Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0004153 (
atherosclerosis
)
77,401
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Both atorvastatin and fenofibrate are known to lower postprandial chylomicrons and chylomicron remnants. However, until now it has not been investigated which of the two drugs is more effective in one and the same patient and, secondly, whether these drugs exert different effects on chylomicron remnants of different sizes. To this end 12 patients with mixed hyperlipidemia were treated in a crossover study with 40 mg atorvastatin or with 200 mg micronized fenofibrate once daily for 6 weeks. Oral fat loading was given before and after each treatment. Chylomicron remnants of various sizes were determined by fluorometric determinations of retinyl palmitate after lipoprotein separation by size-exclusion chromatography. As expected, atorvastatin was more effective than fenofibrate on total and LDL-cholesterol (P < 0.05). Fenofibrate, in contrast, was more effective on all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in both the fasting and the postprandial state. The stronger effect of fenofibrate affected not only chylomicrons and VLDL but also chylomicron remnants. It reduced large chylomicron remnants by 66% at 6h and by 74% at 8 h. The action of atorvastatin was less pronounced, with corresponding reductions of 42 and 65% (P < 0.05 only after 8 h). Fenofibrate was even more effective on small chylomicron remnants, yielding reductions of 47, 74, and 66% at 4, 6, and 8 h.
Atorvastatin
, in contrast, gave reductions of 30 and 26% after 6 and 8 h, the effect reaching statistical significance only after 6h. Fenofibrate is therefore more effective than atorvastatin in lowering all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including large and small chylomicron remnants.
Atherosclerosis
2003 Dec
PMID:Chylomicron remnants of various sizes are lowered more effectively by fenofibrate than by atorvastatin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. 1464 9
At the beginning of
atherosclerosis
before evidence of morphological lesions or plaques, vascular distensibility or arterial compliance decreased gradually. This endothelial dysfunction is regarded as an early feature of
atherosclerosis
. In a randomized, double-blind study design, group 1 (12 patients; 7 males, 5 females) with serum LDL-C levels higher than 170 mg/dL and without any other risk factor for
atherosclerosis
received three months of 20 mg/day atorvastatin treatment while group 11 (8 males, 4 females) with the same characteristics received 80 mg/day. Baseline and posttreatment serum lipid fractions and arterial compliance were measured. Arterial compliance was measured noninvasively in the left common carotid artery with color Doppler ultrasound.
Atorvastatin
reduced total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and triglyceride levels by 32% (P < 0.001), 40.8% (P < 0.001), and 19% (P < 0.001), respectively, and increased HDL-C by 6.9%, (P = 0.002) in the first group. In the second group these reductions were 38.5% (P < 0.001), 46.2% (P < 0.001), and 26.78% (P < 0.001), respectively, and the increase in HDL was 7.8% (P = 0.03). It was observed that the decrease in serum TC, LDL-C and triglyceride levels were significantly higher in the second group than the first group. With atorvastatin, the distensibility coefficient (DC) and compliance coefficient (CC) increased from 18.7 +/- 3.4 to 21.3 +/- 2.9 10(-3) x kPa(-1) (P < 0.001) and from 0.69 +/- 0.05 to 0.77 +/- 0.03 mm2 x kPa(-1) (P < 0.001) in the first group while they changed from 18.3 +/- 3.6 to 21.9 +/- 3.0 10(-3) x kPa(-1) (P < 0.001) and from 0.70 +/- 0.04 to 0.81 +/- 0.01 mm2 x kPa(-1) (P < 0.001) respectively, in the second group. DC and CC increased in both groups, but the differences between the groups were not significant. High doses of atorvastatin reduce blood lipid levels more than conventional doses, however, the change in compliance is not dose-dependent. As endothelial dysfunction is regarded as an early feature of
atherosclerosis
, there would be no need to administer aggressive doses in a patient without any risk factors other than hyperlipidemia.
...
PMID:Effects of low and high doses of atorvastatin on arterial compliance. 1471 Nov 90
Dyslipidemia, characterized by elevated serum levels of triglycerides and reduced levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, has been recognized in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. It is thought that elevated levels of circulating cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-alpha, may alter lipid metabolism in patients with HIV infection. Protease inhibitors, such as saquinavir, indinavir and ritonavir, have been found to decrease mortality and improve quality of life in patients with HIV infection. However, these drugs have been associated with a syndrome of fat redistribution, insulin resistance, and hyperlipidemia. Elevations in serum total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, along with dyslipidemia that typically occurs in patients with HIV infection, may predispose patients to complications such as premature
atherosclerosis
and pancreatitis. It has been estimated that hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia occur in greater than 50% of protease inhibitor recipients after 2 years of therapy, and that the risk of developing hyperlipidemia increases with the duration of treatment with protease inhibitors. In general, treatment of hyperlipidemia should follow National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines; efforts should be made to modify/control coronary heart disease risk factors (i.e. smoking; hypertension; diabetes mellitus) and maximize lifestyle modifications, primarily dietary intervention and exercise, in these patients. Where indicated, treatment usually consists of either pravastatin or atorvastatin for patients with elevated serum levels of LDL-C and/or total cholesterol.
