Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.23.15 (renin)
 35,795 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Little is known about the effect of chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on the catecholamine levels in fowls. In this study, we investigated the effects of chronic lisinopril dihydrate (Ld) application on the plasma levels of adrenaline and noradrenaline and on the blood pressure. Lisinopril was given in different concentrations (25, 75 and 250 mg/l drinking water) to the white Leghorn chickens for 9 weeks, while the control group drank tap water only. Twenty-eight hours after the last lisinopril application, arterial blood pressure (BP), plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline levels, plasma renin (PRA) and plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activities were determined. In all concentrations, lisinopril significantly increased PRA and decreased ACE activities. Arterial BP was decreased only in the group receiving high lisinopril concentration (Controls 119+/-10.27, Ld3 98+/-5.4 mm Hg). However, the lower lisinopril concentrations did not alter arterial BP compared to the control group. Plasma noradrenaline levels were decreased in a concentration-dependent manner (47-58%), but plasma adrenaline levels remained unchanged. The heart weight/body weight ratio was not changed in any of the lisinopril-treated groups. The persistent decrease in the blood pressure after lisinopril treatment was not directly related to a decrease of plasma ACE activity or plasma noradrenaline levels. Its mechanism still remains to be elucidated.
 ...
PMID:Long-term lisinopril dihydrate application decreases plasma noradrenaline but not adrenaline levels in chickens. 1080 21

The pharmacology of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and their role in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are described, and pharmacokinetic properties and common adverse events are presented. ACE inhibitors play a vital role in the RAS by regulating the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. All ACE inhibitors share the same basic structure; however, they can be separated on the basis of their functional (binding) group: carboxyl, sulfhydryl, or phosphinyl. These functional groups are, in part, responsible for differences in the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of these agents. Captopril and lisinopril are the only ACE inhibitors that are not prodrugs requiring activation through hepatic biotransformation. Differences among the ACE inhibitors in lipophilicity are described; fosinopril has the greatest lipophilicity and lisinopril the least. ACE is found in numerous tissues, and there is increasing evidence of differences among ACE inhibitors in their ability to inhibit tissue ACE. Most ACE inhibitors are eliminated mainly by the kidneys and to a lesser extent through the liver. Lisinopril is the only ACE inhibitor that does not require hepatic metabolism. In the selection of an ACE inhibitor for once-daily use to treat hypertension, differences in trough-peak ratios are clinically relevant. Fosinopril, ramipril, and trandolapril have minimum trough-peak ratios of 50% or greater. ACE inhibitors are generally well tolerated, with hypotension, cough, and hyperkalemia being the most frequently reported adverse effects for the entire class. Drug interactions across the ACE inhibitor class as well as agent-specific interactions are described. Factors to be considered in the selection of an ACE inhibitor include differences in potency, affinity for ACE, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity that are related to structural properties of the drug; whether the trough-peak ratio enables use of a once-daily dose; and potential adverse effects related to a drug's functional (binding) group.
 ...
PMID:Overview of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. 1103 16

Both angiotensin II and vascular endothelial growth factor are angiogenic agents that have recently been implicated in the pathogenesis of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. In this study, retinal neovascularization was examined in a model of retinopathy of prematurity with the use of neonatal transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats, which overexpress renin in tissues, and Sprague-Dawley rats. Blockers of the renin-angiotensin system were administered during the neovascularization period. The ACE inhibitor lisinopril and the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan both increased retinal renin levels and prevented inner retinal blood vessel growth. Quantitative in situ hybridization revealed that the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its type 2 receptor in the inner retina and proliferating blood vessels were increased in rats with retinopathy of prematurity. Lisinopril reduced both retinal vascular endothelial growth factor and its type 2 receptor mRNA in retinopathy of prematurity rats, whereas losartan had no effect. It is predicted that agents that interrupt the renin-angiotensin system may play an important role as retinoprotective agents in various forms of proliferative retinopathy.
 ...
PMID:Retinal neovascularization is prevented by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. 1111 32

The main objective of the CALM (Candesartan And Lisinopril Microalbuminuria) study is to assess the effect of a dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system--using both an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker--in patients with type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and microalbuminuria. The study included 200 patients randomized to receive candesartan 16 mg or lisinopril 20 mg for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of the same monotherapy or a combination treatment. Main outcomes are the reduction of microalbuminuria and blood pressure. All three of the treatments are effective, but the dual blockade is respectively 18%, 8 mmHg and 5 mmHg more effective in reducing microalbuminuria, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. No comparison is made between this "new" association and the more frequently used biotherapy (i.e. ACE-I plus thiazidic diuretic) and therefore its usefulness in regular practice is still to be determined.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical study of the month. The CALM study assessing the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor antagonist in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy]. 1129 48

