Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:6.2.1.1 (ACS)
 78,556 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Digoxin metabolites cross-react in the Ciba Corning ACS digoxin assay in proportion to their bioactivity, but have greater (near 100%) cross-reactivity in the Abbott TDx, Baxter Stratus, and Ciba Corning Magic RIA digoxin assays. We studied the analytical performance of the ACS digoxin assay and compared it with these other assays. Coefficients of variation ranged from 5.5% at 3.11 ng/ml to 8.8% at 0.57 ng/ml. Mean analytical recovery was 96.4%. Results on dilutions were linear in the range of 0.6-5.0 ng/ml. We observed no interference by hemoglobin, bilirubin, or triglycerides. Dihydrodigoxin and digitoxin had lower cross-reactivity in the ACS and Stratus assays than in the TDx and Magic assays. Digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) in patients' sera was not detected in the ACS assay but was in the TDx, Stratus, and Magic assays. Digibind therapy seemingly did not affect digoxin results by ACS or Stratus, but did for up to 10 days after therapy for TDx and Magic. We compared digoxin results for 121 sera from 49 patients. Deming regression analysis was performed on the first specimen from each patient: ACS = 1.08(TDx)-0.17 ng/ml (r = 0.961, Sy,x = 0.164); ACS = 1.16(Stratus)-0.46 ng/ml (r = 0.973, Sy,x = 0.123); ACS = 1.00(Magic)-0.20 ng/ml (r = 0.982, Sy,x = 0.110). Discrepant results (> 2Sy,x from the regression line) were usually lower by the ACS assay (87%). Nine of 11 patients with discrepant results had renal insufficiency or hepatic disease, conditions commonly associated with increased DLIF. These observations may be explained by the improved specificity of the ACS digoxin assay.
 ...
PMID:Analytical performance of a monoclonal digoxin assay with increased specificity on the ACS:180. 884 24

Digoxin-like immunoreactive substance (DLIS) is known to interfere with fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) (Digoxin II, Abbott Laboratories) and falsely elevates the total digoxin concentrations. Digoxin FAB antibody (Digibind) is also known to affect digoxin results by FPIA assay. The authors studied the effects of DLIS and Digibind on a new microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for digoxin recently introduced by Abbott Laboratories, compared with the standard FPIA method and chemiluminescence assay (ACS-digoxin, Ciba-Corning). They studied 30 volume-expanded patients (term pregnancy, liver and renal disease) for the presence of DLIS. None of these patients received digoxin. They observed measurable DLIS concentrations in 12 of 30 patients by the FPIA assay and in only 1 patient by both MEIA and ACS assays. The concentration of DLIS in that patient was 0.31 ng/ml of digoxin equivalent by the MEIA assay, 0.36 ng/ml by the ACS assay, and 1.15 ng/ml by the FPIA assay. When they supplemented serum containing digoxin with low to high concentrations of digibind (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0, 10, and 20 micrograms/ml), and measured digoxin concentrations by FPIA, MEIA, and ACS assays, they observed lower than expected values of total digoxin. However, when they supplemented serum containing no digoxin with high concentration of digibind (5.0, 10.0 and 20.0 micrograms/ml) and supplemented protein-free ultrafiltrates with digoxin, they observed expected digoxin concentrations in the ultrafiltrates by all three assays, indicating that the ultrafiltrates are essentially free of digibind.
 ...
PMID:Effects of digoxinlike immunoreactive substances and digoxin FAB antibodies on the new digoxin microparticle enzyme immunoassay. 910 48

Measurement of unbound digoxin in presence of Fab fragments may be useful in management of overdoses. The analysis can be performed on serum directly or on ultrafiltrate of serum. The architecture of the immunoassay may influence the validity of results obtained using these two approaches. We tested this hypothesis by preparing serum mixtures containing various concentrations of digoxin and Digibind and analyzed them by the immunoassays before and after ultrafiltration. Four samples collected from Digibind-treated patients were also analyzed before and after ultrafiltration. The slopes and the y-intercepts of the measured versus the expected values for serum and its ultrafiltrate overlapped for the MEIA digoxin assay. For other three immunoassays tested (ACS:180, Stratus, and On-Line), either the slope or the intercept for measured versus the expected results for serum were significantly different (P < 0.05) than those for ultrafiltrate. Following addition of digoxin and Digibind, differences in results for serum analyzed directly or after ultrafiltration were < 0.50 ng/ml. Comparable samples from digoxin-overdosed patients treated with Digibind had differences of > 1.0 ng/ml. Previous claims reporting direct analysis of digoxin in presence of antidote but not having used patient samples for validation should be revisited. To date, analysis of serum ultrafiltrate by an immunoassay proven not to have matrix bias remains the most accurate approach in measuring unbound digoxin in presence of antidote.
 ...
PMID:Validity of unbound digoxin measurements by immunoassays in presence of antidote (Digibind). 1040 40