Atorvastatin
is more potent in lowering serum total cholesterol and triglycerides compared with other hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, but it is also associated with more drug interactions compared with pravastatin. Simvastatin and lovastatin are significantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP3A4) and are therefore not recommended for coadministration with protease inhibitors. A fibric acid derivative (gemfibrozil or fenofibrate) should be used in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia. However, it must be kept in mind that protease inhibitors, such as nelfinavir and ritonavir, induce enzymes involved in the metabolism of the fibric acid derivatives and may, therefore, reduce the lipid-lowering activity of coadministered gemfibrozil or fenofibrate. In certain patients HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may be used in combination with fibric acid derivatives but patients should be carefully monitored for liver and skeletal muscle toxicity. Select patients may experience improvements in serum lipid levels when their offending protease inhibitor(s) is/are exchanged for efavirenz, nevirapine, or abacavir; however each patient's virologic and immunologic status must be taken closely into consideration.
...
PMID:Management of protease inhibitor-associated hyperlipidemia. 1472 85
Dyslipidaemia is common in patients with Type 2 diabetes and is held to be responsible for considerable CVD-related morbidity and mortality. Patients with Type 2 diabetes are at high risk from complications associated with
atherosclerosis
and should therefore receive preventive interventions. At the level of the adipocyte, impaired insulin action leads to increased rates of intracellular hydrolysis of triglycerides with the release of NEFA. The rise in NEFA provides substrate for the liver that, in the presence of impaired insulin action and relative insulin deficiency, is associated with complex alterations in plasma lipids: * Plasma VLDL levels are raised. (i). Increased VLDL levels are associated with post-prandial hyperlipidaemia that is compounded by impaired LPL activity. The latter may be independently associated with CAD. (ii). Remnant particles can deliver more cholesterol to macrophages than LDL-C particles. Thrombogenic alterations in the coagulation system also ensue from hypertriglyceridaemia. * Plasma HDL-C levels are reduced. (i). The reduction in cardioprotective HDL-C means a reduction of cholesterol efflux from the tissues--the first step in reverse cholesterol transport to the liver from peripheral tissues. (ii). The antioxidant and antiatherogenic activities of HDL-C are reduced when circulating levels are low. * LDL-C particles become small and dense. Small, dense LDL-C particles are held to be more atherogenic than their larger, buoyant counterparts because they (a) are more liable to oxidation and (b) may more readily adhere to and subsequently invade the arterial wall. The atherogenicity of LDL-C may also be enhanced by nonenzymatic glycation. Metabolic and lipid abnormalities can often be improved with lifestyle changes, including dietary modification, weight loss, smoking cessation and increased exercise. Although attainment of better glycaemic control may improve diabetic dyslipidaemia, pharmacological intervention is usually required. Several large-scale clinical trials, including 4S and more recently HPS, have clearly demonstrated the benefits of statins in reducing cardiovascular events. By virtue of their high absolute risk of CVD, many patients with Type 2 diabetes may achieve a greater risk reduction than their non-diabetic counterparts. For example, in 4S there was a 43% reduction in total mortality risk among patients with diabetes compared with 29% for non-diabetics and a reduced risk of MI by 55% vs. 32% for diabetic and non-diabetics, respectively. In the diabetic subgroup in HPS, there were reductions of approximately 25-30% in the risk of first major vascular events. More recently, the lipid-lowering arm of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) was halted early because of a significant reduction in cardiovascular events compared with placebo. Surprisingly an analysis of subgroups failed to show significance among the diabetic population, although the sample size, shortened follow-up period and higher drop-in statin use among diabetics on placebo may have affected results. The Collaborative
Atorvastatin
Diabetes Study (CARDS), involving 2800 patients with Type 2 diabetes, was halted 2 years early in June 2003 because patients allocated atorvastatin had significant reductions in MI, stroke and surgical procedures compared with those receiving placebo. The UKPDS demonstrated that the appearance and progression of certain microvascular complications of Type 2 diabetes could be reduced by treatment directed at hyperglycaemia and hypertension. In addition, correction of dyslipidaemia in patients with diabetes is important in reducing the high toll from macrovascular disease. The subjects in the HPS had similar lipid profiles to the participants in UKPDS, suggesting that additional benefit would accrue from a therapeutic assault on the main cardiovascular risk factors simultaneously. We now have firm evidence that appropriate use of statins in patients with Type 2 diabetes can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
...
