Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0006142 (breast cancer)
 160,383 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sequential administration of the association of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and paclitaxel could be better tolerated than the association of an anthracycline and paclitaxel while having a similar antitumour effect. 69 patients with advanced breast cancer previously untreated with anthracyclines or paclitaxel entered a phase II multicentre study in which FEC was followed by paclitaxel. Both regimens were administered 4 times every 21 days. The median follow-up is 20 months and 38/69 patients have died. Grade III-IV toxicity was acceptable. Leukopenia occurred in 26% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 2% and anaemia in 4%. One patient had reversible heart failure during FEC therapy. Peripheral neuropathy and arthralgia-myalgia occurred in 9% and 4% of patients, respectively and one patient had respiratory hypersensitivity during paclitaxel treatment. 9 patients did not complete therapy because of: treatment refusal (n = 1), cardiac toxicity (n = 1), early death during FEC chemotherapy (n = 1), major protocol violations (n = 4), hypersensitivity reaction (n = 1) and early death during paclitaxel chemotherapy (n = 1). The overall response rate was 65% (95% CI = 53-76), and 7% of patients had stable disease. Therapy was defined as having failed in 28% of patients because they were not evaluable (13%) or had progressive disease (15%). The median time to progression and survival are 13.2 and 23.5 months, respectively. Sequential FEC-paclitaxel is a suitable strategy for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have not been previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. In fact, it avoids major haematologic toxicity and has a good antitumour effect.
 ...
PMID:A phase II study of sequential 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) and paclitaxel in advanced breast cancer (Protocol PV BC 97/01). 1146 Oct 67

To assess the activity of paclitaxel in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in breast cancer, a phase II trial was conducted in women with metastatic disease. Toxicity, response rate, median survival, median duration of response, and median time to disease progression were measured. Between January 1994 and May 1996, 47 patients with metastatic breast cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) < or = 2 who had previously been treated with chemotherapy received 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel over 3 hours on day 1. After paclitaxel administration, 300 mg intravenous (i.v.) leucovorin over 30 minutes was administered followed by 350 mg/m2 i.v. push 5-FU. Both 5-FU and leucovorin were given on days 1-3. Treatment was repeated every 28 days for a minimum of 6 cycles per patient. Two (4%) patients had a complete response and 21 (45%) patients had a partial response for an overall response rate of 49% (95% confidence interval: 35%-63%). The median survival was 17.7 months, median duration of response was 8.6 months, and median time to disease progression was 6.3 months. There was no statistical difference in survival or time to progression between anthracycline-naive, anthracycline-sensitive, and anthracycline-resistant patients. Nine (19%) patients had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, and no patient required blood or platelet transfusion. The most frequently observed nonhematologic toxicities were arthralgia and myalgia. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained on 19 patients. Responders had higher peak plasma concentrations of paclitaxel than nonresponders (4.46 vs. 2.9 micrograms/mL; P = 0.02). Paclitaxel/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin is an active, well-tolerated regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Clin Breast Cancer 2000 Jul
PMID:Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (TFL) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. 1189 52

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy of epirubicin plus paclitaxel was administered to 23 patients with locally advanced breast cancer (including 13 cases of stage IIb, 6 of stage IIIa, and 4 of stage IIIb). All patients were female. They were treated with epirubicin 60 mg/m2, on day 1, by i.v. followed paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 by 3 hours continuous infusion on day 2 and every 3 weeks repeatedly. Premedication with dexamethasone, ondansetron, diphenhydramine and cimetidine were administered to prevent gastroenteric and allergic reactions before chemotherapy. Two to 4 cycles were used. Ten out of 23 patients had a complete response, 10 had partial response, and 3 had no change. The response rate was 87% (20/23). Six out of 23 patients underwent breast conserving surgery as tumor size had become smaller and downstaging was realized after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The major toxicities included neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia, nephrotoxicity, gastroenteric reactions, alopecia and flushing to the face. However, these were well tolerated in these patients.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of effects from neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus paclitaxel in cases of locally advanced breast cancer]. 1214 94

