Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0002962 (angina)
 21,142 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass has provided a way of evaluating the undesirable effects of high blood pressure on the heart in the same way as for obesity, excess salt intake and blood hyperviscosity. Recently, the left ventricular mass was shown to correlate (r = 0.81) with the hemodynamic stimuli of blood pressure, stroke volume and left ventricular contractility. Prospective trials at Cornell and Framingham indicate that left ventricular mass is a powerful predictive factor of the risk of complications in hypertension. In the first of these trials, we demonstrated in a 5 year follow-up study of 140 men with uncomplicated hypertension that the incidence of death, myocardial infarction or angina requiring myocardial revascularisation, was four times greater in patients with increased left ventricular mass and that this association was independent of the blood pressure levels. Then, in a 10 year follow-up study of hypertensive patients of both sexes, we established that the left ventricular mass was the most powerful predictive factor of mortality and morbidity and that this was so marked (15% death rate in subjects with LVH vs 1% in subjects with normal left ventricular mass--p less than 0.00001--, cardiovascular accidents in 26% of subjects with LVH compared with 12% in subjects with normal left ventricular mass--p less than 0.0001) that only left ventricular mass and age were independant predictive factors of morbid events in multiple variable analysis. In the Framingham study, the frequency of coronary events in a 4 year follow-up period of healthy subjects from the original cohort (average age 69 years) was significantly related to the left ventricular mass and independent of other risk factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Relationship between left ventricular mass and prognosis of arterial hypertension]. 208 Aug 92

We developed a comorbidity index on a cohort of 162,699 Medicare beneficiaries who had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 1987 and validate it on two national cohorts: (1) a cohort of 164,427 Medicare beneficiaries who had an AMI in 1988 and (2) a cohort of 10,466 patients admitted to Veterans Administration Hospitals (VAH) for AMI in 1988-1991. The impact of each sensitivity was expressed as; (1) the risk of mortality for those with the comorbidity, (2) the adjustment to the log odds for 2 year mortality and (3) the age-based likelihood of 2 year mortality. Models were validated by calculated the area under an ROC curve obtained by fitting a logistic regression model to each validation population. The two year mortality rate for 30-day survivors was approximately 30% in each of the 3 cohorts. The 5 most prevlent comorbidities coded in the developmental cohort were heart failure (34%), chronic angina (27%), minor arrythmias (25%) and uncomplicated hypertension (18%). Cancer was the most powerful predictor of 2 year mortality, impacting mortality the same as a 18.3 year age increase. Saturation (having all secondary diagnoses in the discharge summary filled) resulted in a 9.2 year age increase. Validation in the 1988 Medicare and in the Veterans Administration Hospitals cohorts resulted in areas of 73% and 72% under the respective ROC curves. Our methods can serve as a prototype for others wishing to assess comorbidity in other targeted subgroups.
 ...
PMID:Development and validation of a claims based index for adjusting for risk of mortality: the case of acute myocardial infarction. 786 69

Sinus arrest or atrioventricular block are rare but serious adverse effects of diltiazem. The risk of developing such adverse reactions may be somewhat exacerbated by concomitant beta-adrenergic blocker therapy. In patients with hypertension or coronary heart disease, combination therapy with diltiazem and a beta-blocker usually enhances therapeutic benefit relative to monotherapy, but adverse effects attributable to this combination, especially in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or latent cardiac conduction deficits, may be limiting. Therefore, such combination therapy may not be suitable in patients with atrioventricular block grade I, bradycardia or hypotension, and patients on the combined therapy should always have their blood pressure, heart rate and atrioventricular conduction on ECG monitored. If combination therapy with diltiazem and propranolol or metoprolol is commenced, or in the case of impaired renal function, an adjustment of the beta-blocker dosage may be required. Clinical studies on the combined use of diltiazem and beta-adrenergic blockers mostly concern the treatment of angina pectoris in patients with coronary heart disease. Although very few cases of severe bradycardia and conduction abnormalities have been reported in patients with uncomplicated hypertension on diltiazem and beta-blockade combination, there seems to be a potential for the occurrence of significant conduction disturbances with the combined treatment, and precautions should apply also for hypertensive populations.
 ...
PMID:Cardiac conduction with diltiazem and beta-blockade combined. A review and report on cases. 887 97

The treatment of hypertension in the elderly has to take into account co-existing pathology. However, the benefit from treatment are large in terms owing to the frequency of cardiovascular events in the elderly. The benefits observed in randomised controlled trials are reviewed together with the adverse effects of the individual treatments. The optimal use of anti-hypertensive treatment is considered in light of any concomitant disease; for example beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers when angina is present and the avoidance of diuretics in the presence of gout. Important hazardous drug interactions are also discussed. It is concluded that diuretics are still the first choice in uncomplicated hypertension and the least expensive. However the place of anti-hypertensive treatment is not established in those over the age of 80 years.
 ...
PMID:Tailoring anti-hypertensive treatment in the elderly. 978 90

