Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:5.99.1.2 (topoisomerase)
 9,166 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The acquisition of drug-resistant tumour cells is the main problem in the medical treatment of a range of malignant diseases. In recent years, three new classes of anti-cancer agents, each with a novel mechanism of action, have been brought forward to clinical trials. These are the topoisomerase I (topo I) poisons topotecan and irinotecan, which are both camptothecin derivatives, the taxane tubulin stabilizers taxol and taxotere and, finally, the antimetabolite gemcitabin, which is active in solid tumours. The process of optimizing their use in a combination with established agents is very complex, with numerous possible drug and schedule regimens. We describe here how a broad panel of drug-resistant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines can be used as a model of tumour heterogeneity to aid in the selection of non-cross-resistant regimens. We have selected low-fold (3-10x) drug-resistant sublines from a classic (NCI-H69) and a variant (OC-NYH) SCLC cell line. The resistant cell lines include two sublines with different phenotypes towards alkylating agents (H69/BCNU and NYH/CIS), two sublines with different phenotypes against topo I poisons (NYH/CAM and NYH/TPT) and three multidrug resistant (MDR) sublines (H69/DAU, NYH/VM, and H69/VP) with combinations of mdr1 and MRP overexpression as well as topoisomerase II (topo II) down-regulation or mutation. Sensitivity to 20 established and new agents was measured in a standardized clonogenic assay. Resistance was highly drug specific. Thus, none of the cell lines was resistant to all drugs. In fact, all resistant cell lines exhibited patterns of collateral sensitivity to various different classes of drugs. The most intriguing pattern was collateral sensitivity to gemcitabin in two cell lines and to ara-C in five drug-resistant cell lines, i.e. in all lines except the lines resistant to topo I poisons. Next, all sensitivity patterns in the nine cell lines were compared by correlation analysis. A high correlation coefficient (CC) for a given pair of compounds indicates a similar pattern in response in the set of cell lines. Such data corroborate the view that there is cross-resistance among the drugs. A numerically low coefficient indicates that the two drugs are acting in different ways, suggesting a lack of cross-resistance between the drugs, and a negative correlation coefficient implies that two drugs exhibit collateral sensitivity. The most negative CCs (%) to the new drug leads were: taxotere-carmustine (BCNU) (-75), taxol-cisplatin (-58), ara-C-taxol (-25), gemcitabin-doxorubicin (-32), camptotecin-VM26 (-41) and topotecan-VP16 (-17). The most negative correlations to the clinically important agent VP-16 were: cisplatin (-70); BCNU (-68); camptothecin (-38); bleomycin (-33), gemcitabin (-32); ara-C (-21); topotecan (-17); melphalan (-3); and to the other main drug in SCLC treatment cisplatin were: doxorubicin (-70); VP-16 (-70); VM-26 (-69); mAMSA (-64); taxotere (-58); taxol (-58). Taxol and taxotere were highly correlated (cross-resistant) to VP-16 (0.76 and 0.81 respectively) and inversely correlated to cisplatin (both -0.58). Similarly, camptothecin and topotecan were correlated to cisplatin but inversely correlated to VP-16 and other topo II poisons. From the sensitivity data, we conclude that collateral sensitivity and lack of cross-resistance favours a cisplatin-taxane or topo I-topo II poison combination, whereas patterns of cross-resistance suggest that epipodophyllotoxin-taxane or topo I poison-cisplatin combinations may be disadvantageous.
 ...
PMID:In vitro cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity in seven resistant small-cell lung cancer cell lines: preclinical identification of suitable drug partners to taxotere, taxol, topotecan and gemcitabin. 906 9

We have shown previously that NAD/poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-deficient cells that overexpress Mr 78,000 glucose-regulated stress protein (GRP78) are resistant to topoisomerase II inhibitors, such as etoposide, m-amsacrine, and doxorubicin. However, these cells have been found to be hypersensitive to DNA cross-linking agents, including melphalan, cisplatin, and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU). These observations prompted us to examine whether overexpression of GRP78 is associated with modulation of cytotoxicity of clinically useful DNA-cross-linking agents such as melphalan, BCNU, and cisplatin. We up-regulated GRP78 in V79 Chinese hamster cells by 2-5-fold using two independent approaches that include exposure to 6-aminonicotinamide, or 2-deoxyglucose. Subsequently, these GRP78-overexpressing cells were trypsinized, plated in regular medium without GRP78-inducing agents, and allowed a 5-h attachment time before being treated with melphalan, BCNU, or cisplatin for 1 h to determine clonogenic survivals. In addition, repair of DNA cross-links induced by those agents were determined by alkaline elution assay. Our results show that the GRP78-overexpressing V79 cells are hypersensitive to DNA cross-linking agents compared to the control V79 cells. Furthermore, repair of drug-induced DNA cross-links appears to be considerably slower in these cells relative to that found in control V79 cells. Thus, our results suggest that (a) up-regulation of GRP78 is associated with an impairment of DNA cross-link repair, (b) up-regulation of GRP78 is associated with potentiation of cytotoxicity induced by alkylating and platinating agents, and (c) up-regulation of GRP78 can be considered as a potentially useful tool to modulate the cytotoxicity of clinically useful alkylating and platinating agents.
 ...
PMID:Hypersensitivity to DNA cross-linking agents associated with up-regulation of glucose-regulated stress protein GRP78. 937 11

