Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.21.1 (chymotrypsin)
 10,938 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The pattern and kinetics of partial proteolysis of Arthrobacter D-xylose isomerase tetramer was studied in order to determine the flexibility of surface loops that may control its stability. It was completely resistant to trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase at 37 degrees C, but thermolysin cleaved specifically and quantitatively at Thr-347-Leu-348 between helices 10 and 11 to remove 47 residues from the C-terminus of each 43.3 kDa subunit. At high temperatures, helices 9 and 10 were removed from each 38 kDa subunit to give a 36 kDa tetramer. The kinetics of nicking by thermolysin indicated that the Thr-347-Leu-348 loop is locked at low temperatures, but 'melts' at 25 degrees C and is fully flexible above 34 degrees C. The flexibility appears to be associated with binding of Ca2+ ions at the active site, since Co2+, Mg2+ and xylitol protect in proportion to their ability to displace Ca2+. The missing C-terminal helices make many intersubunit contacts that appear in the structure to stabilize the tetramer, but the properties of the purified nicked proteins are almost indistinguishable from the native enzyme. Both the 38 kDa tetramer and the 36 kDa tetramer are identically active and dissociate similarly in urea or SDS to fully active dimers, but the nicked dimers are slightly less stable to urea at 62 degrees C. In the Mg2+ form the thermostability of the 38 kDa tetramer is identical with that of the native enzyme, but the 36 kDa tetramer has a slightly lower 'melting point' (70 degrees C versus 80 degrees C), which may be due to unravelling from the end of helix 8. Since elimination of all the C-terminal helices and many intersubunit contacts has so little effect, one can conclude that the 'weak point' that controls the protein's thermostability lies within the N-terminal beta-barrel domain.
 ...
PMID:Arthrobacter D-xylose isomerase: partial proteolysis with thermolysin. 842 59

Since the development of the first docking algorithm in the early 1980s a variety of different docking approaches and tools has been created in order to solve the docking problem. Subsequent studies have shown that the docking performance of most tools strongly depends on the considered target. Thus it is hard to choose the best algorithm in the situation at hand. The docking tools FlexX and AutoDock are among the most popular programs for docking flexible ligands into target proteins. Their analysis, comparison, and combination are the topics of this study. In contrast to standard consensus scoring techniques which integrate different scoring algorithms usually only by their rank, we focus on a more general approach. Our new combined docking workflow-AutoxX-unifies the interaction models of AutoDock and FlexX rather than combining the scores afterward which allows interpretability of the results. The performance of FlexX, AutoDock, and the combined algorithm AutoxX was evaluated on the basis of a test set of 204 structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). AutoDock and FlexX show a highly diverse redocking accuracy at the different complexes which assures again the usefulness of taking several docking algorithms into account. With the combined docking the number of complexes reproduced below an rmsd of 2.5 A could be raised by 10. AutoxX had a strong positive effect on several targets. The highest performance increase could be found when redocking 20 protein-ligand complexes of alpha-thrombin, plasmepsin, neuraminidase, and d-xylose isomerase. A decrease was found for gamma-chymotrypsin. The results show that--applied to the right target-AutoxX can improve the docking performance compared to AutoDock and FlexX alone.
 ...
PMID:Alternative to consensus scoring--a new approach toward the qualitative combination of docking algorithms. 1749 29