Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:5.99.1.2 (topoisomerase)
9,166 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The Escherichia coli chromosome is compacted into 40-50 negatively supercoiled domains. It has been proposed that these domains differ in superhelical density. Here, we present evidence that this is probably not the case. A modified Tn10 transposable element was inserted at a number of locations around the E. coli chromosome. This element, mTn10-plac-lacZ+, contains the lac operon promoter, plac, whose activity increases with increasing superhelical density, fused to a lacZ+ reporter gene. Although mTn10-plac-lacZ+ fusion expression varies as much as approximately threefold at different insertion sites, the relative levels of expression from these elements are unaffected by replacing plac with the gyrA promoter, pgyrA, which has a reciprocal response to changes in superhelical density. Importantly, topoisomerase mutations and coumermycin, which inhibits DNA gyrase activity, alter mTn10-plac-lacZ+ and mTn10-pgyrA-lacZ+ fusion expression in expected ways, showing that the elements remain responsive to supercoiling and that topoisomerase activity is required for maintaining superhelical density. Fusion expression is not affected by anaerobic growth or osmotic shock, two physiological conditions thought to alter supercoiling. The approximately threefold difference in mTn10-plac-lacZ+ and mTn10-pgyrA-lacZ+ fusion expression observed at different sites may be explained by regional differences in chromosomal copy number that arise from bidirectional replication. Together, these results strongly suggest that the E. coli chromosomal domains do not differ in functional superhelical density.
...
PMID:Chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli. 796 44

We have previously shown that cells mutant for TOP3, a gene encoding a prokaryotic-like type I topoisomerase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, display a pleiotropic phenotype including slow growth and genome instability. We identified a mutation, sgs1 (slow growth suppressor), that suppresses both the growth defect and the increased genomic instability of top3 mutants. Here we report the independent isolation of the SGS1 gene in a screen for proteins that interact with Top3. DNA sequence analysis reveals that the putative Sgs1 protein is highly homologous to the helicase encoded by the Escherichia coli recQ gene. These results imply that Sgs1 creates a deleterious topological substrate that Top3 preferentially resolves. The interaction of the Sgs1 helicase homolog and the Top3 topoisomerase is reminiscent of the recently described structure of reverse gyrase from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, in which a type I DNA topoisomerase and a helicase-like domain are fused in a single polypeptide.
...
PMID:The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. 796 74

The trans-fused gamma-lactone ring of etoposide is readily epimerized to its cis epimer, which is biologically inactive, or is metabolized to the inactive ring-opened hydroxy acids. Modification of this gamma-lactone ring of 4 beta-(arylamino)-4'-O-demethyl-4-desoxypodophyllotoxin resulted in several compounds (15-16, 21-22, and 24) that should block this epimerization and the resulting biological deactivation. In a topoisomerase II inhibition assay, compounds 21, 22, and 24 showed comparable activity to etoposide. In a protein-linked DNA complex formation assay, compounds 21 and 22 were more active than etoposide.
...
PMID:Antitumor agents. 144. New gamma-lactone ring-modified arylamino etoposide analogs as inhibitors of human DNA topoisomerase II. 829 16

Chromosome band 11q23 is a site of recurrent translocations and interstitial deletions in human leukemias. Recent studies have shown that the 11q23 gene HRX is fused to heterologous genes from chromosomes 4 or 19 after t(4;11)(q21;q23) and t(11;19)(q23;p13) translocations to create fusion genes encoding proteins with structural features of chimeric transcription factors. In this report, we show structural alterations of HRX by conventional Southern blot analyses in 26 of 27 de novo leukemias with cytogenetically diverse 11q23 abnormalities. The sole case that lacked HRX rearrangements was a t(11;17)-acute myeloid leukemia with French-American-British M3-like morphology. We also analyzed 10 secondary leukemias that arose after therapy with topoisomerase II inhibitors and found HRX rearrangements in 7 of 7 with 11q23 translocations, and in 2 of 2 with unsuccessful karyotypes. In total, we observed HRX rearrangements in 35 leukemias involving at least nine distinct donor loci (1q32, 4q21, 6q27, 7p15, 9p21-24, 15q15, 16p13, and two 19p13 sites). All breakpoints localized to an 8-kb region that encompassed exons 5-11 of HRX, suggesting that fusion proteins containing similar portions of HRX may be consistently created in leukemias with 11q23 abnormalities. We conclude that alteration of HRX is a recurrent pathogenetic event in leukemias with 11q23 aberrations involving many potential partners in a variety of settings including acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis, and topoisomerase II inhibitor-induced secondary leukemias of both the myeloid and lymphoid lineages.
...
PMID:HRX involvement in de novo and secondary leukemias with diverse chromosome 11q23 abnormalities. 821 10

