Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:5.99.1.2 (topoisomerase)
9,166 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A possible link between protein kinase C (PKC) and P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated-multidrug resistance (MDR) was assumed from studies on MDR cell lines selected in vitro. The functional relevance of PKC for the MDR phenotype remains unclear, and the involvement of a particular PKC isozyme in clinically occurring drug resistance is not known. Recently, we have demonstrated significant correlations between the expression levels of the PKC eta isozyme and the MDR1 or MRP (multidrug resistance-associated protein) genes in blasts from patients with acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML) and in ascites cell aspirates from ovarian cancer patients. To extend these findings to further types of human tumours we analysed specimens from 64 patients with primary breast cancer for their individual expression levels of several MDR-associated genes (MDR1, MRP, LRP (lung cancer resistance-related protein), topoisomerase (Topo) II alpha/IIbeta, cyclin A and the PKC isozyme genes (alpha, beta1, beta2, eta, theta, and mu) by a cDNA-PCR approach. We found significantly enhanced mean values for MRP, LRP and PKC eta gene expression, but significantly decreased Topo II alpha and cyclin A gene expression levels in G2 tumours compared with G3. Remarkably, significant positive correlations between the MDR1, MRP or LRP gene expression levels and PKC eta were determined: MDR1/PKC eta (rs = +0.6451, P < 0.0001) n = 62; MRP/PKC eta (rs = +0.5454, P < 0.0001) n = 63; LRP/PKC eta (rs = +0.5436, P < 0.0001) n = 62; MRP/LRP (rs = +0.7703, P < 0.0001) and n = 62, MDR1/MRP (rs = +0.5042, P < 0.0001) n = 62. Our findings point to the occurrence of a multifactorial MDR in the clinics and to PKC eta as a possible key regulatory factor for up-regulation of a series of MDR-associated genes in different types of tumours.
...
PMID:Multiple gene expression analysis reveals distinct differences between G2 and G3 stage breast cancers, and correlations of PKC eta with MDR1, MRP and LRP gene expression. 945 50

Cross-resistance between different cytostatic agents which are structurally and functionally dissimilar is a common phenomenon called multidrug resistance (MDR). The best characterized mechanism of MDR involves P-glycoprotein. However, this does not completely explain MDR. Within the last few years, two new genes that can confer MDR have been identified (MRP and LRP). Furthermore, topoisomerase II has been associated with a special form of MDR. During the past several years, considerable interest has been shown in strategies to reverse MDR by using pharmacological compounds, monoclonal antibodies, immunotoxins, bispecific antibodies, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, ribozymes, and albumin-conjugated drugs in in vitro and in vivo assays. All these experimental assays demonstrated that MDR can be circumvented. Two agents that have received the most attention in the clinic are verapamil and cyclosporin A. Despite some promising results (especially in hematological malignancies), the results obtained in the treatment of solid tumors with modulators have so far been quite disappointing. This may be explained by the fact that the MDR phenotype alone does not completely account for the resistance of human cancer. Several other resistance-related proteins (e.g., glutathione S-transferase, metallothionein, O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase, thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, heat shock proteins) can be also expressed in resistant tumors. Additionally, cell proliferation, vascularization and apoptosis are involved in resistance.
...
PMID:Multidrug resistance and its reversal. 971 85

Clinical studies have suggested that both MDR1 and MRP may play a significant role in the chemosensitivity and outcome of neuroblastoma. To clarify the nature of multidrug resistance (MDR) in this tumour a series of six neuroblastoma cell lines have been characterized with regard to P-glycoprotein, MRP and LRP expression using immunocytochemistry and expression of MDR1, MRP, LRP and topoisomerase II genes using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). By RT-PCR, all lines expressed MRP, five expressed LRP and four expressed MDR1, but protein levels of each of these were variable. Chemosensitization to a range of MDR-associated drugs (vincristine, doxorubicin, etoposide, taxotere, topotecan) and non-MDR-associated drugs (cisplatin, melphalan) by three modulating agents, cyclosporin A, PSC 833 and the novel Biricodar (VX-710; Incel), was evaluated using a colourimetric cytotoxicity assay (MTS). Alteration of daunorubicin efflux by these agents was evaluated using FACS analysis. Clonogenic assay was used to study the influence of these chemosensitizers on vincristine cytotoxicity. Marked sensitization to vincristine was observed in MDR1-positive lines, and a similar but less consistent effect was seen with taxotere, doxorubicin and etoposide. With MRP-positive, MDR-negative lines, only VX-710 caused consistent sensitization. These data confirm MDR1 and MRP expression as contributory factors in chemoresistance in neuroblastoma and indicate that VX-710 may be a useful modulator of both mechanisms and worthy of clinical evaluation in this tumour.
...
PMID:BIRICODAR (VX-710; Incel): an effective chemosensitizer in neuroblastoma. 1037 71

