Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0006142 (
breast cancer
)
160,383
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Because of the limited effects of single-agent chemotherapy for solid tumors, combination therapy was employed in an attempt to enhance the clinical effects. Following our former report in which the combination effects of mitomycin C (MMC) and 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR) were clarified, combined applications of 4 drugs, vindesine (VDS), methotrexate (MTX), cisplatin (CDDP) and 5'-DFUR against 3 lines of human
breast cancer
(H-62, H-31, H-71), and one line each of gastric cancer (H-55) and colon cancer (H-110) xenografted into nude mice were evaluated in comparison with
CAF
(cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and 5-FU) therapy which is commonly used for
breast cancer
. Treatment was initiated in groups of 7 mice each when the mean tumor volume of subcutaneous tumors had reached about 100mm3, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated in terms of the inhibition rate (I.R.). A synergistic effect is said to exist when the combination therapy is superior to each single drug therapy at the maximal tolerated dose. Combination therapy with 3 drugs (VDS, CDDP and 5'-DFUR) or 4 drugs (VDS, CDDP, MTX and 5'-DFUR) achieved an I.R. of over 98%, i.e., a marked effect with tumor shrinkage, in 3 lines of tumors (H-55, H-31 and H-62). Moreover, remarkable effects were shown even in the other 2 lines which were insensitive to every single-agent therapy, the I.R. values being 85.7% (H-71) and 78.5% (H-110). A synergistic effect was obtained in 3 of the 5 lines examined. These combination therapies were histologically superior to therapies employing each single-drug therapy or
CAF
therapy. The side effects for combination of these 3 or 4 drugs evaluated by body weight loss were transient and equivalent to maximal dose of VDS or CDDP. Clinically, it is thought that these combined therapies of 3 or 4 drugs will bring about a considerable response in practice.
...
PMID:[Combination chemotherapy with 3 or 4 drugs on human breast and gastrointestinal cancer xenografts in nude mice (II)]. 295 10
Fourteen evaluable patients with gynecologic adenocarcinoma (7 ovarian, 4 endometrial, 2 peritoneal and one
breast cancer
) were treated with ifosfamide (1 g/m2 X 5 days), adriamycin (50 mg/m2) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2) combined chemotherapy (IAP). All the patients had measurable disease, and three were refractory cases who had received prior chemotherapy including two
CAP
(cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and cisplatin). To avoid hemorrhagic cystitis induced by ifosfamide, uroprotective mesna (400 mg/body X 3) was used following ifosfamide infusion. The 5-day schedule of IAP treatment brought a 100% response rate in these patients. Complete responses were observed in 3 patients and lasted 6, 10 and 12 months. Partial responses were achieved in 11 patients including two with
CAP
refractory ovarian cancer, although the remission in previously treated patients was of short duration. Hematologic side effects of the IAP regimen were severe, showing grade 4 leucopenia in 85.7% of the patients, and it required maximal anti-infection treatments. Mesna resulted in microhematuria in only one patient. Despite high age of the patients (mean age: 60.1 years) in this study, CNS (central nervous system) toxicities associated with ifosfamide and mesna treatment were minimal. The results suggested that the IAP combination therapy was effective and acceptable in the control of gynecological adenocarcinomas.
...
PMID:Treatment of gynecological adenocarcinomas with a combination of ifosfamide, adriamycin and cisplatin. 313 35
Fourteen patients with locally advanced
breast cancer
were treated at Stanford University Medical Center with a combined modality approach. Treatment consisted of an initial 5 day course of cyclophosphamide followed by three cycles of combination chemotherapy (
CAF
or CMF). Patients subsequently received radiation therapy to the involved breast and regional nodal areas, followed by mastectomy if resistant disease was present following irradiation. Additional chemotherapy (CMF) was administered for 6 cycles. With a median follow up of 42 months, all fourteen patients are free of local disease. Five out of the fourteen patients have experienced distant relapses and two patients died. We conclude that an aggressive combined modality approach to treatment of locally advanced
breast cancer
can result in excellent local control and survival even in poor prognosis patients. A review of pertinent studies on multimodality treatment for locally advanced
breast cancer
confirms our findings.
...