The therapeutic efficacy of weekly paclitaxel infusion for relapsed breast cancer patients is not known. We assessed safety, feasibility, and therapeutic efficacy in a pilot study of weekly 1-h low-dose paclitaxel infusion for relapsed breast cancer in an outpatient clinic. Eighteen patients with relapsed breast cancer who had received prior chemotherapy regimens, including anthracyclines, mitomycin, and 5-fluorouracil beyond a second line of treatment were enrolled into the study. The dose of paclitaxel was between 40 mg/m(2) and 80 mg/m(2) per week in a 1-h infusion, and a treatment cycle was 4 weeks until there was no evidence of progressive disease. When a dose of 80 mg/m(2) was administered, the treatment cycle was weekly infusion three times with a 1-week interval per 4-week cycle. The mean treatment period was 5.5 months and the maximal length of administration was 8 months. The overall response rate was 44.4%, including 2 cases of complete response and 6 cases of partial response. Tumor response was observed in 3 of 7 cases of lung metastases (42.8%), 6 of 12 cases of soft tissue metastases (50.0%), and 1 of 3 cases of liver metastases (33.3%), whereas 8 cases with bone metastases did not respond. The mean time to response was 1.8 months and the mean response duration was 4.3 months. The dose between 31.5 mg/m(2)/wk and 79.7 mg/m(2)/wk was not associated with tumor response. Toxicities associated with weekly 1-h low-dose paclitaxel infusion were tolerable, and most were less than grade 2, including alopecia (100%), neutropenia (88.8%), flushing (66.6%), face edema (61.1%), numbness (55.5%), and myalgia (38.8%). There was 1 case of grade 3 neutropenia. Weekly 1-h low-dose paclitaxel might be a therapeutically effective, safe infusion and feasible as a salvage chemotherapy for relapsed breast cancer patients following failure of prior chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Feasibility and therapeutic efficacy of weekly 1-h low-dose paclitaxel infusion for relapsed breast cancer. 1246 61

Capecitabine is an orally administered prodrug of fluorouracil which is indicated in the US and Europe, in combination with docetaxel, for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer failing anthracycline therapy, and as monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline therapy (US) or failing intensive chemotherapy (Europe). Capecitabine is also approved for use in metastatic colorectal cancer. Capecitabine is metabolically activated preferentially at the tumour site, and shows antineoplastic activity and synergy with other cytotoxic agents including cyclophosphamide or docetaxel in animal models. Bioavailability after oral administration is close to 100%. In patients with pretreated advanced breast cancer, capecitabine is effective as monotherapy and also in combination with other agents. Combination therapy with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 2 weeks of every 3-week cycle plus intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day one of each cycle was superior to intravenous monotherapy with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day one of each cycle. Capecitabine plus docetaxel significantly reduced the risks of disease progression and death by 35% (p = 0.0001) and 23% (p < 0.05), respectively, and significantly increased median survival (p < 0.05) and objective response rates (p < 0.01). Efficacy has also been demonstrated with capecitabine monotherapy and combination therapy in previously untreated patients in preliminary trials. The most common adverse effects occurring in patients receiving capecitabine monotherapy include lymphopenia, anaemia, diarrhoea, hand-and-foot syndrome, nausea, fatigue, hyperbilirubinaemia, dermatitis and vomiting (all >25% incidence). While gastrointestinal events and hand-and-foot syndrome occurred more often with capecitabine than with paclitaxel or a regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), neutropenic fever, arthralgia, pyrexia and myalgia were more common with paclitaxel, and nausea, stomatitis, alopecia and asthenia were more common with CMF. The incidence of adverse effects and hospitalisation was similar in patients receiving capecitabine plus docetaxel and those receiving docetaxel monotherapy. In conclusion, capecitabine, an oral prodrug of fluorouracil which is activated preferentially at the tumour site, is an effective and convenient addition to the intravenous polychemotherapeutic treatment of advanced breast cancer in pretreated patients, and also has potential as a component of first-line combination regimens. Combined capecitabine plus docetaxel therapy resulted in similar rates of treatment-related adverse effects and hospitalisation to those seen with docetaxel monotherapy. Capecitabine is also effective as monotherapy in pretreated patients and phase II data for capecitabine as first-line monotherapy are also promising. While gastrointestinal effects and hand-and-foot syndrome occur often with capecitabine, the tolerability profile was comparatively favourable for other adverse effects (notably, neutropenia and alopecia).
 ...
PMID:Capecitabine: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer. 1251 69

