Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0006142 (breast cancer)
 160,383 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing tamoxifen to ovarian ablation carried out either by surgery or irradiation as first-line hormonal therapy for pre-menopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Patients in all trials included were required to have measurable disease and to be currently menstruating or within 1 year of cessation of menses, and to have estrogen receptor (ER) positive or unknown disease (ER negative women were admitted to one of the studies). Individual patient data were obtained from the four studies identified and the results updated to June 1992. A total of 220 eligible patients were enrolled in the four trials. There was no difference in overall response rate between tamoxifen and oophorectomy across the four trials (p = 0.94, Mantel-Haenszel test). The odds reduction for progression was 14% +/- 12% and for mortality 6% +/- 13% in favour of tamoxifen, results which were not statistically significant (p = 0.32 and 0.72, respectively). Although the design of all four studies included a cross-over to the other therapy, only 54/111 patients receiving ovarian ablation and 34/109 patients receiving tamoxifen as primary therapy actually crossed over to the other arm at the time of disease progression. Response to initial treatment with tamoxifen was predictive of subsequent response to ovarian ablation (p < 0.05), and response to initial therapy with ovarian ablation was predictive of subsequent response to tamoxifen (p < 0.05). Support curves based on log-likelihood ratios revealed that this meta-analysis provides moderate evidence rejecting a 14% advantage for ovarian ablation compared to tamoxifen in terms of odds of disease progression. A 25% advantage for ovarian ablation with respect to odds of death is also rejected with moderate evidence. We conclude that the efficacy of tamoxifen appears to be similar to that of ovarian ablation by surgery or irradiation as first-line therapy for premenopausal, ER positive metastatic breast cancer, and is unlikely to be substantially inferior.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997 Jul
PMID:An individual patient-based meta-analysis of tamoxifen versus ovarian ablation as first line endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. 926 99

Because tamoxifen and all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) have additive antitumor effects in preclinical systems, we performed a Phase I/II clinical trial of this combination in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients with potentially hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer were enrolled. All received 20 mg of tamoxifen by mouth daily. Consecutive cohorts of 3-6 patients were treated on odd-numbered weeks with ATRA at doses of 70, 110, 150, 190, or 230 mg/m2/day. Twenty-six patients were entered in this trial; 25 were evaluable. A dose of 230 mg/m2 ATRA produced unacceptable headache and dermatological toxicity, but doses < or = 190 mg/m2 were tolerable. Two of 7 patients with measurable disease responded. Seven of 18 patients with evaluable, nonmeasurable disease achieved disease stability for more than 6 months. Plasma AUCs on day 1 of successive weeks of treatment were stable over time. A nonsignificant decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor I levels was noted during treatment, but this trend was similar to that observed in three "control" patients treated with tamoxifen alone. When given with daily tamoxifen, the maximum tolerated dose of ATRA that could be given on alternate weeks was 190 mg/m2/day. This schedule of ATRA resulted in repeated periods of exposure to potentially therapeutic concentrations of ATRA. Declines in the serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations observed in patients treated with tamoxifen and ATRA were similar to those observed in patients treated with tamoxifen alone. Objective responses were observed, some in patients who had previously progressed while receiving tamoxifen, suggesting that further studies would be of interest.
 ...
PMID:Phase I/II trial of all-trans retinoic acid and tamoxifen in patients with advanced breast cancer. 953 31

The objective of this review is to determine clinical practical guidelines for the use of serum tumor markers in the care of breast cancer patients outside of clinical trials. Mucin antigens (CA 15-3, MCA, CA 549) and CEA are established markers in breast cancer. Owing to their low sensitivity, none of these markers can be recommended for screening, diagnosis or staging. During follow-up, increasing marker levels may indicate recurrence 3-6 months earlier than clinical and radiological examinations in about 40-50% of patients. However, the clinical benefit of this lead-time is not established. Tumor markers are able to monitor response to treatment in 70-80% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, paradoxical changes of the markers especially in the beginning of treatment, the insufficient concordance with tumor activity in 20-30% of the women, and the lack of curative therapy regimens limit the prospective clinical use of the markers in the individual patient. Therefore, marker changes require confirmation by radiological methods in most cases. The present data are insufficient to recommend routine use of tumor markers alone for monitoring breast cancer patients after primary treatment or during palliative therapy. However, in the absence of readily measurable disease (e. g. bone metastases) continuously increasing marker levels may be used to indicate treatment failure. If high-dose chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer renders to be effective, the clinical impact of tumor markers will increase considerably. Until that time, the analytical performance and the sensitivity of the established marker assays should be improved, and the clinical role of newer marker tests (TPS, CA 27.29) should be evaluated.
 ...
PMID:[Considerations in rational use of tumor markers in breast carcinoma]. 962 26

