Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.21.73 (urokinase-type plasminogen activator)
 10,685 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Many aspects of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment could be greatly advanced with new, effective biomarkers. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has multiple weaknesses as a biomarker, such as not distinguishing well between cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia or between indolent and aggressive cancers, thus leading to overtreatment, especially unnecessary biopsies. PSA also often fails to indicate accurately which patients are responding to a given treatment. Yet PSA is the only prostate cancer biomarker routinely used by urologists. Here, we provide updated information on the most relevant of the other biomarkers currently in use or in development for prostate cancer. Recent research shows improvement over using PSA alone by comparing total PSA (tPSA) or free PSA (fPSA) with new, related markers, such as prostate cancer antigen (PCA) 3, the individual molecular forms of PSA (proPSA, benign PSA, and intact PSA), and kallikreins other than PSA. Promising results have also been seen with the use of the fusion gene TMPRSS2:ERG and with various forms of the urokinase plasminogen activation receptor. Initially, there were high hopes for early PCA, but those data were not reproducible and thus research on early PCA has been abandoned. Much work remains to be done before any of these biomarkers are fully validated and accepted. Currently, the only markers discussed in this paper with Food and Drug Administration-approved tests are PCA 3 and an isoform of proPSA, [-2]proPSA. Assays are in development for most of the other biomarkers described in this paper. While the biomarker validation process can be long and filled with obstacles, the rewards will be great-in terms of both patient care and costs to the health care system.
...
PMID:Prostate cancer biomarkers: an update. 2449 50

The objective of this study was to validate the results from our published work and to test the robustness of our unique malignancy index as a (non-invasive) predictor of prostate cancer in fresh blood samples obtained from patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and healthy volunteers (Controls). The malignancy index was obtained by dividing the product of three biomarker values, [urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)], by the age of the patient/healthy volunteer, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay methodology. The results confirmed earlier findings that the malignancy index discriminates prostate cancer from non-prostate cancer. The index significantly separated the PCa group from the Control group with values of 0.0701 (n=54) and 0.0007 (n=47), respectively, by a factor of 100. The malignancy index of the small BPH cohort was found to be 0.0016 (n=20), differing by a factor of 44 from the Control group. When data from the earlier study and the current study data were collectively analyzed, the index again significantly separated the PCa group from the Control group by a factor of 15, with values of 0.0624 (n=125) and 0.0042 (n=110), respectively. However, the same could not be said of the BPH data since the sample size (n=20) was well below par, for comparison. In the initial blood study, the PCa group was significantly separated from the Control group by a factor of 8.5. The data presented here concur with findings in needle biopsies and transurethral resection tissue, reported elsewhere (Bohm et al., 2013; Akudugu et al., 2015). At this preliminary stage, the malignancy index has potential and merit as a prostate cancer biomarker.
 ...
PMID:The malignancy index is a robust predictor of prostate cancer. 3300 93


<< Previous 1 2 3