Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:3.5.1.4 (
deaminase
)
5,113
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Somatic hypermutation generates variants of antibody genes and underpins the affinity maturation of antibodies. It is restricted to the V-gene segments, and although it decays exponentially toward the 3'end, it includes recognizable hot spots. Although the detailed mechanism of hypermutation remains elusive, the process may take place in two separate stages, preferentially targeting G/Cs in the first and A/Ts in the second stage. It seems that
MSH2
is involved in the second stage, and that activation induced
deaminase
(AID) is implicated in the control of hypermutation. The constitutively hypermutating cell line Ramos expresses AID, and we have prepared transfectants that express a chimeric AID-green fluorescent protein. The fluorescence is strongly detected in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus. Yet, the chimeric protein increases the hypermutation rate either directly or, more likely, indirectly, by favoring the transport of AID into the nucleus. Thus, in Ramos, AID seems to be rate limiting. Unexpectedly, the proportion of deletions also is increased. The increase in mutation rate detected by a fast cytofluorimetric method based on the accumulation of sIgM-loss mutants correlates with the increase measured by mutations defined by sequence analysis. The higher mutation rate is largely explained by the higher proportion of mutated clones, indicating that AID controls the number of cells that undergo hypermutation but not the number of mutations that are incorporated in each mutation round.
...
PMID:AID-GFP chimeric protein increases hypermutation of Ig genes with no evidence of nuclear localization. 1201 59
The DNA sequence data of the somatic hypermutation (SHM) field published since 1984 has been critically reviewed. The analysis has revealed three strand biased mutation signatures. The first concerns the mutations generated at G:C base pairs in mice genetically deficient in uracil-DNA glycosylase and
MSH2
-MSH6-mediated mismatch repair. Such mice display the AID
deaminase
footprint and here C mutations exceed G mutations at least 1.5-fold. This supports earlier and more recent studies claiming that dC-to-dU deaminations occur preferentially in the single stranded DNA regions of the displaced nontranscribed strand (NTS) during transcription. The second concerns the signature generated in immunised mice where G mutations exceed C mutations by at least 1.7-fold. This is a newly identified strand bias which has previously gone undetected. It is consistent with the polynucleotide polymerisation signature of RNA polymerase II copying the template DNA strand carrying AID-mediated lesions generated at C bases, viz. uracils and abasic sites. A reverse transcription step would then need to intervene to fix the mutation pattern in DNA. The third concerns the long recognised strand biased signature generated in normal aged or actively immunised mice whereby A mutations exceed T mutations by two- to three-fold. It is argued that this pattern is best understood as a combination of adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing followed by a reverse transcription step fixing the A-to-G, as well as A-to-T and A-to-C, as strand biased mutation signatures in DNA. The reasons why the AID-linked RNA polymerase II mutation signature had previously gone undetected are discussed with regard to limitations of standard PCR-based SHM assay techniques. It is concluded that the most economical SHM mechanism involves both DNA and RNA deaminations coupled to a reverse transcription process, most likely involving DNA polymerase eta acting in its reverse transcriptase mode. Experimental approaches to differentiate this RNA-based model from the standard DNA deamination model are discussed.
...
PMID:Mechanism of somatic hypermutation: critical analysis of strand biased mutation signatures at A:T and G:C base pairs. 1906 97