Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:5.99.1.2 (topoisomerase)
9,166 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Streptonigrin stimulated unique intensity patterns of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA cleavage in agarose and sequencing gels with no similarity to those of doxorubicin, VM-26,4'(9-acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide, genistein, and mitoxantrone. Surprisingly, a statistical analysis of 60 sites stimulated by streptonigrin in SV40 and pBR322 DNAs showed that the drug required the dinucleotide 5'-TA-3' from 2- to 3-positions at the DNA cleavage site. Streptonigrin did not intercalate into the double helix; however, a positive value of the reduced linear dichroism indicated that indeed the drug interacted with the DNA. An angle of 45 degrees was found between the major drug and local DNA axes, suggesting a minor groove binding mode. Moreover, a DNA winding assay showed that streptonigrin may tighten the helical twist of DNA, similar to the known minor groove binder distamycin. Drug competition for receptor site binding was then evaluated by drug combination in the cleavage reaction. DNA cleavage intensity patterns were altered only with the streptonigrin/mitoxantrone combination, suggesting that the two compounds may compete for ternary complex formation. The results indicate that streptonigrin may bind to the DNA in a manner similar to that of minor groove binders and that its pharmacophore, possibly different from other topoisomerase II inhibitors, may be an important determinant of its unique sequence position specificity.
...
PMID:Unique sequence specificity of topoisomerase II DNA cleavage stimulation and DNA binding mode of streptonigrin. 792 86

Studies were done to determine (a) the subcellular distribution of the alpha (170 kDa) and beta (180 kDa) isozymes of topoisomerase II, and (b) the extent to which each isozyme forms complexes with DNA in tumor cells incubated with and without VM-26. Western blotting revealed that topoisomerase II beta was highly unstable during cell fractionation. However, preincubation of human CEM leukemia cells with 5-100 microM VM-26 for 30 min protected the beta isozyme from degradation by progressively increasing the amount of this isoform bound to DNA. The amount of topoisomerase II beta detected in nuclei of CEM cells incubated for 30 min with 25 microM VM-26 was 7-fold greater than in nuclei from untreated control cells. VM-26 also had a protective effect on topoisomerase II beta in HL-60 leukemia and WiDR colon carcinoma cells. In contrast, the intercalating agents mitoxantrone and m-AMSA did not protect topoisomerase II beta from degradation during cell fractionation. The stabilization of topoisomerase II beta by VM-26 allowed subsequent studies of the subcellular distribution of the topoisomerase II isozymes. Both isozymes were detected in the nonmatrix (high salt-soluble) fraction of nuclei from CEM cells, but only topoisomerase II alpha was present in the nuclear matrix. VM-26 stabilized binding of the alpha and beta topoisomerase II isoenzymes to nonmatrix DNA and topoisomerase II alpha to matrix DNA. The differences observed in the subnuclear distribution and DNA binding pattern of the topoisomerase II isozymes support the hypotheses that each isozyme has a distinct cellular function, and that both the alpha and beta isozymes are potential targets for VM-26 in intact cells. In addition, the results demonstrated that pretreatment of various cell lines with VM-26 is a useful way to stabilize topoisomerase II beta during cell fractionation.
...
PMID:Subcellular distribution of the alpha and beta topoisomerase II-DNA complexes stabilized by VM-26. 798 Jun 48