Long-term renin-angiotensin system blockade is beneficial in a variety of renal diseases. This study examines the long-term (34 weeks) effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and the angiotensin II receptor type I blocker L158,809 in the Fisher to Lewis rat model of chronic renal transplant failure. Treatment in allografted rats with lisinopril or L158,809 was initiated 10 days after transplantation, or at the time when proteinuria exceeded 50 mg/24 h. Untreated allografts and syngrafts served as controls. In contrast to syngrafts, untreated allografts developed proteinuria, hypercholesterolaemia, interstitial damage, and glomerulosclerosis. Lisinopril or L158,809 treatment in allografts starting at day 10 after transplantation completely prevented this, with the exception of interstitial damage, but this treatment also caused a reduction in blood pressure and renal function. Moreover, the intimal surface area of the renal arteries was dramatically increased in allografts treated with either lisinopril or L158,809 compared with untreated allografted rats. Treatment once proteinuria had developed was less effective in preventing glomerulosclerosis, but also caused less intimal expansion. Thus, chronic renin-angiotensin system blockade preserves glomerular morphology in the absence of proteinuria, but enhances intimal hyperplasia and reduces renal function in experimental transplantation. In view of these results, it should be questioned whether such treatment benefits renal transplant patients in the long term.
 ...
PMID:Chronic blockade of angiotensin II action prevents glomerulosclerosis, but induces graft vasculopathy in experimental kidney transplantation. 1132 51

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of a nonevaluative social support intervention (pet ownership) on blood pressure response to mental stress before and during ACE inhibitor therapy. Forty-eight hypertensive individuals participated in an experiment at home and in the physician's office. Participants were randomized to an experimental group with assignment of pet ownership in addition to lisinopril (20 mg/d) or to a control group with only lisinopril (20 mg/d). On each study day, blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma renin activity were recorded at baseline and after each mental stressor (serial subtraction and speech). Before drug therapy, mean responses to mental stress did not differ significantly between experimental and control groups in heart rate (94 [SD 6.8] versus 93 [6.8] bpm), systolic blood pressure (182 [8.0] versus 181 [8.3] mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (120 [6.6] versus 119 [7.9] mm Hg), or plasma renin activity (9.4 [0.59] versus 9.3 [0.57] ng. mL(-1). h(-1)). Lisinopril therapy lowered resting blood pressure by approximately 35/20 mm Hg in both groups, but responses to mental stress were significantly lower among pet owners relative to those who only received lisinopril (P<0.0001; heart rate 81 [6.3] versus 91 [6.5] bpm, systolic blood pressure 131 [6.8] versus 141 [7.8] mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 92 [6.3] versus 100 [6.8] mm Hg, and plasma renin activity 13.9 [0.92] versus 16.1 [0.58] ng. mL(-1). h(-1)). We conclude that ACE inhibitor therapy alone lowers resting blood pressure, whereas increased social support through pet ownership lowers blood pressure response to mental stress.
 ...
PMID:Pet ownership, but not ace inhibitor therapy, blunts home blood pressure responses to mental stress. 1164 Dec 92

To evaluate the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, a renally excreted angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, we assessed supervised administration of the drug after hemodialysis (HD) three times weekly. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed by interdialytic 44-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) monitoring, and endocrine responses were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA) before and after dialysis. Lisinopril dose was titrated at biweekly intervals. If this was not effective after full titration (lisinopril to 40 mg three times weekly), ultrafiltration was added to reduce dry weight. The primary outcome variable was change in BP from the end of the run-in period to the end of the study. No change in mean ABP was noted during run-in. However, mean 44-hour ABP decreased from 149 +/- 14 (SD)/84 +/- 9 to 127 +/- 16/73 +/- 9 mm Hg, a decrease of 22/11 mm Hg (P < 0.001) at final evaluation. Of 11 patients who completed the trial, only 2 patients had systolic hypertension (>/=135 mm Hg) and 1 patient had diastolic hypertension (>/=85 mm Hg) at the final visit. Four patients were administered 10 mg of lisinopril; 5 patients, 20 mg; and 2 patients, 40 mg; only 1 of these patients required ultrafiltration therapy. There was a persistent antihypertensive effect over 44 hours. BP reduction was achieved without an increase in intradialytic symptomatic or asymptomatic hypotensive episodes. PRA increased in response to dialysis, as well as lisinopril. In conclusion, supervised lisinopril therapy is effective in controlling hypertension in chronic HD patients. This may be related to blockade of angiotensin II generation by kidneys despite the loss of excretory function.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril therapy for hemodialysis hypertension: hemodynamic and endocrine responses. 1172 57

