Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:5.99.1.2 (topoisomerase)
 9,166 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In vitro sensitivity of HT29 human colon cancer cells to doxorubicin (DXR), vincristine (VCR), etoposide (VP16), cisplatin (CDDP), melphalan (L-PAM) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) was markedly reduced when cell-culture density increased. For some drugs, confluence-dependent resistance (CDR) was partly due to decreased intracellular drug accumulation; the ratio of mean intracellular drug content of non confluent to confluent cells (NC/C) was 2.5 for DXR, 4.1 for VCR and 7.4 for VP16. Altered drug penetration with confluence could be related to decrease of plasma membrane fluidity as measured by the fluorescence polarization method. Reduction of drug intracellular accumulation was nil or weak for L-PAM (NC/C = 1.0), CDDP (NC/C = 1.2) and 5 FU (NC/C = 1.8). Even if drug concentration was adjusted in culture medium to produce similar intracellular drug content in confluent and non confluent cells, higher intrinsic resistance of confluent cells was still evidenced for DXR and VP16 but not for VCR, the only agent without direct interaction with DNA. DXR- and VP16-induced DNA breakage was also less important in confluent than in non-confluent cells. CDR appeared closely related to an increased proportion of non-cycling cells at confluence, as demonstrated by flow cytometry, expression of nuclear antigen recognized by Ki67 MAb and expression of topoisomerase II. CDR is probably a major factor in the poor sensitivity of colorectal adenocarcinomas to chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Confluence-dependent resistance in human colon cancer cells: role of reduced drug accumulation and low intrinsic chemosensitivity of resting cells. 154 2

In an effort to improve the additive anti-tumor efficacy of commonly used alkylating agents, the topoisomerase-II inhibitor etoposide was used in combination with either the mitochondrial poison and energy-depleting agent lonidamine or the hemorheologic agent and tumor-blood-flow-increasing agent pentoxifylline. In the FSaIIC murine fibrosarcoma system, these modulators were evaluated for modulation of whole-tumor cell killing vs. bone-marrow CFU-GM toxicity with the alkylating drugs CDDP, CTX, L-PAM or BCNU. Etoposide alone was essentially additive with the alkylating drugs for both tumor-cell and bone-marrow killing, except for BCNU, where a substantial increase in tumor-cell killing occurred (0.5 to 2.0 logs over the dose range of BCNU tested) without a significant increase in bone-marrow toxicity. Etoposide plus lonidamine was significantly more active than etoposide alone only with CTX and BCNU in tumor-cell vs. bone-marrow killing. Etoposide plus pentoxifylline was also most active with these two alkylating agents, where increases in tumor-cell killing of 0.5 to 1.0 log were observed. Hoechst-33342-defined tumor-cell sub-population studies revealed that etoposide significantly improved the killing of dim (putative hypoxic) cells by CDDP, but neither lonidamine nor pentoxifylline significantly improved killing of bright or dim cells together. With CTX, etoposide plus lonidamine or pentoxifylline substantially improved killing of dim cells over etoposide alone (each by about 0.8 logs). These data indicate that a therapeutic advantage may be achievable by combining etoposide with lonidamine or pentoxifylline for use with alkylating drugs.
 ...
PMID:Etoposide with lonidamine or pentoxifylline as modulators of alkylating agent activity in vivo. 204 6

Previously, we reported on the resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cis-DDP) of tumor cells in IgM immunocytoma tumors. In vitro cell lines were established, from tumors both sensitive and resistant to cis-DDP. The cultured cells obtained from the parent tumor were designated IgM-I, and those from a cis-DDP resistant tumor IgM/cDDP. In vitro dose response studies showed a difference in cis-DDP sensitivity with a resistance factor of approximately 20 at a relative survival of the tumor cells of 50 percent. The resistance factor was determined both in an assay with continuous cis-DDP exposure for 72 h, and in a clonogenic assay after an exposure for 1 h to various dosages of cis-DDP. The IgM/cDDP cells showed cross-resistance, in vitro and in vivo, to the currently used cis-DDP analogs carboplatin (CBDCA or JM8) and iproplatin (CHIP or JM9). Cross-resistance was also observed against the recently developed platinum(IV) compound tetraplatin. In addition, the cell line IgM/cDDP was resistant to other drugs interacting with DNA, such as doxorubicin (DXR), mitomycin C (MMC) and melphalan (L-PAM). For two non DNA-interacting drugs, vincristine (VCR), a mitosis inhibitor, and VP-16, a topoisomerase inhibitor, both cell lines were equally sensitive.
 ...
PMID:Resistance of in vitro grown IgM immunocytoma cells to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cis-DDP) and cross-resistance to other DNA interacting drugs. 234 18

In order to simulate drug resistance observed in the clinic, two cisplatin-resistant cell lines were produced from a murine ovarian reticulosarcoma, M5076 (M5), by pulse (M5/CDDP) and continuous (M5/CDDPc) treatment with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)(CDDP). These cell lines showed a similar stable low level of resistance (approximately 3-fold) to CDDP and cross-resistance to carboplatin, iproplatin and the new alkylating agent tallimustine, but not to L-PAM (L-phenylalanine mustard) and BCNU (1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea). Collateral sensitivity to two inhibitors of topoisomerase II, VP16 (etoposide) and doxorubicin (Dox), but cross-resistance to the topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin, were observed. The two cell lines were also sensitive to 5-fluorouracil. No increase in the level of glutathione or activity of glutathione S-transferase could be observed in resistant cells compared with the parental M5 cells. Total DNA platination immediately after treatment was similar in the parental and resistant cell lines. Repair of total DNA platination, measured after 24 h of recovery, was undetectable in M5 and M5/CDDP cells, but was 33% in M5/ CDDPc cells. Initial DNA-interstrand cross-links (DNA-ISC) were six times higher in M5 than in M5/CDDP cells, but 24 h after treatment, both lines had completely repaired this damage. M5/ CDDPc cells did not show formation of DNA-ISC at any time after treatment. The two resistant cell lines were tumorigenic when implanted in mice and resistant to CDDP treatment in vivo. The CDDP resistant tumours were not cross-resistant in vivo to L-PAM, BCNU and Dox, which had been active in vitro, nor to tallimustine, which had been cross-resistant in vitro. Mechanisms of resistance in M5/CDDP and M5-CDDPc seem to be based on a lower formation of DNA-ISC combined, for the latter cell line, with a higher repair capacity for total DNA platination.
 ...
PMID:In vitro and in vivo characterisation of low-resistant mouse reticulosarcoma (M5076) sublines obtained after pulse and continuous exposure to cisplatin. 894 89