Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0000737 (abdominal pain)
 31,184 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

As no adequate comparison of these widely used drugs has been made, we have performed a double-blind cross-over trial in 30 individuals with chronic diarrhea. Each underwent three randomized treatment periods of 4 wk duration. Patients were instructed to increase the daily dose gradually until control was achieved or side effects became intolerable. Stool frequency, consistency, urgency, and incontinence were then compared when a stable dose was reached. Though 2.3 capsules (4.6 mg) of loperamide, 2.3 capsules (103.5 mg) of codeine and 2.5 capsulses (12.5 mg) of diphenoxylate all reduced stool frequency to the same extent, diphenoxylate was significantly less effective in producing a solid stool. Before treatment 95% of patients experienced urgency, sometimes associated with fecal incontinence, often as their major diability. Loperamide and codeine were more effective in relieving this than was diphenoxylate. Side effects, particularly central nervous effects, were greatest with diphenoxylate and least with loperamide. Approximately equal numbers discontinued each preparation; poor control and central-nervous-system side effects were the usual reasons for stopping diphenoxylate and codeine, and abdominal pain and constipation for stopping loperamide. We conclude that both loperamide and codeine phosphate are superior to diphenoxylate in the symptomatic treatment of chronic diarrhea.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind cross-over study comparing loperamide, codeine and diphenoxylate in the treatment of chronic diarrhea. 700 6

Loperamide oxide was compared with placebo for the treatment of chronic diarrhoea in patients with Crohn's disease. After initially receiving 2 mg loperamide oxide or placebo, hospital out-patients with Crohn's disease were instructed to take one tablet of loperamide oxide (1 mg) or placebo after passage of each unformed stool in a 1-week double-blind investigation. Patients who responded to this treatment by passing less than three unformed stools per 24 h continued to receive the drug, twice daily, for a further week. At the end of the initial 1-week treatment phase both the investigator's and the patients' global evaluations of efficacy were significantly in favour of the active treatment (P = 0.025 and P = 0.020, respectively). The investigator's assessment of the change in abdominal pain was significant for loperamide oxide (P = 0.020) but not for placebo. Improvements in patient-rated severity of diarrhoea were significantly greater for loperamide oxide than for placebo (P = 0.046). The mean daily dose of loperamide oxide was 2.7 mg. During the second week, both the investigator's and the patients' assessments of global efficacy and symptom improvement continued to favour loperamide oxide though the differences were not significant. Adverse events were rare. The results suggest that loperamide oxide (3 mg/per day) provides a safe and effective treatment for the chronic diarrhoea associated with Crohn's disease.
 ...
PMID:Loperamide oxide for the treatment of chronic diarrhoea in Crohn's disease. 852 76

Loperamide was used to provide a source of opioid-induced constipation in healthy volunteers. Each volunteer took a sequence of three dose levels of loperamide. One of three laxatives was used to counterbalance the effect of loperamide and restore bowel function to what the individual considered normal at each stage before the dose of loperamide was increased. Lactulose, senna, and codanthrusate were selected as examples of a softening, a stimulant, and a combination laxative, respectively. Outcome measures were the doses of laxative used, stool form and frequency, ease of defecation, a rating scale of subjective bowel function, and the occurrence of adverse effects. Each laxative was taken by ten volunteers, and all proved capable of maintaining normal bowel function. A combination of stimulant and softening laxatives was most likely to maintain normal bowel function at the lowest dose and least adverse effects. The mean final dose of lactulose was excessive for use in ill patients. Senna was associated with significantly more adverse effects than the other laxatives, mainly abdominal pain (P < 0.001). This model of constipation may provide a standardized means of assaying the clinical effectiveness of oral laxatives.
 ...
PMID:A volunteer model for the comparison of laxatives in opioid-related constipation. 893 40

Because treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients can be frustrating to the clinician and patient as well, the physician should strive to gain the patient's confidence with a concise, appropriate work-up and by offering reassurance and education that IBS is a functional disorder without significant long-term health risks. First-line treatment should be aimed at treating the most bothersome symptom. Tricyclic antidepressants are superior to placebo in reducing abdominal pain scores, as well as improving global symptom severity. Loperamide is superior to placebo in managing IBS-associated diarrhea. Whereas fiber has a role in treating constipation, its value for IBS or, specifically, in the relief of abdominal pain or diarrhea associated with IBS is controversial. Although certain antispasmodics have demonstrated superiority over placebo in managing abdominal pain, none of these agents are available in the United States. Probiotic therapy using Lactobacillus plantarum has demonstrated superiority to placebo in improving pain, regulating bowel habits, and decreasing flatulence. As studied in a recent placebo-controlled prospective study, Chinese herbal medicines significantly improved bowel symptom scores and global symptom profile, and reduced IBS-related quality of life impairment. Some of the most promising emerging therapies in IBS revolve around targeted pharmacotherapeutic modulation of serotonin receptors (ie, 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 subtypes), which are involved in sensory and motor functions of the gut. Other investigational agents that are also being explored include cholecystokinin antagonists, alpha2-adrenergic agonists (eg, clonidine), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (eg, citalopram), and neurokinin antagonists. IBS is best understood through the biopsychosocial paradigm, and therefore, its effective management requires a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach based on patient education and reassurance, enhanced by diet recommendations and lifestyle modifications, and complemented by pharmacotherapy and psychosocial intervention in more severe cases.
 ...
PMID:Irritable Bowel Syndrome. 1209 74