Although the DNA topoisomerases are critical intracellular targets of a number of clinically important anticancer drugs, the mechanism(s) by which inhibition of these enzymes causes cell death are poorly understood. We found that treatment of human leukemic lymphoblasts (CCRF-CEM) with teniposide (VM-26), under conditions that stabilize DNA-topoisomerase II complexes, caused the formation of internucleosomal DNA ladders. However, it appeared unlikely that the VM-26-stabilized DNA-topoisomerase II-cleavable complexes directly produce these internucleosomal DNA ladders, since similar nucleosomal DNA ladders were observed following either continuous or a short (1 h) exposure of cells to VM-26. Under continuous exposure to VM-26, the internucleosomal DNA ladders were associated with the transient induction of c-jun mRNA in a dose-dependent fashion, reaching maximum expression at 6 h after treatment with VM-26 and being down-regulated to basal levels by 12 h. The induction of c-jun mRNA by VM-26 apparently preceded DNA ladder formation. However, in CEM sublines selected for resistance to VM-26 (CEM/VM-1 and CEM/VM-1-5; approximately 50- and 140-fold resistant, respectively) and which display the phenotype of multidrug resistance associated with altered DNA topoisomerase II (at-MDR), we found that the induction of c-jun mRNA by VM-26 and subsequent DNA ladder formation were progressively attenuated in proportion to the resistance of the cells, apparently due in part to decreased stabilization of DNA-topoisomerase II-cleavable complexes. Further, the attenuated induction of c-jun in the at-MDR cells was found to be associated with a decreased rate of c-jun transcription and an increase in the instability of its mRNA following VM-26 treatment. The attenuation of c-jun mRNA induction was also reflected in decreased production of c-Jun protein in the at-MDR cells. Of interest was the fact that no significant induction of c-fos mRNA by VM-26 was observed in either CEM or at-MDR cells. Furthermore, the induction of c-jun was related to the activation of AP-1 DNA-binding activity in a time- and dose-dependent manner in CEM cells, whereas the activation of AP-1 binding was attenuated in at-MDR cells in proportion to their resistance to VM-26. Using Jun and Fos family member antibody inhibition experiments in gel-mobility shift assays, we found that AP-1-binding activity appeared to be preferentially mediated by c-Jun/Fra-1 heterodimers in both CEM and at-MDR cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Differences between drug-sensitive and -resistant human leukemic CEM cells in c-jun expression, AP-1 DNA-binding activity, and formation of Jun/Fos family dimers, and their association with internucleosomal DNA ladders after treatment with VM-26. 806 63

A total of 27 selected analogues of VP-16 and VM-26 were compared with VP-16 and VM-26 for their relative abilities to stabilize the enzyme-substrate intermediate normally formed between eukaryote topoisomerase II and DNA. This activity was compared with cytotoxicity results obtained using the human colon HCT116 cell line and antitumor results obtained after intraperitoneal injection of mice with murine leukemia P388. The most potent analogues were those containing OH groups (demethyl) in either the 3' and 4' or the 3', 4', and 5' positions, the latter being twice as potent as VP-16. VM-26 was only 40% more potent than VP-16 in this assay. It was generally found that the 4'-esters had little activity in vitro, yet were cytotoxic and had antitumor activities. All other analogues with little in vitro activity were not very cytotoxic and had little if any antitumor activity. A very good correlation exists between stabilization of topoisomerase II-DNA intermediates, cytotoxicity, and antitumor activity.
...
PMID:Structure-activity relationships of VP-16 analogues. 807 24

Over the past decade, DNA topoisomerase I and II appeared to be the targets of some antitumor agents: CPT-11 and Topotecan derived from Camptothecin which interact with topoisomerase I; Actinomycin D, Adriamycin and Daunorubicin, Elliptinium Acetate, Mitoxantrone, Etoposide and Teniposide, Amsacrine which interact with topoisomerase II. The multiple functions of these enzymes are important as they play a role during replication, transcription, recombination, repair and chromatine organisation. Particularly, they relax torsional constraints which appear when intertwined DNA strands are separated while replication fork or RNA polymerases are moving. To some extent, topoisomerase I and II are structurally and functionally different. Moreover, topoisomerase I is not indispensable for a living cell whereas topoisomerase II is. Drug-topoisomerase interaction which probably leads to antitumoral effect of the compounds studied in this review is not a trivial inhibition of the enzyme but rather a poisoning due to stabilization of cleavable complexes between the enzyme and DNA. These stabilized complexes are likely to induce apoptosis-like programmed cell death, which is characterised by DNA fragmentation. However, it appears that it is the collision of the replication fork with the drug-stabilized cleavable complex that is responsible for the cytotoxicity of the drug: poisoning of topoisomerases by antitumor agents leads to a new concept of "dynamic toxicity". Although they interact with a common target, topoisomerase II poisons have differential effects on macromolecules syntheses, cell cycle and chromosome fragmentation; a few compounds may produce free radicals. Because of these differential effects in addition to quantitative and qualitative variations of stabilized cleavable complexes, in particular DNA sequences on which topoisomerase II is stabilized, these antitumor agents do not resemble each other. Cellular resistance to topoisomerases poisons results of two principal types of alteration: target and/or drug transport modification. Decreased ability to form the cleavable complex in resistant cells may be the consequence of both decreased amount of topoisomerase or altered enzyme. On the other hand, overexpression of membrane P-glycoprotein, which pumps drugs out of the cell by an energy dependent process provokes a decreased accumulation of these drugs. Cross resistances to other drugs are mainly under control of these two different mechanisms of resistance. A complete knowledge of their individual effects and mechanisms of resistance would allow a better clinical use of topoisomerases poisons, especially when administered in combination chemotherapy.
...
PMID:[Poisons of DNA topoisomerases I and II]. 808 Oct 34

