Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.4.15.1 (ACE)
18,300 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The combination therapy with ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists, or calcium channel antagonists may exert more beneficial effects on cardiovascular diseases than monotherapy. Perindopril, candesartan cilexetil, or amlodipine alone or the combination of low doses of each agent was administered orally to stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) for 4 weeks to compare the hypotensive or cardiovascular effects. Although perindopril (2 mg/kg), candesartan cilexetil (2 mg/kg), or amlodipine (3 mg/kg) alone caused comparable hypotensive effects in SHRSP, monotherapy with perindopril or candesartan decreased left ventricular (LV) weight; mRNA levels for atrial natriuretic factor, skeletal alpha-actin, and collagen types I and III; and aortic weight and platelet-derived growth factor-beta receptor tyrosine phosphorylation to a greater extent than monotherapy with amlodipine. Although monotherapy with a low dose (0.2 mg/kg) of perindopril or candesartan cilexetil did not significantly reduce the LV mRNA levels and aortic platelet-derived growth factor-beta receptor phosphorylation of the SHRSP, combination therapy at such a low dose normalized these parameters more potently than the use of amlodipine (3 mg/kg) alone. Although perindopril or candesartan cilexetil alone at 0.05 mg/kg did not decrease the blood pressure of the SHRSP, such a low dose of combination therapy decreased LV weight and atrial natriuretic factor mRNA levels of the SHRSP to a greater extent than amlodipine alone or amlodipine combined with perindopril or candesartan cilexetil. Our results provide evidence that suggests the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an AT(1) receptor antagonist may be more effective in the treatment of cardiac and vascular diseases than the combination of a calcium channel blocker with an ACE inhibitor or an AT(1) receptor antagonist or monotherapy with each agent.
...
PMID:Cardiovascular effects of combination of perindopril, candesartan, and amlodipine in hypertensive rats. 1072 May 93

The fixed low-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor perindopril and the non-thiazide diuretic indapamide has been evaluated in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Combination therapy aims to improve overall therapeutic efficacy while minimising adverse effects. In well-designed multicentre clinical trials, perindopril/indapamide at doses ranging from 2/0.625 to 8/2.5 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control. A similar reduction in supine BP was observed when combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was compared with losartan 50 mg/day or atenolol 50 mg/day. Similar reductions in 24-hour ambulatory BP were also seen with perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day and irbesartan 150 mg/day. However, response and normalisation rates were significantly higher with combination therapy than with losartan or irbesartan monotherapy. Combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy effectively reduced BP in elderly patients aged 65 to 85 years to a significantly greater extent than either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Supine BP was also normalised in approximately two-thirds of patients in a small noncomparative trial in patients with hypertension and renal impairment. Low-dose perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day was well tolerated in clinical trials; the most common adverse events were headache and cough. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of diuretics, occurred with a higher incidence with combined perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day therapy than with either atenolol 50 mg/day or placebo. Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day has shown efficacy in well designed comparative trials with atenolol, losartan and irbesartan including elderly patients and patients with renal impairment. Studies comparing this dosage of perindopril/ indapamide with other combination therapies would be beneficial in allowing the place of perindopril/indapamide to be more accurately determined. The fixed-low dose combination of perindopril/indapamide provides a promising and well tolerated treatment option in the management of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
...
PMID:Perindopril/indapamide 2/0.625 mg/day: a review of its place in the management of hypertension. 1146 78

Large artery properties constitute an important component of left ventricular afterload in hypertension. The present study examined whether such properties were particularly responsive to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. A prospective, randomized, 12-week study in 138 previously treated hypertensive subjects, in 67 of whom usual treatment (UC) was replaced with perindopril (P) therapy. Large artery properties were assessed as central arterial pressure augmentation determined by applanation tonometry of the radial artery and a transfer function. At baseline both augmentation index (AI, %) and pressure (AP, mm Hg) were related to body size, heart rate, and gender. In addition AP was related to age and systolic blood pressure (BP). After 12 weeks of treatment AP decreased significantly in both perindopril and UC groups, whereas AI only decreased significantly (151.7%+/-2.3% to 144.9%+/-2.6%) in those treated with perindopril. Decreases in AP (-4.2+/-0.9 mm Hg v -1.9+/-0.7 mm Hg) and AI (-6.8%+/-2.2% v -2.2%+/-2.5%) from week 0 to week 12 were greater in the perindopril-treated group, but differences between groups failed to reach statistical significance (P = .05 and .09, respectively). The change in AI during the 12-week treatment period was dependent on the initial heart rate (P < .001), systolic BP (P < .05), weight (P < .001), and sex (P < .001), but not on treatment group (P > .5). Al at 12 weeks was negatively correlated with heart rate but regression slopes for the association were virtually identical for perindopril and UC groups. Perindopril treatment produces a greater decrease in AI than continuation with previous therapy, but this can be largely explained by hemodynamic changes rather than direct arterial effects.
...
PMID:Effects of ACE inhibitor therapy on derived central arterial waveforms in hypertension. 1202 54