Drug resistance is a major problem in patients with small cell lung cancer; in fact, most die of resistant disease, despite an initial response. Several markers of drug resistance have been described in preclinical models, but the mechanism of drug resistance in lung cancer patients remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of the expression of a number of markers of drug resistance, proliferation, and apoptosis in relation to response to chemotherapy and survival in patients with small cell lung cancer. Tumor samples were derived from 93 previously untreated patients who were randomized in a Phase III study to receive cyclophosphamide, epirubicine, and etoposide or cyclophosphamide, epirubicine and vincristine alternating with carboplatin and etoposide. Paraffin-embedded samples, derived from the primary tumor site prior to chemotherapy, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for expression of markers implicated in drug resistance [topoisomerase (topo) IIalpha, topo IIbeta, and multidrug resistance-associated protein], apoptosis (p53, p21, and bcl-2), or proliferation (Ki67). Response prediction was analyzed by chi2 test and logistic regression analysis; overall and disease-free survival curves were compared by log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Shorter survival was observed in patients with extensive disease (P = 0.037) and poorer performance status (P = 0.028) and in patients whose tumors expressed high topo IIalpha levels (P = 0.01) and high Ki67 (P = 0.024). By multivariate analysis, the following factors were found to be predictive for worse survival: high expression levels of topo IIalpha, Ki67, and bcl-2; male sex; and extensive disease. High topo IIbeta expression was found to be predictive for lower overall and complete response rate. No relationship between apoptotic pathway markers or MRP and response to chemotherapy was observed. In conclusion, high expression of topo IIalpha was predictive of worse survival, and high expression of topo IIbeta was predictive of lower response rates. Furthermore, lower survival probability was observed in patients with bcl-2-positive tumors. Immunohistochemical assessment of these markers in diagnostic biopsies may give important prognostic information and may help selecting patients in the worse prognostic categories for new therapeutic strategies.
...
PMID:Expression of DNA topoisomerase IIalpha and topoisomerase IIbeta genes predicts survival and response to chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer. 1047 85

Breast cancer is a chemosensitive tumour and anthracyclines are one of the most active cytotoxic agents in chemotherapy treatment. Failure after anthracycline-containing chemotherapy is a poor prognostic factor because of low response rate to salvage chemotherapy. Several factors like P-glycoprotein mediated drug resistance (MDR-1 or MRP), glutathione or amplification of topoisomerase II have been found to be involved in anthracycline resistance. No clear benefit for patients treated with 'resistance-modifier' agents like verapamil, dexverapamil or quinidine has yet been demonstrated. Most clinical studies with non-cross resistant cytotoxic agents are lacking a strict definition of anthracycline resistance. A strict definition of anthracycline resistance implies progressive disease during anthracycline chemotherapy. Among the cytotoxic drugs only 5-Fluorouracil (given as 24 h continuous infusion with folinic acid) and the taxanes produce more than 20% objective remission (RR) in case of anthracycline resistance, whereas the highest response rate was reported for docetaxel (32-57%). Only few randomized studies were performed: docetaxel showed higher anti-tumor activity than methotrexat/5-FU (RR: 42% vs 19%, P<0.001) or mitomycin/vinblastine (RR: 30% vs 12%;P<0.001) and treatment with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) was in favour to mitomycin (RR 17% vs 6%). In combination chemotherapy most activity have been reported for paclitaxel plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (given as 24 h continuous infusion with folinic acid) (RR: 58%) or for docetaxel plus cisplatinum (RR: 46%). High-dose regimens with growth factor or stem cell support seems to be active in anthracycline-resistant disease but the toxicity is considerable. In conclusion, the taxanes, especially docetaxel as single agent or paclitaxel plus high-dose 5-FU, are the most promising therapeutic options in treatment of anthracycline resistant disease. Further clinical phase II/III studies in breast cancer should include exact definition of anthracycline pretreatment and resistance.
...
PMID:Current options in treatment of anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. 1054 72

