Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: KEGG:D04296 (Asthma)
 25,733 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In response to environmental concerns regarding chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), two new triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) inhalation aerosol (Azmacort Inhalation Aerosol) formulations have been developed using a more environmentally favorable propellant, HFA-134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). This multicenter, open-label study evaluated the safety of switching asthma patients from TAA-CFC to one of two TAA-HFA formulations. After a 2- or 4-week baseline period during which patients received only CFC-containing TAA Inhaler, 552 patients were randomized to receive TAA-HFA 75 or 225 microg for 6 or 12 months. A total of 493 patients completed treatment. Seven patients discontinued because of adverse events and two because of ineffective asthma control. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups, and most events were mild to moderate in severity and were not considered related to study medication. No clinically relevant suppression of the hypophyseal-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis was observed. Pulmonary function tests were not adversely affected by use of either study medication, and improvements were noted in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF25%-75%) throughout the course of treatment. This study confirms that TAA-HFA provides effective, long-term asthma control and can safely be substituted for the currently marketed CFC-containing TAA product.
J Asthma 2000 Apr
PMID:Long-term safety of a non-chlorofluorocarbon-containing triamcinolone acetonide inhalation aerosol in patients with asthma. Azmacort HFA Study Group. 1080 3

This was an open-label, parallel group, randomized, age-stratified, multicenter study designed to compare the safety and efficacy of regular use of albuterol formulated in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA albuterol) and albuterol formulated in chlorofluorocarbons-11/12 (CFC albuterol) in children with asthma. Children age 4-11 years using a short-acting inhaled beta2-agonist for 6 months to manage stable asthma, and with a prestudy forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) of >50% predicted after withholding short-acting inhaled beta2-agonists for at least 6 hr, an increase in FEV1 > or = 12% within 30 min after two puffs of CFC albuterol, and the capability to comply with medication withholding requirements were eligible for study entry. After screening evaluation, patients entered a minimum 7-day run-in period. On study day 1 spirometry and a baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) were performed, pulse and blood pressure were measured, and patients self-administered two puffs of their randomized study drug, either HFA albuterol or CFC albuterol. Serial spirometry was performed over 6 hr after study drug dosing. Pulse and blood pressure were measured just prior to each spirometry and a 12-lead ECG was performed at 60 min postdose. Patients took two puffs of their study drug four times a day for 4 weeks. At study week 4, study day 1 procedures were repeated. Patients maintained a daily diary of morning (A.M.) and evening (P.M.) peak expiratory flow (PEF), daytime asthma symptom scores, nighttime asthma sleep disturbance scores, and study drug use. Demographics and baseline characteristics of the 63 patients randomized to HFA albuterol (33) and CFC albuterol (30) were similar. No significant differences were found between the HFA albuterol and CFC albuterol treatment groups for any of the primary or secondary FEV1 efficacy variables either at study day 1 or study week 4. No significant differences were noted between treatment groups for A.M. and P.M. PEF, individual asthma symptom scores, nighttime asthma sleep disturbance scores, and rescue study drug use over the 4-week study. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups for change from predose in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and 12-lead ECG intervals at either study day 1 or study week 4. Adverse event reporting was similar for the two treatment groups. In this study, with regular use of HFA albuterol in children with asthma, there was a similar safety profile and comparable bronchodilator efficacy as with CFC albuterol.
J Asthma 2000 Dec
PMID:Comparable bronchodilation with hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA) albuterol and chlorofluorocarbons-11/12 (CFC) albuterol in children with asthma. 1119 31

Handling difficulties, such as poor coordination of actuation and inhalation, are common in patients using press and breathe (P&Bs) metered-dose inhalers to administer asthma medication. Although spacers can help overcome some difficulties, the cumbersome nature of these devices often detracts from their use for the administration of rescue medications, where portability is important. This randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study investigated the efficacy, dose-response and safety of HFA-albuterol delivered via a breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device in comparison with the same medication delivered using a conventional P&B device. In total, 39 patients received six study treatments in a random sequence at clinic visits separated by 2-7 days: 2 puffs from a HFA-placebo Autohaler; 1, 2, or 4 puffs from a HFA-albuterol Autohaler; I or 2 puffs from a HFA-albuterol P&B. Both active inhalers delivered 90 microg albuterol base equivalent/actuation from the actuator. The change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and the area under the FEV1 curve (FEV1 AUC) were significantly greater than placebo for all active treatment groups (p < or = 0.01) and were suggestive of a dose response for each inhaler. Examination of the pooled slope of the dose responses for the Autohaler and P&B using Finney's Parallel Line Bioassay Methodology found a highly statistically significant relationship indicating the equivalence of the two inhalers on both parameters (p < or = 0.002). The relative potency of the two inhalers was 0.8 (95% CI: 0.47, 1.46) for the mean change from baseline in FEV1 and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.48) for the change from baseline in FEV1 AUC. There was also a trend toward an increase in the mean percentage change from baseline in FEV1 as the number of puffs increased for both inhalers. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups with regard to time to onset of bronchodilator effect and the duration of effect was significantly greater than placebo (p < or = 0.01) in each of the active groups. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in nature and were of similar incidence (< or = 18% of patients) in each group. This study demonstrates a dose-response for HFA-albuterol on bronchodilation using both the Autohaler and P&B devices and illustrates that, in patients with good coordination of inhalation with actuation, the efficacy and safety of the two inhalers is similar at equivalent doses.
J Asthma 2003
PMID:Efficacy response of inhaled HFA-albuterol delivered via the breath-actuated Autohaler inhalation device is comparable to dose in patients with asthma. 1452 98

