Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0003615 (appendicitis)
 4,439 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

It has been described a case of appendicitis in atypical appendix localisation complicated by perforation with coexisting pleuropneumonia on the right side in 21 year old primipara in 33 week of gestation. It has been performed cesarean section with simultaneous surgical intervention.
Ginekol Pol 1996 Jan
PMID:[A rare case of appendicitis in pregnancy]. 865 19

A study was undertaken to determine fertility in a group of females who as children had been operated on for appendicitis. The 134 women operated on for appendicitis were reviewed. Their ages ranged from 2-18 years at the time of appendectomy. Our data show that perforated appendicitis before puberty has little if any role in the etiology of tubal infertility.
Ginekol Pol 1997 Aug
PMID:[The significance of appendectomy for appendicitis on subsequent fertility]. 949 11

11 cases of the endometriosis of the appendix vermiformis were analyzed among women in age between 19-57 years. We observed that endometriosis of appendix were accompanied by advanced stages of the ovarian or peritoneum endometriosis in 9 cases. Diagnosis of endometriosis of the appendix is almost impossible before operation because it often could be covered by other genital organs diseases such like: uterine fibromas, ectopic pregnancy, PID. The clinical symptoms of appendicitis observed before an operation seldom find confirmation in results of additional laboratory tests.
Ginekol Pol 2001 May
PMID:[Endometriosis of the appendix vermiformis]. 1152 75

The authors present a diagnostically difficult case of a three year old girl with abdominal pain. The girl with abdominal pains, nausea, upper airways infarction and some urinary system symptoms was admitted to Children's Surgical Clinic for observation. She was given antibiotic therapy and i.v. infusions. WBC was 29.6 tys./ul and CRP 2.7 mg/dl. No other abnormalities were detected in biochemical or sonographic investigation. The girl was submitted to laparotomy because of unclear abdominal signs suggesting acute appendicitis. Phlegmonous appendicitis and twisted/rotated left ovary with multiple adhesions were found. Histopathological investigation showed teratoma of the left ovary. Postoperative course went without complication.
Ginekol Pol 2003 Apr
PMID:[Rare coexistence of phlegmonous appendicitis and tumor of a twisted left ovary]. 1291 74

The report presents six cases of mesothelial inclusion cysts (MIC), detected in five females (22-53 years of age) and one male (47 years old). The lesions were unifocal (four cases) and multifocal (two cases), and were located on the surface of the peritoneum in the cul de sac, on the intestines, urinary bladder, uterine adnexa, also involved round ligament within the pelvis and in the inguinal canal (one patient). Additionally, in one female, small cysts, free-floating in the peritoneal cavity were present. In three patients, clinical signs resulted directly from the presence of MIC. One female had been 7 years previously operated on due to endometrioid ovarian cysts. Apart from MIC, three patients presented with concomitant diseases: appendicitis (two cases), peritoneal pseudomyxoma or primary ovarian carcinoma. Gross appearance: the lesions were polycystic, the surgical materials ranging from three fragments measuring 0.5 cm each to seven fragments, with the maximum size of 14x6 cm. The cysts were from microscopic size to 2 cm in diameter, the majority were thin-walled, semitranslucent, filled with clear or yellowish fluid or gelatinous contents. In one case, the cyst walls were thicker and showed intense inflammatory lesions and fibrinous exudate. Microscopically, the majority of cysts were lined with a single layer of flattened or cuboid mesothelial cells (CK+, calretinin+). In two patients, the mesothelium demonstrated diffuse squamous cell metaplasia; in one individual, the cells focally formed small papillae and were vacuolated. No mucus was observed either in the cytoplasm or outside the cells. Immunohistochemical reactions to CEA, ER, PR and MIB-1 were negative. Intramural proliferations and intracystic detached clumps of cells showed both mesothelial cells (without any mitotic activity and signs of atypia) and macrophages (CD68+). To date, the follow-up has been 7 years and 3 years in two individuals, and from 1 to 7 months in the remaining three patients--all of them are free from recurrent disease. One female failed to report for follow-up examinations. The report also presents the review of literature.
Pol J Pathol 2005
PMID:Mesothelial inclusion cysts (so-called benign cystic mesothelioma)--a clinicopathological analysis of six cases. 1609 70