PMID:Lipoprotein abnormalities and their consequences for patients with type 2 diabetes. 1498 18
The management of dyslipidemia in adults with diabetes is receiving more attention. However, there is a paucity of large, prospective, randomized outcome trials designed for diabetic patients. Diabetic dyslipidemia is characterized by an increase in triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations, and small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. The treatment goals include an LDL cholesterol less than 100 mg/dL, triglyceride level less than 150 mg/dL, and an HDL greater than 40 mg/dL for men and more than 50 mg/dL for women. In the Diabetic
Atherosclerosis
Intervention Study, fenofibrate resulted in a 42% less increase in the percent stenosis, as assessed by quantitative coronary arteriography. The Heart Protection Study documented the unambiguous benefit of simvastatin in reducing all-cause mortality among 5963 diabetic patients. The Lescol Intervention Prevention Study observed a reduction in major adverse cardiac events in diabetics undergoing percutaneous intervention who received fluvastatin. The Veterans Affairs HDL Cholesterol Intervention Trial reported a reduction in major coronary events among 627 diabetic patients with low HDL cholesterol who sustained a myocardial infarction. The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetics (FIELD) Trial (n = 9795), the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD, n = 10,000), the
Atorvastatin
Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (ASPEN, n = 2421), and the Collaborative
Atorvastatin
Diabetes Study (CARDS, n = 2140) will provide the prospective outcome data that are needed for the management of patients. Combination drug therapy will be necessary to achieve treatment goals. Careful monitoring will be required to avoid myositis and hepatotoxicity.
...
PMID:Clinical trials and lipid guidelines for type II diabetes. 1505 51
The results of numerous long-term, randomized trials show that statins significantly decrease the risks of myocardial infarction, stroke, and vascular death as well as total mortality. The benefits of statins on cardiovascular disease in patients who are not experiencing acute coronary syndromes generally become apparent only after about 2 years. In contrast, atorvastatin conferred an early clinical benefit in the lipid-lowering arm of the long-term Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial as well as early benefit on progression of
atherosclerosis
in the Reversal of
Atherosclerosis
with Aggressive Lipid Lowering trial. An unexpected finding at baseline in the prospective Interaction of
Atorvastatin
and Clopidogrel Study was that patients on atorvastatin had significantly decreased platelet activity compared with either patients on other statins or those taking no statins.
Atorvastatin
has protective effects against membrane lipid peroxidation at pharmacologic concentrations. These and other considerations contribute to the hypothesis that atorvastatin has pleiotropic effects that translate into early clinical benefits on cardiovascular disease.
...
PMID:Hypothesis: atorvastatin has pleiotropic effects that translate into early clinical benefits on cardiovascular disease. 1509 70
Few data are available on the effects of high dose statin therapy on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes. In a double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial we have studied the effects of 80 mg atorvastatin over 8 weeks on LDL, VLDL and HDL subfractions in 40 overweight type 2 diabetes patients. VLDL and LDL subfractions were prepared by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Triglycerides, cholesterol, total protein and phospholipids were measured and mass of subfractions calculated. HDL subfractions were prepared by precipitation.
Atorvastatin
80 mg produced significant falls in LDL subfractions (LDL(1) 66.2 mg/dl:36.6 mg/dl, LDL(2) 118:56.6 mg/dl, LDL(3) 36.9:19.9 mg/dl all P < 0.01 relative to placebo) and VLDL subfractions (VLDL(1) 55:22.1 mg/dl, VLDL(2) 40.1:19.1 mg/dl, VLDL(3) 52.6:30 mg/dl all P < 0.01 relative to placebo). There was no change in the proportion of LDL present as LDL(3). There was a reduction in the proportion of VLDL as VLDL(1) and a reciprocal increase in the proportion as VLDL(3). Changes in VLDL subfractions were associated with changes in lipid composition, particularly a reduction in cholesterol ester and a reduction in the cholesterol ester/triglyceride ratio. Effects on HDL subfractions were largely neutral. High dose atorvastatin produces favourable effects on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes which may enhance antiatherogenic potential.
