Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0000737 (
abdominal pain
)
31,184
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Tolcapone is a potent, reversible catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor with both peripheral and central activity. It has been demonstrated to improve motor function and allow levodopa dose reductions in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients who are experiencing either a stable response or motor fluctuations while on levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor therapy. Because striatal dopamine is metabolized by COMT and monoamine oxidase (MAO), central COMT inhibition alone or in combination with MAO inhibition might provide symptomatic benefit for patients not receiving levodopa. We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of tolcapone alone and in combination with oral selegiline in early untreated PD patients. Patients were randomized to receive 200 mg tolcapone three times a day or placebo for the 8 weeks of the study. Open-label oral selegiline (5 mg in the morning and midday) was administered to all patients during the second 4 weeks of the study. There was no difference between treatment groups according to the investigator's assessment of tolerability at week 4. Ninety-five percent of tolcapone-treated patients and 98% of placebo-treated patients experienced excellent or good tolerability during the first 4 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: -10.3, 5.7; p = 0.57). A decrease in tolerability occurred in the tolcapone group during the second 4 weeks of the study following the addition of selegiline. The most commonly reported side effects were diarrhea (31% tolcapone, 7% placebo), nausea (21% tolcapone, 2% placebo), urine discoloration (12% tolcapone, 0% placebo),
dizziness
(12% tolcapone, 5% placebo), headaches (12% tolcapone, 10% placebo), and
abdominal pain
(10% tolcapone, 5% placebo). We did not identify symptomatic benefit associated with tolcapone alone or in combination with oral selegiline in this group of otherwise untreated PD patients.
...
PMID:A pilot evaluation of the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of tolcapone alone and in combination with oral selegiline in untreated Parkinson's disease patients. Tolcapone De Novo Study Group. 968 68
Once-daily trovafloxacin 200 mg was compared with high-dose amoxicillin, 1 g three times daily, given for 7 to 10 days. At end of treatment (day 10), the response was clinically successful (cure + improvement) in 93% of 152 clinically evaluable trovafloxacin patients and in 89% of 160 amoxicillin patients. At study end (day 35), respective rates were 91% and 81% (95% confidence interval: 1.6, 17.6; P=0.01). In evaluable patients with positive baseline radiographs, 93% of trovafloxacin and 88% of amoxicillin patients demonstrated radiological resolution at end of treatment. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae eradication rates were comparable at end of treatment in both treatment groups, but at study end Streptococcus pneumoniae eradication rates were higher in trovafloxacin patients (100% vs 81%). At study end, all four trovafloxacin patients with baseline penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae were clinically cured with pathogen eradication, whereas two of five amoxicillin patients with baseline penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae were clinical failures with pathogen persistence. For patients in whom no pathogen was identified, trovafloxacin was significantly more effective at end of treatment (P=0.096) and study end (P=0.013). Treatment-related adverse events were comparable; the most common were headache, vomiting and
dizziness
in trovafloxacin patients, and diarrhoea. headache and
abdominal pain
in amoxicillin patients.
...
PMID:Trovafloxacin versus high-dose amoxicillin (1 g three times daily) in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. 975 91
Forty-six patients were randomized to receive either 45 or 90-ml oral sodium phosphate (NaP) (Fleet Phospho-Soda), or X-Prep (a Senna preparation) before elective colonoscopy to compare the quality of colon cleansing, ease of preparation, and gastrointestinal intolerance. Before colonoscopy, one of us administered a questionnaire to the patient to assess how well the preparation was tolerated (scale from 1 to 5: 1 = easy, to 5 = unable to finish) and about the presence of four symptoms:
abdominal pain
, nausea, vomiting, and
dizziness
. The quality of colon cleansing was graded by two gastroenterologists (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor), who were unaware of how the patient was prepared or tolerated the preparation. The overall quality of bowel preparation with 90-ml oral NaP was better than with X-Prep and 45-ml NaP (p < 0.01). Patients found preparation with NaP to be easier than X-Prep (p < 0.002). No difference was seen in the incidence of
abdominal pain
, nausea, vomiting or
dizziness
. In the 90-ml NaP group, a significant rise in sodium and chloride occurred. However, increments were not greater than 5%. Hyperphosphatemia was noted with NaP, but was transient, and no concomitant decrease in calcium was seen. We conclude that, in the groups of patients studied, 90-ml NaP is a safe colonic cleansing agent that is better tolerated and more effective than others.
...
