Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.6.3.44 (P-glycoprotein)
13,344 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Two human cancer cell lines (MA 2 and MA 3) were established from pleural effusions of infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast. The lines were maintained in continuous monolayer culture with doubling times of 70 (MA 2) and 78 (MA 3) hr for more than two years and possessed extensively rearranged abnormal karyo-types with modal chromosome number of 83 (MA 2) and 81 (MA 3) and DNA index values of 1.65 and 1.77, respectively. No amplifications or rearrangements were evident in the c-myc, int-2, c-erb B2, c-Ha-ras, or hst 1 genes in MA 2 and MA 3 cell lines. The clinical histories of the patients from whom the cell lines were derived are reported and compared with the results observed in the cell lines in vitro. The presence of CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA tumor markers observed in the primary tumor tissues was retained by the established cell lines. While the primary tumor tissues were ER+/PgR borderline+ (MA 2) and ER-/PgR+ (MA 3), the MA 2 line was ER+/PgR- and the MA 3 line remained ER-/PgR+. The MDR P-glycoprotein was not expressed either in primary tumor tissues or in the respective cell lines. High expression of cytokeratins 7, 18, and 19 was evident by immunohistochemical analysis in each cell line. whereas cytokeratins 8 and 17 were poorly or not at all expressed. The treatment history of the patients from whom the cell lines were derived involved CMF followed six months later by novantrone and cisplatin plus VP 16 (MA 2) and FEC followed four years later by CMF (MA 3). The chemosensitivity pattern assay of the cell lines indicated that the MA 2 line was sensitive to doxorubicin, cisplatin, and vinblastine, whereas the MA 3 line was sensitive to doxorubicin and cisplatin. The characteristics of these cell lines indicate them to be a good experimental model to investigate breast cancer biology and anticancer drug response.
...
PMID:Establishment and characterization of two new cell lines derived from human metastatic breast carcinomas. 913 Dec 70

Recently reported morphologic and molecular genetic evidence suggests that some ovarian carcinomas arise from their benign and low malignant potential (LMP) counterparts. In order to help reach a better understanding of ovarian tumorigenesis, we studied a wide range of gene products involved in cellular growth regulation in archival material obtained from three groups of tumors with graduated malignant potential. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER-2/neu-encoded receptor protein, p53 gene product, and multidrug resistance gene product (P-glycoprotein). The expression of EGFR, HER-2/neu-encoded receptor protein, and mutant p53 product was significantly lower in LMP tumors than in carcinomas (p < 0.05). HER-2/neu immunopositivity was more prevalent in adenocarcinomas than in LMP tumors, and the proportion of HER-2/neu-positive adenocarcinomas increased with the progression of the disease. The staining differences between LMP tumors and adenocarcinomas with antibodies against Ki-67, PCNA, and P-glycoprotein were not statistically significant. Immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, HER-2/neu, and p53 in ovarian epithelial tumor is relevant to ovarian tumorigenesis. It could serve as a powerful tool for the pursuit of retrospective studies focused on these important biologic markers.
...
PMID:Immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation markers and altered gene expression in archival specimens of ovarian epithelial tumors. 939 93

ELAM is an E-Selectin adhesion molecule involved in the inflammatory process but it is also thought to potentially participate in the development of blood borne metastases, by facilitating tumour cell adhesion to vessels wall. ELAM expression in tumours was immunohistochemically investigated in 203 breast carcinomas. Frozen tissue sections were probed with monoclonal anti ELAM (Clone 1.2B6) using automated and quantitative immunoperoxidase systems. A positive anti-ELAM immunoreaction was observed in 113 tumours (57%). The mean surface of positive tumours varied from 3% to 50% (mean = 11.75%, SD = 8.7) and was correlated with histoprognostic indicators and tumour expression of various antigens detected according to the same method as ELAM. The results showed that ELAM immunoexpression was independent of the tumour size, grade and type and of the nodal status but significantly increased parallel to patients' age (p<0. 01). ELAM expression was independent of Ki-67/MIB1, anti-P53 and anti-Bcl2, anti-CD44v, anti-c-erbB-2, anti-CD31, anti-RE/RP, anti-PS2, and anti-VLA3 immunoreactions. But ELAM expression correlated with that of the VCAM vascular cell adhesion molecule (p=0.0004), VLA2 (p<0.0001), P-glycoprotein (p=0.025), and of Cathepsin D to a lower degree (p=0.06) and inversely correlated with E-cadherin (p=0.03). The results suggest that endothelial cell activation is independent of tumour cell proliferative activity and of stromal angiogenesis and that the precise role and regulation of ELAM in tumours remains to be elucidated. Also the clinical relevance of ELAM immunohistochemical expression requires further investigation and correlation with patients' follow-up.
...
PMID:ELAM selectin expression in breast carcinomas detected by automated and quantitative immunohistochemical assays. 953 26

