Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.24.11 (CD10)
 9,792 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A well-characterized positive marker for hepatocellular differentiation would be a useful tool for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The recently commercially available Hep Par 1 antibody (clone OCH1E5.2.10) has been reported to be a sensitive marker for HCC in paraffin embedded sections. Of non-hepatocellular tumors, occasional carcinomas have been reported to stain, most frequently gastric adenocarcinomas. This study further evaluated the staining of this antibody on a large number of neoplasms using tissue microarray technology as well as conventional tissue sections. Six hundred seventy-six tumors, including 19 cases of HCC, were tested. Eighteen of 19 cases of HCC were positive, 3 showing <5% staining. Two cases negative on the array showed focal staining when whole tissue sections from the same tumors were used. 16 of 34 cases of gastric carcinomas gave positive reactions, 4 of these showed less than 5% staining. Staining of gastric carcinomas was not limited to signet ring-type carcinomas or to areas of hepatoid differentiation. Only 1 of 11 cases of cholangiocarcinoma showed focal staining. We also noted several other tumors to stain occasionally, including adrenal cortical carcinoma (3/13), yolk sac tumor (2/9), colonic adenocarcinoma (8/106), lung carcinoma (3/52), ovarian carcinoma (5/48), and endocervical adenocarcinoma (1/5). We did not observe staining in pancreatic carcinoma (11), renal cell carcinoma (36), breast carcinoma (85), melanoma (25), or mesothelioma (5). This study supports Hep Par 1 as a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of HCC, but with significant limitations. Cautious use of this antibody in a panel with other positive (alpha fetoprotein, CD10, polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen) and negative (epithelial membrane antigen, monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen, CD15) markers of hepatocellular differentiation may aid in the accurate diagnosis of HCC.
 ...
PMID:Hep par 1 antibody stain for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: 676 tumors tested using tissue microarrays and conventional tissue sections. 1259 66

The diagnosis of primary clear cell carcinoma of the ovary or kidney is usually straightforward. However, problems in ascertaining the site of the primary tumor may arise when there is widespread metastatic disease or when clear cell carcinoma is present in both the ovary and kidney. In this study, the value of a panel of antibodies in distinguishing between an ovarian and renal clear cell carcinoma was evaluated. The panel comprised cytokeratin (CK)7 and 20, vimentin, estrogen receptor (ER), CD10, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) marker. Ovarian clear cell carcinomas (n=14) were positive with CK7 (14/14), vimentin (6/14), ER (2/14), and RCC marker (2/14). All were negative with CD10 and CK20. Renal clear cell carcinomas (n=14) were positive with CD10 (14/14), RCC marker (14/14), vimentin (7/14), CK7 (2/14), and CK20 (1/14). All were negative with ER. This panel allows clear cell carcinomas of the ovary and kidney to be distinguished with a high degree of certainty and is a useful adjunct to histologic examination. Primary ovarian clear cell carcinomas are characterized by CK7 positivity, whereas primary renal neoplasms are characterized by positivity for CD10 and RCC marker and negative staining with CK7.
 ...
PMID:A panel of immunohistochemical stains assists in the distinction between ovarian and renal clear cell carcinoma. 1281 95

The differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and metastatic carcinoma, especially in moderate-poorly differentiated (MPD) HCC and poorly differentiated carcinoma, can be challenging in fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the liver. Recent studies demonstrate that canalicular staining for CD10 appears to be a highly specific marker for hepatocytic differentiation. The objective of this study was to test the utility of CD10 in differentiating HCC from metastatic carcinoma in FNAB of the liver. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks of 55 cases (22 HCC, 23 metastases, and 10 benign hepatic lesions) of FNAB of the liver were immunostained using monoclonal antibody against CD10, with microwave oven antigen retrieval, followed by a standard ABC method. Nineteen (86%) of 22 HCC cases were positive for CD10 with a canalicular staining pattern. Among them, 9 (82%) of 11 well-differentiated (WD) HCC and 10 (91%) of 11 MPD HCC were positive for CD10. Three (13%) of 23 metastatic carcinomas were positive for CD10, demonstrating a contrasting cytoplasmic and membranous staining pattern. The three positive cases were metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), choriocarcinoma, and adenocarcinoma of the lung. All 10 cases of benign hepatic lesions showed positivity for CD10 with a canalicular and focal membranous staining pattern. In conclusion, CD10 appears to be a useful marker in discriminating between HCC and metastatic carcinoma when applied to FNAB of the liver. CD10 does not provide discrimination between WD HCC and benign hepatocytes.
 ...
PMID:Diagnostic utility of CD10 in differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the liver. 1475 58

