Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: KEGG:D01817 (Iohexol)
 504 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We compared two nonionic contrast agents (ioxaglate and iohexol) with an ionic agent (Renografin-76) on the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on the hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine in one hundred consecutive patients. Patients were randomized to nonionic or ionic groups and were further evaluated regarding the effect of fluid loading prior to catheterization. The ionic agent more often produced subjective reactions (rash, nausea/vomiting). Following ventriculography, both ionic and non-ionic agents produced an increase in left ventricular end diastolic pressure and this effect was undetermined by fluid loading. Nonionic agents decreased aortic diastolic pressure following ventriculography and this effect was unaltered by fluid loading. In contrast, the ionic agent produced profound hemodynamic changes (drop in both systolic and diastolic pressures) following coronary arteriography and these effects were blunted by prior fluid loading. The ionic agent produced significantly greater heart rate slowing and prolongation of the QT interval than the nonionic agents, suggesting that the latter are potentially less arrhythmogenic. Comparing the two non-ionic agents, we found that both decreased aortic diastolic pressure and increased left ventricular end diastolic pressure following ventriculography. Iohexol produced greater heart rate slowing than did ioxaglate, though the increase was minor compared to the ionic agent. Neither nonionic agent appeared to significantly affect serum creatinine. In conclusion, the two nonionic agents appeared to offer significant advantages over the ionic agent in ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991 Apr
PMID:Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine. 191 99

To assess the influence of viscosity on flow resistance, 4 clinically available contrast media were injected through 12 angiographic catheters of varying dimensions at 20 degrees and 37 degrees C. Seven cc of contrast was injected at a pressure of 200 PSI at 3cc/sec by Medrad Mark IV power injector. The pressure of injection through the manifold was recorded with an electronic pressure transducer. The lowest injection pressure at 37 degrees C occurred with Hexabrix. Differences in contrast media viscosity were apparent with catheters less than 6 French diameter. There were minimal differences in injection pressures with regard to the coronary curve tip configurations for any of the contrast agents. At 20 degrees C, Isovue had lower injection pressures than the other contrast agents. Injection through 5 French catheters demonstrated a greater than 1.5 atmosphere difference, especially between Omnipaque and Hexabrix. The difference in contrast media injection pressure was greater than 2 atmospheres between 8 French guiding and 8 French diagnostic catheters and between 5 French and 6 French diagnostic catheters and less than 2 atmospheres between 8 French and 6 French diagnostic catheters. Injection pressure differences greater than 1 atmosphere were not observed for catheters of the same French size at body or room temperature contrast injection. These data indicate that important temperature related viscosity differences between agents are present and confirm that the largest differences in contrast media are most apparent for the smallest diameter catheters. Given equivalent image opacification and hemodynamic and adverse effects, selection of a low viscosity contrast media theoretically provides an advantage during procedures using small diameter catheters or interventional procedures requiring contrast media visualization through reduced channels.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991 Apr
PMID:Influence of radiographic contrast media viscosity to flow through coronary angiographic catheters. 203 74

Hemodynamic changes due to intracoronary injections of nonionic contrast medium Omnipaque-350 (OM), ionic dimer Hexabrix (HB), and ionic contrast medium Renografin-76 (R76) were compared at baseline and during reperfusion after a 30-minute left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion. In 11 open chest, anesthetized, and atrially paced dogs, 4 ml of either OM, HB, R76, or 0.9% NaCl were injected into the carotid-LAD bypass system. Coronary blood flow (CBF) and coronary vascular resistance (CVR) were measured before, during and after the intracoronary injection. The maximal hyperemic change (in percentage) from the preinjection value of CBF and CVR were calculated. The results at baseline and during reperfusion for CBF were: 104 +/- 14% vs. 85 +/- 10% for OM (NS); 76 +/- 11% vs. 39 +/- 9% for R76 (p less than 0.05); 57 +/- 8% vs. 33 +/- 5% for HB (P less than 0.05); and 30 +/- 7% vs. 9 +/- 4% for 0.9% NaCl (p less than 0.05). Consequently, the hyperemic changes of CVR at baseline and during reperfusion were: -49 +/- 3 vs. -42 +/- 4% for OM (NS); -44 +/- 3% vs. -24 +/- 6% for R76 (p less than 0.01); -36 +/- 3% vs. -24 +/- 4% for HB (p less than 0.05); and -18 +/- 4% vs. -7 +/- 3% for 0.9% NaCl (p less than 0.05). Thus, ischemia and reperfusion significantly dampened the coronary hemodynamic and vascular response to R76, HB, and 0.9% NaCl but not to OM. The preserved coronary vascular reserve with high flow in this canine post-ischemic reperfusion model may explain the advantage of nonionic over ionic contrast media used in emergency coronary angiography following thrombolysis.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991 Jun
PMID:Effects of intracoronary administration of contrast media on coronary hemodynamics in a canine post ischemic reperfusion model. 207 Apr 5