Diabetes mellitus increases the risk for hypertension and associated cardiovascular diseases, including coronary, cerebrovascular, renal and peripheral vascular disease. The risk for developing cardiovascular disease is increased when both diabetes and hypertension co-exist; in fact, over 11 million Americans have both diabetes and hypertension. These numbers will continue to climb, internationally, since the leading associated risk for diabetes development, obesity, has reached epidemic proportions, globally. Moreover, the frequent association of diabetes with dyslipidemia, as well as coagulation, endothelial, and metabolic abnormalities also aggravates the underlying vascular disease process in patients who possess these comorbid conditions. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) are overactivated in both hypertension and diabetes. Drugs that inhibit this system, such as ACE inhibitors and more recently angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs), have proven beneficial effects on the micro- and macrovascular complications of diabetes, especially the kidney. The BRILLIANT study showed that lisinopril reduces microalbuminuria better than CCB therapy. Numerous other long-term studies confirm this association with ACE inhibitors including the HOPE trial. Furthermore, the European Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) study, showed that lisinopril slowed the progression of renal disease, even in individuals with mild albuminuria. In fact, there are now five appropriately powered randomized placebo-controlled trials to show that both ACE inhibitors and ARBs slow progression of diabetic nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes. These effects were shown to be better than conventional blood pressure lowering therapy, including dihydropyridine CCBs. In patients with microalbuminuria, ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduce the progression of microalbuminuria to proteinuria and provide a risk reduction of between 38 and 60% for progression to proteinuria. This is important since microalbuminuria is known to be associated with increased vascular permeability and decreased responsiveness to vasodilatory stimuli. Recently, increased AVP levels have been lined to microalbuminuria and hyperfiltration in diabetes. The microvascular and macrovascular benefits of ACE inhibition, ARBs and possible role of AVP antagonists in diabetic patients will be discussed, as will be recommendations for its clinical use.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of the diabetic patient: focus on cardiovascular and renal risk reduction. 1243 44

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in the under 65s, and with the burden of disease case load expected to exceed 200 million worldwide within 10 years, much effort is being spent on prophylactic interventions. Early work focused on improving glycaemic control; however, with the publication of EURODIAB Controlled trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-dependent Diabetes (EUCLID) and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), the focus has recently moved to control of blood pressure and specifically the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). There is a large body of evidence for a local RAS within the eye that is activated in diabetes. This appears to be directly responsible, as well as indirectly through other mediators, for an increase in concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a selective angiogenic and vasopermeability factor that is implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme appears to reduce concentrations of VEGF, with a concurrent anti-proliferative effect independent of systemic VEGF levels or blood pressure. Angiotensin II (Ang II) Type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockade has been shown to reduce neovascularisation independent of VEGF levels in animal models. This may be due to antagonism of activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase, which is a potent cellular proliferation stimulator, by Ang II, although this needs further evaluation.
 ...
PMID:The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the eye in diabetes. 1258 67

During cardiac surgery, as a result of surgical aggression, myocardial ischaemia and cardiopulmonary bypass, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone mechanism is intensely activated. Our aim is to document whether, in the case of patients undergoing chronic treatment with lisinopril, the non-withdrawal of this inhibitor's administration before cardiac surgery and the administering of a last dose on the day of the operation are associated with coronary haemodynamic alterations. A study was made of 18 patients submitted to myocardial revascularization under extracorporeal circulation and distributed in two groups: group A) without ACE inhibitorsplacebo, group B) with ACE inhibitors (Lisinopril). Coronary blood flow (CBF) was determined by inverted thermodilution via Baim's catheter. Coronary and metabolic haemodynamic values were calculated. Lisinopril had no significant influence on the CBF or on the other above-mentioned values. Therefore, it is not necessary to withdraw ACE inhibitors in cardiac surgery interventions.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of the withdrawal of ACE inhibitors in coronary artery surgery]. 1534 63


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>