Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0004134 (ataxia)
 15,886 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This study compared the antinociceptive properties of systemic administration of selective, non-peptidergic antagonists at neurokinin (NK1 and NK2) receptors to those of other classes of antinociceptive agent. (All doses are in mg/kg.) In mice, the NK1 antagonist, CP 99,994, preferentially (inhibitory dose50 (ID50) = 4.4) inhibited the late phase (LP) as compared to the early phase (EP) (16.1) of formalin-induced licking (FIL). A high dose (17.6) elicited ataxia in the rotarod test. Acetic acid-induced writhing was reduced at intermediate doses (10.0) whereas the tail-flick (TF) response to thermal and mechanical stimuli was inhibited only at high doses (22.7 and 17.7, respectively). Modulation of stimulus intensity did not modify the influence of CP 99,994 upon the response to heat. A similar pattern of data was acquired with RP 67,580, although this NK1 antagonist more potently inhibited writhing (2.8). In contrast, RP 68,651, the inactive isomer of RP 67,580, neither reduced the LP of FIL nor modified writhing indicating that these actions of RP 67,580 were stereospecific. Three further NK1 antagonists, SR 140,333, WIN 51,708 and WIN 62,577, likewise inhibited the LP of FIL and failed to modify the TF response at non-ataxic doses. Further, SR 140,333 (0.5) and WIN 51,708 (1.4) were potent ligands in the writhing procedure. The NK2 antagonist, SR 48,966, mimicked NK1 antagonists in preferentially inhibiting the LP (7.7) as compared to the EP (26.9) of FIL. Further, only at doses higher than those evoking ataxia (20.9) did SR 48,968 modify the TF response (36.5 and 32.0 for heat and pressure, respectively). However, it differed to NK1 antagonists in being inactive in the writhing test (> 40.0). In comparison to these NK1 and NK2 antagonists, the mu-opioid agonists (morphine and fentanyl) and kappa-opioid agonists (enadoline and U 69,593) equipotently inhibited all nociceptive responses at doses not provoking ataxia. While the glycine B receptor partial agonist, (+)-HA 966, selectively blocked the LP of FIL and did not evoke ataxia, the NMDA receptor channel blocker, (+)-MK 801, elicited antinociception only at doses close to those provoking ataxia. Finally, the NSAIDs, indomethacin and ibuprofen, the BK2 antagonist, Hoe 140 and the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors, L-NAME and 7 nitroindazole, inhibited the LP (but not the EP) of FIL and (except for L-NAME) also reduced writhing: in contrast, they did not evoke ataxia and were inactive in the TF procedures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Antinociceptive profiles of non-peptidergic neurokinin1 and neurokinin2 receptor antagonists: a comparison to other classes of antinociceptive agent. 765 44

We previously reported markedly reduced (-76%) dopamine (DA) levels in the putamen of seven patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1) who had no evidence of nigral cell loss or parkinsonism. To determine whether the DA reduction was accompanied by loss of DA nerve terminals, we measured levels of the DA transporter ([3H]WIN, 35,428 binding; DA transporter protein) and the vesicular monoamine transporter ([3H]DTBZ binding) in the putamen of these patients. As compared with the controls (n = 14), mean putamen concentrations of [3H]WIN 35,428 binding (-45%), dopamine transporter protein (-61%), and [3H]DTBZ binding (-48%) were significantly reduced in this SCA1 subgroup. We conclude that the degeneration in nigrostriatal DA neurons begins at the nerve ending in SCA1.
 ...
PMID:Striatal dopamine nerve terminal markers but not nigral cellularity are reduced in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. 910 12