PMID:A randomized prospective trial comparing 45 and 90-ml oral sodium phosphate with X-Prep in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. 979 53
Cholinesterase inhibitors are currently the most established treatment strategy in Alzheimer's disease. The treatment effect appears mainly to be symptomatic. Effects on progression of the disease following long term treatment, and possible neuroprotective effects, have been investigated. Delay until nursing home placement has been reported. Three cholinesterase inhibitors, tacrine, donepezil and rivastigmine, are in clinical use. Other cholinesterase inhibitors, such as galantamine (galanthamine), metrifonate, physostigmine, eptastigmine, are currently under clinical evaluation. So far the efficacy appears to be comparable between the various cholinesterase inhibitors; treatment for up to 6 months has produced an improvement in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale -- Cognitive Subscale score (ADAS-cog) of between 1.8 and 4.9 in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Tacrine, donepezil, galantamine and physostigmine are reversible inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase, while metrifonate is considered to be an irreversible inhibitor and rivastigmine a pseudoirreversible inhibitor. Tacrine and physostigmine have lower bioavailability, 17 to 37% and 3 to 8%, respectively, than the other cholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine, galantamine and donepezil (40 to 100%). The elimination half-life is considerably longer for donepezil (70 to 80h) in comparison to most of the other cholinesterase inhibitors (0.3 to 12h). Donepezil is therefore administered once daily in comparison to rivastigmine which is administered twice daily and tacrine which is administered 4 times daily. Simultaneous food intake lowers the plasma concentration of tacrine and reduces the adverse effects of rivastigmine. Drugs like theophylline and cimetidine have been reported to change the pharmacokinetics of tacrine and donepezil. In contrast, concomitant medication with various drugs with rivastigmine does not seem to cause any drug interactions in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Tacrine, donepezil and galantamine are metabolised via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) liver enzymes. Active metabolites are known for tacrine and galantamine. Rivastigmine is not metabolised via CYP enzymes, but via esterases and is excreted in the urine. Tacrine is associated with hepatotoxicity while other cholinesterase inhibitors seem devoid this adverse effect. Increased liver enzyme values have been observed in 49% of patients with Alzheimer's disease treated with tacrine. Rechallenge with tacrine reduces the incidence of elevated liver enzyme levels. Peripheral cholinergic adverse effects are common for the cholinesterase inhibitors, with an incidence ranging between 7 to 30%. For some cholinesterase inhibitors, such as rivastigmine, the cholinergic adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting,
dizziness
, diarrhoea and
abdominal pain
can be reduced by slowing the rate of dose titration.
...
PMID:Cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a comparison of tolerability and pharmacology. 988 90
The efficacy and safety of minocycline was investigated in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had already received more than three disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Minocycline was administered at 100 mg twice a day to fifteen patients with active RA. The drug efficacy was evaluated by the clinical variables including the number of painful and/or swollen joints, the duration of morning stiffness, grip strength, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum concentrations of C-reactive protein, and the titer of rheumatoid factor. Three patients experienced adverse effects such as
dizziness
and
abdominal pain
or discomfort, but only one patient with
abdominal pain
and
dizziness
was discontinued. Fourteen RA patients, who had taken minocycline for at least 6 months, were subjected to the clinical evaluation. Among them, 8 patients (54%) showed a significant improvement of clinical valuables for disease activity, beginning even at 4 weeks of the therapy. The continued effects were observed in 8 patients with over 1 year-minocycline therapy. Intriguingly, an active patient with a history of multiple DMARDs-resistancy showed a marked favorable response to this drug. The present study indicates that minocycline may be an effective DMARD with highly safe performance for patients with active and refractory RA. This is the first demonstration of the benefit of minocycline in the Japanese patients.
...
PMID:[An evaluation of efficacy of minocycline as an anti-rheumatic drug in patients with active and refractory rheumatoid arthritis]. 1004 18
The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride combination therapy for the prophylaxis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in at-risk nonimmune subjects in South Africa. This open-label trial was conducted at research sites in South Africa during the main malaria transmission season, February through July. The study volunteers were temporarily living in, or traveling to, a malaria-endemic area. They received I tablet of 250 mg atovaquone and 100 mg proguanil hydrochloride once daily for up to 10 weeks. Subjects were monitored using sequential clinical and laboratory assessments. Thick blood smears were stained and evaluated by a central laboratory. An immunochromatographic test for P. falciparum was also used for on-site patient management. Prophylactic success was summarized using a 95% confidence interval for the proportion of subjects who did not develop parasitemia or who withdrew due to a treatment-related adverse event. A total of 175 subjects (15% women) were enrolled in the trial. The mean duration of drug exposure was 8.9 weeks. The combination of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride was well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events considered possibly related to study treatment were headache (7%),
abdominal pain
(2%), increased cough (2%), and skin disorder (2%). No serious adverse events were reported, and no treatment-emergent effects were noted for any laboratory variables. One subject who was noncompliant with therapy developed parasitemia, and 3 subjects withdrew due to a treatment-related adverse event (2 subjects with headache and 1 with nausea and
dizziness
). The prophylaxis success rate was 97%. In this study, atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride combination therapy had an excellent safety and efficacy profile for prophylaxis of P. falciparum malaria in nonimmune subjects.
