Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0000737 (abdominal pain)
 31,184 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

BACKGROUND: Major complications of modern bariatric operations are infrequent but can be quite disabling to the patient and pose therapeutic challenges to the surgeon. We present our experience with five patients who underwent gastrectomy for complications following gastric reduction procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 1995, four women and one man, average age 46.8 years (34-66), underwent total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y end-to-side esophagojejunostomy (4), or near-total gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy (1). The decision to perform total gastrectomy was based on the poor quality of the remaining gastric pouch and the surgeon's judgement. Preoperative diagnoses included gastric outlet obstruction secondary to anastomotic ulcer or stricture, gastroesophageal reflux with esophagitis, chronic gastrocutaneous fistula, and iatrogenic linitis secondary to gastric wrap with mesh. Preoperatively, the patients complained of intolerable nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and dysphagia. RESULTS: in the five patients who underwent total or near-total gastrectomy, there was no operative mortality or morbidity; however, one patient (near-total gastrectomy) has required a second operation for pyloroplasty. Although one patient was lost to follow-up 6 months after surgery, the average follow-up for the remaining four patients is 2 years. These four patients were interviewed and all report complete satisfaction with their surgery and much improvement in their symptoms. Presently, they consume an average of three meals per day (range 2-6), with each meal measuring about 2 cups in size. All report the sensation of satiety after meals. All patients receive supplemental iron, B12, and multivitamins. From a nutritional standpoint, there has not been a significant change in the levels of albumin, total protein, hematocrit, weight and BMI since total gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y end-to-side esophagojejunostomy is an appropriate therapy with low morbidity and mortality in highly selected patients with complications resulting from gastric reduction procedures.
 ...
PMID:Gastrectomy for Complications of Bariatric Procedures. 1072 78

Symptoms related to fungal esophagitis were studied in patients with alcoholic liver disease who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Data of 517 patients were studied retrospectively (group I) and 100 alcoholic liver disease patients, that were successively admitted to hospital, were enrolled in the prospective part (group II). Out of the 41 cases with fungal esophagitis found in group I, data of 38 could be evaluated. In group II 13 of the 93 evaluable patients had fungal esophagitis; according to Kodsi's grading 10 patients had grade 1., one patient grade 2. and two patients grade 2-3. oesophagitis. There was no case with grade 4. esophagitis. The rate of symptoms among the 51 patients with fungal esophagitis was: anorexia 23 (45.0%), abdominal pain 22 (43.1%), vomiting 17 (33.3%), nausea 15 (29.4%), occult gastrointestinal bleeding 12 (23.5%), weight loss 9 (17.6%), melena 7 (13.7%), bloating 6 (11.7%), acidic regurgitation 3 (5.8%), haematemesis 2 (3.9%), thoracic pain 2 (3.9%), singultus 1 (1.9%), odynophagia 0 and dysphagia 0. In 7 patients (13.7%) none of the studied symptoms could be identified. Despite the relatively high frequency of symptom free fungal esophagitis reported in the literature, the total lack of odynophagia and dysphagia in our patient group was remarkable. In the lack of deglutition disorders the other symptoms do not raise the suspicion of esophagitis. The diagnosis in such cases can be established only by endoscopy.
 ...
PMID:[Symptoms of fungal esophagitis in alcoholic liver disease]. 1094 8

Anisakis simplex, a fish parasite of the nematode family, typically infects marine mammals such as whales, dolphins and seals. Human anisakiasis, which is acquired by eating raw or insufficiently heated fish or squid, has gained world-wide importance. Infestation with living larvae caused by eating parasitised fish results in acute upper abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting and may be confused with acute abdomen due to appendicitis and other inflammatory abdominal disorders. Extraintestinal organ manifestations are rare. Endoscopically, inflammation, oedema, erosions and ulcerations may be found. The parasite can been found in up to 50% of patients. Histologically, an eosinophilic inflammation is typical. Acute anisakiasis may be prevented by thorough cooking or deep-freezing the parasitised fish for at least 48 h. IgG-antibodies specific for Anisakis simplex are thought to represent an immunological host reaction against parasitic antigens. More recently, allergic reactions to Anisakis ingestion or exposure, such as urticaria, anaphylaxis and even occupational asthma, have been reported. These allergic reactions may also occur when the fish has been properly cooked, and hence these allergens are thought to be heat-stable. Such cases may be diagnosed by skin tests and the determination of specific Anisakis-IgE. However, the specificity of IgE is low, since they may also be present in exposed asymptomatic individuals. Since the eliciting allergens are temperature-stable, prophylactic dietetic measures are indicated. We report a case from Switzerland acquired during a holiday in Portugal. The patient suffered from recurrent dysphagia and urticaria, and histologically eosinophilic oesophagitis was found. IgG-antibodies and a positive skin prick test to Anisakis simplex support its aetiologic role for the symptoms.
 ...
PMID:[Eosinophilic esophagitis associated with recurrent urticaria: is the worm Anisakis simplex involved?]. 1113 Jan 47

