Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.16.2 (PCP)
 3,761 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A putative animal model of anxiety based on shock-induced ultrasonic vocalization was pharmacologically validated in young adult rats. Suppression of shock-induced ultrasonic vocalization was obtained with diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, meprobamate and pentobarbital; the serotonin (5-HT)1A receptor agonists 8-OH-DPAT [8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin], buspirone, ipsapirone, gepirone and tandospirone; the nonselective 5-HT receptor agonists TFMPP [1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazin], mCPP [1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazin] and DOI (1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane); the NMDA antagonists PCP (phencyclidine) and MK-801; the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists idazoxane, yohimbine and 1-PP (1-pyrimidinylpiperazine); and the atypical neuroleptic clozapine. The alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, the 5-HT2/5-HT1C antagonist ritanserin, the 5-HT3 antagonists ondansetron and ICS-205,930, and the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine did not, or only partially, reduce ultrasonic vocalization. Tricyclic and tetracyclic, as well as some atypical antidepressants and a monoamineoxidase (MAO) inhibitor, showed no ultrasonic vocalization reducing effects, or reduced ultrasonic vocalization only at high doses. An opiate, an antimuscarinic, (pro)convulsants and typical neuroleptics did not reduce ultrasonic vocalization. The present findings suggest that the ultrasonic vocalization model specifically measures anxiolytic effects. Because ultrasonic vocalization responding develops within five days, remains stable for at least three months and gives highly reproducible results, the test appears suitable for rapid and repeated testing of new anxiolytics in the same animals.
 ...
PMID:Shock-induced ultrasonic vocalization in young adult rats: a model for testing putative anti-anxiety drugs. 790 65

In humans, phencyclidine (PCP) is known to produce a syndrome of behavioral effects which have many characteristics in common with schizophrenia. Therefore, antagonism of PCP effects might be evidence for antipsychotic efficacy of a compound. In the present studies, the effects of the D2-like antagonist haloperidol, the mixed D2-like/5-HT2 antagonists olanzapine and clozapine, and a series of 5-HT receptor subtype selective antagonists on the hyperlocomotion produced by PCP were evaluated in mice. PCP (0.3-10 mg/kg) produced a dose-related increase in locomotor activity, with a peak effect at 3.0 mg/kg. The D2-like antagonist haloperidol produced a dose-related decrease in locomotor activity when administered alone, and blocked the hyperactivity effects of PCP over the same dose-range (minimal effective dose, MED = 0.3 mg/kg for both effects). In contrast, olanzapine and clozapine reversed the hyperlocomotion effects of PCP at doses (MED = 0.03 and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively) approximately 30- and 10-fold, respectively, below those that decreased activity when administered alone (MED = 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg, respectively). The selective 5-HT2 antagonist LY53857 (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) administered alone had no effect on locomotor activity but reversed (MED = 0.1 mg/kg) the effects of PCP. Similarly, the selective 5-HT2A/2C antagonist ritanserin (0.001-1.0 mg/kg) alone had no effect on locomotor activity, but reversed (MED = 0.01 mg/kg) the effects of PCP. The selective 5-HT2A antagonists ketanserin (MED = 3.0 mg/kg) and MDL 100,907 (MED = 0.3 mg/kg) produced dose-related decreases in locomotor activity and ketanserin (MED = 0.1 mg/kg) and MDL 100,907 (MED = 0.003 mg/kg) reversed the effects of PCP. The selective 5-HT3 antagonist zatosetron (0.01-10 mg/kg) and the selective 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100,635 (0.001-3 mg/kg) were without effects on spontaneous locomotor activity. Zatosetron reversed the effects of 3.0 mg/kg PCP at the nonselective dose of 10 mg/kg whereas WAY 100,635 (0.001-1 mg/kg) did not affect PCP-induced hyperlocomotion. The present results indicate that PCP increases locomotor activity, at least in part, due to actions at 5-HT2A, but not 5-HT3 or 5-HT1A, receptors. Further, the present findings support the hypothesis that antagonism at 5-HT2A receptors contributes to the in vivo actions of atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine and clozapine.
 ...
PMID:Blockade of phencyclidine-induced hyperlocomotion by olanzapine, clozapine and serotonin receptor subtype selective antagonists in mice. 912 67

The results of the studies described here support the hypothesis that ibogaine produces its effects via selective interactions with multiple receptors. It appears that 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, and sigma 2 receptors are involved in mediating the stimulus effects of ibogaine. In addition, opiate receptors may also be involved. In contrast, sigma 1, PCP/MK-801, 5-HT3, and 5-HT1A receptors do not appear to play a major role. Ibogaine's hallucinogenic effects may be explained by its interactions with 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors, while its putative antiaddictive properties may result from its interactions with sigma 2 and opiate receptors. Alternatively, the possibility that ibogaine's hallucinogenic properties underlie its antiaddictive effects, as previously suggested (34), would support a role for 5-HT2 receptors in mediating the reported therapeutic effects of ibogaine. Certainly many questions remain regarding ibogaine's mechanism of action. Although drug discrimination will be useful for answering some of those questions, the true potential of this technique is realized whin it is combined with other techniques. The next few years promise to be fruitful with respect to our understanding of this agent. Reasons supporting this belief include advances in the study of sigma receptors, interest in ibogaine's effects on second messenger systems, and the development of ibogaine congeners such as 18-methoxycoronaridine (35). In conclusion, the aforementioned studies should serve to guide further endeavors. Pertinent questions have been generated: What is the role of sigma receptors in the effects of ibogaine, especially with regard to addiction? How does ibogaine affect opiate neurotransmission? What effects, if any, do the Harmala alkaloids have on addiction phenomena? What is the mechanism of action of harmaline? Can 10-hydroxyibogamine serve as a discriminative stimulus and, if so, what receptor interactions mediate its stimulus effects? Does the ibogaine-trained stimulus generalize to novel agents, including 18-methoxycoronaridine?
 ...
PMID:Drug discrimination studies with ibogaine. 1170 17