Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0000737 (abdominal pain)
 31,184 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy using an implantable reservoir was used for 22 patients with liver metastasis from September 1986 to March 1990. The material consisted of 8 subjects with gastric cancer and 14 with colorectal cancer. One had metastasis in one lobe (H1), 10 had a few scattered metastases in both lobes (H2) and 11 had numerous metastases in both lobes (H3). In 5 cases, a reservoir was implanted to prevent the recurrence after hepatectomy. Infusion catheter was placed in the proper hepatic artery in 5 cases via the gastroduodenal artery at laparotomy and it was carried out subcutaneously via the femoral artery in 17 cases. In all cases intra-arterial infusion of 5-FU was continuously administered followed by intermittent one shot injection of ADM. The clinical effectiveness of the therapy was well evaluated. One-year cumulative survival rate of all cases by Kaplan-Meier method was 55% and that of H2 cases was 78%. No recurrence was noted in post hepatectomy cases. Eight cases (36.3%) showed remarkable complications, which made it impossible to continue intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy: hepatic artery occlusion (3 cases), infection (2 cases), abdominal pain (1 case), hematoma in the implanted site (1 case) and dislocation of the infusion catheter (1 case). From the present study, it is considered that intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy is a useful procedure for the control of liver metastasis. Regimens for improved chemotherapy and the maintenance of more useful and safer catheters should therefore be investigated for further development of the therapeutical estimation.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation and problem of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy of liver metastasis from digestive organ cancer]. 211 5

Fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin display marked therapeutic synergy in preclinical models and are effective in the treatment of a number of solid tumors when combined and administered intravenously (IV). Each drug has also been administered intraperitoneally (IP) and displays a favorable pharmacologic profile and acceptable clinical toxicity. We therefore undertook a phase I study to determine the feasibility and toxicity of combination IP chemotherapy with these agents. Thirty-one patients with histologically documented malignancy confined to the peritoneal space were treated with cisplatin 90 mg/m2 mixed with 5-FU in 2 L of lactated Ringer's solution and given IP for 4 hours every 28 days. Cohorts of at least three patients received starting 5-FU concentrations ranging from 5 mmol/L (1,300 mg in 2 L) to 20 mmol/L. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia with a median granulocyte nadir of 156 cells per microliter occurring at a 5-FU dose of 20 mmol/L. Intrapatient escalation of the 5-FU dose was permitted and 15 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered at 5-FU concentrations greater than 20 mmol/L, the highest concentration being 30.7 mmol/L (8 g of 5-FU in 2L). Other toxicities included mild to moderate nausea during all cycles of therapy, vomiting in 54% of cycles, and diarrhea in 15% of cycles. Abdominal pain, renal dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy, and oral mucositis occurred infrequently and were not related to the 5-FU dose. Peritoneal fluid and plasma 5-FU concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in selected patients. Mean peak plasma 5-FU concentrations ranged from 6.19 mumol/L to greater than 60 mumol/L, and peritoneal fluid to plasma 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) ratios ranged from 85 to 1,150. Nine of 15 patients with nonbulky disease had resolution of malignant ascites or at least a 50% reduction of peritoneal studding by tumor at repeat laparotomy. We conclude that combination IP chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU is technically feasible and has acceptable clinical toxicity and a favorable pharmacologic profile. The recommended starting 5-FU dose for phase II trials is 3,900 mg mixed with 90 mg/m2 of cisplatin in 2 L of isotonic fluid.
 ...
PMID:Phase I clinical and pharmacologic study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and fluorouracil in patients with advanced intraabdominal cancer. 223 Aug 97

Twenty patients with primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) treated by hepatic arterial embolization in our department from Dec. 1986 to Mar. 1987 are reported. There were 15 males and 5 females. The ages ranged from 34 to 75 years with an average of 50.7. Preoperative diagnosis and localization of the tumor were done by AFP, B-us, CT and angiography (right lobe 15 cases, left lobe 1 case, both lobes 4 cases). Celiac and superior mesenteric angiography was carried out by femoral artery approach and then highly selective hepatic catheterization was utilized for hepatic arterial embolization. Antitumor agent (5-Fu, adriamycin), iophendylate and foamy gel sponge were used for peripheral and proximal embolization. Manifestations were improved in most of the patients after embolization, such as relief of abdominal pain, improvement of appetite, decrease of tumor size. Total necrosis of the tumor was found in 2 patients who underwent surgery 1 month after embolization. The side effects of the posthepatic embolization such as, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and fever could be relieved by symptomatic treatment. No severe complications, such as gangrene of the gall bladder, hepatic failure, liver abscess, intestinal necrosis or pulmonary embolization were found except 3 patients who died of renal failure after the procedure. The liver dys-function returned to normal within 2 weeks. Hepatic arterial embolization provides an alternative treatment for the patients with PHC who has compensated liver function without severe systemic diseases, especially renal endocrine problems and severe portal hypertension. They should have patent portal system as proved by angiography. The authors considered that this therapeutic embolization with hepatic chemotherapy infusion is safe and effective in the management of PHC. It may increase the resectability and provide palliative means for the advanced and terminal cases.
 ...
PMID:[Hepatic artery embolization for primary hepatic carcinoma]. 255 66

Continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy is associated with a significantly greater tumor response rate, though patients must be hospitalized for a long time. This paper describes techniques and our experience with arterial continuous infusion chemotherapy for outpatients using implantable port and ambulatory pump. Eleven patients (liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and local recurrence of rectal cancer) were treated with continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy at our outpatient clinic. The chemotherapy infusions were carried out repeatedly for 5.7 months on average (10-2 months) with 5-FU or CDDP. Total periods of infusions were 64.8 days on the average (136-24 days). The infusion dose and frequency of drug refilling were limited by pump quality. A major complication occurred only in one patient who developed arterial thrombosis. Minor complications were mainly gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting) and abdominal pain, which were easily corrected with drugs. The tumor responses were as follows: PR 1 case, MR 1 case, NC 7 cases and PD 2 cases. Home arterial continuous infusion chemotherapy reduced the hospitalized period and helped patients return to work. Therefore it may well contribute to improve the quality of life of cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:[Continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy in cancer cases followed as outpatients]. 278 3

Twenty-seven patients with ovarian cancer who had failed combination chemotherapy were offered intraperitoneal (IP) fluorouracil (5-FU) as salvage therapy in an attempt to ascertain the efficacy of such a therapeutic method. All patients had minimal residual epithelial cancer. The median number of treatment cycles was six. Major problems with dialysate inflow and egress occurred in ten patients and required discontinuation of therapy. An additional ten patients experienced hematologic toxicity with a median nadir WBC of 2,300/microL. Therapy was altered but not discontinued because of this complication. Other adverse sequelae, such as abdominal pain, were manageable with medication. IP 5-FU is technically feasible on a multiinstitutional basis in residual ovarian cancer, but its therapeutic role remains to be defined.
 ...
PMID:Adverse effects of intraperitoneal fluorouracil in patients with optimal residual ovarian cancer after second-look laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. 292 71

Fifteen patients, median age 64 years, presenting with advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas, were included in this study. The treatment combination consisted of folinic acid (200 mg/m2, IV bolus injection) followed by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 400 mg/m2, 30-min infusion) for 5 consecutive days and mitomycin C (10 mg/m2, IV bolus injection) on day 1, the therapy being resumed every 21 days. An objective response was noted in 7 of 15 patients (47%): 1 complete and 6 partial responses, including 4 of 5 patients who had received no prior chemotherapy and 3 of 10 patients who previously failed to respond to 5-FU. Objective responses were encountered in 4 of 7 stomach cancers, 2 of 3 pancreas tumors, and in only 1 of 5 colorectal carcinomas. Furthermore, 9 of 11 patients were completely relieved of their abdominal pain. The median duration of remission was 5 months. The median survival time of patients who responded to treatment was 7 months. Toxicity was acceptable, with mainly leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia (5 patients) and oral mucositis (3 patients), leading to dose reduction. The combination of 5-FU+ folinic acid + mitomycin C appears to be a potentially effective regimen in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal tumors, even in patients previously treated with 5-FU.
 ...
PMID:5-Fluorouracil, high-dose folinic acid, and mitomycin C combination chemotherapy in advanced gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. A pilot study. 313 20

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TAE) and hepatic arterial infusion using totally implantable reservoir were performed for the treatment of liver metastasis of colo-rectal cancers, and their therapeutic effects, side effects and complications were evaluated. Eleven cases of H1 (metastasis in one lobe only), 7 cases of H2 (a few scattered metastases in both lobes), 12 cases of H3 (numerous metastases in both lobes) were entered into the study and underwent TAE 45 times. Gel foam, Ivaron and Lipiodol were used as embolic materials in combination with chemotherapeutic agents such as mitomycin C and adriamycin. Serum CEA level was decreased less than 50% of pre-TAE level 20 out of 32 (61%). The tumor size was regressed in 25% of TAE cases which were evaluated on the basis of CT scan. Abdominal symptoms including abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting and fever, leukocytosis, elevated GOT, LDH and bilirubin level were seen after TAE therapy. Median survival of H1, H2 and H3 cases were 21 months, 8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. Another 21 cases (H1, 5 cases: H2, 3 cases: H3, 13 cases) of liver metastasis of colo-rectal cancers were treated with selective hepatic arterial infusion therapy using totally implantable reservoir. Reservoir catheters were implanted into hepatic artery via gastroduodenal artery under direct vision at laparotomy. Mitomycin C, adriamycin and fluorouracil (5-FU) were used as chemotherapeutic agents. No particular side effect such as leukopenia or liver dysfunction was noted. Median survival of H1, H2 and H3 cases treated with arterial infusion were 4 months, 9 months and 9 months, respectively. Median survival of TAE cases and arterial infusion cases was 10 and 6 months, respectively. Thus, the survival rate of cases treated with TAE was better than that of cases treated with arterial infusion.
 ...
PMID:[Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and selective hepatic arterial infusion using totally implantable reservoir]. 341 58