Both mesotheliomas and renal cell carcinomas can present a wide variety of morphological patterns. Because of this, renal cell carcinomas that metastasize to the pleura and lung may be confused with mesotheliomas. The aim of the present study was to compare the value of the various immunohistochemical markers currently available for the diagnosis of mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma. A total of 48 mesotheliomas (40 epithelioid, 8 sarcomatoid), and 48 renal cell carcinomas (24 conventional, 12 chromophobe, 8 papillary, 4 sarcomatoid) were investigated for the expression of the following markers: calretinin, mesothelin, cytokeratin 5/6, WT1, thrombomodulin (TM), N-cadherin, CD15 (leu-M1), MOC-31, Ber-EP4, BG-8 (Lewis(y)), CD10, renal cell carcinoma marker (RCC Ma), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and B72.3. All (100%) of the epithelioid mesotheliomas reacted for calretinin, mesothelin, and cytokeratin 5/6; 93% for WT1; 78% for TM; 75% for N-cadherin, 48% for CD10, 15% for Ber-EP4, 8% for MOC-31, 8% for RCC Ma, 5% for BG-8, and none for CEA, B72.3, or CD15. Of the sarcomatoid mesotheliomas, 88% expressed calretinin, 75% N-cadherin, 38% CD10, and 13% each expressed cytokeratin 5/6, WT1, and TM. All of the remaining markers were negative. Among the RCCs, 81% expressed CD10, 75% N-cadherin, 63% CD15, 50% RCC Ma, 50% MOC-31, 42% Ber-EP4, 8% BG-8, and 2% TM. The remaining markers were negative. The results indicate that calretinin, mesothelin, and cytokeratin 5/6 are the best positive mesothelioma markers for differentiating epithelioid mesotheliomas from renal cell carcinomas. The best discriminators among the antibodies considered negative markers for mesothelioma are CD15, MOC-31, and RCC Ma. An accurate differential diagnosis can be reached with the use of any 2 of the 3 recommended positive markers, which should be selected based on availability and on which ones yield the best staining results in a given laboratory. One of the recommended negative markers may be added to the panel if deemed necessary. If confirmation of renal origin is needed, RCC Ma could be useful. Calretinin is the only marker that appears to have any utility in distinguishing between sarcomatoid mesotheliomas and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinomas.
 ...
PMID:The diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study. 1518 36

CD10 has been considered a useful marker in the diagnosis of renal carcinomas, because of its expression in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas and its absence in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. On the other hand, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma expresses parvalbumin, which is absent in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas. To further address the relevance of these markers, we studied the expression of CD10 and parvalbumin in 42 samples of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (seven of which had aggressive features, including invasion beyond the renal capsule, renal vein invasion, metastases, or sarcomatoid transformation), 75 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (eight metastatic) and 51 papillary renal cell carcinomas (two metastatic). CD10 was found in 100% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 63% of papillary renal cell carcinomas and in all metastatic cases of both types. At variance with previous studies, we found CD10 expression in from 30 to 90% of the neoplastic cells, in 11 of 42 (26%) chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. The CD10-positive cases included five of the seven (71%) chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with aggressive features. Statistical analysis showed significant association of CD10-positive tumors with clinicopathologic aggressiveness (P=0.003) and mitotic figures (P=0.04). Parvalbumin was strongly expressed in all primary and metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Western blot analysis was utilized to confirm the expression of both CD10 and parvalbumin in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.
 ...
PMID:CD10 is expressed in a subset of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. 1528 60

The differential diagnosis between hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system and metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma can be problematic, because they may share striking morphologic similarities. Since CD10 is expressed in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, while inhibin alpha is expressed in hemangioblastoma, we used CD10 and inhibin alpha (inhibin A) to study their possible use in the distinction of these two entities. A total of 22 cases of cerebellar hemangioblastoma, five cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma to the central nervous system, and 16 primary cases of clear cell renal cell carcinoma were studied with immunohistochemical staining of both CD10 and inhibin A. All 22 cases of hemangioblastoma were immunonegative for CD10 in the stromal cells. In contrast, all five cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and 16 cases of primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma showed positive CD10 membranous staining. In all, 20 cases of hemangioblastoma (20/22, 91%) expressed inhibin A in the stromal cells. Two cases of primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma (2/16, 13%) and three cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (3/5, 60%) showed immunopositivity for inhibin A. In conclusion, in addition to the immunostaining of inhibin A, CD10 is a superior marker for distinguishing between a hemangioblastoma and a metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:Immunoreactivity of CD10 and inhibin alpha in differentiating hemangioblastoma of central nervous system from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. 1557 72

Immunohistochemistry has become an important tool in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors. This article reviews the role of immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of the three main categories of ovarian tumors, with emphasis on recently developed antibodies. In the surface epithelial stromal category the most common problem is its discernment from metastasis. The use of differential cytokeratins, primarily CK7 and CK20, as well as Cdx-2, beta-catenin, and P504S in differentiating between metastatic adenocarcinoma, particularly of colorectal origin, and primary ovarian carcinoma is discussed. Dpc4 may be useful in distinguishing pancreatic from ovarian mucinous carcinomas, because up to 55% of pancreatic carcinomas lack Dpc4 expression, whereas the differential expression of mucin genes may be helpful in distinguishing between primary ovarian mucinous and metastatic tumors. Urothelial markers (thrombomodulin and uroplakin III) and renal cell carcinoma markers (CD10 and renal cell carcinoma marker) can be helpful in the diagnosis of metastatic urothelial and renal cell tumors to the ovary. The roles of inhibin, calretinin, CD99, and other recently described markers in the diagnosis of sex cord-stromal tumors are reviewed. The uses of OCT-4 (POU5F1) (a new highly sensitive and specific marker of dysgerminoma and embryonal carcinoma), CD30, and c-kit are also discussed.
 ...
PMID:Immunohistochemistry as a tool in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: an update. 1562 16

