Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.15.1 (ACE)
 18,300 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Effects of manidipine, a new calcium antagonist, and delapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, on glucose and lipid metabolism were investigated in mild to moderate hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The patients were treated with either manidipine 10 mg/day (n = 12, mean age 63 +/- 2 years) or delapril 30 mg/day (n = 8, 62 +/- 3 years) for 12 weeks. Glucose and insulin (IRI) responses to 75 g oral glucose load, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c), serum levels of total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride and apolipoproteins, and 24 h urinary excretion of C-peptide were measured before and at the end of treatment. Both manidipine and delapril showed adequate hypotensive effects. Neither manidipine nor delapril affected blood glucose and IRI responses to glucose load. Manidipine showed no effect on lipids whereas delapril increased HDL cholesterol (47 +/- 5 mg/dL to 61 +/- 7, p < 0.05), although total cholesterol and triglyceride were not altered. The ratio of TC-HDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol was decreased by delapril (3.44 +/- 0.30 to 2.61 +/- 0.45, p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in apolipoproteins. Both manidipine and delapril have adequate antihypertensive actions without unfavorable effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in hypertensive patients with NIDDM. Delapril seems to have a beneficial effect on lipid metabolism.
 ...
PMID:Effects of manidipine and delapril on glucose and lipid metabolism in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. 134 82

The actions of angiotensin II can be described in terms of the three paradigms listed in Table 1. According to the first paradigm (organ physiology), angiotensin II is a pressor, while the second (cell biochemistry) views it as an extracellular messenger that, by promoting Ca2+ release within cells, causes vasoconstriction and a weak positive inotropic response by the heart. However, neither of these paradigms fully explains the remarkable ability of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors to improve the prognosis for patients with heart failure. To account for these clinical effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, we will probably need to invoke the third paradigm (gene expression), which views angiotensin II as a growth factor that promotes and modifies protein synthesis. Angiotensin II, therefore, should probably not be viewed simply as a vasoconstrictor with a side effect to promote hypertrophy, but instead as a growth factor that, because it utilizes Ca2+ to mediate its effects on gene expression, also increases smooth muscle tone and myocardial contractility. This view of angiotensin II as a growth factor helps us to understand the clinical benefit of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors as arising from inhibition of maladaptive changes in the failing heart (gene expression) as well as from the reduced afterload (organ physiology) that results from decreased smooth muscle tone (cell biochemistry).
 ...
PMID:Is angiotensin II a growth factor masquerading as a vasopressor? 134 1

Renal arterial disease occurs in 3-5% of patients with systemic hypertension. It is important to determine the type of lesion by arteriography to understand the natural history of the specific disease and to choose appropriate therapy. Some have questioned why arteriography should be performed if an operation or percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty is not considered. One must keep in mind that if the arteriographic characteristics are known, the specific lesion and its course may be predicted, resulting in better management of the disease. In patients with a unilateral lesion angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are efficacious, but calcium antagonists may also be used. However, if therapy does not provide optimum control of blood pressure or the impairment of renal function progresses, then percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty or surgery should be reconsidered.
 ...
PMID:Hypertension due to renal arterial disease. 134 12

These studies were undertaken to evaluate different manifestations of structural cardiovascular changes and the effects of antihypertensive therapy in essential hypertension. A meta-analysis of 109 studies that had examined the effect of different pharmacological blood pressure lowering regimens on left ventricular structure, examined by echocardiography, was undertaken to increase the statistical power, to resolve uncertainty and to improve the accuracy of estimation of the magnitude of effect. Strict preset criteria were applied. The effect of different drugs in monotherapy and in particular first line antihypertensive therapies were compared, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers and calcium antagonists all reduced left ventricular mass (LVM) through a reduction in wall hypertrophy, the effect being most pronounced with ACE-inhibitors. Conversely, diuretics reduced LVM mainly through a reduction of left ventricular volume. Previously untreated males (n = 28, 86 kg, 46 years, 27 kg/m2) with non-malignant essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 95 mmHg 3-4 times (in triplicate) on placebo) were randomized to long-term double-blind treatment with enalapril (E) or hydrochlorothiazide (H). There were no significant differences between the groups at baseline. Vascular alterations in the retina (eyeground photo, refined grading), cardiac morphology (M-mode echocardiography, ASE), structural vascular changes of the hand (plethysmography, minimal resistance (Rmin)), total peripheral resistance ((TPR), calculated from dye-dilution) and blood pressure (intraarterial) were significantly interrelated at baseline except LVM and Rmin. After 6 months of therapy, E reduced the signs of vascular changes in the retina as well as Rmin in the hand circulation, while H did not change or increased these structural vascular changes. The blood pressure lowering effect of E (mainly through lowering of TPR) tended to be more pronounced, measured both intraarterially and indirectly, than that seen with H (mainly through lowering of cardiac output), however, there were no significant differences. LVM decreased progressively with E while the effect of H was non-significant. E reduced wall thickness but not left ventricular diameter and also improved left ventricular distensibility significantly. The effect on cardiac morphology was significantly different between therapies when taking change in blood pressure into account. After the longest follow-up on monotherapy (18 months) E had reduced LVM by 2.7 g/mmHg and H (14 months) by 1.3 g/mmHg (significant for E only). In univariate analysis the changes in cardiovascular structure were significantly related to the changes in the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Structural cardiovascular changes in essential hypertension. Studies on the effect of antihypertensive therapy. 134 61