A Phase I trial of intraperitoneally administered 5-FU and citrovorum factor was performed in eight patients with a variety of malignancies. Both drugs were given according to a single weekly dose schedule in a volume estimated to be 2000 cc, including residual ascites. Citrovorum factor 50 mg was given first, immediately followed by 5-FU 1000-3400 mg, according to a dose-escalating schedule. Myelosuppression proved to be the dose-limiting toxicity, though mucositis, diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal pain were also produced. Six patients failed to respond to therapy. One patient with malignant mesothelioma showed a significant decrease in the production of malignant ascites and a transient conversion of peritoneal fluid cytologies from positive to negative, while a second patient with pancreatic cancer showed conversion of peritoneal fluid cytologies from positive to negative and demonstrated an objective partial response of an hepatic metastasis. Dosage adjustment according to body surface area would seem indicated by the toxicity data, with a 5-FU dose of 1200 mg/m2 body surface area and citrovorum factor 50 mg/m2 being recommended for Phase II trials of this combination of drugs given according to this weekly schedule.
 ...
PMID:Phase I trial of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and citrovorum factor. 348 98

Clinical studies were prospectively conducted to quantitate the toxic side-effects of 5-FU administered by either the intravenous (i.v.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) route. Sixty-six patients were treated following resection of a primary large bowel cancer after randomization to receive 5-FU by i.p. or i.v. routes. In both groups of patients, the dose of drug was increased a fixed amount until a toxic response occurred. At this point, the dose of drug was maintained or reduced in an attempt to complete 12 monthly treatment cycles of chemotherapy. The overall mean dose of drug administered by the i.p. route (1,479 mg) was significantly greater than given i.v. (1,019 mg), as it was for each treatment cycle. The primary adverse side-effect, resulting in drug dose stabilization or reduction, was leukocyte suppression of i.v. 5-FU or physical symptoms (abdominal pain or discomfort) for i.p. 5-FU (p2 = 0.0006 and p2 = 0.0318, respectively). The most frequent symptom reported by all patients was fatigue. Even though i.v. 5-FU dose was titrated to reduce toxicity, the nadir leukocyte count was suppressed over all cycles. The total numbers of immediate and delayed serious complications that resulted from i.v. or i.p. 5-FU were similar, although the nature of these complications differed markedly between the two routes of drug administration. Failure to complete 5-FU chemotherapy was significantly more common if patients received i.v. 5-FU plus pelvic irradiation. These studies indicate that intraperitoneal 5-FU administration decreases systemic drug effects even when the i.p. drug dose is increased to cause local toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Toxicity studies of adjuvant intravenous versus intraperitoneal 5-FU in patients with advanced primary colon or rectal cancer. 377 3

A phase II study of ip 5-FU was performed in 14 patients with ovarian cancer who were refractory to systemic chemotherapy including prior iv 5-FU in 12 of the patients. 5-FU was administered via a semipermanent Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. The starting concentration of 5-FU in the dialysate was 4 mM. The patients received eight consecutive 2-L exchanges, each of 4-hour duration, for a total of 36 hours including time for instillation and drainage. Treatment courses were repeated every 2 weeks for six cycles or until disease progression occurred. A total of 69 cycles of ip 5-FU were administered to 14 patients. There was one complete response to therapy documented by second-look laparotomy. While the response rate was only 7%, in seven of eight (88%) patients with small volume disease (tumor masses less than 2.0 cm in diameter), there was no evidence for disease progression while receiving ip 5-FU therapy. In this phase II trial, the major toxic effect of ip 5-FU was abdominal pain. While there were no cases of documented bacterial peritonitis, all of the patients experienced some degree of abdominal discomfort while receiving therapy. Fifty percent of the patients had severe abdominal pain with at least one cycle of therapy. Other toxic effects included myelosuppression, mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and skin rash. The results of this study indicate that ip 5-FU should be further evaluated in patients with ovarian cancer who have a small volume of disease and who have not had prior therapy with 5-FU.
 ...
PMID:Phase II trial of 5-FU administered Ip to patients with refractory ovarian cancer. 652 96


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>