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) (44 microg)/salmeterol (21 microg) delivered as two inhalations twice daily via a single hydrofluoroalkane (HFA 134a) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (FSC) with that of placebo HFA 134a (PLA), fluticasone propionate 44 microg chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) alone and salmeterol 21 microg CFC alone (S) in patients (n=360) with persistent asthma previously treated with beta2-agonists (short- or long-acting) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). After 12 weeks of treatment, patients treated with FSC had a significantly greater increase (p < or = 0.006) in mean FEV1 AUC(bl) compared with PLA, FP, or S. At end point, mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV1 for FSC (0.58 L) was significantly (p < or = 0.004) greater than PLA (0.14 L), FP (0.36 L), and S (0.25 L). Patients treated with FSC also had a significantly higher probability of remaining in the study without being withdrawn due to worsening asthma (2%) compared with those in the PLA (29%) and S (25%) groups (p < 0.001). Finally, treatment with FSC resulted in significantly (p < or = 0.007) greater improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, need for rescue albuterol, and asthma symptom scores compared with FP, S, and PLA. The safety profile of FSC was also similar to FP or S alone. Initial maintenance treatment of the two main components of asthma, inflammation, and smooth muscle dysfunction (e.g., bronchoconstriction), with FSC results in greater overall improvements in asthma control compared with treatment of either individual component alone.
J Asthma 2004
PMID:Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA 134A MDI in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. 1564 29

Cromolyn sodium (Intal) has been available in the United States to treat asthma for more than 30 years. Its clinical efficacy in patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma is well documented, and its extensive clinical record of safety remains unique among antiasthma medications. The history of cromolyn sodium complements the science behind current understanding of asthma pathophysiology. Cromolyn sodium was the first nonsteroid, antiasthma drug that blocked chemical mediator release at the cellular level. However, the younger generation of health care providers may not be familiar with the medication due to the plethora of antiasthma agents that have recently become available. This review reexamines the role of cromolyn sodium (now available as an HFA aerosol) in the treatment of asthma.
J Asthma 2005 Mar
PMID:Cromolyn sodium: fitting an old friend into current asthma treatment. 1587 38

Inflammation in asthma extends into the small airways (< 2 mm diameter). Most inhaled corticosteroids are suspensions with a particle size > 2 mm. Therefore, inflammation in the small airways of patients with asthma may not be adequately treated with these preparations. Some inhaled corticosteroids, on the other hand, are compounded with alcohol, resulting in a solution producing an aerosol that has a mean particle diameter of < 2 mm. This study was designed to compare the addition of equivalent amounts of two inhaled corticosteroids (one a suspension and one a solution) to the treatment of patients with asthma, which was uncontrolled despite treatment with moderate to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and usually additional controller medications. The study was performed with 30 patients, > or = 18 years of age. Subjects were randomized in a single-blind fashion to receive, in addition to their current asthma therapy, either CFC-FP 220 microg each morning and 110 microg each evening (n = 10) or HFA-BDP 160 mcg twice daily (n = 20). Pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry, single breath nitrogen washout for closing volume and residual volume by plethysmography were assessed before and after 3 months of therapy. In the subjects who received HFA-BDP, the ratio of closing volume (CV) to vital capacity (VC) and residual volume (RV) decreased significantly (p = 0.0214 and 0.0433, respectively), whereas forced expiratory flow over 25-75% of the vital capacity (FEF25-75%), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and morning peak flow improved significantly (p = 0.0014, 0.0184, and 0.0321). Improvements from baseline of CV, CV/VC, and postbronchodilator FEF25-75%, were statistically significant in the HFA-BDP group compared with the CFC-FP group (p = 0.0049, 0.0194, and 0.0355, respectively). These preliminary findings suggest that the addition of HFA-BDP, compared with CFC-FP in patients with poorly controlled asthma despite receiving moderate to high doses of inhaled steroids, has a greater effect on parameters reflecting small airway patency presumably secondary to reduction in inflammation.
J Asthma 2005 May
PMID:Hydrofluoroalkane-134A beclomethasone or chlorofluorocarbon fluticasone: effect on small airways in poorly controlled asthma. 1603 34