Anticholinergics and prokinetics are mainstays of therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) patients despite their limited efficacy and troublesome side-effect profile. The clinical limitations of these drugs are a result of their relative broad and nonspecific pharmacologic interaction with various receptors. Recent advances in gut physiology have led to the identification of various receptor targets that may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of IBS. Medicinal chemists searching for safe and effective IBS therapies are now developing compounds targeting many of these specific receptors. The latest generation of anticholinergics, such as zamifenacin, darifenacin, and YM-905, provide selective antagonism of the muscarinic type-3 receptor. Tegaserod, a selective 5-HT4 partial agonist, tested in multiple clinical trials, is effective in reducing the symptoms of abdominal pain, bloating, and constipation. Ezlopitant and nepadudant, selective antagonists for neurokinin receptors type 1 and type 2, respectively, show promise in reducing gut motility and pain. Loperamide, a mu (mu) opioid receptor agonist, is safe and effective for IBS patients with diarrhea (IBS-D) as the predominant bowel syndrome. Fedotozine, a kappa (kappa) opioid receptor agonist, has been tried as a visccral analgesic in various clinical trials with conflicting results. Alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in IBS-D patients but incidents of ischemic colitis seen in post-marketing follow-up resulted its removal from the market. Compounds that target cholecystokinin. A, N-methyl-D-aspartate, alpha 2-adrenergic, and corticotropin-releasing factor receptors are also examined in this review.
 ...
PMID:Irritable bowel syndrome neuropharmacology. A review of approved and investigational compounds. 1218 41

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains a therapeutic challenge in part because of the limited understanding of the pathophysiology. The placebo response rate varies in randomized controlled trials from 20 to 70%, and can persist for up to at least 1 year. It is contentious whether dietary fibre and bulking agents relieve the symptoms of IBS; constipation probably improves. Anticholinergic and antispasmodic agents are of questionable benefit in IBS despite positive meta-analyses of poor quality trials. A meta-analysis concluded that the tricyclic antidepressants were superior to placebo in IBS, although the individual trial results were variable. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are of uncertain benefit. Laxatives are used for constipation but probably poorly control the IBS symptom complex. Loperamide is superior to placebo in improvement of diarrhoea but not abdominal pain in IBS. Tegaserod is a well- tolerated aminoguanidine indole derivative of serotonin that is a partial 5HT4-receptor agonist with prokinetic properties; a therapeutic gain over placebo of 5% to 15% has been observed in constipation-predominant IBS in females. Alosetron is a 5HT3-receptor antagonist that is efficacious in females with diarrhoea-predominant IBS, with a 12% to 17% therapeutic gain; the risk of ischaemic colitis is 1 in 350, with very severe constipation occurring in about 1 in 1000. Optimizing study design remains a challenge in IBS. New visceral analgesic and motility modifying agents, as well as anti-inflammatory agents are in trials, and hopefully additional efficacious therapeutic options for patients with IBS will soon emerge.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of drug treatment in irritable bowel syndrome. 1296 80

The symptomatic management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia, which often overlap, can be frustrating and difficult. Education and reassurance remain central for management although controlled trials are lacking. Psychological interventions may be useful in select patients but methodological inadequacies in clinical trials limit their interpretability. For symptom exacerbations, drug treatment is reasonable but no current treatment successfully targets the full symptom complex. Bulking agents are not of proven efficacy in IBS; they may improve constipation but worsen bloating and pain. Anticholinergics are of uncertain value in IBS. A meta-analysis of trials of smooth muscle relaxants for IBS has been reported to be positive but the quality of the trials included was poor. Antidepressants for IBS and functional dyspepsia appear to be efficacious based on the limited published evidence; both global symptoms and abdominal pain improve. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are of uncertain efficacy but anecdotally appear to be useful. Laxatives are not of proven efficacy in IBS. Loperamide improves diarrhea, but not abdominal pain in IBS. No drug is of proven efficacy for bloating. Acid suppression remains the mainstay of therapy for functional dyspepsia but the majority of patients do not have an adequate response. Promising drugs include new prokinetics for constipation-predominant IBS (e.g., tegaserod, a partial 5-HT4 agonist, prucalopride, a full 5-HT4 agonist, and dexloxiglumide, a cholecystokinin1 antagonist), agents for diarrhea-predominant IBS (e.g., 5-HT3 antagonists, alpha2 receptor agonists and corticotrophin receptor-1 antagonists), other visceral analgesics (e.g. tachykinin antagonists, opioid agonists) and in dyspepsia fundus relaxing agents (e.g., 5-HT1 agonists, tegaserod).
 ...
PMID:New and emerging treatments for irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia. 1598 38

