Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:5.99.1.2 (
topoisomerase
)
9,166
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The recent piperazinyl-substituted mono-fluoroquinolones represent a family with some common characteristics on one side, and variable parameters on the other side. COMMON characteristics: same mechanism of action: DNA-gyrase inhibitors of the A subunit of
topoisomerase
; pH dependent antibacterial activity; a rather long post-antibiotic effect for both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria; same physiochemical properties: organic acids, high pKa, lipophilicity. Some common pharmacokinetic parameters: low protein binding (less than 50%); high volume of distribution (greater than 1.5 l/kg) with good attainable tissue concentrations in lymph, blister fluid, renal tissue, prostate, bronchial secretions, saliva, aqueous humor,
CSF
, bone, bile; good intracellular penetration in macrophages, polynuclear neutrophils; high peak urinary concentrations markedly exceeding the MIC for virtually all bacterial urinary tract pathogens, even accounting for the increase in MIC in the urine, especially at lower (acidic) pH; low extraction ratio dialysis; similar adverse reactions; CNS, gastro-intestinal, photosensitivity, tendo-articular and cartilage toxicity. However, most other pharmacokinetic parameters are different from one fluoroquinolone to the other; oral bioavailability, peak serum levels (C max) as a measure of bioavailability, terminal half-life of elimination (t1/2) are all variable. The extent of metabolic biotransformation varies greatly, the two extremes being ofloxacin, showing a high metabolic stability, and pefloxacin, highly metabolized. The degree of antibacterial activity of different metabolites also varies greatly. The renal clearance of most fluoroquinolones, except pefloxacin, greatly exceeds normal glomerular filtration rate, suggesting additional renal tubular secretion. Renal elimination of most fluoroquinolones - except pefloxacin, is blocked by probenecid.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Comparative pharmacokinetic parameters of new systemic fluoroquinolones: a review. 329 63
The recent piperazinyl-substituted mono-fluoroquinolones represent a family with some common features on the one hand, and some variable parameters on the other. Some of the common features are: same mechanism of action (DNA-gyrase inhibitors of the A subunit of
topoisomerase
); pH-dependent antibacterial activity; a rather long post-antibiotic effect for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria; same physicochemical properties (organic acids, high pKa, lipophilicity). Common pharmacokinetic parameters include low protein binding (less than 50%); high volume of distribution (greater than 1 l/kg) with good tissue concentrations attainable in lymph, blister fluid, renal tissue prostate, bronchial secretions, saliva, aqueous humour,
CSF
, bone and bile; good intracellular penetration in macrophages and polynuclear neutrophils; high peak urinary concentrations, markedly exceeding the MIC for virtually all bacterial urinary tract pathogens, even accounting for the increase in MIC in the urine, especially at lower (acidic) pH; low extraction ratio dialysis; similar adverse reactions (CNS, gastrointestinal, photosensitivity, tendo-articular and cartilage toxicity). However, most other pharmacokinetic parameters are different from one fluoroquinolone to the other: oral bioavailability, peak serum levels (Cmax) as a measure of bioavailability, terminal half-life of elimination (t1/2) are all variable. The extent of metabolic biotransformation varies greatly, the two extremes being ofloxacin, showing a high metabolic stability and pefloxacin, highly metabolized. The degree of antibacterial activity of different metabolites also varies widely.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Comparative pharmacokinetic parameters of new systemic fluoroquinolones. 329 83
Inhibitors of topoisomerase I and
topoisomerase
II have demonstrated synergy when administered sequentially in several tumor models while having a diminished antitumor effect when given concurrently. To explore the potential for clinical sequence-dependent synergy, we instituted a Phase I study of topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) followed by doxorubicin (a
topoisomerase
II inhibitor) in patients with advanced malignancies. Thirty-three patients with advanced malignancies or malignancies for whom no standard therapy exists were entered into the study. Topotecan was administered in escalating doses by 72-h continuous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by a bolus of doxorubicin given on day 5. To explore the hematological toxicity associated with this sequence, bone marrow aspirates were obtained both prior to the topotecan infusion and immediately prior to the doxorubicin in 10 patients to determine by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis whether CD34+ cell synchronization was occurring using this sequential schedule. Dose-limiting hematological toxicity occurred at the first dose-level in three of six patients. Therefore, we defined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) below our starting dose-level. Further dose-escalation and a new MTD were defined with the addition of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The MTD was, therefore, topotecan 0.35 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 on day 5 without G-