The present experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of four cannabimimetics on detailed temporal parameters of operant responding. In this study, the behavioral output during performance of a fixed ratio 5 schedule of reinforcement was recorded by a computer program that measured the response initiation time (IT; time interval between the offset of one lever press and the onset of the next) and the response duration (the amount of time that elapses from the onset to the offset of one lever press) of each lever press. ITs were further partitioned into fast responses (IT=0.0-1.0 s), short pauses (IT= 1.0-2.5 s), and long pauses (IT>2.5 s). Four cannabimimetic agents were assessed in this study: (R)-methanandamide (AM 356), a hydrolytically stable analog of arachidonylethanolamide, an endogenous ligand for the CB1 receptor; CP-55,940, a potent non-classical synthetic ligand; (-)-delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta8-THC), an isomer of the naturally occurring delta9-THC; and WIN 55,212-2, a synthetic aminoalkylindole. All four of the cannabimimetic drugs tested significantly suppressed operant lever pressing in a dose dependent manner. The rank order of potencies observed in the present study was CP-55,940>>WIN-55,212-2>delta8-THC>AM 356, which is consistent with the rank order of affinities for the CB1 receptor shown by these drugs. All of the cannabimimetics substantially increased average IT, and also increased duration time. There was a substantial increase in average length of long pauses, and statistically significant but very small changes in the local rate of responding as measured by the average length of fast ITs. Cannabinoid-treated rats were largely immobile during pauses in responding, and these animals showed several signs of ataxia and catalepsy at the doses that suppressed lever pressing. Together with other data, the present results suggest that CB1 stimulation leads to motor effects that are associated with a suppression of lever pressing.
 ...
PMID:A detailed characterization of the effects of four cannabinoid agonists on operant lever pressing. 963 1

Previous studies in our laboratory showed that cannabinoid CB1 receptor knockout mice (CB1-/-) presented increased anxiety-like behaviours that did not respond to the anxiolytic actions of benzodiazepines. These results suggest that the pharmacological effects of benzodiazepines may involve the participation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of alprazolam and the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 on behavioural assays (light-dark box test, neurological severity score and step-down inhibitory avoidance test) and on the functional activity of the CB1 receptor (WIN-55,212-stimulated [(35)S] guanosine triphosphate (GTP) gamma binding autoradiography).The administration of alprazolam (40 microg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) decreased anxiety-like behaviours in the light-dark box test and significantly reduced WIN-55,212-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgamma binding autoradiography in the amygdala and in the CA1 field of the hippocampus, but was without effects on CA2, CA3 and the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus. The administration of AM251 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) blocked the anxiolytic action of alprazolam (40 microg/kg, i.p.), significantly reduced the sedative (ataxia, neurological severity score in the 0.5 cm bar) and the amnesic actions (short time term memory (1 h after electric shock)) of alprazolam (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.).Taken together, these findings revealed that cannabinoid CB1 receptor plays a pivotal role in the pharmacological actions of benzodiazepines. Furthermore, these results suggest that blockade of cannabinoid CB1 receptors may be useful in the treatment of patients with problems related to the consumption of benzodiazepines. Further clinical trials are needed to test this hypothesis.
 ...
PMID:The cannabinoid CB1 receptor is involved in the anxiolytic, sedative and amnesic actions of benzodiazepines. 1982 99

Impairment of motor skills is one of the most common acute adverse effects of cannabis. Related studies have focused mainly on psychomotor alterations, and little is known about the direct impact of cannabinoids (CBs) on motoneuron physiology. As key modulators of synaptic function, CBs regulate multiple neuronal functions and behaviors. Presynaptic CB1 mediates synaptic strength depression by inhibiting neurotransmitter release, via a poorly understood mechanism. The present study examined the effect of CB agonists on excitatory synaptic inputs incoming to hypoglossal motoneurons (HMNs) in vitro and in vivo. The endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) and the synthetic CB agonist WIN 55,212-2 rapidly and reversibly induced short-term depression (STD) of glutamatergic synapses on motoneurons by a presynaptic mechanism. Presynaptic effects were fully reversed by the CB1-selective antagonist AM281. Electrophysiological and electron microscopy analysis showed that WIN 55,212-2 reduced the number of synaptic vesicles (SVs) docked to active zones in excitatory boutons. Given that AM281 fully abolished depolarization-induced depression of excitation, motoneurons can be feasible sources of CBs, which in turn act as retrograde messengers regulating synaptic function. Finally, microiontophoretic application of the CB agonist O-2545 reversibly depressed, presumably via CB1, glutamatergic inspiratory-related activity of HMNs in vivo. Therefore, evidence support that CBs, via presynaptic CB1, induce excitatory STD by reducing the readily releasable pool of SVs at excitatory synapses, then attenuating motoneuron activity. These outcomes contribute a possible mechanistic basis for cannabis-associated motor performance disturbances such as ataxia, dysarthria and dyscoordination.
 ...
PMID:Cannabinoid agonists rearrange synaptic vesicles at excitatory synapses and depress motoneuron activity in vivo. 2559 1