We assessed the value of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol (FES) in women with breast cancer for predicting response to systemic therapy. Results of FES-PET were correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) status. Forty-three women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer underwent FDG-PET and FES-PET prior to institution of systemic therapy. All patients had measurable disease and had tumors submitted for ER determination. Cancers were considered functionally hormone sensitive if the standardized uptake value of the lesion on FES-PET was >/=1.0 (FES+) and hormone resistant if the standardized uptake value was <1.0 (FES-). Information obtained by FES-PET was compared with the results of ER assays. The tumor response to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy was correlated with intensity of uptake by both FDG-PET and FES-PET. The ER status of the breast cancers was negative (ER-) in 20 patients, positive (ER+) in 21 patients, and unknown in 2 patients. All 20 of the ER- tumors were also FES-. However, of the 21 ER+ tumors, 16 were FES+ and 5 were FES-. Thirty patients were treated initially with chemotherapy, and 21 (70%) demonstrated objective responses. We were unable to correlate the response to chemotherapy with information obtained by FDG-PET or FES-PET. Thirteen patients were treated with hormone therapy, and 8 (61%) responded to that therapy. Only 1 of the 5 patients whose tumors were ER+ but FES- received hormone therapy, and this treatment resulted in disease stabilization only. Multiple sites of disease were assessed by FES-PET in 17 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Functional hormone sensitivity, defined by FES-PET, was concordant with multiple lesions in 13 (76%). Ten patients with locally advanced breast cancer developed recurrent disease. The initial site of recurrence was the breast in 5 patients. Of the 5 patients with systemic recurrence, 4 had disease detected at the site of recurrence on the pretreatment FDG-PET study but not detected on pretreatment computed tomography. In our experience, FDG-PET imaging is more sensitive than conventional imaging methods, including computed tomography, in staging women with breast cancer. When compared with the in vitro assay of ER status, FES-PET has an apparent sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 100%. Our finding of a subset of patients who have tumors that are ER+ and FES- suggests that the functional assessment of hormone sensitivity by PET imaging can identify patients with ER+ disease whose tumors are likely to be hormone refractory.
 ...
PMID:Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. 981 53

Considering the recommended dose of the docetaxel/doxorubicin combination (75 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively), we decided to proceed with a pilot program in untreated metastatic breast cancer aimed at defining a multidrug regimen that could be later randomly compared with a standard doxorubicin-containing polychemotherapy regimen with equidoses of doxorubicin such as the FAC protocol (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) in first-line metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients. We proceeded with a pilot phase II study of the TAC combination, which consists of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion preceded by doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, both given as an intravenous bolus. Three hundred seventy courses were delivered in 54 anthracycline-naive patients, among whom 62% had visceral metastases. Median relative dose intensity was above 98% for all drugs. Grade 4 neutropenia was the main toxicity (70% of cycles) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia and infection was acceptable (6% and 0.8% of cycles, respectively). Acute and chronic extrahematologic toxicities were mild, mostly grade 2, and the docetaxel-specific toxicities (fluid retention, nail changes, etc) were not major clinical problems; no patient was discontinued due to fluid retention. The major response rate was 73% overall and 79% in measurable disease. Time to progression and survival are still under evaluation. The TAC combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen that is the basis of two currently open, pivotal, randomized phase III trials comparing TAC with FAC in the metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:Taxane-based three-drug combination in metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. 986 9

Motivated by the observation of preclinical synergy, a Phase I dose escalation study of edatrexate in combination with a 3-h paclitaxel infusion was performed in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of edatrexate and the toxicities associated with this combination and to report preliminary observations of efficacy with this novel combination. Thirty-six patients were enrolled in this Phase I trial. Thirty-five eligible patients were treated every 21 days in cohorts of at least three patients and were assessable for toxicity. One patient was ineligible due to hyperbilirubinemia. Stepwise dose escalations of edatrexate were administered until grade >3 nonhematological dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The initial dose level of edatrexate was 180 mg/m2; subsequent cohorts were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate (210, 240, 270, 300, 350, and 400 mg/m2). Edatrexate was administered by i.v. infusion over 1 h. Paclitaxel was administered 24 h later at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion with standard dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine premedication. The MTD of edatrexate was reached at the 350 mg/m2 level in this study. Grade 3 diarrhea was seen in one patient at the 300 and 400 mg/m2 dose levels, requiring dose reductions. Two patients experienced grade 4 stomatitis at the 400 mg/m2 dose level and also required dose reduction, establishing the MTD as 350 mg/m2. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were noted in two of three patients at the highest dose level. Of 35 patients, 4 patients reported grade 3 myalgias and 1 patient reported grade 3 neurosensory complaints, which were seen mostly at the 350 and 400 mg/m2 dose levels; however, 1 patient reported grade 3 myalgias at 180 mg/m2. No cumulative neurotoxicity was observed, and no patient experienced an allergic reaction to paclitaxel. In 23 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, there were four complete (17%) and seven partial responses, with an overall response rate of 48% (95% confidence interval, 27-69%). All of the responses were seen in patients who had not received prior chemotherapy for stage IV disease. The median duration of response was not assessable because many responding patients went on to receive high-dose chemotherapy treatment with stem cell support. The combination of edatrexate and paclitaxel for treatment of metastatic breast cancer is a feasible and safe regimen. The MTD of edatrexate was 350 mg/m2 when combined with a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) given 24 h later. Activity was noted even among patients who had relapsed shortly after receiving methotrexate- and/or doxorubicin-containing adjuvant regimens. Additional studies evaluating the sequences and dosing schema for this combination are warranted to improve the response proportion and define the duration of the response.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 1003 75

