Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:4.1.1.6 (CAD)
 4,420 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have studied cell lines of rodent and human origin for their propensity to become resistant to antifolates (methotrexate, trimetrexate), phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate (PALA), and colcemid, resistances associated with amplification of the DHFR, CAD, and MDR1 genes, respectively. We have employed two different methods: (1) a shallow step-wise selection protocol, where time to attain specified resistance is the quantitative measure, (2) the frequency of resistant colonies at specified drug concentrations. Although there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods, the two methods gave the same relative ranking of cell lines. Striking differences in the propensity for gene amplification (resistance) were found: human cell lines were less prone to amplify genes than Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. This ranking was similar with all of the agents employed. Additionally, we observed that whereas PALA resistance in CHO cells is associated with amplification of the CAD gene, PALA resistance in the two human cell lines studied (HeLaS3 and VA13) was not associated with amplification and/or overexpression of the CAD gene, and thus this resistance to PALA occurs by an unknown mechanism.
 ...
PMID:The propensity for gene amplification: a comparison of protocols, cell lines, and selection agents. 750 68

The view that chemical or physical oncogenesis and tumor therapy resistance represent different parts of common cellular alterations gained considerable attractiveness, because it explains the inherent unreponsiveness of many tumors. Viruses are potent oncogenes and are causally linked to approximately one-fifth of all human malignancies. Whether viral oncogenesis exerts comparable effects was less clear. Recent progress in experimental research provided ample evidence that viruses affect response of tumor cells toward anti-cancer drugs and irradiation. Resistance to cytostatic drugs and radiation develops by alterations at the drug-target sites (i.e., DNA or specific target proteins), upstream (i.e., detoxification mechanisms), or downstream of them (i.e., programmed cell death). Viruses interfere with specific cellular genes at these three levels. Viral proteins induce the expression and expression of drug resistance genes, that is, MDR1, DHFR, or CAD. Viral interactions with the tumor suppressor genes (p53, pRB) abrogate cell cycle arrests and disturb DNA repair of drug- and radiation-induced DNA lesions. The readiness to commit cellular suicide (apoptosis) is also affected by viral genes. The connection between viral oncogenesis and the response of tumor cells to treatment adds a new dimension to tumor biology and may have important consequences for oncological treatment modalities in the future.
 ...
PMID:Impact of viral oncogenesis on responses to anti-cancer drugs and irradiation. 1100 11

The tumor resistance of glioblastoma cells in vivo is thought to be enhanced by their heterogeneity and plasticity, which are extremely difficult to curb in vitro. The external microenvironment shapes the molecular profile of tumor culture models, thus influencing potential therapy response. Our study examines the expression profile of selected lncRNAs involved in tumor resistance network in three different glioblastoma-derived models commonly utilized for testing drug response in vitro. Differential expression analysis revealed significant divergence in lncRNA profile between parental tumors and tumor-derived cell cultures in vitro, including the following particles: MALAT1, CASC2, H19, TUSC7, XIST, RP11-838N2.4, DLX6-AS1, GLIDR, MIR210HG, SOX2-OT. The examined lncRNAs influence the phenomenon of tumor resistance via their downstream target genes through a variety of processes: multi-drug resistance, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, autophagy, cell proliferation and viability, and DNA repair. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro expression identified differences in the levels of potential lncRNA targets, with the highest discrepancies detected for the MDR1, LRP1, BCRP and MRP1 genes. Co-expression analyses confirmed the following interrelations: MALAT1-TYMS, MALAT1-MRP5, H19-ZEB1, CASC2-VIM, CASC2-N-CAD; they additionally suggest the possibility of MALAT1-BCRP, MALAT1-mTOR and TUSC7-PTEN interconnections in glioblastoma. Although our results clearly demonstrate that the artificial ex vivo microenvironment changes the profile of lncRNAs related to tumor resistance, it is difficult to anticipate the final phenotypic effect, since this phenomenon is a complex one that involves a network of molecular interactions underlying a variety of cellular processes.
 ...
PMID:If Artificial In Vitro Microenvironment Can Influence Tumor Drug Resistance Network via Modulation of lncRNA Expression?-Comparative Analysis of Glioblastoma-Derived Cell Culture Models and Initial Tumors In Vivo. 3324 8