Several recurring chromosomal translocations involve the AML1 gene at 21q22 in myeloid leukemias resulting in fusion mRNAs and chimeric proteins between AML1 and a gene on the partner chromosome. AML1 corresponds to CBFA2, one of the DNA-binding subunits of the enhancer core binding factor CBF. Other CBF DNA-binding subunits are CBFA1 and CBFA3, also known as AML3 and AML2. AML1, AML2 and AML3 are each characterized by a conserved domain at the amino end, the runt domain, that is necessary for DNA-binding and protein dimerization, and by a transactivation domain at the carboxyl end. AML1 was first identified as the gene located at the breakpoint junction of the 8;21 translocation associated with acute myeloid leukemia. The t(8;21)(q22;q22) interrupts AML1 after the runt homology domain, and fuses the 5' part of AML1 to almost all of ETO, the partner gene on chromosome 8. AML1 is an activator of several myeloid promoters; however, the chimeric AML1/ETO is a strong repressor of some AML1-dependent promoters. AML1 is also involved in the t(3;21)(q26;q22), that occurs in myeloid leukemias primarily following treatment with topoisomerase II inhibitors. We have studied five patients with a 3;21 translocation. In all cases, AML1 is interrupted after the runt domain, and is translocated to chromosome band 3q26. As a result of the t(3;21), AML1 is consistently fused to two separate genes located at 3q26. The two genes are EAP, which codes for the abundant ribosomal protein L22, and MDS1, which encodes a small polypeptide of unknown function. In one of our patients, a third gene EVI1 is also involved. EAP is the closest to the breakpoint junction with AML1, and EVI1 is the furthest away. The fusion of EAP to AML1 is not in frame, and leads to a protein that is terminated shortly after the fusion junction by introduction of a stop codon. The fusion of AML1 to MDS1 is in frame, and adds 127 codons to the interrupted AML1. Thus, in the five cases that we studied, the 3;21 translocation results in expression of two coexisting chimeric mRNAs which contain the identical runt domain at the 5' region, but differ in the 3' region. In addition, the chimeric transcript AML1/MDS1/EVI1 has also been detected in cells from one patient with the 3;21 translocation as well as in one of our patients. Several genes necessary for myeloid lineage differentiation contain the target sequence for AML1 in their regulatory regions. One of them is the CSF1R gene. We have compared the normal AML1 to AML1/MDS1, AML1/EAP and AML1/MDS1/EVI1 as transcriptional regulators of the CSF1R promoter. Our results indicate that AML1 can activate the promoter, and that the chimeric proteins compete with the normal AML1 and repress expression from the CSF1R promoter. AML1/MDS1 and AML1/EAP affect cell growth and phenotype when expressed in rat fibroblasts. However, the pattern of tumor growth of cells expressing the different chimeric genes in nude mice is different. We show that when either fusion gene is expressed, the cells lose contact inhibition and form foci over the monolayer. In addition, cells expressing AML1/MDS1 grow larger tumors in nude mice, whereas cells expressing only AML1/EAP do not form tumors, and cells expressing both chimeric genes induce tumors of intermediate size. Thus, although both chimeric genes have similar effects in transactivation assays of the CSF1R promoter, they affect cell growth differently in culture and have opposite effects as tumor promoters in vivo. Because of the results obtained with cells expressing one or both genes, we conclude that MDS1 seems to have tumorigenic properties, but that AML1/EAP seems to repress the oncogenic property of AML1/MDS1.
...
PMID:Rearrangement of the AML1/CBFA2 gene in myeloid leukemia with the 3;21 translocation: expression of co-existing multiple chimeric genes with similar functions as transcriptional repressors, but with opposite tumorigenic properties. 858 55

