Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0004135 (ATM)
 13,001 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

1. Using a nested case-control study of 661 non-institutionalized elderly (> or = 60 years) residents of Dubbo, New South Wales, Australia, the aim of this study is to determine whether the A1166C polymorphism of the angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptor gene is associated with hypertension in the elderly. 2. Individuals were classified as isolated systolic hypertension (ISH, n = 146), systolic diastolic hypertension (SDH, n = 188), or normotensive, age- and sex-matched controls (n = 327). AA, CC and AC genotypes were determined using restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of DNA generated by nested polymerase chain reaction. 3. A univariate analysis (chi 2) was complemented by a logistic regression analysis, facilitating adjustment for potential confounders. The unadjusted genotype and allele frequencies in ISH or SDH subjects did not differ significantly from the control subjects (chi 2 = 3.0, P = 0.55, 4 d.f.; chi 2 = 3.0, P = 0.23, 2 d.f., respectively). After adjustment for potential confounders neither genotype nor allele predicted ISH or SDH in this cohort. 4. From this study we conclude that the A1166C polymorphism of the AT1 receptor gene is not a marker for ISH nor for SDH in this large, elderly community sample.
 ...
PMID:The A1166C mutation in the angiotensin II type I receptor and hypertension in the elderly. 1040 80

A large-scale, 8-week, open-label, clinical experience trial evaluated the efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor (AT1 subtype) blocker candesartan cilexetil (16 to 32 mg once daily) either alone or as add-on therapy in 6465 hypertensive patients. The study population was 52% female and 16% African American with a mean age of 58 years. It included 5,446 patients who had essential hypertension (HBP) and 1,014 patients who had isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). These patients had either untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140 to 179 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90 to 109 mm Hg inclusive at baseline) despite a variety of antihypertensive medications including diuretics, calcium antagonists, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and alpha- or beta-blockers, either singly or in combination. The mean baseline blood pressure for the HBP group was 156/97 mm Hg. Candesartan cilexetil as monotherapy (in 51% of HBP patients) reduced mean SBP/DBP by 18.7/ 13.1 mm Hg. As add-on therapy (in 49% of HBP patients) to various background therapies, candesartan cilexetil consistently reduced mean SBP/DBP further, irrespective of the background therapy: diuretics (17.8/11.3 mm Hg), calcium antagonists (16.6/11.2 mm Hg), beta-blockers (16.5/ 10.4 mm Hg), ACE inhibitors (15.3/10.0 mm Hg), alpha-blockers (16.4/10.4 mm Hg). The mean baseline blood pressure for the ISH group was 158/81 mm Hg. Candesartan cilexetil, as monotherapy (in 34% of ISH patients), reduced SBP/DBP by 17.0/4.4 mm Hg. As add-on therapy (in 66% of ISH patients) to various background therapies, candesartan cilexetil consistently reduced mean SBP/DBP further, irrespective of the background therapy: diuretics (17.4/5.1 mm Hg), calcium antagonists (15.6/3.6 mm Hg), beta-blockers (14.0/4.8 mm Hg), ACE inhibitors (13.4/4.3 mm Hg), and alpha-blockers (11.6/4.5 mm Hg). The further blood pressure lowering effects of candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy were seen regardless of age, sex, and race. Overall, 6.8% of the 6465 patients withdrew because of adverse events, most commonly headache (6.3%) and dizziness (5.0%). Orthostatic hypotension was infrequent; 0.2% with candesartan cilexetil alone, and 0.8% with candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy. Thus, candesartan cilexetil either alone or as add-on therapy was highly effective for the control of systolic or diastolic hypertension regardless of demographic background when used in typical clinical practice settings.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of candesartan cilexetil as add-on therapy in hypertensive patients uncontrolled on background therapy: a clinical experience trial. ACTION Study Investigators. 1141 37

The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of the first four available AT1-receptor blockers. i.e. losartan, valsartan, irbesartan and candesartan, were assessed based on data obtained from the FDA's evaluation reports of the respective New Drug Application files. All available randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies in adult men and women with mild to moderate primary diastolic hypertension were included, provided that the reduction in trough (24 h post-dose) supine or sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) had been assessed using the intention-to-treat approach. All studies had an initial single-blind placebo run-in period followed by at least 4 weeks double-blind treatment. The selected studies were included in a meta-analysis of the dose-response relationship for each drug. The dose-response relationship was estimated by fitting the placebo-adjusted, weighted mean reductions in DBP for each dose of the drug to an Emax model. The Emax (maximal effect at an infinitely large dose) for the reduction in DBP, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals in brackets, were found to be 5.6 (3.6-7.5) mmHg for losartan, 5.8 (5.0-6.6) mmHg for valsartan, 6.9 (5.9-7.9) mmHg for irbesartan and 7.5 (6.1-8.9) mmHg for candesartan (p = 0.014, candesartan vs valsartan). In conclusion, this investigation demonstrates that candesartan can reduce DBP significantly more than valsartan, and is supportive of previous head-to-head comparisons, which have proven candesartan to have a greater antihypertensive effect than losartan at recommended doses. Thus, differences in efficacy between different AT1-receptor blockers do exist, and should have implications for the choice of AT1-receptor blocker when treating patients with hypertension, considering the importance of good blood pressure control.
 ...
PMID:The relationships between dose and antihypertensive effect of four AT1-receptor blockers. Differences in potency and efficacy. 1245 52

Hypertension is the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease, constituting the most common cause of death in industrialized countries. Therefore, the task of blood pressure reduction has significant importance in reducing vascular damage, myocardial infarctions, kidney damage and incidence of cerebrovascular accidents. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a central role in control and function of the cardiovascular and renal systems, and is deeply involved in the pathophysiology of diseases of vasculature, heart, kidneys and others. Therefore, blockade of RAAS by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and blockers of angiotensin II type AT1 receptors (ARBs) is widely utilized by clinicians. Indeed, it has long been known that ACE inhibitors and ARBs protect different targets of angiotensin II, due to impedance of the negative effects of the hormone and the inhibition of aldosterone production, which contributes both directly and indirectly to the damages, independent of angiotensin II. Despite this, the morbidity and mortality resulting from the progression of cardiovascular diseases in patients treated with ACE inhibitors or ARBs remain high. As such, over the years, much effort has been dedicated to the development of direct inhibitors of renin. The earliest renin inhibitors, developed 30 years ago were not effective due to their protein nature, which prevents their oral administration and limited their clinical use. In the last decade, several non-protein renin inhibitors which could be given orally were developed, of which Aliskiren is the most well known representative. Due to the fact that neutralization of the RAAS by ACE inhibitors and ARBs has been reviewed at length many times, this review will focus on the renewed subject of renin inhibition. The earliest research, both in humans as well as in animal models, show that Aliskiren has therapeutic potential in treatment of patients with hypertension, cardiovascular disease and renal disease. However, the efficacy of Aliskiren in treating systolic and diastolic hypertension in patients was not better than that obtained using ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Even so, there is no need to lower levels of optimism for potential therapy using direct inhibitors of renin. Current research is still in its early stages and there is a need to remember that it took many years to prove the clinical usefulness of ACE inhibitors, which are now central to treatment of cardiovascular and renal diseases, including hypertension.
 ...
PMID:[Oral inhibitors of renin and their potential use as therapeutic agents in treating hypertension]. 1869 32