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of pantoprazole are reviewed. Pantoprazole is a gastric hydrogen-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (H+/K(+)-ATPase) inhibitor. It shares the same core structure as other currently available proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). The FDA-labeled indication is the short-term treatment of erosive esophagitis. PPIs act by selectively inhibiting H+/K(+)-ATPase in the secretory canaliculus of the stimulated parietal cell. Understanding the pharmacodynamics of PPIs is more relevant than knowing their pharmacokinetics, since the duration of action depends on the rate of de novo proton-pump regeneration, not the duration of drug circulation in the body. Pantoprazole is well absorbed, undergoes little first-pass metabolism, and has an absolute bioavailability of approximately 77%. Pantoprazole has been evaluated in more than 100 clinical trials involving more than 11,000 patients. It is effective in treating erosive esophagitis and duodenal and gastric ulcers. It is also effective as adjunctive treatment with antimicrobials in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Pantoprazole has been shown to control acid production in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Pantoprazole is well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse effects are headache, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. The recommended oral dosage for erosive esophagitis is 40 mg once a day for up to eight weeks. The recommended i.v. dose is 40 mg given over 15 minutes once a day in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who are unable to take oral medication. Pantoprazole appears to be as safe and effective as other PPIs in acid-related disorders.
 ...
PMID:Pantoprazole. 1140 94

Dyspepsia can describe a subset of children with episodic or persistent abdominal symptoms--often related to feeding--that are thought to be caused by disorders of the proximal part of the digestive tract. Symptoms, such as vomiting, early satiety, postprandial epigastric abdominal pain, heartburn, abdominal fullness, poor weight gain, and/or anorexia, have been incorporated into the definition of dyspepsia. Unfortunately, presenting signs and symptoms in children with dyspepsia are nonspecific and can occur as a result of many diseases, such as parasitic infections, esophagitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, Helicobacter pylori infection, Crohn's disease, biliary tract or hepatic disease, pancreatitis, and lactose intolerance. This lack of specificity makes the evaluation of dyspepsia more difficult. Here, we describe an approach for the evaluation of dyspepsia that correlates in part with the child's presenting symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Techniques for the evaluation of dyspepsia in children. 1141 83

Lansoprazole is an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion and also exhibits antibacterial activity against Helicobacter pylori in vitro. Current therapy for peptic ulcer disease focuses on the eradication of H. pylori infection with maintenance therapy indicated in those patients who are not cured of H. pylori and those with ulcers resistant to healing. Lansoprazole 30 mg combined with amoxicillin 1g, clarithromycin 250 or 500mg, or metronidazole 400 mg twice daily was associated with eradication rates ranging from 71 to 94%, and ulcer healing rates were generally >80% in well designed studies. In addition, it was as effective as omeprazole- or rabeprazole-based regimens which included these antimicrobial agents. Maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg/day was significantly more effective than either placebo or ranitidine in preventing ulcer relapse. Importantly, preliminary data suggest that lansoprazole-based eradication therapy is effective in children and the elderly. In the short-term treatment of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), lansoprazole 15, 30 or 60 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, ranitidine 300 mg/day or cisapride 40 mg/day and similar in efficacy to pantoprazole 40 mg/day in terms of healing of oesophagitis. Lansoprazole 30 mg/day, omeprazole 20 mg/day and pantoprazole 40 mg/day all provided similar symptom relief in these patients. In patients with healed oesophagitis. 12-month maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg/day prevented recurrence and was similar to or more effective than omeprazole 10 or 20 mg/day. Available data in patients with NSAID-related disorders or acid-related dyspepsia suggest that lansoprazole is effective in these patients in terms of the prevention of NSAID-related gastrointestinal complications, ulcer healing and symptom relief. Meta-analytic data and postmarketing surveillance in >30,000 patients indicate that lansoprazole is well tolerated both as monotherapy and in combination with antimicrobial agents. After lansoprazole monotherapy commonly reported adverse events included dose-dependent diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, headache and abdominal pain. After short-term treatment in patients with peptic ulcer, GORD, dyspepsia and gastritis the incidence of adverse events associated with lansoprazole was generally < or = 5%. Similar adverse events were seen in long-term trials, although the incidence was generally higher (< or = 10%). When lansoprazole was administered in combination with amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole adverse events included diarrhoea, headache and taste disturbance. In conclusion, lansoprazole-based triple therapy is an effective treatment option for the eradication of H. pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Preliminary data suggest it may have an important role in the management of this infection in children and the elderly. In the short-term management of GORD, lansoprazole monotherapy offers a more effective alternative to histamine H2-receptor antagonists and initial data indicate that it is an effective short-term treatment option in children and adolescents. In adults lansoprazole maintenance therapy is also an established treatment option for the long-term management of this chronic disease. Lansoprazole has a role in the treatment and prevention of NSAID-related ulcers and the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia; however, further studies are needed to confirm its place in these indications. Lansoprazole has emerged as a useful and well tolerated treatment option in the management of acid-related disorders.
 ...
PMID:Lansoprazole: an update of its place in the management of acid-related disorders. 1169 67