Wood creosote, the principal ingredient in Seirogan, has a long history as a known gastrointestinal microbicidal agent. When administered orally, the intraluminal concentration of wood creosote is not sufficiently high to achieve this microbicidal effect. Through further animal tests, we have shown that antimotility and antisecretory actions are the principal antidiarrheal effects of wood creosote. Wood creosote inhibits intestinal secretion induced by enterotoxins by blocking the Cl(-) channel on the intestinal epithelium. Wood creosote also decreases intestinal motility accelerated by mechanical, chemical, or electrical stimulus by the inhibition of the Ca(2+) influx into the smooth muscle cells. In this overview, the antimotility and antisecretory effects of wood creosote are compared with those of loperamide. Wood creosote was observed to inhibit stimulated colonic motility, but not normal jejunal motility. Loperamide inhibits normal jejunal motility, but not stimulated colonic motility. Both wood creosote and loperamide inhibit intestinal secretion accelerated by acetylcholine. Wood creosote was found to have greater antisecretory effects in the colon than loperamide. Based upon these findings, we conclude that the antidiarrheal effects of wood creosote are due to both antisecretory activity in the intestine and antimotility in the colon, but not due to the microbicidal activity as previously thought. Wood creosote was found to have no effects on normal intestinal activity. These conclusions are supported by the results of a recent clinical study comparing wood creosote and loperamide, which concluded that wood creosote was more efficacious in relieving abdominal pain and comparable to loperamide in relieving diarrhea.
 ...
PMID:New views on antidiarrheal effect of wood creosote: is wood creosote really a gastrointestinal antiseptic? 1632 39

Irritable bowel syndrome affects 10 to 15 percent of the U.S. population to some degree. This condition is defined as abdominal pain and discomfort with altered bowel habits in the absence of any other mechanical, inflammatory, or biochemical explanation for these symptoms. Irritable bowel syndrome is more likely to affect women than men and is most common in patients 30 to 50 years of age. Symptoms are improved equally by diets supplemented with fiber or hydrolyzed guar gum, but more patients prefer hydrolyzed guar gum. Antispasmodic agents may be used as needed, but anticholinergic and other side effects limit their use in some patients. Loperamide is an option for treatment of moderately severe diarrhea. Antidepressants have been shown to relieve pain and may be effective in low doses. Trials using alosetron showed a clinically significant, although modest, gain over placebo, but it is indicated only for women with severe diarrhea-predominant symptoms or for those in whom conventional treatment has failed. Tegaserod has an advantage over placebo in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome; it is indicated for up to 12 weeks of treatment in women. However, postmarketing reports of severe diarrhea and ischemic colitis further limit its use. Herbal therapies such as peppermint oil also may be effective in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Therapies should focus on specific gastrointestinal dysfunctions (e.g., constipation, diarrhea, pain), and medications only should be used when nonprescription remedies do not work or when symptoms are severe.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. 1722 1

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder that can present with a wide array of symptoms that make treatment difficult. Current therapies are directed at relieving symptoms of abdominal pain or discomfort, bloating, constipation, and diarrhea. Pharmacologic agents used to treat IBS-associated pain include myorelaxants, peppermint oil, and peripherally acting opiates. Dicyclomine and hyoscyamine, the two myorelaxants available in the United States, have not been proven effective in reducing abdominal pain in patients with IBS. The efficacy of peppermint oil is debated, but methodological problems with existing studies preclude definitive judgment. Loperamide is ineffective for relief of abdominal pain. For IBS patients with excessive abdominal bloating, a small number of studies suggest that bacterial eradication with gut-directed antibiotics and bacterial reconstitution with nonpathogenic probiotics may reduce flatulence. For constipation-predominant (C-IBS) symptoms, current treatment options include fiber supplementation, polyethylene glycol, and tegaserod. Soluble fibers (ispaghula, calcium polycarbophil, psyllium) are more effective than insoluble fibers (wheat bran, corn fiber) in alleviating global symptoms and relieving constipation, although fiber in general has marginal benefit in treatment of overall IBS symptoms. Polyethylene glycol increases bowel frequency in chronic constipation, but its overall efficacy against IBS is unclear. Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) agonist, demonstrates superiority over placebo in improving bowel frequency and stool consistency and alleviating abdominal pain and bloating in women with C-IBS. Overall global symptoms are modestly improved with tegaserod when compared with placebo. Additional agents under investigation for C-IBS include the ClC(2) chloride channel opener lubiprostone, mu-opioid receptor antagonist alvimopan, and 5-HT(4) agonist renzapride. For diarrhea-predominant (D-IBS) symptoms, available therapies include loperamide, alosetron, and clonidine. Alosetron, a 5-HT(3) antagonist, is superior to placebo for reducing bowel frequency, improving stool consistency, and relieving abdominal pain in women with D-IBS. However, alosetron is available under a restricted license because of concerns for ischemic colitis and severe constipation necessitating colectomy. Clonidine may be helpful in alleviating global symptoms for D-IBS patients.
 ...
PMID:Current gut-directed therapies for irritable bowel syndrome. 1683 50


1 2 Next >>