concurrently with a single daily pill in the full range of dosing combinations. Amlodipine/atorvastatin retains the safety and efficacy of its parent compounds whilst simplifying the management of these comorbid conditions, in what may be considered the first version of a polypill.
 ...
PMID:Amlodipine/atorvastatin: the first cross risk factor polypill for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. 1535 Jan 69