The goals of antihypertensive therapy are to lower blood pressure and prevent end-organ damage without side effects, which affect quality of life. The antihypertensive drugs, regardless of class, all lower blood pressure, but they vary in their mechanisms of action, side-effect profiles, suitability for patients with other comorbid conditions, and ability to protect against the long-term sequelae of hypertension. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-VI) recommends diuretics and beta-blockers as first-line therapy for uncomplicated hypertension, with diuretics also being strongly preferred for patients with isolated systolic hypertension or hypertension and heart failure and beta-blockers being strongly preferred for patients who have had a myocardial infarction (MI) and those with hypertension and angina, atrial tachycardia, or atrial fibrillation. Because angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to be cardioprotective and renoprotective in patients with diabetes or impaired left ventricular (LV) function, the JNC-VI recommends them as first-line therapy in patients with diabetes with proteinuria, heart failure, and MI complicated by LV dysfunction. It recommends calcium channel blockers for hypertensive patients with angina, long-acting dihydropyridines for those with isolated systolic hypertension, and the nondihydropyridines for those with atrial tachycardia or fibrillation, diabetes, and proteinuria. The angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) share many of the organ-protective effects of ACE inhibitors when studied in animal models. They are effective in lowering blood pressure and have a very benign side-effect profile; however, these agents have not been available long enough to ascertain their efficacy in protecting against long-term complications.
 ...
PMID:Clinical overview of antihypertensive classes--clinically relevant differences: myths or facts? Based on a presentation by Alan H. Gradman, MD. 1097 60

Recent studies have shown that beta-blockers in patients with hypertension is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, in particular stroke, leading to headlines speculating the end of the beta-blocker era. The objective of this review is to critically examine the usefulness of beta-blockers in cardiovascular diseases. We reviewed the currently available evidence for the usefulness of beta-blockers in patients with hypertension and also assessed the efficacy of its use for other indications, like, chronic heart failure, stable angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias etc. The review of the currently available literature shows that for patients with uncomplicated hypertension, there is paucity of data or absence of evidence to support use of beta-blockers as monotherapy or as first line agent. Given the risk of stroke and numerous unacceptable adverse effects, the risk benefit ratio for beta-blockers is not acceptable for this indication. However, beta-blockers are very efficacious agents for the treatment of heart failure, certain types of arrhythmia, and post myocardial infarction. The various guideline committees should seriously reconsider their decision about their endorsement of beta-blockers as first line therapy for uncomplicated hypertension. However, this is applicable for hypertension and beta-blockers continue to be efficacious for other indications.
 ...
PMID:How useful are beta-blockers in cardiovascular disease? 1716 85

Beta-blockers have long being used as first-line therapy for hypertension as their use had resulted in a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in controlled clinical trials. A recent meta-analysis comparing beta-blockers to all other anti-hypertensive drugs taken together has found that stroke reduction was sub-optimal. Specifically, atenolol was associated with a 26% higher risk of stroke compared with other drugs. Several reasons may explain the less favourable outcomes with beta-blocker therapy. These include some adverse metabolic abnormalities such as dyslipidaemia and new-onset diabetes, and less effective reduction of central aortic compared with brachial blood pressure. Newer beta-blockers such as carvedilol or nebivolol are better tolerated. These beta-blockers have a vasodilating effect, which may beneficially affect systolic blood pressure in the aorta. Their long-term cardiovascular outcome in hypertension is still not known. Further studies would be required to show that stroke is adequately reduced by these newer beta-blockers. In conclusion, beta-blockers should not be the first drugs of choice in the management of uncomplicated hypertension. They may be used in addition to other antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure goals. However, in patients with angina pectoris, a previous myocardial infarction, heart failure and certain dysrhythmias, beta-blockers still play an important role.
 ...
PMID:Should beta-blockers still be used as initial antihypertensive agents in uncomplicated hypertension? 1807 10

Beta-blockers were documented to reduce reinfarction rate more than 3 decades ago and subsequently touted as being cardioprotective for a broad spectrum of cardiovascular indications such as hypertension, diabetes, angina, atrial fibrillation as well as perioperatively in patients undergoing surgery. However, despite lowering blood pressure, beta-blockers have never shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated hypertension. Also, beta-blockers do not prevent heart failure in hypertension any better than any other antihypertensive drug class. Beta-blockers have been shown to increase the risk on new onset diabetes. When compared with nondiuretic antihypertensive drugs, beta-blockers increase all-cause mortality by 8% and stroke by 30% in patients with new onset diabetes. Beta-blockers are useful for rate control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation but do not help restore sinus rhythm or have antifibrillatory effects in the atria. Beta-blockers provide symptomatic relief in patients with chronic stable angina but do not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction. Adverse effects of beta-blockers are common including fatigue, dizziness, depression and sexual dysfunction. However, beta-blockers remain a cornerstone in the management of patients having suffered a myocardial infarction and for patients with heart failure. Thus, recent evidence argues against universal cardioprotective properties of beta-blockers but attest to their usefulness for specific cardiovascular indications.
 ...
PMID:Cardioprotection with beta-blockers: myths, facts and Pascal's wager. 1970 92