CSF
, whereas the MTD with G-
CSF
was topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/day by 72-h continuous i.v. infusion, followed by doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on day 5. Ten patients with paired bone marrow aspirates obtained before topotecan and before doxorubicin administrations were available for evaluation. In 7 of 10 patients, there was an increase (16.6 +/- 2.9% to 25.0 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.02) in the proportion of CD34+ cells in S-phase 24 h after the topotecan infusion and prior to doxorubicin compared to the pretreatment values, whereas 1 patient had a decrease in the proportion of CD34+ cells in S phase and 2 patients had no change. Topotecan and doxorubicin with this sequence and schedule can be given safely; the dose-limiting toxicity is hematological toxicity. Alterations in the fraction of hematopoietic progenitor CD34+ cells in S-phase may account for the increased granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia observed at relatively low dose levels of the combination with and without G-
CSF
.
...
PMID:A phase I study of topotecan followed sequentially by doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies. 981 46
The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential synergy between meropenem and levofloxacin in vitro and in experimental meningitis and to determine the effect of meropenem on levofloxacin-induced resistance in vitro. Meropenem increased the efficacy of levofloxacin against the penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain KR4 in time-killing assays in vitro and acted synergistically against a second penicillin-resistant strain WB4. In the checkerboard, only an additive effect (FIC indices: 1.0) was observed for both strains. In cycling experiments in vitro, levofloxacin alone led to a 64-fold increase in the MIC for both strains after 12 cycles. Addition of meropenem in sub-MIC concentrations (0.25 x MIC) completely inhibited the selection of levofloxacin-resistant mutants in WB4 after 12 cycles. In KR4, the addition of meropenem led to just a twofold increase in the MIC for levofloxacin after 12 cycles. Mutations detected in the genes encoding for
topoisomerase
IV (parC) and gyrase (gyrA) confirmed the levofloxacin-induced resistance in both strains. Addition of meropenem was able to completely suppress levofloxacin-induced mutations in WB4 and led to only one mutation in parE in KR4. In experimental meningitis, meropenem, given in two doses (2 x 125 mg/kg), produced a good bactericidal activity (-0.45 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h) comparable to one dose (1 x 10 mg/kg) of levofloxacin (-0.44 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h) against the penicillin-resistant strain WB4. Meropenem combined with levofloxacin acted synergistically (-0.93 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h), sterilizing the
CSF
of all rabbits.
...
PMID:Meropenem prevents levofloxacin-induced resistance in penicillin-resistant pneumococci and acts synergistically with levofloxacin in experimental meningitis. 1455 20
The treatment of cancer may be associated with various chemotherapy-induced mucocutaneous reactions. One of the mucocutaneous adverse effects of antineoplastic drugs is the toxic local tissue reaction, the extravasation, which occurs in less than 1-2% of cytotoxic infusions. The standard management of vesicant extravasation includes: discontinuing all local infusions, aspiration of any residual drug, elevating the involved limb, local cooling or warm compresses, local anesthesia, antidotes (sodium thiosulfate for alkylating agents, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for anthracyclines and mitomycin, and hyaluronidase for the vinca alkaloids), and finally surgical debridement with plastic surgery reconstruction. Because the anthracyclines are
topoisomerase
II poisons that are antagonized by
topoisomerase
II catalytic inhibitors such as dexrazoxane, it seems to be the treatment of choice immediately after extravasation of doxorubicin, epirubicin, daunorubicin, etc. One systemic dose of dexrazoxane after the accident may significantly reduce the toxic tissue lesions. Repeated intralesional injections of
GM-CSF
may accelerate the wound healing without the need of skin grafts.
...
PMID:[The significance of extravasation in oncological care]. 1840 1