Based on the recommended phase II doses for doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and docetaxel (60 mg/m2) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's (NSABP) experience with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2), we conducted a phase II trial at 18 institutions using doxorubicin/docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (ATC) given every 21 days, in preparation for a major adjuvant breast cancer study (NSABP B-30), in which ATC would be used. Eligibility requirements included measurable stage IIIB/IV breast cancer, performance status 0-2, normal left ventricular ejection fraction, and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease (nontaxane adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if completed > 12 months before entry and if the cumulative dose of doxorubicin was =240 mg/m2). Eighty-nine patients were entered who ranged in age from 30-78 years (38.2% < 50 years; 61.8% =50 years). A total of 33.7% of patients had stage IIIB disease, and 66.3% had stage IV disease. Among the stage IV patients, 20.3% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Dexamethasone premedication (8 mg p.o. b.i.d. for 3 days) and prophylactic ciprofloxacin (500 mg p.o. b.i.d. days 5-15) were used. Colony-stimulating growth factors were reserved for secondary prophylaxis after prolonged or febrile neutropenia (FN) or documented severe infection in a prior cycle. After a cumulative dose of doxorubicin 480 mg/m2, patients could continue with docetaxel/cyclophosphamide alone. Eighty-nine patients and 577 courses were evaluable for toxicity. Median time on study as of May 2002 was 36.5 months (range, 28-47 months). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 34 patients (38%); 8 developed FN in the absence of prior prophylactic growth factor support; 26 developed FN despite prior growth factor support (for one patient this information was unavailable). There were no septic deaths. One patient died from pulmonary embolism. Other grade 3/4 adverse events included: nausea (9%), vomiting (7%), stomatitis (6%), diarrhea (4%), arthralgia/myalgia (3%), and neurotoxicity (1%). Clinical congestive heart failure was seen in 3 patients (3.4%). Seventy-seven patients were evaluable for best response within 6 cycles of therapy. Thirteen patients (16.9%) had a complete response, 43 (55.8%) had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 72.7%. The median response duration was 23.8 months (95% CI, 16.2-37.8 months), and the median time to progression or death was 23.5 months (95% CI, 16.3-38.7 months). The median survival time was 35.6 months (95% CI, 26.6-39.4 months). The administration of ATC with primary ciprofloxacin and secondary colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis is feasible and active. Its value in the adjuvant setting is currently under investigation.
Clin Breast Cancer 2002 Dec
PMID:Phase II trial of doxorubicin/docetaxel/cyclophosphamide for locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: results from NSABP trial BP-58. 1253 63

Based on the synergistic interactions of the sequence doxorubicin-paclitaxel-gemcitabine obtained in our preclinical study, a Phase I trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of this new sequence in breast cancer. Patients with stage IIIB-IV breast cancer received doxorubicin on day 1, paclitaxel on day 2 and gemcitabine on day 6 and 13 (steps IIa, III and V) in cohorts of 3 patients. From March 1999 to December 2000, 9 patients were treated. The most important toxicity was hematological. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at the second level because dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 3 patients. Non hematological toxicities were alopecia, diarrhea, asthenia, nausea, mucositis, paresthesia and myalgia. A Phase II trial is ongoing to further investigate the activity of this new sequential treatment with doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 day 1), paclitaxel (160 mg/m2 day 2) and gemcitabine (800 mg/m2 day 6) in advanced breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Doxorubicin, paclitaxel and gemcitabine: a Phase I study of a new sequential treatment in stage III B - IV breast cancer. 1459 42

From 1996 to 2000, high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem-cell support was used as an adjuvant treatment strategy for management of primary high-risk breast cancer patients with more than five positive nodes. This single institution study included 52 women aged < or = 56 years with primary operable breast cancer and > or = 6 tumour-positive axillary lymph nodes. The treatment regimen consisted of at least three initial courses of FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) followed by high-dose chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin) supported by autologous peripheral blood stem-cell reinfusion. This study focuses on quality control including evaluation of toxicity, supportive therapy and assessment of the stem-cell products. Cytokeratin 19 positive cells were found in the stem-cell product from 3/37 patients. Data regarding organ toxicity were used for evaluation of short- and long-term side effects. Substantial acute toxicity and frequent catheter-related infections were found. Long-term toxicities included reduced lung diffusion capacity (n = 36), fatigue (n = 14), arthralgia/myalgia (n = 10), neurotoxicity (n = 9) and memory loss (n = 4). However, most toxicities were grade 1-2 and reversible within two years. No treatment-related death occurred. Within a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 11-57), 25% of the patients had relapsed. Recurrence-free survival was 75% and overall survival was 88% three years after the start of treatment. Overall, high-dose chemotherapy was relatively well tolerated, with manageable toxicity and an acceptable requirement of supportive therapy. Until now, high-dose chemotherapy has not proven superior to conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy, therefore it is necessary in the future to focus on well-designed randomized studies.
 ...
PMID:Acute and late toxicity following adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary operable breast cancer--a quality assessment study. 1465 Dec 13