GERD prevalence continues to rise in contrast to peptic ulcer disease. The spectrum contains reflux esophagitis and so-called 'endoscopy-negative GERD' or 'non-erosive GERD' (NERD) or S-GERD and patients with 'normal' overall 24-h esophageal acidification but with a high 'symptom-index'. The majority of reflux patients will not need endoscopy initially. Prompt referral for endoscopy is indicated only if the patient has atypical symptoms or alarm symptoms such as dysphagia, anemia, weight loss, severe abdominal pain, or pain that does not respond to acid neutralization or suppression, or develops symptoms after the age of 50 years. Antireflux therapy consist of raising the head of the bed, maintaining normal weight, and avoidance of foods and drugs that precipitate symptoms, together with antacids or over-the-counter H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs). If symptoms persist after these simple measures or if antacids or H(2)RAs are needed quite often, then a more formal first-line treatment should be started. Many experts feel that a stepdown approach instead of a stepup approach is clinically and economically a more appropriate way of installing such first-line therapy. Physicians increasingly consider prescribing a (low- or standard dose) once-a-day proton pump inhibitor (PPI) as firstline therapy. If symptoms recur after 4-week trial or are in sufficiently relieved, then the patient should be referred for endoscopy. Endoscopy may reveal no abnormalities (NERD) or evidence of reflux-induced damage. Treatment of endoscopy-negative reflux disease should be directed towards rapid relief of symptoms and then maintenance of relief using minimum effective therapy. Responses to PPIs are somewhat lower in endoscopy-negative patients compared to esophagitis. Some form of long-term therapy is needed in the majority of patients. 'On demand' PPI therapy to control reflux symptoms is a new and attractive option. The goal of treatment of GERD should be to relieve symptoms and to heal lesions. Symptom severity and much less endoscopic abnormalities, drives the therapy. When symptoms are mild or intermittent and when esophagitis is absent or minimal, standard dose PPI is usually reinstituted. If there is moderate or severe esophagitis or if symptoms are particularly troublesome, then the patient should start again with standard-dose PPI therapy once a day, but not uncommonly a b.i.d. dosage maybe necessary. Once a dose of the acid suppressant that relieves symptoms is found, this dose should be maintained for a period of 3 months. After this time, an attempt should be made to reduce the dose. A plan should be formulated for long-term treatment.
 ...
PMID:Review article: treatment of mild and severe cases of GERD. 1204 64

