Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.23.16 (HIV-1 protease)
 2,107 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The functional groups of cage dimeric N-alkyl substituted 3,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridines are similar to those of cyclic and azacyclic ureas that are potent inhibitors of HIV-1 protease of the dihydroxyethylene- and hydroxyethylene type, respectively. In the following study the conformity of common functional groups is investigated concerning their orientation in space as well as in the enzyme HIV-1 protease. Starting from X-ray crystal data of the centrosymmetric cage dimeric N-benzyl derivative with ester groups, the derivative with hydroxymethylene groups was built and a systematic conformational search was performed for the conformationally important torsion angles considering electrostatic and van der Waals interactions. From the huge number of conformations those comprising centrosymmetrical and C2-symmetrical energy minima were selected and minimized. The three remaining conformers were fitted to the azacyclic urea A-98881 selected from the HIV-1 protease enzyme-inhibitor complex using the centroids of the corresponding aromatic residues and additionally by the field fit option of the Advanced CoMFA module of SYBYL. Interestingly, the energetically most favourable one, which, additionally, possesses C2-symmetry like the active site cavity of HIV-1 protease, showed the best fit. Comparing the electrostatic potential (EP) of the latter with the EP of A-98881 the aromatic residues show excellent accordance. Slight differences in the extent of the EP were found in the areas of the hydroxymethylene groups of the cage dimer and the single hydroxy group as well as the urea carbonyl group of A-98881, respectively. In order to compare the binding possibilities to the enzyme HIV-1 protease for the cage dimer and A-98881, their interaction fields with certain probes (CH3 for alkyl, NHamide, and carbonyl, O- of COO-), representing the decisive functional groups of the active site, have been calculated using GRID and projected into the enzyme placing the structures according to the position of A-98881 in the enzyme-inhibitor complex. The strongest calculated fields of the O- probe were found near Asp 25 for both structures. Another respective conformity consists in the overlap of the fields for the NHamide probe near Ile 50 and 50' for the investigated cage dimer and A-98881.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of azacyclic urea A-98881 as HIV-1 protease inhibitor with cage dimeric N-benzyl 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1,4-dihydropyridine as representative of a novel class of HIV-1 protease inhibitors: a molecular modeling study. 1021 31

A method (FILO, Field Interaction Ligand Optimization) for obtaining the optimal molecular interaction field was developed on the basis of the Simplex optimization procedure applied to a matrix of interaction energies obtained by performing a GRID computation on a suitable data set. The FILO procedure was tested on a set of nine HIV-1 protease inhibitors with known crystal structures. The results of FILO consist of the optimal molecular interaction field of a putative new ligand with optimal binding affinity. The final FILO model yields R2 and R2(CV) values of 0.993 and 0.936, respectively, and finds eight negative and four positive interaction nodes for the OH probe taken as an example. The eight H bonding interactions pointed out by FILO identified well the binding site AA-residues Gly A27, Asp A29, water 501, Gly B48 and Asp A25 of HIV-1 protease.
 ...
PMID:FILO (field interaction ligand optimization): a simplex strategy for searching the optimal ligand interaction field in drug design. 1121 19

Structural water molecules within protein active sites are relevant for ligand-protein recognition because they modify the active site geometry and contribute to binding affinity. In this work an analysis of the interactions between 23 ligands and dimeric HIV-1 protease is reported. The X-ray structures of these complexes show the presence of four types of structural water molecules: water 301 (on the symmetry axis), water 313, water 313bis, and peripheral waters. Except for water 301, these are generally complemented with a symmetry-related set. The GRID program was used both for checking water locations and for placing water molecules that appear to be missing from the complexes due to crystallographic uncertainty. Hydropathic analysis of the energetic contributions using HINT indicates a significant improvement of the correlation between HINT scores and the experimentally determined binding constants when the appropriate bridging water molecules are taken into account. In the absence of water r2 = 0.30 with a standard error of +/- 1.30 kcal mol(-1) and when the energetic contributions of the constrained waters are included r2 = 0.61 with a standard error of +/- 0.98 kcal mol(-1). HINT was shown to be able to map quantitatively the contribution of individual structural waters to binding energy. The order of relevance for the various types of water is water 301 > water 313 > water 313bis > peripheral waters. Thus, to obtain the most reliable free energy predictions, the contributions of structural water molecules should be included. However, care must be taken to include the effects of water molecules that add information value and not just noise.
 ...
PMID:Simple, intuitive calculations of free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes. 3. The free energy contribution of structural water molecules in HIV-1 protease complexes. 1531 62