Abundant evidence has accumulated showing that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates in patients with heart failure and myocardial infarction. Fewer completed trials have assessed their potential benefits in this regard in hypertensive subjects, but evidence of benefit is beginning to accrue from studies examining patients with hypertension, particularly in the presence of diabetes and after infarction. Ongoing trials of blood pressure (BP) lowering using ACE inhibition fall into three main categories: 1) those comparing ACE inhibitors with older drugs such as diuretics and beta blockers; 2) those examining more aggressive versus less aggressive lowering of BP; and 3) those investigating BP lowering in patients at high risk for a cardiac event. Among those in the last group is the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), which examines the effects of perindopril-based ACE inhibitor therapy in both normotensive and hypertensive patients who have survived a stroke. This trial is particularly important because it serves as a model for studies of BP lowering across a wide range of BP and BP-related conditions.
...
PMID:Ongoing trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: what they can tell us. 1149 8

It is well established that blood pressure lowering is effective for the primary prevention of stroke and other cardiovascular disorders in subjects with blood pressures as low as 140/90 mmHg, and up to 80 years of age. Despite this knowledge, blood pressure levels are controlled in less than 25% of the hypertensive population worldwide. It has taken longer to prove that blood pressure lowering is equally effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke. The results of PROGRESS (Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study) have confirmed that a perindopril-based regimen in subjects with cerebrovascular disease substantially reduces the incidence of secondary stroke and primary myocardial infarction. It is daunting to recall that it has taken almost two decades for beta-blockers to be widely used for the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, since widespread use of the PROGRESS regimen would prevent more than half a million strokes worldwide each year. The real challenge now is to implement novel and effective strategies for the control of blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors worldwide. Strategies should include lifestyle measures, such as stopping smoking, exercise and reducing overweight. There is a real need to identify hypertensive subjects and treat them with blood pressure lowering drugs for primary prevention. In subjects with established cardiovascular disease, consideration should be given to a range of proven interventions for secondary prevention, such as blood pressure lowering, irrespective of current blood pressure, anti-platelet drugs, statins for lowering cholesterol and glycaemic control in diabetics. Among new strategies to lower overall cardiovascular risk, consideration should be given to the development of single-pill combinations of drugs of known efficacy, including various combinations of ACE inhibitors, diuretics, beta-blockers, aspirin and statins, among others.
...
PMID:Challenges for the prevention of primary and secondary stroke: the importance of lowering blood pressure and total cardiovascular risk. 1182 38

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by improving coronary perfusion, reducing ventricular hypertrophy and remodeling, and preventing progression of coronary atherosclerosis. However, the cellular mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of ACEi are not fully understood. We studied the in vivo effects of ACE inhibition with perindopril on cellular expression of ACE, AT(1) receptors and 2 nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms, endothelial (eNOS) and inducible NOS (iNOS), in human blood vessels using quantitative in vitro autoradiography and immunocytochemistry. Seven patients with ischemic heart disease were treated with perindopril (4 mg/d) for up to 5 weeks before elective coronary bypass surgery, whereas controls did not receive the ACEi (n=7). Perindopril decreased plasma ACE by 70% and the plasma angiotensin II to angiotensin I ratio by 57% and reduced vascular ACE to approximately 65% of control levels in both endothelium and adventitia. By contrast, AT(1) receptor binding in vascular smooth muscle cells was increased by 80% in patients treated with perindopril as confirmed by immunocytochemistry. eNOS was expressed primarily in endothelial cells, whereas little iNOS expression occurred in vascular smooth muscle cells of untreated patients. Both eNOS and iNOS expression seemed to increase during perindopril treatment. These results suggest that suppression of angiotensin II formation in the vascular wall and increased expression of eNOS and iNOS during ACE inhibition may be beneficial in reversing endothelial dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Because vascular AT(1) receptor expression is increased during chronic ACE inhibition, more clinical studies are required to determine whether it is necessary to combine ACE inhibitors and AT(1) receptor antagonists in clinical management of heart failure, coronary heart disease, and hypertension
...
PMID:Perindopril alters vascular angiotensin-converting enzyme, AT(1) receptor, and nitric oxide synthase expression in patients with coronary heart disease. 1236 66

Perindopril is a long-acting ACE inhibitor, acting through its only active metabolite perindoprilat. It inhibits the renin-angiotensin system by preventing both the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II and the degradation of bradykinin, thereby reducing the vasoconstriction and left ventricular remodelling characteristic of heart failure. Perindopril 4mg significantly improved a range of haemodynamic parameters in single-dose and long-term (8 weeks and 3 months) studies involving patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), with little or no effect on blood pressure or heart rate. In randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted over 3 months and a large noncomparative study (up to 30 months), perindopril 4mg once daily significantly increased exercise tolerance and reduced symptoms of heart failure in patients with mild to moderate CHF. Perindopril 4mg once daily is generally well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate CHF. In a large noncomparative study the most commonly reported adverse clinical event was cough, which led to 2.8% of patients discontinuing treatment. In short-term comparative trials there was a significantly lower incidence of first-dose hypotension following the recommended starting dose of perindopril 2mg than after the equivalent starting doses of captopril, enalapril and lisinopril.
...
PMID:Perindopril: in congestive heart failure. 1207 91