Drug resistance to inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II can result from qualitative or quantitative alterations in the target enzyme, topoisomerase II, or from perturbations in drug transport that may or may not involve P-glycoprotein. In the present study, a drug-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line, SMR16, was selected in the presence of an epipodophyllotoxin (VP-16) and was found to be cross-resistant to all classes of topoisomerase II inhibitors (3-35-fold). The 3-fold level of resistance of these cells to vincristine is likely due to diminished uptake of this drug, and this is not mediated by overexpression of P-glycoprotein. No alteration in transport of VP-16 was observed. Immunoblotting with several polyclonal anti-topoisomerase II antibodies demonstrated that the resistant cells contain approximately two-thirds of the parental enzyme amount. The topoisomerase II catalytic activity present in 0.35 M NaCl nuclear extracts paralleled this decrease. VP-16- and 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide-induced DNA damage, mediated by topoisomerase II, was found to be decreased 10-12-fold in both intact SMR16 cells and nuclei isolated from these cells, when measured by alkaline filter elution. However, the VP-16-induced DNA cleavage activity present in 0.35 M NaCl nuclear extracts of the resistant cells was attenuated only 2-fold, relative to wild-type cells. Homogeneous preparations of the enzyme obtained from resistant cells demonstrated the same cleavage and catalytic activity as purified wild-type topoisomerase II. Analysis by pulse-field gel electrophoresis of the DNA isolated from VM-26- and 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-anisidide-treated sensitive and resistant cells demonstrated significantly less conversion of SMR16 chromosomal DNA into 50-150-kilobase DNA fragments. Chinese hamster ovary SMR16 cells are apparently resistant to topoisomerase II poisons because the topoisomerase II that defines the DNA topological domains is either decreased in amount or insensitive to drug action.
...
PMID:Topoisomerase II activity involved in cleaving DNA into topological domains is altered in a multiple drug-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line. 809 26

A panel of six 'wild type' and three VP-16 resistant small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines is used to evaluate to what extent in vitro sensitivity testing using a clonogenic assay can contribute to combine cytotoxic drugs to regimens with improved efficacy against SCLC. The resistant lines include (a) H69/DAU4, which is classical multidrug resistant (MDR) with a P-glycoprotein efflux pump (b) NYH/VM, which exhibits an altered topoisomerase II (topo II) activity and (c) H69/VP, which is cross-resistant to vincristine, exhibits a reduced drug accumulation as H69/DAU4 but is without P-glycoprotein. 19 anticancer agents were compared in the panel. The MDR lines demonstrated, as expected, cross-resistance to all topo II drugs, but also different patterns of collateral sensitivity to BCNU, cisplatin, ara-C, hydroxyurea, and to the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. The complete panel of nine cell lines clearly demonstrated diverse sensitivity patterns to drugs with different modes of action. Correlation analysis showed high correlation coefficients (CC) among drug analogues (e.g. VP-16/VM-26 0.99, vincristine/vindesine 0.89), and between drugs with similar mechanisms of action (e.g. BCNU/Cisplatin 0.89, VP-16/Doxorubicin 0.92), whereas different drug classes demonstrated low or even negative CC (e.g. BCNU/VP-16 -0.21). When the CC of the 19 drug patterns to VP-16 were plotted against the CC to BCNU, clustering was observed between drugs acting on microtubules, on topo II, alkylating agents, and antimetabolites. In this plot, camptothecin and ara-C patterns were promising by virtue of their lack of cross-resistance to alkylating agents and topo II drugs. Thus, the differential cytotoxicity patterns on this panel of cells can (1) give information about drug mechanism of action, (2) enable the selection and combination of non-cross-resistant drugs, and (3) show where new drugs 'fit in' among established agents.
...
PMID:Differential cytotoxicity of 19 anticancer agents in wild type and etoposide resistant small cell lung cancer cell lines. 809 93

