Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0002962 (
angina
)
21,142
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Platelet hypersensitivity has been documented in diabetes and
angina pectoris
and can be partially reversed in hyperbetalipoproteinemia by clofibrate. We therefore examined the effects of incubating another lipid-lowering agent, halofenate, with both normal platelets and platelets made hypersensitive in vitro by incorporation of 55 per cent excess cholesterol into their membranes. At therapeutic concentrations, halofenate caused a time- and dose-dependent inhibition of the aggregation of normal platelets by epinephrine. After 30 minutes' incubation at 37 degrees C., halofenate significantly inhibited the extent of aggregation by 88 per cent (p less than 0.01), whereas clofibrate inhibited aggregation by 44 per cent (p less than 0.01). Halofenate was a more potent inhibitor of platelets than clofibrate (p less than 0.01). The mean threshold concentration of epinephrine necessary for aggregation of normal platelets (4.2 muM) was not significatnly increased with clofibrate (10 muM) but was markedly elevated with halofenate (245 muM; p less than 0.001). Significant but less dramatic increases in threshold concentration of ADP and collagen were found with halofenate but no clofibrate. Cholesterol-rich platelets were 114-fold more sensitive to epinephrine and twofold more sensitive to ADP than normal platelets but after incubation with halofenate became even less sensitive than normal.
Clofibrate
inhibited the extent of aggregation of hypersensitive platelets but did not alter the threshold concentration of epinephrine necessary for aggregation. Thus, halofenate is more potent than clofibrate in reducing the sensitivity of normal platelets to aggregating agents in vitro and can completely reverse experimentally produced platelet hypersensitivity. These data suggest that halofenate might be useful in reversing increased platelet sensitivity in cardiovascular diseases.
...
PMID:Halofenate: a potent inhibitor of normal and hypersensitive platelets. 95 86
Evidence to support the hypothesis that lowering total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol may reduce heart attacks and heart deaths has, until recently, not been available. Early primary prevention trials lacked definitive data on these "hard" end points. Since 1980, five primary prevention trials have attempted to demonstrate the benefit of lowering cholesterol. Three of these involved diet: the Oslo Heart Trial and both the European and American Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trials (MRFITs). Two involved lipid-lowering drugs: the European
Clofibrate
Primary Prevention Trial and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's recently concluded Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial (LRC-CPPT). The Olso Heart Trial suggested a benefit from the dietary reduction of cholesterol; results of the other studies of diet were equivocal. Although clofibrate did demonstrate a reduced incidence of heart attacks in the treated group, the cardiac mortality rate was not altered in this group. A significant increase in the all-cause mortality rate (other than ischemic heart disease) observed in this trial in treated subjects makes clofibrate difficult to recommend. The LRC-CPPT study, involving cholestyramine, has provided conclusive evidence concerning the benefits of lowering cholesterol: significant reductions were observed in all cardiovascular end points measured, including the development of
angina
and positive exercise stress tests, referral for bypass surgery, and the hard primary study end point heart attack and heart attack death.
...
PMID:Primary prevention of coronary heart disease by lowering lipids: results and implications. 390 77
A trial is reported of the effects of giving clofibrate to prevent progression of pre-existing ischaemic heart disease. There were two groups randomly distributed between clofibrate (350 patients) and placebo (367 patients) regimens. The trial lasted about six years and was conducted in 19 hospitals in Scotland. The criteria of acceptance into the trial were precise and were monitored by one observer. The standards of diagnosis of events were defined and all protocols and electrocardiograms were read blind by one observer.THREE CATEGORIES OF PATIENTS WERE ADMISSIBLE TO THE TRIAL: (1) patients with one myocardial infarction (W.H.O. E.C.G. criteria) between 8 and 16 weeks before the start of the trial; (2) patients with
angina
of a duration of 3 to 24 months, provided their E.C.G. showed signs of myocardial ischaemia at rest or after exercise; and (3) patients with one recent myocardial infarction and pre-existing
angina
as defined above.There were fewer deaths in patients with
angina
(categories 2 and 3 above) treated with clofibrate than in those on placebo. The mortality in the former group was reduced by 62%, and this is a statistically significant difference.
Clofibrate
did not have any statistically significant effect in reducing the rate of non-fatal infarction in patients with
angina
or in those with myocardial infarction and pre-existing
angina
, though a beneficial trend was evident when both subgroups were combined (a 44% reduction compared with the placebo group). There was a significant reduction in all events (fatal and non-fatal) in patients with
angina
("all anginas") in the clofibrate-treated group; the rate was reduced by 53%.
Clofibrate
did not alter the overall mortality or morbidity rates in patients admitted to the trial with recent myocardial infarction without preceding
angina
of more than three months' duration. In one subgroup there was a statistically significant adverse effect in the clofibrate-treated group. The lack of any overall effect in patients with myocardial infarction might be related to the unexpectedly low mortality rate (2.97%) in the placebo group; it is usually in the region of 4-9% per annum after first myocardial infarction.In patients categorized as "all anginas" there was significant reduction in events whether the initial serum cholesterol level was high (greater than 260 mg/100 ml) or normal.
Clofibrate
seemed to have a small but not significant beneficial effect in patients with myocardial infarction with initially high serum cholesterol levels, but was of no value in those with initially normal serum cholesterol levels. There was no significant relationship between the response or lack of response of serum cholesterol to clofibrate and the incidence of events either in patients with
angina
or in those with infarction.The main conclusion of this trial is that clofibrate had a beneficial effect in reducing mortality and, to a lesser extent, morbidity in patients who presented with
angina
("all anginas"). This effect was independent of initial serum cholesterol levels or the extent to which serum cholesterol was lowered. The drug had no significant overall effect on prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction alone.
...
PMID:Ischaemic heart disease: a secondary prevention trial using clofibrate. Report by a research committee of the Scottish Society of Physicians. 494 6