Many patients with metastatic breast cancer receive several types of chemotherapy, although it is recognized that there is a declining probability of response. A major problem confronts oncologists in deciding when to recommend to patients that no further chemotherapy should be given. To address this problem we have assessed prospectively, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and costs of health care for 35 patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving third line chemotherapy in a representative clinical situation. HRQL and utilities were measured longitudinally using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the time trade-off method. Patients received a median of 2 cycles of chemotherapy and lived a median of 4.3 months. Twelve patients (34%) had substantial (> 10 points) improvement in the Global QL subscale and more than 30% of patients had similar changes in emotional and social function. The median baseline utility score was 0.9 and utilities correlated poorly with HRQL subscale. Eighteen patients had measurable disease and one patients experienced a partial response. Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 30% of patients. The average cost of management from study entry to death was CDN$ 17,260 (approximately US$ 12,000). Sixteen percent of this cost was associated directly with chemotherapy while hospital admissions and outpatient visits accounted for 50% and 14% of the total cost respectively. We conclude that: (a) many patients receiving third line chemotherapy maintain or improve indices of HRQL despite short survival and a low response rate: this might be due to chemotherapy, placebo effect, or a shift in frame of reference for HRQL; (b) patients were unwilling to trade quantity for quality of life; and (c) response rates and survival may be overestimated in patients selected for clinical trials.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999 Apr
PMID:Third line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an evaluation of quality of life and cost. 1044 20

Initial trials of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer yielded high response rates but significant cardiac toxicity was observed. In this phase II trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with epirubicin. Patients with advanced breast cancer, performance status 0-2, measurable disease, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, who may have received adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) followed by a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-three eligible patients were treated at six centres. 67% patients received the maximum of six cycles. The response rate was 54% (95% CI 38-69%), 12% CR and 42% PR. Estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4-10.0) and estimated median overall survival was 17.9 months (95% CI 14.2-25.7). Four patients had a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > or =20% of baseline value, and in two patients the LVEF decreased to below the lower limit of normal, but no patient developed clinical evidence of cardiac failure. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 56% cycles, but only 4% of cycles were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 non-haematologic toxicity was uncommon. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) is a well tolerated, promising regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.
 ...
PMID:A phase II trial of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced breast cancer. 1094 87

The purpose of this study was a retrospective analysis of docetaxel in a cohort of anthracyclines and paclitaxel pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. From July 1998 to June 1999, 24 consecutive patients were included for this study. The regimen consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 in combination with a 3-day schedule of dexamethasone every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median age of patients was 53 (ranged 32-67) years with a median performance status of 2. Twenty of the 24 patients (84%) had measurable disease. The median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-4). A total of 146 cycles chemotherapy were given with a mean of 6. There was a 25% (six of 24) overall response rate including one complete response, 37.5% stable disease and 37.5% progressive disease. The major toxicity included grade 3-4 leukopenia (41.7%) and eight episodes of infection. No treatment-related death was observed. The responders included patients refractory to or resistant to prior paclitaxel treatment. The median survival and median time to disease progression was 12 and 9 months, respectively. We conclude that docetaxel has a modest activity in breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel, indicating a partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel.
 ...
PMID:Single-agent docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel: partial cross-resistance between paclitaxel and docetaxel. 1108 52

The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly administration of paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. Twenty-six patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with escalated doses of paclitaxel (starting dose 70 mg/m(2)/wk with increments of 10 mg/m(2)/wk) for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. No intrapatient escalation or growth factor support was allowed. The DLT was exceeded at the dose of 120 mg/m(2)/wk, and the dose-limiting events were grade IV neutropenia and treatment delay because of incomplete hematologic recovery. There was no cumulative myelosuppression. Grade IV neutropenia occurred in four (6%) cycles, and there was one episode of febrile neutropenia. Grade II/III fatigue occurred in 19 (73%) patients, resulting in discontinuation of treatment in 2 of them; grade II neurosensory toxicity and grade II alopecia occurred in 8 (31%) patients each. The MTD, which is also the recommended dose for further phase II studies, was 110 mg/m(2)/wk. Among the 21 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease, 2 (10%) partial responses were observed, both in patients with heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer. The weekly administration of paclitaxel for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks is a feasible, safe, and active outpatient regimen that merits further evaluation in combination with other anticancer agents.
 ...
PMID:A dose-finding study of the weekly administration of paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors. 1147 74


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>