The low osmolar nonionic contrast medium Omnipaque was used in 5,339 consecutive coronary angiographies and serious complications were registered. Myocardial infarction occurred in 4 patients, of whom 2 died, and ventricular fibrillation in 1. Cerebral embolism occurred in 11 patients, all of whom survived. The results are compared with those of previous series of coronary angiography with high osmolar ionic media. It is concluded that use of the nonionic medium Omnipaque resulted in a significant reduction of the frequency of serious complications.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
PMID:Safety of the nonionic contrast medium omnipaque in coronary angiography. 250 Feb 47

The hemodynamic effects induced by coronary angiography in dogs with low osmolar ionic dimer Hexabrix (HB) and nonionic Omnipaque-350 (OM) were compared to the standard ionic contrast medium, Hypaque-76 (H76), both in the normal heart and in one with simulated severe cardiac disease. Left coronary angiography was performed in 12 "normal" closed-chest dogs with 10-cc injections of H76, HB, and OM in a randomized, blinded fashion. The maximal change in the left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure (SP), mean aortic pressure (MAP), left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), and LV dp/dt were recorded. The LVSP and MAP fell 30 +/- 3 mm Hg and 26 +/- 4 mm Hg with H76, 22 +/- 2 mm Hg and 19 +/- 2 mm Hg with HB, and 7 +/- 1.5 mm Hg and 5 +/- 1 mm Hg with OM (P less than .001). The LVEDP increased 4.8 +/- 0.5 mm Hg with H76, 3 +/- 0.5 mm Hg with HB, but only 0.2 mm Hg with OM (P less than .001). The LV dp/dt decreased 392 +/- 63 mm Hg/sec with H76 and 235 +/- 21 mm Hg/sec with HB, but increased 411 +/- 50 mm Hg with OM (P less than .001). In eight additional open-chest dogs, left coronary angiography was performed 1 hr after occlusion of the proximal LAD coronary artery and in the presence of a critical circumflex coronary artery (CX) stenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989 Mar
PMID:Hemodynamic abnormalities during coronary angiography: comparison of Hypaque-76, Hexabrix, and Omnipaque-350. 292 Mar 87

The influence of contrast media on coagulation has an important association with thromboembolic complication during coronary angiography. In this study, whole blood was methodically mixed with nonionic contrast medium, Iohexol (IOH), conventional ionic contrast medium, Hypaque-76 (H76), and low osmolar ionic dimer Hexabrix (HB) in vitro. The thrombotic propensity of contrast agents can be evaluated by measuring the clot formation of the mixtures. The experiments were repeated with whole blood after systemic heparinization. In the in vitro study, 5 ml of canine (N = 10) and 3 ml of human (N = 11) whole blood was incubated for 30 min in glass tubes with equal volumes of IOH, H76, HB, and 0.9% NaCl before heparinization. Clot formation with IOH and 0.9% NaCl were seen both in dogs (4.0 +/- 0.7 gm and 5.6 +/- 0.8 gm) and in patients (1.4 +/- 0.9 gm and 2.9 +/- 1.3 gm), whereas no clot was seen with H76 or XB. Following heparinization, no clot was visualized in any mixture of whole blood with contrast media or 0.9% NaCl. Similar results were observed in the catheter-syringe system with canine blood (N = 11) mixed with the contrast agents. Blood clots found in 15 min and 30 min of IOH were 0.07 +/- 0.08 gm and 0.44 +/- 0.20 gm (P less than 0.01) and of NaCl were 0.29 +/- 0.37 gm and 0.69 +/- 0.38 gm (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989 Mar
PMID:The potential risk of thrombosis during coronary angiography using nonionic contrast media. 292 Mar 94

