Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:4.1.1.6 (CAD)
4,420 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We determined the time-course of the release of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in six patients undergoing coronary artery bypass (CAD) and eight patients undergoing valve replacement for mitral stenosis (MS). Before CPB, the arterial ANF was significantly higher in MS patients than in CAD patients (243 +/- 38 and 29 +/- 5.8 pg/ml respectively, P less than 0.01). With the onset of CPB, the acute pressure unloading of the atria induced a significant, rapid decrease of ANF only in MS patients (-64% of pre-CPB value at 5 min) and no major changes in CAD patients. Clamping of the aorta induced a further progressive reduction of ANF release to almost zero in both groups. Readmission of coronary flow to the empty atria with declamping resulted in an increase in the plasma level of ANF in both groups to reach the concentration present in MS patients before CPB. After CPB, the ANF levels decreased in CAD patients while remaining elevated in MS patients. These data suggest that ANF release from human atria depends on atrial filling pressure and other unknown factors.
...
PMID:Time course of human atrial natriuretic factor release during cardiopulmonary bypass in mitral valve and coronary artery diseased patients. 182 75

To compare the hemodynamic, antiischemic, metabolic, and neurohumoral effects of intravenous esmolol (beta 1 blocking agent) and gallopamil (verapamil-like calcium channel blocker), 14 patients with angiographically proven CAD and reproducible ST segment depression were studied at rest and during exercise under control conditions and after an intravenous bolus injection of esmolol (0.5 mg/kg/1 min, followed by an infusion with 0.2 mg/kg/min) or gallopamil (0.025 mg/kg/3 min). In contrast to gallopamil, esmolol significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (175.7 vs. 160 mm Hg) and heart rate (107.4 vs. 96.9 min-1) during exercise as well as cardiac output (11.57 vs. 9.38 l/min) and significantly enhanced systemic vascular resistance both at rest (1241 vs. 1479 dynes.s.cm-5) and during exercise (805 vs. 947 dynes.s.cm-5). On the other hand, exercise filling pressures and lactate levels (3.66 vs. 3.05 mmol/l) were significantly reduced by gallopamil only. Thus, the significant improvement of exercise tolerance by both esmolol and gallopamil is based on different mechanisms of action: esmolol improves myocardial ischemia by appreciably reducing myocardial oxygen consumption, whereas gallopamil primarily improves oxygen supply and ventricular performance. Plasma catecholamines, atrial natriuretic factor, and aldosterone levels as well as plasma renin activity were identically influenced by esmolol and gallopamil, respectively. A reflex activation of the sympathetic system did not occur.
...
PMID:[Anti-ischemia effects of gallopamil and esmolol in an intra-individual comparison in patients with coronary heart disease]. 791 67