The topoisomerase II inhibitor, VP-16 (etoposide), is an important component in many chemotherapeutic regimens. To characterize resistance to this drug, the human melanoma cell line, FEM-X, was selected in multiple steps with VP-16. To prevent the development of typical multidrug resistance, an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein, the tiapamil analog, RO-11-2933, was added to the selections. The resultant clone FVP3 is 56-fold resistant to VP-16 and cross-resistant to doxorubicin (Adriamycin) (9-fold) and VM-26 (27-fold). These cells are also two- to four-fold resistant to m-AMSA, daunorubicin, and mitoxantrone. FVP3 is not resistant to the P-glycoprotein substrates vinblastine, does not express the MDR1 gene at detectable levels, and does not show reduced 3H-VP-16 accumulation. Unlike other cell lines that exhibit resistance to inhibitors of topoisomerase II, FVP3 has the same level of topoisomerase II expression and activity as FEM-X. Using live cells treated with VP-16, band depletion assays and KCI/SDS precipitation assays show that topoisomerase II from FVP3 is much less susceptible to drug-induced cleavable complex formation than is that from FEM-X. This difference in sensitivity to VP-16 is also detected using lysates from disrupted cells, but not with isolated nuclei devoid of cytoplasmic and membrane components. In addition, the topoisomerase II present in nuclear extracts from FVP3 is not resistant to the effects of VP-16 as measured by: (1) inhibition of strand passing activity during decatenation of kinetoplast DNA, (2) drug-induced linearization of plasmid DNA, and (3) immunodepletion by VP-16. These results suggest that some component of the cytoplasm or cellular membranes, or a factor depleted from nuclei during their isolation, is responsible for the resistance to VP-16 in FVP3.
...
PMID:Characterization of an unusual mutant of human melanoma cells resistant to anticancer drugs that inhibit topoisomerase II. 809 46

DNA methylation is deregulated during oncogenesis. Since several major anti-cancer drugs act on topoisomerases, we investigated the effects of cytosine methylation on topoisomerase cleavage activities. Both topoisomerase I and II cleavage patterns were modified by CpG methylation in c-myc gene DNA fragments. Topoisomerase II changes, mainly cleavage reduction, occurred for methylation sites within 7 base pairs from the topoisomerase II breaks and were different for VM-26 and azatoxin. For topoisomerase I, cleavage enhancement as well as suppression were observed. Using synthetic methylated oligonucleotides, we show that hemimethylation is sufficient to alter topoisomerase I activity. Cytosine methylation on the scissile strand within the topoisomerase I consensus sequence had strong effects. Cleavage was stimulated by methylation at position -4 and was strongly inhibited by methylation at position -3 (with position -1 being the enzyme-linked nucleotide). This inhibitory effect was attributed to the presence of a methyl group in the major groove, since the transition uracil to thymine also inhibited cleavage. Altogether these results suggest an interaction of topoisomerase I with the DNA major grove at positions -3 and -4. In addition, DNA methylation may have profound effects on the activity of topoisomerases and may alter the distribution of cleavage sites produced by anticancer drugs in chromatin.
...
PMID:Effects of DNA methylation on topoisomerase I and II cleavage activities. 813 7

Elsamicin (EM) is a recently discovered antitumour agent that is structurally related to several other compounds displaying anticancer activities, including chartreusin (CT), chrysomycin V (CV) and M (CM), gilvocarcin V (GV) and ravidomycin (RM). The biochemical events resulting in cytotoxicity for most of these compounds have not been clearly elucidated. There is some evidence that GV and CT bind to DNA and that GV is photosensitive, causing DNA damage. Therefore, we investigated the effects of these chemicals on DNA in cells and on pBR322 plasmid DNA. Using alkaline elution techniques, we found that all these compounds induced, to a different extent, DNA breakage in the human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cell line. In addition, all either bound to or intercalated into DNA, as indicated by their ability to alter the electrophoretic migration of DNA in agarose gels. Using the P4 unknotting assay, EM, CT, CV, CM, GV and RM were found to be potent inhibitors of the catalytic activity of topoisomerase II (topo II). Their potencies were compared with the known topo II inhibitors teniposide (VM-26) and doxorubicin (DX). EM was the most potent, with an IC50 of 0.4 mumol/l followed in order by CV, GV, and CT. VM-26 was the least potent with an IC50 of 15 mumol/l. It was concluded from these results that EM, GV, CV, CM and CT are capable of inhibiting topo II and that EM is the most potent inhibitor of topo II yet discovered.
...
PMID:Biochemical characterisation of elsamicin and other coumarin-related antitumour agents as potent inhibitors of human topoisomerase II. 828 Apr 93


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

---