Differences in therapeutic outcomes after regional chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy in liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma cannot be explained only by variations in the regimens of treatment. This study was undertaken to assess the potential of several tumor-associated markers of biological behavior (biomarkers) to predict therapeutic response in order to pre-select the best candidates for this demanding treatment. In a group of 21 patients, flow cytometric DNA ploidy provided the most accurate prediction, with a response rate of 88% in 8 DNA diploid tumors compared to 31% in 13 DNA aneuploid cases (P = 0.017) and a difference in overall survival of nine months (20.4 vs 11.3, P = 0.041). Only a slight trend towards improved response rate was observed when we immunohistochemically detected p53 anti-oncoprotein expression in 11 (52%) p53-positive tumors (P = 0.063). Other immunohistochemical biomarkers as P-glycoprotein (p170), p21/WAF, mdm2, c-erbB-2, and proliferative activity of tumor (detected either by anti-PCNA and anti-Ki67 monoclonal antibodies or as a flow cytometric proliferation index) were unrelated to the outcome of treatment. DNA ploidy and expression of p53 protein are potential biomarkers for predicting the response to regional chemotherapy of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.
...
PMID:Biomarkers for predicting response to regional chemo-immunotherapy in liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. 963 42

VLA2 is thought to be involved in the metastatic process in malignant tumours, in particular in carcinomatous cell adhesion to vessel basement membrane. VLA2 expression was immunohistochemically investigated in 204 breast carcinomas. Frozen tissue sections were probed with monoclonal anti-VLA2 using automated (Ventana ES 320 System) and quantitative (SAMBA 2005 image processor) immunoperoxidase. A positive anti-VLA2 immunoreaction was observed in 48 tumours (23.5%), within epithelial carcinomatous cells. The VLA2-positive surface in tumours varied from 3% to 20% (mean 8.75, S.D. 7.17) and was correlated with histoprognostic indicators and tumour expression of various antigens detected using the same method as that for VLA2. The results show that VLA2 immunoexpression was independent of the tumour size, grade, type and aneuploidy, and of the nodal status. VLA2 significantly correlated with ELAM, VCAM, VLA3 and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) (P < 0.01) and inversely correlated with cathepsin D (P < 0.001), but was independent of Ki67/MIB1, p53, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, E cadherin, CD44v, CD31, oestrogen and progesterone receptors' (ER, PR) antigenic sites and pS2. The exact role, if any, of VLA2 in tumour cell dissemination remains to be elucidated and the clinical relevance of VLA2 immunodetection in breast carcinomas requires further investigation of the correlation between VLA2 immunocytochemical expression and patients' outcome and response to chemotherapy.
...
PMID:VLA2 integrin expression in breast carcinomas evaluated by automated and quantitative immunohistochemistry. 964 45

