Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: EC:3.4.21.7 (
plasmin
)
9,023
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Heparin inhibits proteolytic digestion of
heparin-binding growth factor
-I (HBGF-I) by trypsin,
plasmin
and other proteases. This property is lost after thermal denaturation of HBGF-I, suggesting that a heparin:HBGF-I structural interaction rather than a heparin:trypsin interaction is responsible for the resistance of HBGF-I to digestion with trypsin. Heparin is also able to partially protect HBGF-I from thermal denaturation as demonstrated by the ability of heparin to protect HBGF-I from trypsin digestion. The protective effect of heparin is dependent upon the concentration of heparin as well as temperature and duration of denaturation. Autoradiography of 125I-HBGF-I incubated with human umbilical vein endothelial cells demonstrates near complete protection of HBGF-I from proteolytic modification when the incubation is performed in the presence of heparin. These data suggest that (i) the mechanism of the heparin-induced increase in human endothelial cell number at confluence involves the protection of HBGF-I by heparin against proteolytic inactivation and (ii) heparin provides conformational stability to the proteolytic growth factor which reduces the susceptibility of HBGF-I to denaturation.
...
PMID:Heparin protects heparin-binding growth factor-I from proteolytic inactivation in vitro. 245 18
For tumor progression, a cascade of linked sequential biological events is essential. We tried to test whether biological therapy can modulate specific biological phenotypes and increase the anti-tumor effect when combined with chemotherapy. Five human gastric cancer cell lines (YCC-1, YCC-2, YCC-3, YCC-7, AGS) were used in these studies. Pentosan polysulfate (PPS) as a
heparin-binding growth factor
inhibitor, Tranexamic acid as a
plasmin
inhibitor, Lovastatin as an adhesion inhibitor and Adriamycin as a chemotherapeutic agent were selected. The effects of each drug on colony formation and tumor cell proliferation were evaluated by soft agar assay and cell proliferation assay, respectively to test direct anti-tumor effect. The expression of uPA, PAI-1 was determined by ELISA, while MMPs activity was evaluated by zymography. PPS suppressed the colony-forming activity as much as Adriamycin did, but it showed only cytostatic effects in cell proliferation assay. Migration capacity using Boyden chamber assay was more closely correlated with adhesive capacity than uPA or MMP-2 expression. The motility inhibitory effect of Tranexamic acid was observed in the YCC-7 cell line, which expressed all the required biological phenotypes for migration. In AGS, with high cell motility and adhesiveness, the adhesion was inhibited by Lovastatin and most of the inhibitory effect was recovered by Mevalonate. When PPS was combined with Adriamycin on the Adriamycin-resistant, midkine (MK) gene expressing YCC-7 cell line, the growth inhibition rate increased up to 84%, while that for a single treatment of PPS or Adriamycin was 40% and 22%, respectively (p=0.001). When we combined Tranexamic acid and Adriamycin, we observed the synergistic effect in YCC-3 and YCC-7, while no combined effect was found in YCC-1. The combination of Lovastatin and Adriamycin did not show any combined effects in any of the cell lines. In conclusion, a synergistic anti-proliferative effect (chemo-sensitization) with combined chemo-biotherapy was found in cancer cells with specific biological target, MK. The anti-motility effect was the greatest when the gastric cancer cells expressed all the specific biological phenotypes.
...
PMID:Modulation of biological phenotypes for tumor growth and metastasis by target-specific biological inhibitors in gastric cancer. 1040 90