Candida albicans topoisomerase II, encoded by the TOP2 gene, mediates chromosome segregation by a double-strand DNA break mechanism and is a potential target for anti-fungal therapy. In this paper, we report the characterization of the C. albicans TOP2 gene and its use to develop a yeast system that allows the identification and study of anti-fungal topoisomerase II inhibitors in vivo. The gene, specifying a 1461-residue polypeptide with only 40% identity with human topoisomerase IIalpha and beta isoforms, was isolated from C. albicans on a 6.3 kb EcoRI fragment that mapped to chromosome 4. It was used to construct a plasmid in which TOP2 expresses a recombinant enzyme (residues 57-1461 of C. albicans topoisomerase II fused to the first five residues of Saccharomyces cerevisiae topoisomerase II) under the control of a galactose-inducible promoter. The plasmid rescued the lethal phenotype of a temperature-sensitive S. cerevisiae DNA topoisomerase II mutant allowing growth at 35 degrees C. Yeast cells, bearing ISE2 permeability and rad52 double-strand-break-repair mutations the growth of which at 35 degrees C was dependent on C. albicans topoisomerase II, were killed by the known topoisomerase II inhibitors amsacrine and doxorubicin. Parallel experiments in yeast expressing human topoisomerase IIalpha allowed the relative sensitivities of the fungal and host topoisomerases to be examined in the same genetic background. To compare the killing in vivo with drug inhibition in vitro, the recombinant C. albicans topoisomerase II protein was expressed and purified to near-homogeneity from S. cerevisiae yielding a 160 kDa polypeptide that displayed the expected ATP-dependent DNA-relaxation and DNA-decatenation activities. The enzyme, whether examined in vitro or complementing in S. cerevisiae, was comparably sensitive to amsacrine and doxorubicin. Our results suggest that potential topoisomerase II-targeting anti-fungal inhibitors can be identified and studied in S. cerevisiae.
...
PMID:Molecular cloning and expression of the Candida albicans TOP2 gene allows study of fungal DNA topoisomerase II inhibitors in yeast. 916 74

AML1 is involved at the breakpoint of chromosome 21 band q22 in several recurring chromosomal translocations associated with myeloid and lymphoid leukemias. AML1 corresponds to CBFA2, and encodes one of the DNA-binding subunits of the enhancer core binding factor CBF. Other members of this family of DNA-binding proteins are CBFA1 and CBFA3, also known as AML3 and AML2. The three proteins are characterized by a highly conserved domain (runt domain, > 90% homology) at the amino end that is necessary for DNA-binding and protein dimerization, and by a unique domain at the carboxyl end that is necessary for transactivation. Two recurring chromosomal translocations involving AML1 associated with myeloid leukemias are the t(8;21)(q22;q22), seen in 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M2, and the t(3;21)(q26;q22), that occurs in myeloid leukemias primarily following treatment with topoisomerase II inhibitors. In five patients with a t(3;21) whom we studied, AML1 is interrupted by the translocation breakpoint between the runt domain and the transactivation domain, and is fused to two genes on chromosome band 3q26: EAP, which encodes the ribosomal protein L22, and MDS1, which encodes a small polypeptide of unknown function. In one of the five patients we studied, a fusion with a third gene EVI1 also occurs. The fusion of EAP to AML1 is not in frame, and leads to a protein that is terminated shortly after the fusion junction by introduction of a stop codon. The fusion of AML1 to MDS1 is in frame, and adds 127 codons to the interrupted AML1. Thus, in the five cases that we studied, the 3;21 translocation results in expression of two coexisting chimeric mRNAs which contain the identical runt domain at the 5' region, but differ in the 3' region. In addition, the chimeric junction AML1/MDS1/EVII has been detected in cells from one of our patients with the 3;21 translocation. Several genes necessary for myeloid lineage differentiation contain the target sequence for AML1 in their regulatory regions. We have compared the normal AML1 to AML1/MDS1 and AML1/EAP as transcriptional regulators of the CSF1R promoter which contains the CBF target sequence. Our results indicate that whereas the normal AML1 can activate the promoter, the chimeric proteins compete with the normal AML1 and repress expression from the CSF1R promoter. To determine the role of the chimeric proteins in cell growth, we expressed their cDNA in rat fibroblasts. When either fusion gene is expressed, the cells lose contact inhibition and form foci over the monolayer. However, only cells expressing AML1/MDS1 grow as large tumors in nude mice. Thus, although both chimeric genes have similar effects in transactivation of the CSF1R promoter, they affect cell growth as tumor promoters differently in vivo.
...
PMID:Rearrangements of the AML1/CBFA2 gene in myeloid leukemia with the 3;21 translocation: in vitro and in vivo studies. 920 63