...
PMID:Safety and efficacy of atovaquone and proguanil hydrochloride for the prophylaxis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in South Africa. 1036 39
Eighty United States students in Mexico received either loperamide (an initial dose of 4 mg, followed by 2 mg after passage of each unformed stool, up to 8 mg/d; 40 patients) or loperamide (at the same dosage schedule) plus an oral rehydration therapy (ORT) preparation (500 mL initially, followed by 250 mL after each subsequently passed unformed stool, up to 1,000 mL per 24 hours; 40 patients). The ORT preparation was a modification of the World Health Organization-recommended solution, adjusted to a sodium concentration of 60 mEq/L. All treatments were given for 48 hours. The study demonstrated equivalent clinical responses with regard to diminishment of diarrhea or subjective findings such as
abdominal pain
/cramps, headache, dry mouth,
dizziness
, or thirst. Stool number (by form) and specific gravity of urine postenrollment were similar in the groups. Administration of loperamide plus ORT for the management of traveler's diarrhea, in cases in which subjects were encouraged to drink ad libitum, offered no benefit over administration of loperamide alone.
...
PMID:Oral rehydration therapy plus loperamide versus loperamide alone in the treatment of traveler's diarrhea. 1045 Nov 67
We designed a study to determine the efficacy and safety of amlodipine given once daily in the pediatric population. Twenty-one patients (mean age 13.1 years) with either essential (n=160) or renal (n=5) hypertension, and newly diagnosed (n=15) or poorly controlled or intolerant on existing antihypertensive therapy (n=6), were included. Patients received amlodipine once daily at a starting mean dose of 0.07+/-0.04 mg/kg per day. The total daily dose of amlodipine was increased 25%-50% every 5-7 days if the mean home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) were above the 95th percentile for age and gender. A baseline followed by a repeat 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitor study (ABPM) was performed in 20 patients when the mean HBPM was below the 95th percentile goal. The mean titrated dose required to control BP was 0.29+/-0.11 mg/kg per day for those < 13 years, 0.16+/-0.11 mg/kg per day for those > or = 13 years, 0.23+/-0.14 mg/kg per day for essential, hypertension and 0.24+/-0.13 mg/kg per day for renal hypertension. The ABPM demonstrated that amlodipine provided effective BP control as primary therapy in 14 essential patients. Adverse effects included fatigue (n=6), headache (n=5), facial flushing (n=4),
dizziness
(n=3), edema (n=3),
abdominal pain
(n=3), chest pain (n=2), nausea (n=1), and vomiting (n=1). Quality of life appeared to improve during therapy. Amlodipine was an effective once daily antihypertensive agent with an acceptable safety profile. Higher doses of amlodipine were required for younger patients, and monotherapy was effective in patients with essential hypertension.
...
PMID:Efficacy of amlodipine in pediatric patients with hypertension. 1045 79
A 60-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital in February 1993 due to
dizziness
, dyspnea,
abdominal pain
, and high susceptibility to bleeding. Physical examination revealed livedo reticularis of the foot, but did not detect hepatosplenomegaly. Examination of the peripheral blood detected pancytopenia, leukoerythroblastosis, and tear-drop erythrocytes. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) was diagnosed on the basis of bone marrow biopsy findings. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was confirmed by positive response to anti-cardiolipin antibody and recurrent splenic infarction. Because of factor XIII deficiency, the patient experienced severe gingival bleeding after tooth extraction. Her condition was complicated by mesenteric arterial thromboembolism and she died of sepsis 5 years after onset. Although the incidence of immunopathy in PMF patients is high, few studies to date have focused on APS patients presenting with a variety of severe embolic symptoms. Our patient required careful monitoring due to bleeding tendency and thromboemboli.
...
PMID:[Primary myelofibrosis with fatal mesenteric arterial thromboembolism caused by antiphospholipid syndrome]. 1049 39
Isolated iliac artery aneurysm threatening to rupture is a rare condition with a poor prognosis if not dealt with by the physician in a brisk and effective manner. Symptoms from an iliac aneurysm can masquerade as a range of symptoms from neighbouring organs or be almost asymptomatic before rupturing. A case of a 81 year old man, with symptoms of
dizziness
, fatigue and light lower
abdominal pain
, who developed sudden cardiovascular collapse, is presented.
...
PMID:[Rupture of an isolated iliac aneurysm]. 1068 Apr 75
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>