Fas and Fas ligand (FasL) mediate T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity and may also induce physiologic apoptosis in breast epithelium associated with menstruation and cessation of lactation. Altered expression may thus be associated with breast carcinoma progression, chemotherapy response, or outcome. We performed a clinicopathologic analysis of immunohistochemical staining for Fas and FasL, as well as bax, bcl-2, glutathione-s-transferase, HER-2 (c-erbB-2), Ki67, P-glycoprotein, p53, and hormone receptors in pretreatment breast biopsies from 34 patients with locally advanced or limited stage IV breast carcinoma who received preoperative (neoadjuvant, primary) chemotherapy followed by lumpectomy or mastectomy. Neoplastic cells expressed Fas in 44% and FasL in 85% of pretreatment biopsies. Fas immunostaining was more frequent in tumors with larger size (p = 0.02) and pretreatment metastases (p = 0.03). Combined Fas and p53 staining correlated with pathologic complete response (4 of 5 CR versus 6 of 29 other, p = 0.02), as did combined p53 and lack of FasL staining (2 of 5 CR versus 0 of 29 other, p = 0.02), but individually Fas, p53, and lack of FasL immunostaining demonstrated only trends to correlation with CR (p = 0.13-0.15). No other biomarkers correlated with chemotherapeutic response. Neither FasL nor Fas expression was associated with the degree of peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration, or with expression of the other biomarkers. Recurrence was more frequent in Fas-expressing tumors (recurrent cases 7 of 10 Fas positive versus nonrecurrent 8 of 24 Fas positive, p = 0.07). In this patient group, Fas expression is associated with aggressive tumor behavior. Biomarker immunostaining correlates weakly with pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy, in keeping with complex or heterogeneous tumor-drug interactions.
...
PMID:Clinicopathologic Analysis of Fas, Fas Ligand, and Other Biomarkers in Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma. 1134 71

An important role for beta-catenin pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis was first suggested by the protein's association with adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein, and by evidence of dysregulation of beta-catenin protein expression at all stages of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Recent studies have, however, shown that yet more components of colorectal carcinogenesis are linked to beta-catenin pathways. Pro-oncogenic factors that also release beta-catenin from the adherens complex and/or encourage translocation to the nucleus include ras, epidermal growth factor (EGF), c-erbB-2, PKC-betaII, MUC1, and PPAR-gamma, whereas anti-oncogenic factors that also inhibit nuclear beta-catenin signaling include transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, retinoic acid, and vitamin D. Association of nuclear beta-catenin with the T cell factor (TCF)/lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) family of transcription factors promotes the expression of several compounds that have important roles in the development and progression of colorectal carcinoma, namely: c-myc, cyclin D1, gastrin, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-7, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (aPAR), CD44 proteins, and P-glycoprotein. Finally, genetic aberrations of several components of the beta-catenin pathways, eg, Frizzled (Frz), AXIN, and TCF-4, may potentially contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis. In discussing the above interactions, this review demonstrates that beta-catenin represents a key molecule in the development of colorectal carcinoma.
...
PMID:Beta-catenin--a linchpin in colorectal carcinogenesis? 1183 57

