Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:6.2.1.1 (ACS)
78,556 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

It is anticipated that the ACS measures will figure significantly in the formal evaluation of the PCI, which will be carried out by an independent evaluator during the second and third years of the program. ACS measures will also form, along with other relevant data, a module for program reporting that is part of the overall program for project monitoring and review. The program should be evaluated on its ability to adhere to ACS measures; infuse primary care resources into a community; observe and measure changes in the community's patterns of use for health services; examine the community's health status, especially for hospitalization for otherwise preventable conditions; and sustain effective, adequate health care resources within the community.
...
PMID:Health area profiles as tools for primary care development: New York's primary care initiative. 1012 99

The superiority of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in the medical management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Further, enoxaparin has been shown to be safe and effective during PCI, including in combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Whether enoxaparin is superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with NSTE ACS under-going early invasive strategy is currently being tested in a large clinical trial. Data on the use of enoxaparin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are limited. Unlike patients who present to the catheterization laboratory after several doses of enoxaparin where in a steady state anticoagulation might have been achieved, patients who present early after administration of a single dose of subcutaneous enoxaparin may not have an adequate level of anticoagulation for PCI. The ability to monitor activity of enoxaparin in such patients using a point-of-care test might be useful. This report describes a patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who presented for primary angioplasty 75 minutes after administration of subcutaneous enoxaparin. The Rapidpoint Enox test measured 135 seconds and the patient's corresponding serum anti-Xa level was 0.12 IU/mL indicating a suboptimal level of anticoagulation for PCI. Procedural success was attained using additional 0.3-mg/kg intravenous enoxaparin.
...
PMID:Primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in a patient treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin utilizing point-of-care Enox test. 1278 20

Patients with CKD and CAD have traditionally been a difficult population to diagnose and treat in the setting of ACS. In addition to having poorer outcomes post-ACS, data are lacking regarding best treatments available. Aggressive interventional and medical treatments in this group with already poor outcomes are not necessarily contraindicated and should always be considered. The appalling outcome for CKD patients post-ACS is improved by many therapies shown to benefit in the non-CKD patients. Data suggest that troponins are useful markers in CKD patients, that major bleeding is not increased with the use of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists, that thrombolytics have been used successfully in CKD patients, and that PCI electively and as a primary treatment for ACS is successful and probably more beneficial to treatment.
...
PMID:Treatment of acute coronary syndromes in patients who have chronic kidney disease. 1575 68

In patients with stable CAD, PCI can be considered a valuable initial mode of revascularization in all patients with objective large ischaemia in the presence of almost every lesion subset, with only one exception: chronic total occlusions that cannot be crossed. In early studies, there was a small survival advantage with CABG surgery compared with PCI without stenting. The addition of stents and newer adjunctive medications improved the outcome for PCI. The decision to recommend PCI or CABG surgery will be guided by technical improvements in cardiology or surgery, local expertise, and patients' preference. However, until proved otherwise, PCI should be used only with reservation in diabetics with multi-vessel disease and in patients with unprotected left main stenosis. The use of drug-eluting stents might change this situation. Patients presenting with NSTE-ACS (UA or NSTEMI) have to be stratified first for their risk of acute thrombotic complications. A clear benefit from early angiography (<48 h) and, when needed, PCI or CABG surgery has been reported only in the high-risk groups. Deferral of intervention does not improve outcome. Routine stenting is recommended on the basis of the predictability of the result and its immediate safety. In patients with STEMI, primary PCI should be the treatment of choice in patients presenting in a hospital with PCI facility and an experienced team. Patients with contra-indications to thrombolysis should be immediately transferred for primary PCI, because this might be their only chance for quickly opening the coronary artery. In cardiogenic shock, emergency PCI for complete revascularization may be life-saving and should be considered at an early stage. Compared with thrombolysis, randomized trials that transferred the patients for primary PCI to a 'heart attack centre' observed a better clinical outcome, despite transport times leading to a significantly longer delay between randomization and start of the treatment. The superiority of primary PCI over thrombolysis seems to be especially clinically relevant for the time interval between 3 and 12 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms on the basis of its superior preservation of myocardium. Furthermore, with increasing time to presentation, major-adverse-cardiac-event rates increase after thrombolysis, but appear to remain relatively stable after primary PCI. Within the first 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms, both reperfusion strategies seem equally effective in reducing infarct size and mortality. Therefore, thrombolysis is still a viable alternative to primary PCI, if it can be delivered within 3 h after onset of chest pain or other symptoms. Primary PCI compared with thrombolysis significantly reduced stroke. Overall, we prefer primary PCI over thrombolysis in the first 3 h of chest pain to prevent stroke, and in patients presenting 3-12 h after the onset of chest pain, to salvage myocardium and also to prevent stroke. At the moment, there is no evidence to recommend facilitated PCI. Rescue PCI is recommended, if thrombolysis failed within 45-60 min after starting the administration. After successful thrombolysis, the use of routine coronary angiography within 24 h and PCI, if applicable, is recommended even in asymptomatic patients without demonstrable ischaemia to improve patients' outcome. If a PCI centre is not available within 24 h, patients who have received successful thrombolysis with evidence of spontaneous or inducible ischaemia before discharge should be referred to coronary angiography and revascularized accordingly--independent of 'maximal' medical therapy.
...
PMID:Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. 1676 Feb 7