PMID:Combined modality therapy of locally advanced breast cancer. One institution's experience and a review of the literature. 331 73
Mitoxantrone (Novantrone, N) is a new anthracenedione derivative with structural similarities to doxorubicin (Adriamycin, A). It has shown significant activity during phase I and II clinical trials in the treatment of advanced
breast cancer
. The present trial compares the CNF regimen to
CAF
. All patients received cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), with either N (10 mg/m2) or A (50-60 mg), repeated every three weeks. There were 30 patients in the mitoxantrone group and 30 patients in the doxorubicin group. The results presented are based on 60 patients: 70% were postmenopausal; 25% had received adjuvant chemotherapy; 29% had prior hormonal therapy in an adjuvant setting or for relapse. There were no significant differences between the pretreatment characteristics of each group. The response rate (complete + partial) for CNF was 57% and for
CAF
was 40%. The dose limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia seen after the 3rd cycle in the CNF group. Thrombocytopenia was not seen. There was less nausea and vomiting in the CNF group. No cardiotoxicity was seen in CNF; only 2 patients suffered from congestive heart failure in
CAF
. These preliminary data indicate that CNF seems to be an effective regimen for patients with advanced
breast cancer
and has fewer adverse effects than
CAF
.
...
PMID:A clinical trial of mitoxantrone (novantrone) versus doxorubicin (adriamycin) in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. 332 90
The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) evaluated the response to subsequent chemotherapy or chemohormonal therapy in 46 patients with advanced
breast cancer
treated previously with adjuvant chemotherapy that had been completed 6 months or more before protocol entry. The results were compared with 379 patients in the same study who had not received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and 5-fluorouracil (
CAF
), with or without tamoxifen. There was no difference in response rate, response duration, time to treatment failure, or survival between patients who had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and those who had not. The addition of tamoxifen to
CAF
failed to enhance response rates or response durations in all subgroups. Women who relapsed 6 months or more after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy did not have inherently drug-resistant tumors. They responded to standard
CAF
chemotherapy with the same response rate and survival as patients untreated previously with chemotherapy.
...
PMID:Responses to chemotherapy or chemohormonal therapy in advanced breast cancer patients treated previously with adjuvant chemotherapy. A subset analysis of CALGB Study 8081. 333 11
Randomized clinical trials were conducted in patients with advanced/relapsed
breast cancer
, using CMitF (mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil) regimen in comparison with
CAF
(cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil) regimen. The response rate was 50% (13/26) for the CMitF group and 50% (10/20) for the
CAF
group. Classified by disease site,
CAF
group showed a tendency for a higher response rate in soft tissue, but in bone and viscera the rates were similar for both regimen groups. The median weeks to response (range) was 5 (3-21) weeks for the CMitF group, and 8 (3-22) weeks for
CAF
group, a tendency for slightly earlier response thus being shown in the CMitF group. The median duration of response (range) was 10 (4-47) weeks for the CMitF group, and 9 (4-50) weeks for
CAF
group, whereas by the method of Kaplan-Meier, at 40 weeks after the start of therapy, the proportion showing response still continued to be 60% for the CMitF group, which was a higher rate than the 27% for
CAF
group. The survival rate at 48 weeks was for both groups with no difference shown. Leukopenia, gastrointestinal symptoms and alopecia were major side effects in both groups, but the incidence and severity grade of gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea and vomiting) and alopecia were significantly less in the CMitF group than in
CAF
group. In both groups, the WBC nadir was 2,100/microliter and the time to nadir was 14 days, with no difference shown in hematological toxicity between the two groups. No severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal toxicity was noted.
...
PMID:[Results of clinical trials with a CMitF (cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil) regimen versus a CAF (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil) regimen in advanced/relapsed breast cancer]. 353 Jan 39
In a prospective, randomized trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) evaluated
CAF
chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]) v
CAF
plus tamoxifen (TCAF) in advanced
breast cancer
. Patients were stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status, dominant site of metastatic disease, menopausal status, and prior adjuvant therapy. Regardless of ER status or menopausal status, the addition of tamoxifen conferred no significant advantage in response rate, response duration, time to treatment failure (TTF) or survival over
CAF
alone. A secondary objective was to compare the response to
CAF
of ER positive (ER+) and ER negative (ER-) patients to determine if there was a differential response to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Response rates of ER+ and ER- patients to
CAF
were identical (56%), but the response duration, time to treatment failure, and survival of ER+ patients were significantly longer than ER- patients. This lack of differential response implies that chemotherapy and hormonal therapy may compete for the same pool of ER+ cells. It also suggests that chemotherapy kills
breast cancer
cells indiscriminately, regardless of ER status.