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in American women. It was the second most common cancer in the world in 2002, with more than 1 million new cases. Despite advances in early detection and the understanding of the molecular bases of breast cancer biology, about 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer have recurrent disease. To offer more effective and less toxic treatment, selecting therapies requires considering the patient and the clinical and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Systemic treatment of breast cancer includes cytotoxic, hormonal, and immunotherapeutic agents. These medications are used in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic settings. In general, systemic agents are active at the beginning of therapy in 90% of primary breast cancers and 50% of metastases. However, after a variable period of time, progression occurs. At that point, resistance to therapy is not only common but expected. Herein we review general mechanisms of drug resistance, including multidrug resistance by P-glycoprotein and the multidrug resistance protein family in association with specific agents and their metabolism, emergence of refractory tumors associated with multiple resistance mechanisms, and resistance factors unique to host-tumor-drug interactions. Important anticancer agents specific to breast cancer are described. Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in American women. In 2002, 209,995 new cases of breast cancer were registered, and 42,913 patients died of it. In 5 years, the annual prevalence of breast cancer will reach 968,731 cases in the United States. World wide, the problem is just as significant, as breast cancer is the most frequent cancer after nonmelanoma skin cancer, with more than 1 million new cases in 2002 and an expected annual prevalence of more than 4.4 million in 5 years. Breast cancer treatment currently requires the joint efforts of a multidisciplinary team. The alternatives for treatment are constantly expanding. With the use of new effective chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and biological agents and with information regarding more effective ways to integrate systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy, elaborating an appropriate treatment plan is becoming more complex. Developing such a plan should be based on knowledge of the benefits and potential acute and late toxic effects of each of the therapy regimens. Despite advances in early detection and understanding of the molecular bases of breast cancer biology, approximately 30% of all patients with early-stage breast cancer have recurrent disease, which is metastatic in most cases. The rates of local and systemic recurrence vary within different series, but in general, distant recurrences are dominant, strengthening the hypothesis that breast cancer is a systemic disease from presentation. On the other hand, local recurrence may signal a posterior systemic relapse in a considerable number of patients within 2 to 5 years after completion of treatment. To offer better treatment with increased efficacy and low toxicity, selecting therapies based on the patient and the clinical and molecular characteristics of the tumor is necessary. Consideration of these factors should be incorporated in clinical practice after appropriate validation studies are performed to avoid confounding results, making them true prognostic and predictive factors. A prognostic factor is a measurable clinical or biological characteristic associated with a disease-free or overall survival period in the absence of adjuvant therapy, whereas a predictive factor is any measurable characteristic associated with a response or lack of a response to a specific treatment. The main prognostic factors associated with breast cancer are the number of lymph nodes involved, tumor size, histological grade, and hormone receptor status, the first two of which are the basis for the AJCC staging system. The sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system allows better prediction of prognosis by stage. However, after determining the stage, histological grade, and hormone receptor status, the tumor can behave in an unexpected manner, and the prognosis can vary. Other prognostic and predictive factors have been studied in an effort to explain this phenomenon, some of which are more relevant than others: HER-2/neu gene amplification and protein expression, expression of other members of the epithelial growth factor receptor family, S phase fraction, DNA ploidy, p53 gene mutations, cyclin E, p27 dysregulation, the presence of tumor cells in the circulation or bone marrow, and perineural and lymphovascular space invasion. Systemic treatment of breast cancer includes the use of cytotoxic, hormonal, and immunotherapeutic agents. All of these agents are used in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic setting. Adjuvant systemic therapy is used in patients after they undergo primary surgical resection of their breast tumor and axillary nodes and who have a significant risk of systemic recurrence. Multiple studies have demonstrated that adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer produces a 23% or greater improvement in disease-free survival and a 15% or greater increase in overall survival rates. Recommendations for the use of adjuvant therapy are based on the individual patient's risk and the balance between absolute benefit and toxicity. Anthracycline-based regimens are preferred, and the addition of taxanes increases the survival rate in patients with lymph node-positive disease. Adjuvant hormone therapy accounts for almost two thirds of the benefit of adjuvant therapy overall in patients with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen is considered the standard of care in premenopausal patients. In comparison, the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole has been proven to be superior to tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer. The adjuvant use of monoclonal antibodies and targeted therapies other than hormone therapy is being studied. Interestingly, some patients have an early recurrence even though they have a tumor with good prognostic features and at a favorable stage. These recurrences have been explained by the existence of certain cellular characteristics at the molecular level that make the tumor cells resistant to therapy. Selection of resistant cell clones of micrometastatic disease has also been proposed as an explanation for these events. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy, which is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer, is becoming more popular. It reduces the tumor volume, thus increasing the possibility of breast conservation, and at the same time allows identification of in vivo tumor sensitivity to different agents. The pathological response to neoadj uvant systemic therapy in the breast and lymph nodes correlates with patient survival. Use of this treatment modality produces survival rates identical to those obtained with the standard adjuvant approach. The rates of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy vary according to the regimen used, ranging from 6% to 15% with anthracycline-based regimens to almost 30% with the addition of a noncross-resistant agent such as a taxane. In one study, the addition of neoadjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER-2-positive breast tumors increased the pCR rate to 65%. Primary hormone therapy has also been used in the neoadjuvant systemic setting. Although the pCR rates with this therapy are low, it significantly increases breast conservation. Currently, neoadjuvant systemic therapy is an important tool in not only assessing tumor response to an agent but also studying the mechanisms of action of the agent and its effects at the cellular level. However, no tumor response is observed in some cases despite the use of appropriate therapy. The tumor continues growing during treatment in such cases, a phenomenon called primary resistance to therapy. The use of palliative systemic therapy for metastatic breast cancer is challenging. Five percent of newly diagnosed cases of breast cancer are metastatic, and 30% of treated patients have a systemic recurrence. Once metastatic disease develops, the possibility of a cure is very limited or practically nonexistent. In this heterogeneous group of patients, the 5-year survival rate is 20%, and the median survival duration varies from 12 to 24 months. In this setting, breast cancer has multiple clinical presentations, and the therapy for it should be chosen according to the patient's tumor characteristics, previous treatment, and performance status with the goal of improving survival without compromising quality of life. Treatment resistance is most commonly seen in such patients. They initially may have a response to different agents, but the responses are not sustained, and, in general, the rates of response to subsequent agents are lower. Table 1 summarizes metastatic breast cancer response rates to single-agent systemic therapy.
...
PMID:Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer. 1799 29