Coronary angiography with standard ionic contrast media is associated with marked alterations in cardiac hemodynamics because of the depressant effects of the contrast media on cardiac contractility. Nonionic contrast media have been reported to produce less hemodynamic alteration than standard ionic contrast media. However, there is no information on how one nonionic media compares to another. Thus we compared the hemodynamic effects of three nonionic contrast media, Iopamidol (IOP), Iohexol (IOH), and Ioversol (IOV) to each other as well as to the standard ionic contrast media Hypaque-76 (H76). In 20 closed-chest anesthetized dogs, we recorded the maximal change in left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP), mean aortic pressure, left ventricular diastolic pressure (LVDP), and left ventricular dp/dt during 10-cc left main coronary artery injections of H76, IOP, IOH, and IOV. The mean aortic pressure and LVSP decreased 36 +/- 17 mm Hg and 46 +/- 21 mm Hg with H76 but only 5 +/- 5 mm Hg and 6 +/- 5 mm Hg with IOP, 5 +/- 4 mm Hg and 6 +/- 6 mm Hg with IOH, and 5 +/- 4 mm Hg and 7 +/- 6 mm Hg with IOV (P less than 0.001). The LVDP increased 6 +/- 5.0 mm Hg with H76 but only 0.2 +/- 0.5 mm Hg with IOP, 0.2 +/- 0.3 mm Hg with IOH, and 0.5 +/- 1.0 mm Hg with IOV (P less than 0.001). The LV dp/dt decreased 545 +/- 261 mm Hg/sec with H76 but increased 886 +/- 477 mm Hg/sec with IOP, 910 +/- 96 mm Hg/sec with IOH, and 473 +/- 335 mm Hg/sec with IOV (P less than 0.001). Whereas each nonionic agent produced significantly less hemodynamic abnormalities than H76, there was no significant difference between any of the nonionic agents on any hemodynamic parameter. Thus, as compared to H76, these nonionic contrast media produced only trivial alterations in hemodynamics and LV dp/dt. These agents may be preferable in patients with LV dysfunction.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988
PMID:Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76. 334 17

Plain-film coronary angiography of the cardiac explant on the operating table should be considered when conventional cardiac catheterization is desired but unavailable. We compared the effects of three contrast solutions on cold-preserved, isolated guinea pig hearts. Hearts were excised, perfused for 30 minutes, and arrested with Plegisol solution at 7 degree C. Twenty minutes after arrest, experimental hearts were perfused with one of three solutions: hyperosmolar Hexabrix solution (n = 6), hyperosmolar Renografin-76 solution (n = 6), or diluted, isosmotic Omnipaque solution (n = 8). The hearts were flushed with cold Plegisol solution 5 minutes later. Control hearts received no contrast during arrest (n = 9). The hearts were reperfused after 1 hour of arrest, and coronary blood flow (in millimeters per minute), left ventricular developed pressure (in millimeters of mercury), and rate of developed pressure (in millimeters of mercury per second) were measured. Endothelium-dependent smooth muscle relaxation to bradykinin administration and endothelium-independent relaxation to sodium nitroprusside administration were also assessed. No significant difference in myocardial or endothelial function was noted between control hearts and hearts perfused with Omnipaque solution. Hearts perfused with Renografin solution or Hexabrix solution, however, were found to have significantly impaired endothelial and myocardial function. We conclude that an isosmotic contrast solution should be used for ex vivo coronary angiography in cold-preserved hearts to avoid impairment of endothelial and myocardial function.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996 Aug
PMID:Safe ex vivo coronary angiography with isosmotic contrast agent. 875 95

A crossover study was performed to compare the hemodynamic effects of the iso-osmolar contrast agent iodixanol (Visipaque) 320 mg I/ml to those of the low-osmolar iohexol (Omnipaque) 350 mg I/ml. The main hypothesis was that iodixanol and iohexol would affect left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) to different degrees. In 48 patients with reduced cardiac function (mean ejection fraction 33. 4%), one ventricular injection was performed with each contrast medium. Ventricular, aortic and right atrial pressures and heart rate were measured continuously. Cardiac output (using Fick's principle) and systemic vascular resistance were calculated. LVEDP increased with both agents, but significantly less after iodixanol than after iohexol (P < 0.01), also in subgroups of patients in whom baseline LVEDP was severely increased and in whom 3-vessel disease was present. Immediate changes in variables reflecting vasodilatation were similar with both agents. In conclusion, both contrast agents influenced hemodynamics during ventriculography, but iodixanol had significantly less influence on LVEDP than did iohexol.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000 Jul
PMID:Hemodynamic effects of iodixanol and iohexol during ventriculography in patients with compromised left ventricular function. 1087 28