...
PMID:Chemohormonal therapy in advanced carcinoma of the breast: Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 8081. 365 56
As of August 1984, 115 women with advanced
breast cancer
have been randomized to receive a combination of either cyclophosphamide, Novantrone (mitoxantrone) and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) or cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and 5-fluorouracil (
CAF
). Seventy-one percent of all patients were post-menopausal and 44% of CNF patients and 57% of
CAF
patients were estrogen receptor (ER) negative. Slightly over 30% of all patients had received hormonal therapy or chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting. Hematologic toxicity was similar in regard to platelet counts but slightly lower nadirs were experienced with CNF therapy than with
CAF
. However, there were fewer dosage decreases with CNF. Significantly less nausea and vomiting were observed with the CNF regimen compared to
CAF
. Moreover, alopecia was reduced appreciably in patients who received CNF. The response rate to CNF for the first 38 eligible and evaluable patients was 42%, and for 53 eligible and evaluable patients who received
CAF
the response rate was 45%, a non-significant difference. Median response durations were similar also, 140 days for CNF and 168 days for the
CAF
regimen. Time to treatment failure was similar for both regimens. CNF is an effective regimen for patients with advanced
breast cancer
, with less toxicity than
CAF
.
...
PMID:A randomized multicenter trial of cyclophosphamide, Novantrone and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 389 79
Preoperative chemotherapy was initiated for
breast cancer
in an effort to decrease the number of viable cancer cells that were released into the blood stream during surgical procedure. This possibility was substantiated by several observations made in animal experiments and clinical studies. Preoperative chemotherapy was also given to render the advanced disease amenable to surgical intervention. In one report, systemic chemotherapy (
CAF
) for advanced
breast cancer
produced a response rate of 86% preoperatively, facilitating subsequent mastectomy and a postoperative 5-year survival rate of 52%. However no definite conclusion has yet been obtained as to the prognostic significance of systemic chemotherapy give preoperatively, and further comparative studies are therefore required. Preoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy as an induction therapy was administered to patients with locally advanced
breast cancer
including inflammatory breast cancer, the treatment developed in Japan. In our institute, intra-arterial chemotherapy with ADR or MMC plus 5-FU resulted in a marked decrease in the size of primary and lymph node lesions with 82% CR + PR. Histological examination of resected specimens also revealed that 35% of the patients had no viable cancer cells remaining in their lesions. Five-year and 10-year survival rates were 57% and 41%, respectively, compared with 24% and 18%, respectively for historical controls. Patients showing better local responses to intra-arterial chemotherapy had longer survival time with less frequent local recurrences. Some other studies also indicated improved survival in locally advanced
breast cancer
as a result of preoperative intra-arterial chemotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy including systemic administration is a promising modality for advanced
breast cancer
.
...
PMID:[Preoperative chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer]. 392 5
Thirty patients with metastatic carcinoma of the breast were treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), and peptichemio (
CAP
) as an induction regimen, and maintenance regimen consisting of thiotepa, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (TMF). Twenty-four patients were evaluable. Thirteen patients achieved an objective response for a response rate of 54.0% (complete remission plus partial remission). Median duration of response was 9.5 months (0-32+). The
CAP
regimen had severe myelotoxicity that led to dose reductions in 67% of patients. Furthermore, 50% of the patients required delay (greater than 28-day interval) in chemotherapy courses because of myelosuppression, and peptichemio had to be discontinued in seven patients. The
CAP
chemotherapy as an induction regimen for metastatic breast carcinoma resulted in underutilization of Adriamycin, and proved to be inferior to other Adriamycin-containing regimens. Although peptichemio used as a single agent had significant activity against
breast cancer
, it was not suitable for prolonged use in conjunction with other myelosuppressive agents. However, it may have a role in second-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer in conjunction with nonmyelosuppressive agents. The authors were unable to test the efficacy of non-cross-resistant maintenance therapy with TMF in this trial.
...
PMID:Combination chemotherapy of metastatic breast carcinoma with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and peptichemio. 623 Oct 92
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>