Mammalian cells express two genetically distinct isoforms of DNA topoisomerase II, designated topoisomerase IIalphaand topoisomerase IIbeta. We have recently shown that mouse topoisomerase IIalpha can substitute for the yeast topoisomerase II enzyme and complement yeast top2 mutations. This functional complementation allowed functional analysis of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of mammalian topoisomerase II, where the amino acid sequences are divergent and species-specific, in contrast to the highly conserved N-terminal and central domains. Several C-terminal deletion mutants of mouse topoisomerase IIalpha were constructed and expressed in yeast top2 cells. We found that the CTD of topoisomerase IIalphais dispensable for enzymatic activity in vitro but is required for nuclear localization in vivo. Interestingly, the CTD of topoisomerase IIbetawas also able to function as a signal for nuclear targeting. We therefore examined whether the CTD alone is sufficient for nuclear localization in vivo . The C-terminal region was fused to GFP (green fluorescent protein) and expressed under the GAL1 promoter in yeast cells. As expected, GFP signal was exclusively detected in the nucleus, irrespective of the CTD derived from either topoisomerase IIalphaor IIbeta. Surprisingly, when the upstream sequence of each CTD was added nuclear localization of the GFP signal was found to be cell cycle dependent: topoisomerase IIalpha-GFP was seen in the mitotic nucleus but was absent from the interphase nucleus, while topoisomerase IIbeta-GFP was detected predominantly in the interphase nucleus and less in the mitotic nucleus. Our results suggest that the catalytically dispensable CTD of topoisomerase II is sufficient as a signal for nuclear localization and that yeast cells can distinguish between the two isoforms of mammalian topoisomerase II, localizing each protein properly.
...
PMID:Cellular distribution of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II is determined by its catalytically dispensable C-terminal domain. 922 16

We have analyzed the subcellular distribution of the beta isoform of human topoisomerase II using both isoform-specific antisera and an epitope-tagging approach. Previous immunocytochemical studies have yielded differing results with one reporting this isoform to be predominantly nucleolar. Later studies seem to refute this finding, as do our results with isoform-specific antisera reported here. Epitope tagging minimizes potential complications arising from the use of anti-topoisomerase II antisera that may recognize epitopes that are modified or masked in vivo and could lead to misleading results in immunocytochemical studies. A second strength of this approach is that it allowed a comparison with similarly tagged control proteins (derived from the nucleolar transcription factor UBF) that were known to localize unambiguously to the cytoplasmic, nucleoplasmic, or nucleolar compartments. We report that the C-terminal domain of topoisomerase IIbeta fused to a beta-galactosidase tag localizes to the nucleus (but not the nucleolar compartment) and that this is indistinguishable from the localization of native topoisomerase IIbeta detected by isoform-specific antisera. Further analysis revealed that the nuclear localization determinant lies within the 116-residue C-terminal tail of human topoisomerase IIbeta.
...
PMID:Nuclear distribution of human DNA topoisomerase IIbeta: a nuclear targeting signal resides in the 116-residue C-terminal tail. 974 83

When exposed to etoposide, the outer cells from Chinese hamster V79 spheroids are about 10 times more resistant to DNA strand breaks and cell killing than V79 cells grown as monolayers. Previous results have shown that the outer cells of both spheroids and monolayers grow at the same rate and contain the same amount and activity of the target enzyme, topoisomerase II. In order to examine possible mechanisms for this resistance, cell fusion studies were conducted with fluorescent dye-tagged monolayer and spheroid cells. Fused cells were exposed for 30 min to 1.2 microg/ml etoposide and then separated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting into binucleate cells consisting of two monolayer cells, two spheroid cells, or a mixed doublet consisting of one cell of each type. Individual sorted cell doublets were examined for the presence of etoposide-induced DNA strand breaks using the alkaline comet assay. As expected, doublets of monolayer cells were sensitive to etoposide and doublets of spheroid cells were resistant. However, mixed doublets were as resistant to DNA damage by etoposide as spheroid doublets. In comparison, when etoposide- or adriamycin-resistant V79 monolayer cells were fused to the parent monolayer cells, the expected intermediate sensitivity to etoposide was observed for the mixed doublets. We conclude that etoposide resistance associated with the outer cells of spheroids can be "transferred" to produce resistance in monolayer cells. Rapid changes in phosphorylation that can affect topoisomerase II activity or localization, or that can alter chromatin structure, are suggested as possible mechanisms of resistance. In support of this hypothesis, topo IIalpha phosphorylation was at least 10 times greater in monolayers than in the outer cell layer of spheroids.
...
PMID:Cell fusion studies to examine the mechanism for etoposide resistance in Chinese hamster V79 spheroids. 974 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>

---