Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0000737 (abdominal pain)
 31,184 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Enprostil, a synthetic PGE2, has been shown to have an inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion, a mucoprotective effect and a postprandial lowering effect on gastrin. A double blind randomized study was performed in 80 patients, in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety enprostil (35 mu b.i.d) as compared to cimetidine (400 mg b.i.d) in duodenal ulcer. Healing rates after two, four and six weeks of treatment, as based on endoscopic evaluation, were 35, 72 and 83 p. 100 for enprostil and 45, 73 and 83 p. 100 for cimetidine, respectively. There were no significant differences between treatment groups. The time to relief of nighttime and daytime ulcer pain and antacid consumption were similar in the two groups. The patient's overall subjective assessment was better in the cimetidine group, but this was not confirmed by physicians' opinions. Diarrhea was observed in 7 p. 100 of patients treated by enprostil compared with 5 p. 100 for patients treated by cimetidine. One enprostil treated patient withdrew from the trial prematurely because of abdominal pain. This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of enprostil in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer at the dosage of 35 micrograms twice daily.
 ...
PMID:[Efficacy and tolerability of enprostil in the treatment of duodenal ulcer. Comparison with cimetidine]. 249

Enprostil is a new synthetic prostaglandin E2 with antisecretory and mucosal-protective effects. We compared it with ranitidine in the healing of duodenal ulcer and also examined the subsequent relapse rate. Three hundred thirteen patients were recruited in 15 centers in Europe, of whom 158 were treated with enprostil (E) 35 micrograms twice daily and 155 with ranitidine (R) 150 mg twice daily for up to 6 weeks, using a double-blind method. Patients in both groups were of comparable demography. Healing was significantly quicker with ranitidine. Of patients randomized to treatment, healing (intention-to-treat analysis) at 4 weeks was E 47% and R 69%, and at 6 weeks it was E 66% and R 88%. In patients who met all protocol criteria and completed treatment, healing at 4 weeks was E 58% and R 80%, and at 6 weeks it was E 81% and R 92%. Early relief of pain, both during the day and at night, was significantly quicker with ranitidine. Nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and abdominal pain occurred more often with enprostil. There were no clinically important abnormalities in hematology or biochemistry. Relapse rates were similar. In conclusion, enprostil is not as effective as ranitidine in healing duodenal ulcers.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of enprostil and ranitidine in treatment of duodenal ulcer. 313 3