Diseases of the abdomen (cholecystitis, appendicitis, adnexal masses), although they rarely occur during pregnancy, pose a threat both to the gravid women and the fetus. We attempt to systemize current knowledge on the topic and to outline some diagnostic and therapeutic trends. Appendicitis is very difficult to diagnose during pregnancy. If the diagnosis is set, appendectomy should not be postponed. Diagnostic methods (ultrasonography and others) are useful in the diagnosis of adnexal masses and cholecystitis, while in case of cholecystolithiasis, the typical symptoms are similar to those occurring before pregnancy. Platk's at all algorithm, together with Nowak's at all modifications, may be used in the treatment of adnexal masses. However, the type of inflammation, the response to conservative treatment and the number of relapses have a great influence on the choice of cholecystitis treatment (conservative vs. surgical). In any of the above situations it is also very important to state the most safe stage of the pregnancy to make the operation. In the event of direct threat to the mother and/or fetus, surgical intervention should be conducted regardless of the stage of pregnancy.
Ginekol Pol 2009 Jul
PMID:[Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy]. 1969 17

We present a case report of a 22-year-old pregnant patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed with an appendicitis at 21st week of gestation, who underwent laparotomy and appendectomy. In later pregnancy she required treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections and nephrolithiasis. Despite having several risk factors for an unfavorable perinatal outcome, she had caesarean section performed at term and delivered a healthy full-term newborn. In this patient, we also discuss clinical conundrum of pregnancy complicated with several conditions that may manifest with acute abdominal symptoms and perioperative care for a pregnant woman with type 1 diabetes..
Ginekol Pol 2012 Mar
PMID:Appendicitis in diabetic pregnancy--case report. 2256 99

Peritonitis is a set of symptoms of varying etiology usually with an accompanying infection, systemic and local changes within the peritoneal cavity Colonic diseases, especially colon perforation, are one of the most common causes of peritonitis. The course of the disease may be turbulent due to sudden perforation. In case of limited peritonitis the disease is not as acute as the perforation hole is small and it can be sealed by the omentum and internal organs. Abdominal pain is usually located around the source of infection and is less severe. A 38-year-old patient at 34 weeks gestation was hospitalized in the obstetric-gynecological ward of the Health Care Center with a diagnosis of preterm delivery urinary infection and renal colic. Due to increasing peritoneal symptoms and deteriorating general condition of the patient, a decision to perform immediately exploratory laparotomy combined with the Cesarean section was made. The surgeon indicated a place in the left mesogastrium that could correspond with a drained interintestinal abscess and also found a large amount of fibrin in the lower floor of the peritoneal cavity The initial point of the abscess remained unknown and the patient received total parenteral nutrition for 10 days. On 5 postoperative day the drain was removed from the peritoneal cavity and since day 10 patient health was steadily improving. Bacteriological cultures revealed abundant growth of E. coli that showed sensitivity to the used antibiotics. On 22 postoperative day the patient and her child were discharged home in good condition. Five months later the patient was admitted to the surgical ward with acute abdominal pain with the diagnosis of an abscess in her left mesogastric and subgastric area, perforation of sigmoid diverticulum and fecal fistula. Our case illustrates great difficulties in diagnosing diseases of the abdominal cavity during pregnancy because causes and symptoms may be typical of this condition, as well as of unrelated diseases, including: kidney problems, appendicitis, cholecystitis and bowel disease. Examination of the pregnant patient presents a challenge and the symptoms are uncharacteristic. Tension of the abdominal wall, as well as the muscles of the digestive and urinary tract are reduced and the topography of the internal organs changes during pregnancy. The interpretation of laboratory tests becomes more difficult. In our case, the initial local peritonitis, caused by microperforation of the diverticulum, ran a latent course and was masked by both pregnancy and renal colic symptoms, consequently leading to diffuse peritonitis. The presented case demonstrates the importance of the problem and forces obstetricians to be more vigilant in determining the diagnosis and decision-making, because of its meaning for the health and even the life of the patient and her child.
Ginekol Pol 2012 Dec
PMID:[Complicated colonic diverticulitis at 34 weeks gestation]. 2348 99