The authors describe a case of a 74-year-old man with advanced coronary heart disease in whom pulmonary hemorrhagic complications during therapy with ticlopidine and subsequently with clopidogrel and amiodarone were observed. Fever and massive hemoptysis following five days of ticlopidine treatment, before elective coronary angiography, were noticed. Transient interstitial X-ray changes of the right lung were visible. Three months later a new episode on the third day of clopidogrel administration was manifested. He was after PCI, performed because of ACS complicated with ventricular fibrillation. Two days following clopidogrel discontinuation hemoptysis remitted but after ten days occurred again (this time with bilateral X-ray changes). Amiodarone, given after VF, was stopped. Spectacular improvement with steroid treatment was observed. Indobufen (reversible COX- 1 inhibitor) as an antiplatelet therapy was availed. The authors discuss therapeutic dilemma concerning the patient with coexisting different diseases.
...
PMID:[Recurrent hemoptysis following thienopyridines and amiodarone administration. therapeutic dilemma]. 1680 16

The Clinical Trials described in this article were presented at the Hotline and Clinical Trial Update Sessions of the European Society of Cardiology Congress held in September 2007 in Vienna, Austria. The sessions chosen for this article represent the scope of interest of Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy. The presentations should be considered preliminary, as further analyses could alter the final publication of the results of these studies. PROSPECT evaluated echocardiographic criteria for optimal selection of patients with moderate to severe heart failure who may benefit from cardiac resynchronisation therapy, however concluded that no single echocardiographic measure can be recommended. EVEREST found that tolvaptan, a vasopressin V(2) antagonist, resulted in early weight reduction and improvement of dyspnoea in patients with acute heart failure, but lacked long term improvement. In ARISE, the anti-oxidant succinobucal did not affect the primary outcome in high risk cardiovascular patients, but improved the combination of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and diabetic control in diabetics. ALOFT showed that the addition of the renin inhibitor aliskiren to an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a beta-blocker leads to favourable effects on neurohormonal actions in heart failure. FINESSE markedly improved coronary patency before PCI with half-dose reteplase/abciximab in STEMI patients, however without significantly improving short-term outcome. The Prague-8 Study evaluated whether routine clopidogrel administered >6 h pre-angiography would be a safe way to achieve therapeutic drug levels in case a follow-up intervention would be considered immediately, but appeared not justified because of bleeding complications. CARESS in MI showed that high risk patients with evolving STEMI who undergo thrombolytic therapy should undergo PCI early after the thrombolysis. Finally, the ACUITY trial found that in moderate or high risk Non ST elevation ACS patients triaged to PCI, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, or medical management, bivalirudin, with or without associated GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, resulted in a marked reduction of bleeding at 30 days whilst preserving the ischemic and mortality benefit at 1 year follow up.
...
PMID:Clinical trials update from the European Society of Cardiology Congress in Vienna, 2007: PROSPECT, EVEREST, ARISE, ALOFT, FINESSE, Prague-8, CARESS in MI and ACUITY. 1799 67

Although an association between elevated leucocyte count and mortality in patients with ACS (acute coronary syndromes) has been established, the independence of this association from coronary risk factors and C-reactive protein has been inadequately studied. In the present study, this prospective registry included 4329 patients with ACS treated with PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention): 1059 patients with STEMI [ST-segment elevation MI (myocardial infarction)], 1753 patients with NSTEMI (non-STEMI) and 1517 patients with unstable angina. Blood samples were obtained before angiography for leucocyte count and C-reactive protein measurements. The primary outcome of this analysis was 1-year mortality. At 1 year, 345 patients (8%) had died: 45 patients in the 1st tertile, 93 patients in the 2nd tertile and 207 patients in the 3rd tertile of leucocyte count [Kaplan-Meier estimates of mortality, 3.2%, 6.4% and 14.1% with an OR (odds ratio)=2.42, 95% CI (confidence interval)1.78-3.12; P<0.001 for tertile 3 compared with tertile 2 and an OR=1.99, 95% CI 1.77-2.25; P<0.001 for tertile 2 compared with tertile 1]. The Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for coronary risk factors, ACS presentation, extent of coronary artery disease, C-reactive protein and other covariates identified leucocyte count with a HR (hazard ratio)=1.05 (95% CI 1.02-1.07; P<0.001 for 1000 cells/mm(3) increase in the leucocyte count), but not C-reactive protein (HR=1.13, 95% CI 0.95-1.34; P=0.15 for a 1 tertile increase in the C-reactive protein concentration) as an independent correlate of 1-year mortality. We conclude that elevated leucocyte count, but not C-reactive protein, predicts 1-year mortality independent of cardiovascular risk factors across the entire spectrum of patients with ACS treated with PCI.
...
PMID:Total leucocyte count, but not C-reactive protein, predicts 1-year mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. 1885 14