Primary chemotherapy is a useful strategy for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer and therefore allows in vivo evaluation of the action of cytotoxic drugs and the possibility of accomplishing conservative breast surgeries, as well as the early treatment of metastasis. Mechanisms of resistance to the drugs include the action of protein associated with the efflux of drugs from the intracellular environment hindering their activity; one of the most studied proteins is P-glycoprotein codified by the MDR-1 gene. The presence of polymorphisms can determine different physiological actions of these proteins, intervening with the response of the drug's action. We evaluated the presence of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) C3435T of the MDR-1 gene and its correlation with the response to primary chemotherapy using the RECIST criteria. Forty-one Brazilian women with stages II and III breast cancer using the PCR-RFLP analysis were evaluated. Thirty-three patients with the SNP genotype (TT and CT) and eight patients with the wild genotype (CC) were found; there was no statistically significant correlation between the diverse genotypes and the clinical and pathological responses according to the Cramer correlation coefficient (V = 0.14). The parameters: nuclear and histological degree, and estrogens, progesterone and c-erb B2 receptors did not demonstrate a statistical correlation with the SNP C3435T. Patients with complete pathological response (12.5%) showed only the polymorphic genotype and not the wild genotype. The characteristics of miscegenation in our population could explain the absence of the characterization of a sub-group of individuals where the presence of the polymorphic genotype influenced the response to the primary chemotherapy.
...
PMID:Correlation of polymorphism C3435T of the MDR-1 gene and the response of primary chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. 1839 21

HuR is an ubiquitously expressed RNA-binding protein that stabilizes messenger RNA and regulates translation. This protein has been shown to play an important role in carcinogenesis and cancer progression. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is the product of the multidrug resistance 1 gene, and the overexpression of P-gp induces multidrug resistance and represents a major obstacle in cancer chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the expression of HuR and P-gp in human breast cancer tissues and analyze the relationship between HuR or P-gp expression and the clinical-pathological variables and patient outcomes. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine HuR and P-gp expression in 82 human breast cancer tissues and 20 matched adjacent noncancerous tissues. Additionally, 16 benign breast tumor samples were used as controls. The overexpression of cytoplasmic HuR was found in breast cancer but not in the matched adjacent noncancerous tissues or benign breast tumors. The expression levels of cytoplasmic HuR were significantly associated with increased age, high nuclear grade, and the positive expression of the ER, PR, and HER-2/neu. HuR was also associated with the expression of P-gp protein. Furthermore, univariate analysis indicates that patients with high expression levels of cytoplasmic HuR or P-gp had significantly reduced survival compared to patients with low expression levels. A multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis, nuclear grade, and cytoplasmic HuR positivity were independent indicators for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with breast cancer. In conclusion, cytoplasmic HuR expression detected by immunohistochemical staining is a negative prognostic indicator for survival in patients with breast cancer.
...
PMID:Cytoplasmic HuR expression correlates with P-gp, HER-2 positivity, and poor outcome in breast cancer. 2360 20


<< Previous 1 2

---