Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0003864 (arthritis)
69,039 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Six hundred sixty individuals from a music school were studied to determine the frequency of incidence and the nature of their hypermobility. They were interviewed and examined for the 5 recognized features of hypermobility (laxity of the thumbs, fingers, elbows, spine, and knees). The incidence of hypermobility, according to the number of joints involved, followed an empiric geometric law. Approximately 27% of the individuals had 1 lax joint, whereas only 3% possessed all 5 features. Specific features were present at different frequencies in the 2 sexes. The ratio of the occurrence of 2 features in women compared with the occurrence in men was 2:1. Ratios for the occurrence of 3, 4, and 5 features were 4:1, 8:1, and 3:1, respectively. Thus, hypermobility was a predominantly female characteristic. Joint laxity declined with age, although not to a statistically significant degree. In men, the decline started when they were in their mid-twenties; however, in women, joint laxity continued through the mid-forties.
Arthritis Rheum 1987 Dec
PMID:Hypermobility: features and differential incidence between the sexes. 343 71

Pain dominates the lives of many patients with hyperlaxity syndromes, most commonly the Benign Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (BJHS/EDS). As a result they may experience psychosocial problems, which in many cases severely affects their healthy functioning. Above all is the overriding chronic pain in joints, muscles and ligaments, which arises from an inherent predisposition to the effects of everyday trauma, but other factors such as associated osteoarthritis or fibromyalgia are also important. There may also be neurophysiological factors at play producing nociceptive enhancement. Pain and distress of visceral origin can result from laxity of connective tissue within or providing support for the abdominal, thoracic or pelvic viscera leading to hernia, uterine and/or rectal prolapse, mitral valve prolapse or spontaneous pneumothorax. In children joint hyperlaxity is an important (and often unrecognised) source of rheumatic symptoms, which may be ignored or erroneously ascribed to juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The management of pain and distress in the hyperlaxity syndromes requires skill, patience, compassion and understanding. Often the results of conventional anti-rheumatic therapy (including anti-rheumatic drugs and surgery) as applied to other rheumatic diseases are disappointing and innovative approaches are required. Amongst these, for which evidence of efficacy is available, are physiotherapeutic and orthotic stabilisation of hyperlax joints, proprioceptive enhancement and the newer pain management techniques including cognitive behavioural therapy.
...
PMID:Pain, distress and joint hyperlaxity. 1087 11

An 8-year-old girl with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) required surgical reduction for a dislocated left hip joint following failure of skin traction for 1 week. Unaided walking was achieved by 3 months postoperatively. Incongruence and irregularity of the hip joint remained but may resolve with maturation. Joint laxity caused by synovitis, flexion/adduction contracture with pain, and acetabular dysplasia by growth disturbance apparently caused hip dislocation.
...
PMID:Open reduction of the dislocated hip in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case report. 1714

The pediatric flat foot is a frequent presentation in clinical practice, a common concern to parents and continues to be debated within professional ranks. As an entity, it is confused by varied classifications, the notion of well-intended prevention and unsubstantiated, if common, treatment. The available prevalence estimates are all limited by variable sampling, assessment measures and age groups and hence result in disparate findings (0.6-77.9%). Consistently, flat foot has been found to normally reduce with age. The normal findings of flat foot versus children's age estimates that approximately 45% of preschool children, and 15% of older children (average age 10 years) have flat feet. Few flexible flat feet have been found to be symptomatic. Joint hypermobility and increased weight or obesity may increase flat foot prevalence, independently of age. Most attempts at classification of flat foot morphology include the arch, heel position and foot flexibility. Usual assessment methods are footprint measures, X-rays and visual (scaled) observations. There is no standardized framework from which to evaluate the pediatric flat foot. The pediatric flat foot is often unnecessarily treated, being ill-defined and of uncertain prognosis. Contemporary management of the pediatric flat foot is directed algorithmically within this review, according to pain, age, flexibility; considering gender, weight, and joint hypermobility. When foot orthoses are indicated, inexpensive generic appliances will usually suffice. Customised foot orthoses should be reserved for children with foot pain and arthritis, for unusual morphology, or unresponsive cases. Surgery is rarely indicated for pediatric flat foot (unless rigid) and only at the failure of thorough conservative management. The assessment of the pediatric flatfoot needs to be considered with reference to the epidemiological findings, where there is consensus that pediatric flexible flat foot reduces with age and that most children are asymptomatic. Globally, there is need for a standard by which the pediatric flat foot is assessed classified and managed. Until then, assessment should utilize the available evidence-based management model, the p-FFP Future research needs to evaluate the pediatric flat foot from representative samples, of healthy and known disease-group children prospectively, and using validated assessment instruments. The preliminary findings of the benefits of foot exercises, and discrete investigation into the effects of shoes and footwear use are also warranted.
...
PMID:A Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet. 2144 21