Atherosclerosis
2004 May
PMID:The effect of high dose atorvastatin therapy on lipids and lipoprotein subfractions in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. 1513 63
Statins, as compared to placebo, have proven their efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with or without cardiovascular disease and in a large range of cholesterol levels. Two new head-to-head randomised trials comparing intensive treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg/day with moderate treatment with pravastatin 40 mg/day were recently completed. The mechanistic "Reversing
Atherosclerosis
with Aggressive Lipid Lowering" (REVERSAL) trial randomised 502 patients with stable coronary disease.
Atorvastatin
80 mg (leading to a mean LDL cholesterol of 79 mg/dl) was superior to pravastatin 40 mg (mean LDL of 110 mg/dl) in terms of limiting the progression of atheroma assessed with the use of intravascular ultrasonography after 18 months of follow up (p = 0.02). These differences may be related to the greater reduction in atherogenic lipoprotein (-46% versus -26%, p < 0.001) and C-reactive protein (-36% versus -5%, p < 0.001) in patients treated with atorvastatin as compared to pravastatin. In the clinical "Pravastatin or
Atorvastatin
Evaluation and Infection Therapy" (PROVE-IT) trial, 4162 patients with acute coronary syndromes were randomised to either atorvastatin 80 mg or pravastatin 40 mg and followed for a mean of 24 months. Again, atorvastatin (mean LDL of 62 mg/dl) was superior to pravastatin (mean LDL of 95 mg/dl), resulting in a 16% percent lower risk of the primary end point, a composite of major cardiovascular events (p = 0.005). Thus, both REVERSAL and PROVE-IT support the concept "the lower, the better". However, they do not allow to disentangle the independent and interdependent effects of statins on LDL cholesterol and the process of arterial inflammation. What so ever, the results suggest that the target LDL cholesterol level may be lower than recommended in the current guidelines in high-risk patient so that a sea change in the prevention and management of atherosclerotic vascular disease may occur very soon.
...
PMID:[Clinical study of the month. REVERAL and PROVE-IT: confirmation of the concept " the lower, the better" for cholesterol therapy in patients with coronary heart disease]. 1513 6
Current international guidelines recommend that the goal of treatment with lipid-lowering therapy in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) should be a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of < 100 mg/dl. The question that remains to be answered is whether more aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below this target offers additional benefit and whether it can be tolerated. Two recently published related studies addressed this question by comparing intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin (Lipitor, Pfizer) 80 mg/day with a moderate lipid-lowering regimen of pravastatin (Pravachol, Bristol-Myers Squibb) 40 mg/day. The first study, the Reversing
Atherosclerosis
with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) compared the effect of the two regimens on coronary artery atheroma burden and progression using intravascular ultrasound in patients with symptomatic CAD. The second study, the Pravastatin or
Atorvastatin
Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE-IT) was a clinical outcome trial in patients recently hospitalised with acute coronary syndromes. This article reviews the implications of these two studies in the management of patients with CAD. In addition, other ongoing trials and future directions are explored.
...
PMID:Intensive lipid-lowering therapy in coronary artery disease: implications of the REVERSAL and PROVE-IT trials. 1517 57
Statins are widely used for treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Recent experimental studies revealed that these drugs also exert anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of this study was to assess immunomodulatory effects of statins in humans in vivo. Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were analyzed for serum cytokines and acute phase proteins, HLA-DR and CD38 expression on T cells and superantigen-mediated T cell activation ex vivo before and after 14 days of statin treatment. First, simvastatin 40 mg was compared to atorvastatin 20 mg. Second, two different doses of simvastatin (20 and 40 mg) were tested.
Atorvastatin
treatment led to a significant down-regulation of HLA-DR and the CD38 activation marker on peripheral T cells, whereas simvastatin up-regulated both of these molecules. In contrast, superantigen-mediated T cell activation was inhibited by simvastatin and enhanced by atorvastatin. No significant effect of statin treatment on inflammatory serum markers was detected. Thus, immunomodulatory effects of statins on human T cells are first demonstrated in vivo and are differentially induced by two different statins: atorvastatin led to a major histocompatibility class II (MHC II) antigens down-regulation and may therefore be investigated for treatment of chronic transplant rejection; simvastatin inhibited superantigen-mediated T cell activation, which might explain reduced mortality of simvastatin-treated patients with staphylococcal bacteremia.
Atherosclerosis
2004 Jul
PMID:Statin-induced immunomodulatory effects on human T cells in vivo. 1518 50
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>