Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0006142 (
breast cancer
)
160,383
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Breast cancer
is the most frequent cancer in women while it is the second cause of cancer death. Estrogens are well recognized to play the predominant role in
breast cancer
development and growth and much efforts have been devoted to the blockade of estrogen formation and action. The most widely used therapy of
breast cancer
which has shown benefits at all stages of the disease is the use of the antiestrogen Tamoxifen. This compound, however, possesses mixed agonist and antagonist activity and major efforts have been devoted to the development of compounds having pure antiestrogenic activity in the mammary gland and endometrium. Such a compound would avoid the problem of stimulation of the endometrium and the risk of endometrial carcinoma. We have thus synthesized an orally active non-steroidal antiestrogen, EM-652 (SCH 57068) and the prodrug EM-800 (SCH57050) which are the most potent of the known antiestrogens. EM-652 is the compound having the highest affinity for the estrogen receptor, including estradiol. It has higher affinity for the ER than ICI 182780, hydroxytamoxifen, raloxifene, droloxifene and hydroxytoremifene. EM-652 has the most potent inhibitory activity on both ER alpha and ER beta compared to any of the other antiestrogens tested. An important aspect of EM-652 is that it inhibits both the AF1 and AF2 functions of both ER alpha and ER beta while the inhibitory action of hydroxytamoxifen is limited to AF2, the ligand-dependent function of the estrogen receptors. AF1 activity is constitutive, ligand-independent and is responsible for mediation of the activity of growth factors and of the ras oncogene and MAP-kinase pathway. EM-652 inhibits Ras-induced transcriptional activity of ER alpha and ER beta and blocks SRC-1-stimulated activity of the two receptors. EM-652 was also found to block the recruitment of SRC-1 at AF1 of ER beta, this ligand-independent activation of AF1 being closely related to phosphorylation of the steroid receptors by protein kinase. Most importantly, the antiestrogen hydroxytamoxifen has no inhibitory effect on the SRC-1-induced ER beta activity while the pure antiestrogen EM-652 completely abolishes this effect, thus strengthening the need to use pure antiestrogens in
breast cancer
therapy in order to control all known aspects of ER-regulated gene expression. In fact, the absence of blockade of AF2 by hydroxytamoxifen could explain why the benefits of tamoxifen observed up to 5 years become negative at longer time intervals and why resistance develops to tamoxifen. EM-800, the prodrug of EM-652, has been shown to prevent the development of dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary carcinoma in the rat, a well-recognized model of human
breast cancer
. It is of interest that the addition of dehydroepiandrosterone, a precursor of androgens, to EM-800, led to complete inhibition of tumor development in this model. Not only the development, but also the growth of established DMBA-induced mammary carcinoma was inhibited by treatment with EM-800. An inhibitory effect was also observed when medroxyprogesterone was added to treatment with EM-800. Uterine size was reduced to castration levels in the groups of animals treated with EM-800. An almost complete disappearance of estrogen receptors was observed in the uterus, vaginum and tumors in nude mice treated with EM-800. EM-652 was the most potent antiestrogen to inhibit the growth of human
breast cancer
ZR-75-1, MCF-7 and T-47D cells in vitro when compared with ICI 182780,
ICI 164384
, hydroxytamoxifen, and droloxifene. Moreover, EM-652 and EM-800 have no stimulatory effect on the basal levels of cell proliferation in the absence of E2 while hydroxytamoxifen and droloxifene had a stimulatory effect on the basal growth of T-47D and ZR-75-1 cells. EM-652 was also the most potent inhibitor of the percentage of cycling cancer cells. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
...