Renal cell neoplasms are presumably derived from different cell types of the nephron. Clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are thought to be of proximal tubular origin, whereas oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC are derived from intercalated cells of distal nephron. A few molecules, such as RCC marker and CD10, have been shown to be markers for clear cell RCC and papillary RCC. Such markers are not yet available for renal tumors presumably of the distal nephron. The expression of kidney-specific (Ksp) cadherin, a recently cloned gene thought to be transcribed exclusively in the kidney, was studied in normal human kidney, as well as in 105 primary renal neoplasms, including 42 clear cell RCC, 30 papillary RCC, 13 chromophobe RCC, and 20 oncocytomas. The expression patterns were compared with those of RCC marker. The Ksp-cadherin expression was noted preferentially in distal convoluted tubules with a basolateral membrane stain in normal kidney. All 13 chromophobe RCC and 19 of 20 oncocytomas showed diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for Ksp-cadherin, while only 14% clear cell RCC and 13% papillary RCC showed focal positivity. The RCC marker expression was detected in 85%, 98%, 15% and 0% of clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, and oncocytoma, respectively. A few clear cell RCC and papillary RCC showed dual expression of both RCC marker and Ksp-cadherin, which appear to have distinct histologic features. These results demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity of Ksp-cadherin for distal convoluted tubules, which can be used as adjunct for diagnosis of chromophobe RCC.
 ...
PMID:Kidney-specific cadherin, a specific marker for the distal portion of the nephron and related renal neoplasms. 1569 18

Clear cell papillary cystadenoma is a rare epithelial tumor of the epididymis, which may present as an isolated lesion or as a component of von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHLD). Recently, tumors have also been described in the female genital tract with similar histology. Recognition of clear cell papillary cystadenoma is critical because of its association with VHLD and its potential diagnostic confusion with metastatic renal cell carcinoma because of a shared architecture and clear cells. In this study, we report on the immunohistochemical differentiation of 5 clear cell papillary cystadenomas, 3 of the epididymis and 2 of the mesosalpinx, from metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In 2 cases, there was a history of renal cell carcinoma in the setting of VHLD; and in 1 of these cases, an epididymal papillary cystadenoma was initially considered to be metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were moderately intensely positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and epithelial membrane antigen, strongly positive for CK7 and negative for CK20 and RCC. Four of 5 cases were negative for CD10. This staining profile contrasts with that reported for clear cell renal cell carcinomas, which are typically negative for CK7 and immunoreactive for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and CD10. Our findings indicate that, in cases where there is uncertainty about the histologic diagnosis of clear cell papillary cystadenoma, the above immunohistochemical panel helps to rule out metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:Clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis and mesosalpinx: immunohistochemical differentiation from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. 1576 8

The distinction between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, the granular cell variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and renal oncocytoma is a common diagnostic dilemma. The usefulness of KIT, CD10, RCC, and RON in the differential diagnosis of these renal epithelial tumors was investigated. KIT was 100% positive in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (11 of 11) and renal oncocytoma (12 of 12). The KIT staining pattern was identical in both tumor types, with cytoplasmic membrane attenuation, and fine granular cytoplasmic staining. In contrast, KIT was absent in all granular cell variants of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (0 of 6). RCC was observed in more than 80% of the granular cell variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (5 of 6) but was negative in all chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (0 of 11) and renal oncocytomas (0 of 12). CD10 was expressed in 100% of the granular cell variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (6 of 6), 72% of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (8 of 11), and 58% of renal oncocytomas (7 of 12). RON was 100% positive in the chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (11 of 11) and renal oncocytomas (12 of 12) but only 50% positive in the granular cell variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (3 of 6). Colloidal iron was diffusely and strongly positive in more than 80% of the chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (9 of 11), focally and weakly positive in 41% of the renal oncocytomas (5 of 12) but negative in all granular cell variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (0 of 6). The above results demonstrate that: 1) KIT is a very sensitive marker for both chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma; 2) immunohistochemistry using antibodies to KIT combined with RCC was sufficient to discriminate between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and the granular cell variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma; and 3) neither RON, nor KIT, nor a combination of this panel can be used to distinguish chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. Colloidal iron staining aided in this distinction for the majority of the chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (more than 80% positive) and renal oncocytomas (close to 60% negative).
 ...
PMID:KIT and RCC are useful in distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from the granular variant of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. 1583 88


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>