Management of venous thromboembolism disease could be improved by new drugs with lower risk of bleeding and without the need of regular monitoring of anticoagulant effect. In this way, idraparinux, anti-Xa inhibitor, has been compared to conventional therapy (coumarins) for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Is it worth to treat patients more than six months? This has been evaluated in an interesting study. Prophylaxis after hip replacement surgery is indicated to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism, new drugs are under investigation. Dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been shown as effective as enoxaparin in reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement surgery. In 2007, new european guidelines for non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndromes have been published. Two new antithrombotic drugs, bivalirudin and fondaparinux, are now part of the different possible choices according to specific considerations. New factor Xa and factor IIa inhibitors are under investigation and are compared to heparin in PCI for NSTE-ACS. Fondaparinux and more recently otamixaban have given interesting results. These new recommendations have not yet taken into account new data published in 2007. What will be the positioning of prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, after the results of theTRITON trial? In patients with SCA treated by PCI, prasugrel reduced the ischemic events, while increasing major bleedings. In 2007, numerous publications and meta-analyses on drug-eluting stents (DES) have been published and tempered the fear about a possible increase in mortality with the use of DES.
...
PMID:[What's new on antithrombotics?]. 1895 Jul 43

In randomized clinical trials enoxaparin in non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) has been shown to be more effective than unfractionated heparin in preventing the combined endpoint of death and myocardial infarction. Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin reduced the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction and stroke in NSTE-ACS patients compared to aspirin alone. Aim of the present study was to determine the clinical impact of optimized antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin, clopidogrel and aspirin compared to standard therapy with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and aspirin in NSTE-ACS in clinical practice. We analyzed data of 2,956 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS and either antithrombotic therapy with enoxaparin, clopidogrel and aspirin or with aspirin and UFH, which were prospectively enrolled in the acute coronary syndromes registry (ACOS) from July 2000 until the end of November 2002. After adjustment for baseline characteristics and PCI the combined endpoint of hospital death and non-fatal reinfarctions was lower in the group with optimized antithrombotic therapy including clopidogrel, enoxaparin and aspirin compared to the control-group with aspirin and UFH (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.53). There was no significant difference in major bleedings between the two treatment groups (1.5% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.35), while overall there were more bleeding complications in the group with optimized antithrombotic therapy (4.9% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.005). In clinical practice optimized antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin in NSTE-ACS is associated with a reduction in the combined endpoint of death and non-fatal reinfarctions compared to standard therapy with aspirin and UFH without increase in major bleeding complications.
...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of optimized antithrombotic therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in clinical practice. 1910 83

Antiplatelet and antithrombotic treatment is successful in minimising acute and subacute stent thrombosis as well as reducing recurrent cardiac events and mortality in PCI. In this review we explore the evidence for different treatment strategies.Aspirin and clopidogrel together with heparin at the time of the procedure are now well established. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockers have been shown to reduce events in high risk patients. However, their routine use has been questioned in recent studies.Clopidogrel 600 mg given at least 2 hours preprocedure negates the need for additional routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade in elective, even diabetic patients. Bivalirudin is equivalent to the routine use of GP IIb/IIIa blockade in both elective and ACS patients. Replacing routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade in these patients would be significantly cost saving, reduce bleeding complications and facilitate rapid discharge policies. However, these studies do not have the patient selection to advocate the wholesale replacement of GP IIb/IIIa blockade since high risk patients were excluded. Furthermore, with the advent of drug eluting stents, progressively more complex lesions are being treated that are underrepresented in these trials. Therefore, there still remains a rational for continuing to use GP IIb/IIIa blockade in high risk subsets of both elective and ACS patients. These subsets are yet to be defined. In the setting of primary PCI clear benefits have been shown for the use of adjunctive abciximab, with the greatest benefits seen for upfront treatment. Future studies will test combinations of GP IIb/IIIa blockade and thrombolytic treatment in these patients.
...
PMID:Adjunctive Antiplatelet / Antithrombotic therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention. 1975 29


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>

---