PMID:EM-652 (SCH 57068), a third generation SERM acting as pure antiestrogen in the mammary gland and endometrium. 1041 81
Progesterone antagonists (PAs) (antiprogestins) or progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) form an interesting category of new hormonal agents in the treatment of
breast cancer
. In vitro, antiproliferative effects of different PAs are mainly observed in estrogen-stimulated growth of PR-positive tumor cell lines. Both progestin agonist/antagonist actions on mammary tumor cells are dependent on the type of cell line, culture medium and concentrations of the PAs used, and type of biologic response measured. In various experimental animal tumor models, different PAs showed a greater antitumor activity than tamoxifen or high-dose progestins. Most interestingly, combination treatment of different PAs (mifepristone, ORG 31710, onapristone) or PRMs with different antiestrogens (tamoxifen, droloxifen,
ICI 164384
) or with an aromatase inhibitor (atemestane) showed greater antitumor efficacy than treatment with each single type of drug alone. These additive antiproliferative effects were demonstrated in various experimental in vitro and in vivo models. In some studies, these effects were accompanied by additive effects on several cell biologic parameters. In pretreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, objective responses have been observed in 10-12%, and stable disease in 42-46% of the patients; in previously untreated patients objective response rates of 11 and 56% have been reported. The clinical development of onapristone was stopped because of liver toxicity. At the present time, apart from development of new pure potent PAs, clinical investigation of combined therapy of PAs with antiestrogens are urgently needed.
...
PMID:Progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators in the treatment of breast cancer. 1110 94
Development of antiestrogen resistance is a major clinical problem, and therefore it is crucial to elucidate the mechanisms involved. To investigate whether gain-of-function or loss-of-function mechanisms was most likely to be involved, cell fusion between the antiestrogen-sensitive MCF-7 and the
ICI 164384
- and ICI 182780-resistant MCF-7/164(R)-5 cell lines was performed. Furthermore, a fusion cell line between the tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7/TAM(R)-1 and the MCF-7/164(R)-5 cell line was established. A thorough investigation of growth parameters and expression of selected proteins (estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha), progesterone receptor (PR), Bcl-2, IGF-binding protein-2 (IGFBP2) and IGF receptor Ialpha (IGF-IRalpha)) in the fusion partners and fusion cells revealed that both gain- and loss-of-function changes occurred, and that the mechanisms resulting in resistance to the two antiestrogens were different. This multi-factoriality of antiestrogen resistance is promising in relation to sequential treatment of
breast cancer
patients with different types of endocrine therapy. Furthermore, we found an association between antiestrogen resistance and reduced IGF-IRalpha expression. Overall, the data presented in this report support the usefulness of cell fusion to clarify the mechanisms involved in development of resistance to the pure antiestrogens ICI 182780 and
ICI 164384
and the selective ER modulator tamoxifen and suggest IGF-IRalpha as a new sensitive marker for response to antiestrogen treatment.
...
PMID:Resistance to different antiestrogens is caused by different multi-factorial changes and is associated with reduced expression of IGF receptor Ialpha. 1471 68
The purpose of this study is to investigate EZH2 in a large series of
breast cancer
patients for its prognostic and predictive value, and to evaluate its functional role in treatment response in vitro. EZH2 levels were measured using quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) in primary
breast cancer
specimens and related to clinicopathologic factors and disease outcome. EZH2 expression was downregulated with siRNAs in MCF7, to assess expression alterations of putative EZH2 downstream genes and to determine cell numbers after treatment with the anti-estrogen
ICI 164384
. In 688 lymph node-negative patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, EZH2 was not significantly correlated with metastasis-free survival (MFS). In 278 patients with advanced disease treated with first-line tamoxifen monotherapy, the tertile with highest EZH2 levels was associated with the lowest clinical benefit (OR = 0.48; P = 0.02) and with a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in both univariate (HR = 1.80; P < 0.001) and multivariate analysis, including traditional factors (HR = 1.61; P = 0.004). In vitro, EZH2 silencing in MCF7 caused a 38% decrease in cell numbers (P < 0.001) whereas
ICI 164384
treatment resulted in a 25% decrease (P < 0.001) compared to controls. Combining EZH2 silencing with ICI treatment reduced cell numbers with 67% (P < 0.001) compared to control conditions. EZH2 downregulation was associated with an almost two-fold upregulation of the estrogen receptor alpha (ER) (P = 0.001). In conclusion, EZH2 has no prognostic value in
breast cancer
. High levels of EZH2 are associated with poor outcome to tamoxifen therapy in advanced
breast cancer
. Downregulated EZH2 leads to upregulation of the ER and better response to anti-estrogens.
Breast Cancer
Res Treat 2011 Jan
PMID:Decreased expression of EZH2 is associated with upregulation of ER and favorable outcome to tamoxifen in advanced breast cancer. 2030 27
<< Previous
1
2
3
4