Blood pressure levels are strongly predictive of the risks of first-ever and recurrent stroke. The benefits of blood pressure-lowering therapy for the prevention of fatal and non-fatal stroke in middle-aged individuals are well established. However, until recently, there has been uncertainty about the consistency of such benefits across different patient groups and in particular, for older people and in those with a history of stroke. This paper discusses the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering therapy, specifically in older patients with a history of stroke, with particular attention paid to the results from the Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS). PROGRESS was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6105 individuals with a history of cerebrovascular disease recruited from 172 hospital outpatient clinics in ten countries. Participants (mean age 64 years; range 26-91 years) were randomly assigned to receive active treatment with an ACE inhibitor-based blood pressure-lowering regimen (perindopril) with or without addition of the diuretic indapamide, or matched placebo. At the end of follow up (mean of 4 years), active treatment reduced the incidence of total stroke by 28% (95% CI 17-38%) and the rate of major vascular events by 26% (95% CI 16-34%). Importantly, benefits of treatment were consistent across key patient subgroups, including those with and without hypertension, patients who were Asian and non-Asian, and for both ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes subtypes. Current evidence is now strong for clinicians to consider blood pressure-lowering therapy as pivotal in the prevention of stroke, especially in patients with a known history of cerebrovascular disease (and vascular disease, in general), irrespective of blood pressure levels, as soon as patients are clinically stable after an acute stroke or other vascular event. Additional age-specific analyses of the PROGRESS data, together with those from other completed trials, will provide more reliable information about the size of the benefits of blood pressure-lowering therapy, specifically for different age groups, and particularly in the oldest old (those aged >80 years). In the meantime though, an ACE inhibitor plus diuretic treatment regimen that maximises the degree of blood pressure reduction has a good safety profile and is an effective treatment that should be considered in all patients with stroke, including the elderly.
...
PMID:The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS): clinical implications for older patients with cerebrovascular disease. 1264 80

To compare the effect of antihypertensive drugs on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the peripheral conduit arteries of patients with essential hypertension, in a prospective, randomized, parallel group study, endothelial function was assessed in 168 hypertensive patients before and after 6-month treatment with randomly assigned nifedipine GITS (30 to 60 mg, n=28), amlodipine (5 to 10 mg, n=28), atenolol (50 to 100 mg, n=29), nebivolol (5 to 10 mg, n=28), telmisartan (80 to 160 mg, n=29), and perindopril (2 to 4 mg, n=28). If necessary, hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) was added to each compound. We evaluated brachial artery flow-mediated, endothelium-dependent dilation (high-resolution ultrasound) compared with endothelium-independent response to glyceryl trinitrate (25 microg/s). Brachial artery diameter was measured by automatic computerized analysis. Forty healthy subjects were evaluated as a control group. Oxidative stress production was evaluated by measuring plasma malondialdehyde and plasma lipoperoxides; plasma antioxidant capacity was assessed as ferric-reducing antioxidant power. Hypertensive patients showed a significantly (P<0.01) lower flow-mediated dilation (5.2+/-1.9%) as compared with healthy control subjects (7.1+/-2.6%). Response to glyceryl trinitrate was similar in control subjects and patients. At baseline, blood pressure, diameter, flow-mediated dilation, and response to glyceryl trinitrate were similar in the different treatment groups. All treatments similarly reduced blood pressure, but only perindopril increased flow mediated dilation (from 5.1+/-2 to 6.4+/-2.4%; P<0.01) without modifying the response to glyceryl trinitrate. Perindopril but also telmisartan nifedipine and amlodipine reduced oxidative stress and increased plasma antioxidant capacity. In patients with essential hypertension, ACE inhibitors appear to be the only compounds able to improve conduit artery endothelium-dependent vasodilation.
...
PMID:Different effect of antihypertensive drugs on conduit artery endothelial function. 1271 41

A number of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials have clearly established that blood pressure (BP) lowering, based on all antihypertensive drugs studied, lowers the risk of all major BP-related cardiovascular events. However, this does not exclude that some antihypertensive agents are more or less effective in preventing cardiovascular events than to be expected from the extent of BP lowering. Indeed, clinical trials of thiazide diuretics using 'high' doses demonstrated marked prevention of strokes, but little to no prevention of coronary events. Subsequent studies using thiazides at 'lower' doses showed prevention of both strokes and coronary events. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers exert direct vascular effects which may inhibit atherosclerosis and prevent cardiovascular events, in addition to their benefits related to BP lowering. After the publication of the results of Heart Outcome Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial, this concept has become widely accepted for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. However, placebo-controlled trials, such as HOPE and, recently, the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA), are confounded by the difference in BP and its impact on outcome. Indeed, as a mirror image of these trials, the blacks subgroup in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) exhibited a 4 to 5 mmHg higher systolic BP on ACE inhibitor as compared with the diuretic, associated with 19% higher combined cardiovascular disease and 40% higher stroke rate. Recent overviews of randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes with different antihypertensive drug classes concluded that outcome benefits beyond BP lowering remain unproven.
...
PMID:Blood pressure lowering, not vascular mechanism of action, is the primary determinant of clinical outcome. 1530 9


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>

---