A case, 54-year-old female teacher, has been treated for severe persistent asthma mainly with an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide (BUD), 600 microg/day. The higher dose was considered inappropriate due to the adverse effects including hoarseness, thus, prednisolone (PSL) was frequently given when needed. In this situation, administration of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP), 400 microg/day, was started instead of BUD, and then improvement of the clinical symptoms, PEF and pulmonary function were observed promptly, followed by reduction in the dosage of PSL and a short-acting beta-stimulant. With higher doses of HFA-BDP, her pulmonary condition improved more remarkably. The levels of ECP, Eotaxin and RANTES in induced sputum obtained by inhalation of 10%-hypertonic saline were measured prior to the medication change and after one year, and all of the levels were found to be decreased, from 19000 to 96.0 microg/L, from 410 to 319 pg/ml, and from 281 to 85.1 pg/ml, respectively, indicating improvement of the condition. The overall score of Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire by Juniper also improved from 5.3 to 6.6 points after one year. In this case study, it was suggested that HFA-BDP may reduce eosinophilic inflammation remained in the peripheral airway, and may be effective in supplementing the activity of PSL which must be taken orally by severe asthmatic patients.
 ...
PMID:[A case of severe persistent bronchial asthma who showed significant improvement by switching to hfa-bdp, with reducing the dosage of oral steroids]. 1640 76

In this randomized crossover study, 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent bronchial asthma were assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 8 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period, then hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) for 8 weeks. After a further 2-week washout, they were again administered fluticasone DPI for 8 weeks. Patients in group 2 were assigned HFA-BDP followed by fluticasone PII and finally HFA-BDP over the same time periods. In both groups, no significant difference was observed in use of beta2-agonists and symptom score between the treatment periods; however, markers of pulmonary function were significantly higher when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. Significant increases of morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (p < 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0) (p < 0.01), V50 (p < 0.05), and V25 (p < 0.01) were observed at 18 weeks in group 1, whereas there were significant decreases of V50 (p < 0.05) at 18 weeks in group 2. No significant difference was noted in circulating eosinophil count and serum ECP between the 2 treatments; however, ECP in induced sputum and nitric oxide in expired gas were significantly lower (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively) when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. HFA-BDP might be delivered to small airways more effectively than fluticasone DPI.
J Asthma 2006 Sep
PMID:Usefulness of HFA-BDP for adult patients with bronchial asthma: randomized crossover study with fluticasone. 1693 90

The administration of Qvar (a hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate; HFA-BDP) is highly useful for the treatment of patients with asthma. However, we found in a case of bronchial asthma that replacing the prior inhaled corticosteroids with Qvar resulted in temporary dyspnea and reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Qvar contains beclomethasone dipropionate combined with absolute ethanol and an alternative to fluorocarbon. The patient had complicated alcohol-induced asthma. FEV1 decreased markedly and immediately after Qvar inhalation. The Qvar placebo is free of beclomethasone but contains other ingredients (ethanol and fluorocarbon). FEV1 did not decrease after the Qvar placebo, Aldecin inhalation, and Qvar inhalation orally treated with atropine before inhalation of Qvar. It seems unlikely that the components of Qvar (except beclomethasone) are responsible for the reduction in FEV1 observed immediately after inhalation of Qvar. These findings would be noteworthy when using Qvar for Japanese patients with asthma known to have a relatively high frequency of the complication of alcohol-induced asthma.
J Asthma 2006 Aug
PMID:Bronchial asthma showing reduction in FEV1 after inhalation of Qvar. 1695 59

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma coexist frequently and a dual treatment is recommended by prescribing topical nasal plus oral inhaled corticosteroids. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a nasally inhaled corticosteroid aiming at concomitant control of AR and asthma. A controlled trial was conducted among 60 patients with AR and asthma, aged 6-18 years, who were randomized into two groups. During 8 weeks, the experimental group (30 patients) received exclusively fluticasone propionate hydrofluoroalkane (FP-HFA) inhaled through the nose (mouth closed) using a large volume spacer attached to a face mask. The comparison group (30 patients) received a nasal spray of isotonic saline plus oral inhalation of FP-HFA through a mouthpiece attached to the same spacer. Clinical scores for AR and asthma, nasal inspiratory peak flow (NIPF), and spirometry were assessed by blinded observers. There was a significant improvement in AR scores and NIPF in the experimental group (P <or= 0.01) up to week 8, when a worsening was observed after the intervention was interrupted. Asthma symptoms score, forced expiratory volume (FEV)(1), and FEF(25-75%) were not statistically different between groups at the baseline visit or along follow-up visits (P >or= 0.20). Prebronchodilator FEV(1) (% predicted value) improved by 10% in both groups, comparing values at inclusion with those obtained at the end of follow up. Our results suggest that nasally inhaled FP-HFA through a spacer may control AR and asthma in children and adolescents. This approach is likely to result in higher compliance, lower costs, and fewer side effects.
 ...
PMID:Obtaining concomitant control of allergic rhinitis and asthma with a nasally inhaled corticosteroid. 1757 97


1 2 3 Next >>