Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:4.2.2.7 (heparinase)
 1,270 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Polysaccharides and other complex carbohydrates were released by proteolysis of the chloroform-methanol insoluble residue of 10 day-old worms and eggs of Hymenolepis diminuta. Gas-liquid chromatographic analysis of alditol acetate derivatives of monosaccharides released from the polysaccharides by hydrolysis revealed that in the 10 day-old worm, glucose was the most abundant sugar, followed by galactose, glucosamine, galactosamine, fucose and possibly rhamnose. Mannose was least abundant and xylose was absent. In the egg, glucose and galactose were equally abundant, followed by the same sugars found in 10 day-old worms, and xylose was present. Uronic acid was detected in both fractions by specific chemical tests. None of the saccharide material from eggs and worms was susceptible to degradation by Streptomyces hyaluronidase, chondroitinase AC, and slightly susceptible to chondroitinase ABC, as shown by electrophoretic analysis on composite 2.2% acrylamide-agarose slab gels and 4.5/12.5% polyacrylamide gels before and after enzymatic treatment. One of the gel-separable bands, however, was degradable by both nitrous acid and Flavobacterium heparinase. Both bands from eggs were degradable by nitrous acid. These results suggest that eggs contain heparin and/or heparan sulfate and perhaps dermatan sulfate and that 10 day-old worms also have these polyglycans but possibly not chondroitin sulfate or hyaluronic acid.
 ...
PMID:Characterization of polysaccharides of the eggs and adults of Hymenolepis diminuta. 653 86

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) represent depolymerized porcine mucosal heparin derivatives, which are commonly used for the management of thrombotic disorders. Because of their widespread usage, the supplies of the raw material namely unfractionated heparin are nearly exhausted. Porcine mucosal tissue is almost exclusively used for the preparation of these agents. Thus, there is a timely need for the production of heparin like drugs from other sources. Fermentation techniques have been used to produce carbohydrates such as dextran and innulin for therapeutic purposes. Bacterial cell wall polysaccharide mimics the linear hexose units, which constitute heparin. Utilizing Escherichia coli cell membranes produced by fermentation technology, chemical sulfation and enzymatic epimerization, sulfaminoheparosan type of polymer mimicking the structure of heparin has been produced. These semi-synthetic sulfaminoheparosans exhibit biologic actions comparable to that observed with heparin. The sulfaminoheparosan core can also be degraded to obtain low-molecular-weight (LMW) derivatives mimicking LMWHs. Using this technique, a novel LMW sulfaminoheparosan derivative (Q93C/239) was produced by Inalco, Milan, Italy. To compare this heparin analogue, a LMWH, namely tinzaparin, was used to determine the relative anticoagulant, antiprotease, and molecular profile. Additional studies were carried out to determine the susceptibility of this agent to heparinase-I. These comparative studies exhibited both antiprotease and anticoagulant properties similar to those of tinzaparin. However LMW sulfaminoheparosan resisted heparinase-I digestion at low heparinase-I concentrations. These studies demonstrate that the sulfaminoheparosan derived LMW components exhibit similar molecular and anticoagulant profile as tinzaparin and warrant additional preclinical and clinical development to determine their potential usefulness as antithrombotic agents.
 ...
PMID:Molecular and pharmacologic profile of tinzaparin and a comparable low-molecular-weight bacterial sulfaminoheparosan. 1497 2

The currently available brand-name low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the United States include dalteparin (Pfizer), enoxaparin (Aventis), and tinzaparin (Pharmion). Other products available, in Europe, include certoparin (Novartis), reviparin (Abbott), nadroparin (GlaxoSmithkline), and parnaparin (Alpha-Wasserman). Each of these LMWHs has a characteristic molecular weight profile and biological activity in terms of an anti-FXa and anti-FIIa potency. The mean molecular weight of these drugs ranges from 4.0 kDa to 7.0 kDa and the anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio ranges from 1.5 to 3.5. These agents may also be characterized by the presence of specific chemical end groups such as 2-O-sulfo-4-enepyranosuronic acid at the nonreducing terminus (enoxaparin) or 2,5-anhydro-D-mannose at the reducing terminus (dalteparin). Further, the component oligosaccharide chains exhibit product-specific distribution profiles. It is now widely accepted that individual LMWHs are chemically unique agents and cannot be interchanged therapeutically. Each commercial LMWH has been individually developed for specific clinical indications, which are dose and product dependent. Recently, several generic LMWHs have become available in India (Cutenox and Markaparin) and South America (dilutol, clenox, dripanina), and three companies have filed for regulatory approval of a generic version of enoxaparin in the United States. As the primary aim of a generic drug is to reduce cost without compromising patient care, a generic drug is required to be chemically and biologically equivalent to the pioneer drug. Because LMWHs represent complex natural mucopolysaccharide drugs that have undergone chemical and enzymatic modifications, physicochemical and biological information in addition to molecular weight and anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio should be used to determine generic equivalency to the branded drug. We have utilized a previously reported approach to systematically compare three generic versions of enoxaparin obtained from India and Brazil with the branded enoxaparin (Lovenox) available in the United States. Testing included molecular and structural profiling, evaluation in clot-based and amidolytic anti-FXa and anti-FIIa assays, and heparinase-I digestion profiles. While the molecular profiles (4.8 +/- 1.8 kD) and anticoagulant potencies as determined by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were comparable for all four agents, the generic products showed variations in the thrombin time (TT) and Heptest assays. Two generic and the branded enoxaparin were readily digested by heparinase-I, losing most of their anticoagulant activity, but one generic product resisted digestion. This may have been due to a unique structural feature in this product. These studies show that, while generic LMWHs may exhibit acceptable molecular weight and anti-FXa profiles, they can exhibit assay-based differences and digestion profiles. Testing in animal models to determine safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic parameters may be important to verify equivalence. In order to assure that the generic LMWHs are equivalent to branded LMWHs such that equivalent clinical results are obtained, there is a need to develop clear stepwise guidelines that will establish equivalency in terms of physical, chemical, biochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties for these anticoagulant drugs.
 ...
PMID:Product individuality of commercially available low-molecular-weight heparins and their generic versions: therapeutic implications. 1695 78