We have shown earlier that pre-treatment of V79 Chinese hamster cells with 6-aminonicotinamide (6-AN) or 2-deoxyglucose (2-dG) results in over-expression of the Mr 78,000 glucose-regulated stress protein (GRP78) and the subsequent development of resistance to inhibitors of topoisomerase II. These phenomena also occur in V79-derived cell lines that are deficient in poly(ADP-ribose) (p(ADPR)) metabolism. In contrast, over-expression of GRP78 under the conditions outlined above is found to be associated with hypersensitivity to several clinically-relevant DNA cross-linking agents, namely, 1,3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), cisplatin, and melphalan. We have also previously shown that pre-treatment with 6-AN, an inhibitor of p(ADPR) metabolism, causes an increase in the life span in BCNU-treated mice bearing L1210 tumors. These observations prompted us to examine whether 6-AN pre-treatment can result in the over-expression of GRP78 in human colon cancer cell lines and, if so, whether this increase is associated with sensitization to DNA cross-linking agents outlined above. Following treatment of three colon cancer cell lines, HCT116, SW480, and VACO-8, for 48 h with 0.1 mM 6-AN, cytosolic GRP78 levels were elevated approximately 4.2 times, 8 times, and 2.5 times for each cell line respectively, as measured by Western immunoblotting. To determine sensitivity after GRP78 up-regulation, the cells were washed and grown for 412 h in growth medium devoid of 6-AN, before being treated with DNA cross-linking agents. The 412 h time period allowed p(ADPR) metabolism to return to normal while GRP78 levels remained elevated, thus allowing us to associate GRP78 over-expression with sensitivity to those agents. After treating cells for 1 h with BCNU, cisplatin, or melphalan, cell sensitivity was determined by clonogenic survival assay or a fluorescence-based cytotoxicity assay. Based on changes in IC50 values, 6-AN caused an increase in sensitivity for HCT116, SW480, and VACO-8 cells of 1.5, 2.3, and 1.0 times, respectively, for BCNU, 4.8, 3.8, and 2.6 for cisplatin, and 6.4, 3.7, and 2.2 times for melphalan. Thus, our results show that over-expression of GRP78 in human tumor cell lines is associated with increased sensitivity to clinically useful chemotherapy agents. This sensitization occurred in three different tumor cell lines, each bearing a separate genetic defect associated with altered sensitivity.
 ...
PMID:Increased sensitivity of human colon cancer cells to DNA cross-linking agents after GRP78 up-regulation. 1019 18

To further define the molecular basis for drug resistance to mitoxantrone, a Chinese hamster ovary cell line (MXN(4)) was selected in the presence of 25 nM mitoxantrone and fully characterized. This cell line is 20-fold resistant to mitoxantrone, cross-resistant to several other topoisomerase II poisons, and 2- to 3-fold collaterally sensitive to cisplatin, carboplatin and BCNU. Neither an alteration in cellular uptake of topoisomerase II inhibitor nor overexpression of P-glycoprotein contribute to the drug resistance of MXN(4) cells. Immunoblotting demonstrates equivalent amounts of topoisomerase II alpha and beta in the wild-type and drug resistant cell lines, suggesting that a quantitative alteration in topoisomerase II is not the mechanism of resistance of MXN(4) cells. Mitoxantrone-induced DNA double strand breaks measured in situ were attenuated 28-fold in the drug resistant cell line. Nuclear extracts of MXN(4) cells, as well as topoisomerase II alpha purified to homogeneity from these cells, were found to be markedly resistant to drug-induced covalent DNA: topoisomerase II complex formation. The catalytic activity of purified MXN(4) topoisomerase II was the same as wild-type activity. Thus, the resistance of MXN(4) cells to mitoxantrone involves the expression of a topoisomerase II alpha with altered DNA cleavage activity. The hypersensitivity of this cell line to platinum analogs is due to an apparent increased uptake of these drugs which results in augmented DNA interstrand crosslinking.
 ...
PMID:Characterization of an altered DNA topoisomerase ii-alpha from a mitoxantrone resistant Mammalian-cell line hypersensitive to DNA cross-linking agents. 2155 77


<< Previous 1 2