An Ehrlich ascites tumour cell line (EHR2) was selected in vivo for resistance to mitoxantrone (MITOX). The resistant cell line (EHR2/MITOX) was 6123-, 33-, and 30-fold-resistant to mitoxantrone, daunorubicin, and etoposide, respectively, but retained sensitivity to vincristine. The resistant cells showed moderate sensitisation to mitoxantrone on treatment with verapamil or cyclosporin A. Compared with EHR2, the multidrug resistance-associated protein mRNA was increased 13-fold in EHR2/MITOX. Western blot analysis showed an unchanged, weak expression of P-glycoprotein. Topoisomerase IIalpha was reduced to one-third in EHR2/MITOX relative to EHR2 cells, whereas topoisomerase IIbeta was present in EHR2 but could not be detected in EHR2/MITOX. In the resistant subline, net accumulation of MITOX (120 min) and daunorubicin (60 min) was reduced by 43% and 27%, respectively, as compared with EHR2. The efflux of daunorubicin from preloaded EHR2/MITOX cells was significantly increased. EHR2/MITOX microsomes had a significant basal unstimulated ATPase activity. The apparent K(i) value for vanadate inhibition of the ATPase activity in EHR2/MITOX microsomes was not significantly different from the K(i) value for P-glycoprotein-positive cells. However, whereas verapamil (50 microM) inhibited the ATPase activity of EHR2/MITOX microsomes, it stimulated the ATPase activity of microsomes derived from P-glycoprotein-positive cells. In conclusion, the resistance in EHR2/MITOX was multifactorial and appeared to be associated with: 1) a quantitative reduction in topoisomerase IIalpha and beta protein; 2) reduced drug accumulation, probably as a result of increased expression of a novel transport protein with ATPase activity; and 3) increased expression of MRP mRNA.
...
PMID:Characterisation of non-P-glycoprotein multidrug-resistant Ehrlich ascites tumour cells selected for resistance to mitoxantrone. 1085 31

Multidrug resistance (MDR) and more specifically the expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) have been studied extensively in vitro. Unfortunately, it appears that the predictive value of MDR recognized in vitro is mostly an incorrect measure to determine the responsiveness of a particular tumour in the clinic. This misunderstood or overvalued role of MDR might explain the failure of strategies to reverse Pgp function by the use of modulators in solid tumours. To obtain more insight in in vivo drug resistance we investigated a panel of 15 human ovarian cancer xenografts consisting of the most common histological subtypes known in ovarian cancer patients. The response rate to cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin in the xenografts resembled the results of phase II trials with these agents in ovarian cancer patients. This resemblance justifies drug resistance studies in this experimental in vivo human tumour system. We determined the expression levels of MDR 1, MRP 1, LRP and topoisomerase IIalpha mRNA by the RNase protection assay and the presence of MRP1 and LRP proteins by immunohistochemistry. The S-phase fraction was investigated as a separate parameter by flow cytometry. In none of the 15 ovarian cancer xenografts was MDR 1 expression detectable. The expression levels of MRP 1 and LRP were low to moderate and resembled the presence of the MRP1 and LRP proteins. There was a weak, inverse relationship between the expression levels of LRP and sensitivity to cisplatin and cyclophosphamide (r = -0.44 and -0.45), but not to doxorubicin. The levels of topoisomerase IIalpha varied among the xenografts (0.73-2.66) and failed to correlate with doxorubicin resistance (r = 0.14). The S-phase fraction, however, showed a relation with the sensitivity to cisplatin (r = 0.66). Among the determinants studied in ovarian cancer in vivo, LRP mRNA and the S-phase fraction were the best predictive factors for drug response and most specifically for the activity of cisplatin.
...
PMID:Drug resistance features and S-phase fraction as possible determinants for drug response in a panel of human ovarian cancer xenografts. 1097 Jun 95