Technological advancements have lead to dramatic improvements in stentgraft device design resulting in more trackable delivery systems and transrenal uncovered stents and barbs for better fixation. Transrenal bare-stents may limit stentgraft migration, particularly in patients with short or flared proximal aortic necks. However, potential disadvantages might be in worsening renal function, particularly in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency. We retrospectively analyzed our recent 7 year experience of patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a variety of stentgrafts with and without transrenal bare-stent fixation. Patients were divided into 2 groups; infrarenal fixation (IRF) vs transrenal fixation (TRF), or patients with preoperative serum Cr values that were normal (= or <1.5 mg/dl) vs slightly elevated (1.6-2 mg/dl), vs markedly elevated (2.1- 3.5 mg/dl). The exclusion criteria included patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) on hemodialysis, and preoperative high-grade renal artery stenoses requiring angioplasty and stenting. Of 705 patients that underwent EVAR, 496 (IRF: 385 [78%], and TRF: 111 [22%]) were available with routine evaluations of serum Cr and CT scans. Preexisting comorbidities, mean procedure contrast volume, and postprocedure follow-up were similar in both groups. In the immediate postoperative period, mean serum Cr did not change significantly in either the IRF group (1.3+/-0.7 mg/dl to 1.2+/-0.9 mg/dl) or the TRF group (1.3+/-0.5 mg/dl to 1.3+/-0.6 mg/dl). Mean serum Cr did, however, significantly increase over longer follow-up in both groups: 1.4+/-0.8 mg/dl for IRF (P<0.03), and 1.5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl for TRF (P<0.01). Cr clearance was similarly unchanged in the immediate postoperative period (58+/-23 to 61+/-25 ml/min/1.73 m2 for IRF group, 53+/-17 to 55+/-17 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TRF group), but was significantly decreased in longer follow-up (53+/-23 ml/min/1.73 m2 for IRF, p<0.02: and 48+/-16 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TRF, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in serum Cr increase (p=0.19) or Cr clearance decrease (p=0.68) between the IRF and TRF groups. Small renal infarcts were noted in 6 patients (1.6%) in the IRF group, and in 8 patients (7%) in the TRF group (p=0.37). Of patients with normal preoperative renal function, renal dysfunction developed in 7.7% of IRF group and 6.1% of TRF group (p=0.76). In patients with preexisting CRI, renal dysfunction developed in 18.2% of IRF group, and 17.1% of TRF group (p=0.95). Eight patients with postoperative renal dysfunction, 5 (1.3%) from IRF group and 3 (2.7%) from TRF group subsequently required hemodialysis, and this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.91). We also analyzed 200 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR with intra-arterial contrast agents with and without preexisting CRI not on dialysis. The groups were identified on the basis of preprocedure serum Cr: group 1 (n=108), Cr less than 1.5 mg/dL (normal range); group 2 (n=65), Cr 1.5 to 2.0 mg/dL; group 3 (n=27), Cr 2.1 to 3.5 mg/dL. Routine precautions in patients with CRI included preoperative intravenous hydration with 2 L of normal saline solution, discontinuation of all nephrotoxic drugs, intraoperative administration of mannitol (0.5 g/kg intravenously), and use of nonionic, low osmolar intra-arterial contrast agent (Omnipaque 350). One-hundred and eight patients had normal renal function (group 1), and 92 patients had preexisting CRI with baseline Cr 1.5 to 2.0 mg/dL (group 2, n=65) or 2.1 to 3.5 mg/dL (group 3, n=27). Comorbid conditions included coronary artery disease (group 1, 51%; group 2, 49%; group 3, 59%), hypertension (group 1, 39%; group 2, 46%; group 3, 52%), and diabetes mellitus (group 1, 25%; group 2, 35%; group 3, 48%). In groups 1, 2, and 3, the mean volume of low osmolar contrast agent used was 210 cc, 160 cc, 130 cc, respectively; hemodynamic instability developed in 3, 1, and 1 patient, respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications between the 3 study groups was not statistically different. In grications between the 3 study groups was not statistically different. In group 1 a transient increase in serum Cr (>30% over baseline and >1.4 mg/dL) was noted in 3 patients (2.7%), 2 of whom (1.9%) required temporary hemodialysis and 1 (0.9%) who died of renal failure. In group 2 a transient increase in serum Cr was noted in 2 patients (3.1%); both patients (3.1%) required temporary hemodialysis, and 1 patient (1.5%) died of renal failure. In group 3 a transient increase in serum Cr was noted in 2 patients (7.4%); 1 patient (3.7%) required temporary hemodialysis, and 1 patient (3.7%) died of renal failure. Perioperative hypotension significantly increased the risk for elevated serum Cr and death (p<0.05), and larger contrast volume was associated with an increase in serum Cr (p<0.05) during the postoperative period. Following EVAR renal function declines slightly with both IRF and TRF. Our data show no overall difference between patients with IRF and TRF with respect to infarcts, decline in renal function, or onset of dialysis. There were a slightly greater number of renal infarcts in the TRF group, but these infarcts were clinically inconsequential. In patients with CRI, EVAR with intra-arterial radiographic contrast agents is believed to impair renal function, and CRI is considered a relative contraindication to the procedure. Results of our investigation indicate that risk for worsening renal insufficiency, dialysis, and death is only slightly and not significantly greater in patients with CRI compared with patients with normal renal function. With appropriate precautions of avoiding perioperative hypotension and limiting the volume of nonionic contrast agents, CRI need not be a contraindication for EVAR with intra-arterial contrast agents.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2004 Aug
PMID:Relationship of proximal fixation to renal dysfunction in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. 1536 17


1 2 Next >>