Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:4.1.1.6 (CAD)
 4,420 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Anticoagulants and antithrombotic drugs have played a key role in the prophylaxis, treatment and surgica/interventional management of thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders. There are several newer drugs which are currently developed for the anticoagulant management of cardiovascular diseases in both the medical and surgical indications. These include the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), antithrombin agents such as the Hirudin, Hirulog and Argatroban and indirect and direct anti-Xa drugs, represented by Pentasaccharide (Arixtra) and DX 9065a, respectively. Several other agents such as the natural and recombinant anti-Xa drugs and anti-tissue factor agents are also developed. The antiplatelet agents include Clopidogrel, Cilostazol, Anplag and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. For the subcutaneous indications, unfractionated heparin is gradually replaced by the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs). LMWHs such as the Enoxaparin and Dalteparin are commonly used for the management of acute coronary syndrome. These drugs have been approved for the treatment of unstable angina and are currently undergoing rigorous trials for interventional indications. Arixtra is also developed for various subcutaneous indications. However, it exhibits lower anticoagulant effects and may not be optimal for intravenous and interventional purposes. At a higher dosage when administered intravenously the LMWHs produce varying degrees of anticoagulation at relatively lower activated clotting times (150-200). Several studies in vascular and cardiovascular interventions have shown that even at a relatively lower anticoagulant level the LMWHs are as effective as unfractionated heparin at the recommended dosages which produce a relatively higher level of anticoagulation (ACT > 200 secs.). Thus, these agents are currently developed for interventional and surgical indications. It should be emphasized that different LMWHs produce different degrees of anticoagulation and should therefore be individually optimized for a given interventional or surgical purposes. At a relatively high dosage the levels of LMWHs can be measured by using the ACT and APTT. When administered with such GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors as the Abciximab, Aggrastat or Eptifibratide, these drugs may require dosage adjustment However, since the introduction of the front loading of Clopidogrel, the unqualified use of GP IIb/IIIa is debated. LMWHs will find expanded indications in both the medical and surgical management of patients with cardiovascular disorders including atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. The only approved anti-Xa drug is represented by a synthetic heparinomimetic, namely, Arixtra. This drug is given for the prophylaxis of post orthopedic indications. This agent is undergoing additional clinical trials in the management of coronary artery diseases. Because of the dependence on antithrombin III (AT) and the sole anti-Xa effects, it has a narrow therapeutic index and its efficacy in this indication may be limited. Additional clinical trials are needed at this time to validate the clinical potential of this drug. The antithrombin agents (Hirudin, Hirulog and Argatroban) were initially developed for arterial indications. However, these agents are approved as a substitute anticoagulant in patients with heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and PCI. Currently an of these agents are being developed for surgical and interventional use. However, since there is no available antidote at this time, the development is somewhat limited. The antithrombin agents may be useful in patients with HIT which require further clinical validation. Many other anti-Xa agents are also developed. Most of these can be given parenterally. However, the clinical data is somewhat limited. Similarly, several of the new antiplatelet drugs can be administered parenterally and may be useful in CAD. Since most of these newer anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs are mono-therapeutic their therapeutic index is rather limited. Only in combination these agents can mimic heparins. At this time it is safe to state that heparin and its LMW derivatives will remain the anticoagulant of choice for cardiovascular indications until these newer agents have been validated in extended clinical trials in polytherapeutic settings.
 ...