Choroidal melanoma has a high mortality rate and responds poorly to existing chemotherapy, but unexpected ex vivo sensitivity of a subset of these tumours to topoisomerase II inhibitors has been noted. Since chemoresistance may be mediated by the molecular phenotype of tumours, immunohistochemistry has been used to study the expression of both isoforms of topoisomerase II (alpha and beta) in 29 choroidal melanomas for which chemosensitivity assay data for doxorubicin or mitoxantrone are also available. Of these, eight tumours were topoisomerase II beta-positive and 11 were topoisomerase II alpha-positive. Recent studies showing genetic abnormality (often monosomy of chromosome 3) in choroidal melanoma suggest that loss of immunostaining could be due to genomic loss rather than down-regulation of topoisomerase II beta in these tumours. There was no convincing excess of anthracycline resistance in the topoisomerase II beta-negative group. Addition of topoisomerase II alpha, MDR1 (11/17 positive), LRP (16/28 positive), and MRP (5/29 positive) data in multivariate analysis did not reliably predict sensitivity or resistance. Vincristine chemosensitivity showed no relation to MDR1, LRP or MRP in 18 tumours tested. While it is possible that some tumours which do express topoisomerase II beta may respond to anthracyclines, the molecular basis of resistance or sensitivity to anthracyclines or vincristine in uveal melanoma is complex and remains incompletely understood.
...
PMID:Relationship between expression of topoisomerase II isoforms and chemosensitivity in choroidal melanoma. 1100 93

Resistance to chemotherapy is common in non-small cell lung cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of in vitro established drug resistance markers on the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Samples of 38 patients were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining, for topoisomerase IIalpha and IIbeta, Ki-67, MRP and LRP. In addition, mutation analysis of the topoisomerase IIalpha gene, the B/DNBS and the Tyr804 region, was performed. Lung tumor biopsies were taken prior for treatment with one of the following regimens; cisplatin/paclitaxel, cisplatin/VM26 or VP16, or carboplatin/VP16/ifosfamide. Seventeen patients obtained a partial response, 12 had stable disease and nine patients had progressive disease. None of the investigated markers was related with overall response rate. In one sample a point mutation in the B/DNBS region of the topo IIalpha gene was detected which substitutes IIe(510) with Val. This tumor had a partial response to four courses of cisplatin/VP16 treatment. The survival analysis showed that the patients with high topo IIalpha expressing tumors had a significantly worse survival compared with the patients with low or intermediate topo IIalpha expressing tumors. In conclusion, no relation was observed between expression of topoisomerase IIalpha, IIbeta, Ki-67, MRP or LRP and response rate. Furthermore, worse survival was seen in patients with high topoisomerase IIalpha expressing tumors. In one tumor sample, a newly described mutation in the B/DNBS region of the topo IIalpha gene was detected, which does not appear to be related to drug resistance.
...
PMID:Topoisomerase IIalpha and other drug resistance markers in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. 1132 82

The human U-1285 and GLC(4) cell lines, both derived from small cell carcinoma of the lung, are present in doxorubicin-sensitive (U-1285 and GLC(4)) and doxorubicin-resistant MRP-expressing (U-1285dox and GLC(4)/ADR) variants. These sublines were examined here with respect to their susceptibilities to the toxic effects of selenite and compared to the toxic effects of selenite on the promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60 and its doxorubicin-resistant P-glycoprotein expressing variant. The drug-resistant U-1285dox and GLC(4)/ADR sublines proved to be 3- and 4-fold, respectively, more sensitive to the cytotoxicity of selenite than the drug-sensitive U-1285 and GLC(4) sublines, whereas no difference was observed between the HL-60 sublines. The presence of doxorubicin at a concentration equal to the IC(10) did not significantly potentiate the toxic effects of selenite. The presence of selenite did not significantly affect the expression of the multi-drug resistant proteins (MRP1, LRP and topoisomerase IIalpha) in the drug-resistant cells. The activities of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) were higher (50 and 25%, respectively) in the drug resistant cell sublines U-1285dox and GLC(4)/ADR compared to the drug-sensitive parental lines. The activity of glutathione reductase (GR) was essentially the same in the drug-sensitive and -resistant cell lines. Exposure to selenite resulted in a 4-fold increase in both TrxR and GR activities in U-1285 cells, an effect, which was less pronounced in the presence of doxorubicin. Under similar conditions the increase in the TrxR activity in the resistant U-1285dox cell line, was only 30% and the activity of GR was unaltered. Different responses in the activity of the key enzymes in selenium metabolism are one possible mechanism explaining the differential cytotoxicity of selenium in these cells.
...
PMID:Drug-resistant human lung cancer cells are more sensitive to selenium cytotoxicity. Effects on thioredoxin reductase and glutathione reductase. 1203 72


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>

---