This is a review of literature concerning intestinal obstruction in pregnant women. Approximately 50-90% and 30% of pregnant women, respectively suffer from nausea and vomiting, mostly during the first trimester. There is also increased risk of constipation. During the perioperative period, the administration of tocolytics should be considered only in women showing symptoms of a threatening premature delivery. Intensive hydration should be ordered to sustain uterine blood flow. The incidence of intestinal obstruction during pregnancy is estimated at 1:1500-1:66431 pregnancies and is diagnosed in II and III trimester in most cases. However, it can also occur in the I trimester (6%) or puerperium. Symptoms of intestinal obstruction in pregnancy include: abdominal pains (98%), vomiting (82%), constipation (30%). Abdominal tenderness on palpation is found in 71% and abnormal peristalsis in 55% of cases. The most common imaging examination in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction is the abdominal X-ray. However ionizing radiation may have a harmful effect on the fetus, especially during the first trimester. X-ray is positive for intestinal obstruction in 82% of pregnant women. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are considered safe and applicable during pregnancy. Intestinal obstruction in pregnant women is mostly caused by: adhesions (54.6%), intestinal torsion (25%), colorectal carcinoma (3.7%), hernia (1.4%), appendicitis (0.5%) and others (10%). Adhesive obstruction occurs more frequently in advanced pregnancy (6% - I trimester 28% - II trimester; 45% - III trimester 21% - puerperium). Treatment should begin with conservative procedures. Surgical treatment may be necessary in cases where the pain turns from recurrent into continuous, with tachycardia, pyrexia and a positive Blumberg sign. If symptoms of fetal anoxia are observed, a C-section should be carried out before surgical intervention. The extent of surgical intervention depends on the intraoperative evaluation. Intestinal torsion during pregnancy mostly occurs in the sigmoid colon and cecum. Small bowel torsion secondary to adhesions is diagnosed in 42% of pregnant women with intestinal obstruction. The risk of intestinal torsion is higher in the 16-20 and 32-36 weeks of pregnancy and during puerperium. Intestinal torsion results in vessel occlusion which induces more severe symptoms and makes urgent surgical intervention necessary. The overall prognosis is poor--during II and III trimester the fetal mortality rate reaches 36% and 64%, respectively while the risk of maternal death is 6%. Acute intestinal pseudoobstruction can be diagnosed during puerperium, especially following a C-section. Diagnosis is made on the basis of radiological confirmation of colon distension at the cecum as > 9cm, lack of air in the sigmoid colon and rectum, exclusion of mechanical obstruction. In most cases, the treatment is based on easing intestine gas evacuation and administering neostigmine. The authors point out the need for multi-specialty cooperation in the diagnostic-therapeutic process of pregnant women suspected with intestinal obstruction, since any delay in making a correct diagnosis increases the risk of severe complications, both for the woman and the fetus.
Ginekol Pol 2013 Feb
PMID:[Intestinal obstruction during pregnancy]. 2366 61

Appendicitis (APP) and gall bladder diseases (GBD) are the most frequent non-obstetric indications for urgent surgery among pregnant women. The aim was to present the diagnosis, treatment and potential complications of APP and symptomatic GBD. We searched the literature for APP and GBD during pregnancy and presented the results in the form of a review article. APP symptoms among pregnant women are comparable to these in the general population. Typical clinical symptoms are present in 50-75% of cases. Laboratory tests are useful for a differential diagnosis. The imaging of choice is an ultrasonography scan, but magnetic resonance is of the highest accuracy The final diagnosis is difficult. When the surgery is delayed, the risk of appendix perforation increases and thus complications are more frequent. GBD symptoms and signs are comparable to those in the general population. The best imaging is an ultrasonography scan, and laboratory tests are important in a jaundice differential diagnosis. In cases with symptomatic GBD, a delay in surgery is associated with an increased risk of complications (pancreatitis, abortion, intrauterine death). The treatment method of choice for APP and symptomatic GBD is surgery both laparotomy and laparoscopy (preferred), which are considered relatively safe, though laparoscopy compared to laparotomy for APP can be associated with a higher risk of abortion. Untreated or delayed APP and symptomatic GBD treatment during pregnancy increases the risk of complications, both for the woman and the fetus. Diagnosis is difficult and should be based on a multidisciplinary approach to the patient. Surgery by laparotomy or laparoscopy is relatively safe.
Ginekol Pol 2013 Dec
PMID:[Appendicitis and gall bladder diseases as acute abdominal conditions in pregnancy]. 2450 53


1 2 Next >>