PMID:Management of thrombotic and cardiovascular disorders in the new millenium. 1281 77

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a two to five times increased risk of developing premature cardiovascular disease that shortens life expectancy by 5-10 years. Traditional risk factors known to promote and accelerate the progression of atherosclerotic lesions however, are often absent in patients with RA. Many similarities have emerged between the paradigm of inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and the well-established mechanisms of inflammation in the pathogenesis of RA. Hence it is intriguing to speculate that inflammation in RA is not confined to the joints but also present in the vessel wall. Indeed, low-grade inflammation and endothelial dysfunction play pivotal roles in the initiation, progression and propagation of the atherosclerotic process. While the healthy endothelium prevents adhesion of mononuclear cells, the defence mechanisms cease under the influence of cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation and they express adhesion molecules (selectins, vascular adhesion molecule-([VCAM-]1, intercellular adhesion molecule-[ICAM-]1) that promote the adherence of monocytes. This expression is induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-(IL-)1beta and tumor necrosis factor-(TNF-)alpha, by C-reactive protein (CRP), and CD40/CD40 ligand interactions. As all of these factors are present at increased levels in the systemic circulation in RA, it appears possible that they might impact the endothelium as well. Further similarities include proteolytic enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that play a role in joint destruction as well as in destabilization and rupture of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. In addition, coagulation factors such as increased levels of tissue factor (TF), van Willebrand factor (vWF) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-(PAI-)1 are important in both, RA and CAD. Endothelial dysfunction has shown to correlate with cardiovascular prognosis in several studies, which indicates its clinical relevance. Endothelial function measurement is performed in the coronary or peripheral circulation (by venous occlusion plethysmography or flow-mediated dilation). Recent studies have demonstrated impaired endothelial function in patients with RA, already at early stages of the disease. Similar results are found in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), indicating that inflammation per se may impair altering vascular function. This and more evidence supports the notion that inflammation plays a pivotal role in vascular dysfunction and may by these mechanisms explain at least part of the excess morbidity and mortality observed in RA and SLE. In light of the growing evidence of increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality mostly independent of traditional risk factors, treatment strategies in RA should not only aim at relieving symptoms and inhibiting joint destruction but should have a beneficial effect on the vasculature to reduce cardiovascular events. Indeed, an improvement in endothelial function in RA was recently demonstrated by anti-TNF-alpha therapy and statins. Whether and to what degree the effects of anti-inflammatory strategies to improve endothelial function, which although clinically well established is still a surrogate, translate into clinical benefit for our patients with rheumatologic diseases needs to be determined in large-scale clinical trials some of which are now already under way.
 ...
PMID:[Rheumatoid arthritis, inflammation, and atherosclerosis]. 1559 72

Current thinking supports the notion that several inflammatory proteins intervene with endothelium and haemostatic factors leading to plaque formation and rupture. Of these, C-reactive protein (CRP), monocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) promote atherogenesis by inducing monocyte-macrophage activation, foam cell formation, platelet activation, tissue factor expression, release of other procoagulant cytokines or downregulation of atheroprotective cytokines such as interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor b-1 (TGFb-1). CRP, MSCF and IL-6 are interrelated and have been found in increased blood concentrations in CAD. Increased levels of CRP and IL-6 predict a higher cardiovascular event rate in the general population and in addition to high MCSF or low TGFb-1 predict adverse outcome in CAD patients independently of traditional risk factors. Moreover, in CAD patients, the predictive value of MCSF is additive and beyond that of CRP suggesting the need of a "multimarker approach" in assessing cardiovascular risk. Accumulating evidence supports the utility of non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, namely carotid intimal media thickness, flow mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, augmentation index or pulse wave velocity, in the prediction of cardiovascular risk particularly in primary prevention settings. The combination of these non-invasive tests has been shown to improve their prognostic accuracy compared to each other alone. Although several therapeutic strategies like vaccination against antigens promoting atherogenesis, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, statins, and ACE inhibitors may reduce the levels of these inflammatory markers and improve the non-invasive markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, the impact on cardiovascular risk resulting from these changes is unknown. The combination of an established inflammatory marker such as CRP or a vascular marker such as IMT with novel biochemical and vascular markers of cardiovascular disease may offer additive prognostic information for adverse outcome.
 ...
PMID:Inflammatory and non-invasive vascular markers: the multimarker approach for risk stratification in coronary artery disease. 1837 39