Both paclitaxel and gemcitabine (Gemzar) have shown activity and manageable toxicity when used as single agents in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. This phase II study evaluated their use in combination for metastatic breast cancer patients whose disease recurred or progressed following treatment with anthracycline-containing regimens. Twenty-nine patients ranging from 32 to 68 years of age received paclitaxel at 175 mg/m2 i.v. over 3 hours on day 1 and gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Because of unacceptable thrombocytopenia in the first five patients, the gemcitabine schedule was changed to days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for the remainder of the study. All 29 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Seventeen patients (59%) were considered truly anthracycline- or anthracenedione-refractory. A total of 137 cycles (median: 4 per patient) were administered. The regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 5 (18.5%) of the first 27 cycles and in 6 (5.4%) of the 110 cycles following dosage reduction (P = .04). Five patients had grade 1 and two patients had grade 3 neuropathy. Eight patients had grade 3 neutropenia, two had grade 4 neutropenia with fever at the higher dosage, and eight had grade 1/2 myalgia and fatigue. Five patients (17%) had a complete response and 11 (38%) a partial response, yielding an objective response rate of 55% (95% confidence interval = 36%-73%). Six patients (20.7%) had stable disease. Median response duration was 8 months (range: 4-26 months), and median overall survival was 12 months (range: 4-48+ months). Survival at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 45%, 30%, 20%, and 10%, respectively. The combination of paclitaxel on day 1 with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle appears to have promising activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Phase III trials comparing this promising doublet to paclitaxel monotherapy and to other chemotherapeutic strategies for advanced breast cancer will clarify the role of this regimen.
 ...
PMID:Paclitaxel and gemcitabine as salvage treatment in metastatic breast cancer. 1476 2

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of epirubicin plus paclitaxel was administered to 75 patients (including a 2-cycle group of 39 patients and a 4-cycle group of 36 patients) with locally advanced breast cancer (35 cases of stage IIb, 28 of stage IIIa, 12 of stage IIIb) to compare efficacy and toxicity of 2 cycle and 4 cycle regimens. All patients were female. They were treated with epirubicin 60 mg/m2, on day 1, by i.v., followed by paclitaxel 150 mg/m2, by 3 hour continuous infusion on day 2 repeated every 3 weeks. Premedication with dexamethasone, ondansetron, diphenhydramine and cimetidine were administered to prevent gastroenteritic and allergic reactions before chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients were given 2 cycles and thirty-six were given 4 cycles of this regimen. One of 39 patients had complete response, 28 had partial response and 10 had no change in the 2-cycle group. In addition, 21 of 36 patients had complete response (including 9 who had pathologic complete response), 13 had partial response and 2 had no change. The response rates were 74% (29/39) in the 2-cycle group and 94% (34/36) in the 4-cycle group. There were no progressive disease in these 2 groups. However a higher proportion of PR was observed in stage II patients than in stage III patients. Twelve of 36 patients underwent breast conserving surgery, as tumor size had become smaller and down-staging was realized after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, axillary lymph nodes were palpable in all 75 patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the ET regimen. But 46% (18/39) in the 2-cycle group and 75% (27/36) in the 4-cycle group became impalpable. Conversely, major toxicities (including leukopenia and gastroenteric reactions) were similar in both groups, but myalgia, arthralgia, neurotoxicity and alopecia were more severe in the 4-cycle group than in the 2-cycle group. In the present study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a 4-cycle ET regimen was more effective than with a 2-cycle regimen in down staging locally advanced breast cancer. Although major toxicities were more severe in the 4-cycle group than in the 2-cycle group, the regimen was tolerable and safe.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of effects from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus paclitaxel in cases of locally advanced breast cancer--comparative study of treatment with 2 and 4 cycles]. 1499 52


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>