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a heterogeneous and uncommon disorder characterized by eosinophilic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tissues. The location and depth of infiltration determine its varied manifestations, and the latter is also the basis for the proposed classification into mucosal, muscular and serosal eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea are each present in nearly 50% of the patients, with some overlap. Peripheral eosinophilia is seen in approximately two-thirds of patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis. It is now clear that eotaxin, a specific eosinophil chemoattractant, plays a pivotal role in the process of eosinophil production. The differential diagnosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis in children includes parasitic infections, inflammatory bowel disease, connective tissue diseases, some malignancies and adverse effects of drugs. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis itself has been strongly associated with food allergies, and concomitant atopic diseases or a family history of allergies is elicited in about 70% of cases. The pediatric experience is unique with respect to recognition of distinctive entities such as allergic procto-colitis, almost exclusively seen in infants, and eosinophilic esophagitis being increasingly reported among children and young adults. The gold standard for diagnosis, usually demonstrated on endoscopic biopsies, is prominent tissue eosinophilia. However, the diagnosis may be obscured by the patchy nature of the disease, and muscular and serosal eosinophilic gastroenteritis subtypes. In the latter cases, full thickness biopsies would be indicated for a definitive diagnosis. There are many reports of successful treatment of eosinophilic gastroenteritis in children, using a variety of treatment regimens including elimination diets. Corticosteroids remain the most effective agents for controlling symptoms, but unfortunately the relapsing nature of the disease would mandate prolonged corticosteroid use. Reports of favorable responses to new leukotriene inhibitors in patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis are encouraging; these responses should stimulate future research on the pathophysiology and management of eosinophilic gastroenteritis.
 ...
PMID:Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: epidemiology, diagnosis and management. 1217 71

Eighty five children with recurrent abdominal pain(RAP) were studied. Organic cause was noticed in 70 cases and non-organic in 15 cases. Giardiasis was the commonest organic cause in 57 (67.0 percent), either alone or with other parasitic infestations. Other organic causes include gallstones (4.7 percent), urinary infections (4.7 percent), esophagitis/gastritis (3.5 percent) and abdominal tuberculosis (2.3 percent). Single parent, school phobia, sibling rivalry, RAP in other family members and nocturnal enuresis are significant factors associated with nonorganic causes
 ...
PMID:Recurrent abdominal pain in children. 1236 27

Alendronate is a potent bisphosphonate that is effective in preventing osteoporotic fractures. Clinical trial data involving over 17,000 women provide a large, placebo-controlled experience from which alendronate has been demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated. We review the safety profile of alendronate in the context of its pharmacology, preclinical information and published literature on bisphosphonates. The clinical data include information from 1) the two primary Phase III osteoporosis treatment studies involving 994 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with alendronate for up to 3 years; 2) upper gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability data (including special subgroup analyses) from the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT), involving 2027 women with prior vertebral fractures; 3) an endoscopy study, and 4) postmarketing experience. Because all bisphosphonates have the potential to irritate the upper GI mucosa, we specifically investigated the safety and tolerability profile with respect to the upper GI tract. In the Phase III trials, alendronate 5 or 10 mg/day was well tolerated, with no increase relative to placebo in the incidence of overall adverse experiences (ie, inclusive of all events, not just those related to the GI tract). In the Phase III trials, alendronate 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day was well tolerated, with no increase relative to placebo in the incidence of overall adverse experiences. The incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse experiences, overall, was similar among alendronate 5 mg or 10 mg and placebo, with abdominal pain and dysphagia being the only individual adverse experiences that were significantly increased (with alendronate 10 mg). Esophageal adverse experiences were uncommon, being reported in 8 (2.0%) patients receiving placebo and 9 (4.6%) patients taking alendronate 10 mg. None of the events occuring on alendronate therapy were serious or resulted in discontinuation. Tolerability was not affected by a wide range of concomitant medications including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Additional analyses of the 2027 postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures enrolled in FIT demonstrated that alendronate use was not associated with a significant increase in upper GI events, esophageal events, or gastroduodenal adverse events, even among women at high risk for upper GI complications (those older than 75 yr, those with previous upper GI disease, or those using NSAIDs). Esophageal adverse experiences (including esophagitis and esophageal ulcers) have been reported with alendronate in postmarketed use. A high proportion of these reports involved patients who did not follow the dosing instructions and probably relate to the irritant potential of refluxed gastric acid containing alendronate. Consistent with the antiresorptive mechanism of action of alendronate, asymptomatic decreases in serum calcium and phosphate were observed with alendronate treatment in the clinical trials. There were no other laboratory changes noted with alendronate. Now marketed in 78 countries and used by over 3 million women, the safety profile of alendronate, when dosed appropriately, has been consistent with that of the clinical trial experience. In view of the increased morbidity and mortality associated with fractures, and the proven efficacy of alendronate to reduce fracture risk, the benefit/risk ratio of alendronate remains highly favourable.
 ...
PMID:The clinical tolerability profile of alendronate. 1266 41


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>