In view of the likely prohypertensive effects of hyperinsulinemia and the presence of insulin resistance in primary hypertension, the effects of various antihypertensive therapies on insulin sensitivity need to be identified. The evidence strongly supports major beneficial effects of weight reduction and aerobic exercise. Deleterious effects have been shown for diuretics and most beta-blockers, whereas probable beneficial effects have been seen with alpha-blockers, one angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and various calcium entry blockers. Improvement of insulin sensitivity and reduction of plasma insulin levels are desirable attributes of antihypertensive therapy that should be more carefully considered in the future.
 ...
PMID:Effects of antihypertensive therapy on insulin resistance. 134 22

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent risk indicator of cardiovascular disease. Obtaining reversal of hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy seems to be a desirable objective of antihypertensive treatment. A total of 2,357 patients were included in a meta-analysis on the effect of antihypertensive pharmacological therapy on LVH. Overall left ventricular mass (LVM) was reduced by 11.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.1-13.7) in parallel with a reduction of mean arterial pressure of 14.9% (CI 14.0 to 15.8). When evaluating the effect of first-line therapies on calculated LVM using the same formula for all studies, the absolute reductions in g were 44.7 (ACE-inhibitors), 22.8 (beta-blockers), 26.9 (calcium antagonists) and 21.4 (diuretics) when adjusted for differences between studies (ANCOVA). It can be concluded that effective antihypertensive therapy reduces LVM. ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers and calcium antagonists reduce LVM by reducing wall hypertrophy, the effect of ACE-inhibitors being the most pronounced. Diuretics reduce LVM mainly through an effect on left ventricular inner diameter. How these effects affect prognosis is still an open question.
 ...
PMID:Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy--a meta-analysis. 134 56

About 10% of survivors of an acute myocardial infarction will die in the following year. Thereafter the risk declines but reinfarction is still an important cause of mortality and morbidity. The post infarction trials have clearly shown that the best proven agents to mitigate this toll are aspirin, beta adrenoceptor blockers, and verapamil (but not other calcium blockers, except diltiazem for non Q wave infarction). In the context of hypertension treatment these post infarction trials may have important lessons for drug selection and ancillary treatment since the majority of subjects will ultimately die of ischaemic heart disease. Although the newer agents such as ACE and renin inhibitors, newer calcium channel blockers and alpha blockers have many promising properties in terms of risk factor reduction, no convincing mortality data exists; it is needed. This review will deal with the known effects (both good and bad) of antihypertensive agents and will also review other drug strategies relevant to the hypertensive patient. It will also point out large areas of ignorance.
 ...
PMID:The secondary prevention of myocardial infarction by drug treatment; excluding lipid lowering agents. 134 57

Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia frequently coexist and may require concomitant drug treatments. The efficacy and safety profile of lovastatin given in the presence of antihypertensive medication was evaluated using patient subgroups identified in the Expanded Clinical Evaluation of Lovastatin (EXCEL) Study. The EXCEL study examined 8,245 patients with moderate hypercholesterolemia randomly assigned either to a group treated with lovastatin (20-80 mg daily) or to a group given placebo for 48 weeks. After adjustment for patient characteristics, pairwise comparisons were made between patients taking no antihypertensive agents (n = 3,772) and those taking either calcium antagonists (n = 446), selective beta 1-adrenergic receptor blockers (n = 326), nonselective beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (n = 219), potassium-sparing diuretics (n = 187), thiazide diuretics (n = 126), or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 171). The placebo-corrected dose-dependent effect of lovastatin on the percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was not attenuated in any subgroup and was slightly enhanced in the calcium antagonist subgroup (-29% to -44%, p = 0.06) when compared with patients taking no antihypertensive agents (-24% to -40%); this difference, however, was only of borderline significance. Patterns of lovastatin-induced increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and decrease in triglycerides were not consistently different among the subgroups. Examination of mean changes in serum transaminases, mean changes in creatine kinase, and the proportion of patients discontinuing therapy for clinical adverse experiences did not indicate the presence of an interaction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Lovastatin and coadministered antihypertensive/cardiovascular agents. 134 57

A metaanalysis was performed to determine the effects on quality of life (QL) in hypertension as reported in published clinical trials of antihypertensive drug therapy. All studies included compared active treatment to baseline (placebo or no treatment) with the patients as their own control and used blinded, randomized trials. Change was measured by self and/or interviewer-assisted evaluation, standardized psychomotor/cognitive tests, or sleep laboratory observations. After an exhaustive literature search (1970 to 1990), nine published trials of 27 population groups (n = 1620) using 14 drugs from six pharmacological groups met selection criteria and were analyzed for five QL constructs: sexual function, sleep, psychomotor, general well-being, and mood. Small positive effect size (d) improvement with treatment was seen for sleep (d = 0.106), psychomotor (d = 0.283), general well-being (d = 0.139), and mood (d = 0.167) while no effect could be determined for sexual function (d = -0.030) based on 95% confidence intervals. Either a comparably small improvement with treatment or no effect was seen among various pharmacological drug groups; no negative effect with treatment was identified. A larger positive effect could be postulated if the drug choice was individualized to the patient rather than randomized as in clinical trial methodology. Although none of the drug groups had a clearly superior effect, a more frequent positive effect with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers was seen for all constructs. Narrower demographics and smaller sample sizes may have biased similar positive effects in calcium-channel blockers and diuretics.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life in treatment of hypertension. A metaanalysis of clinical trials. 800 82

The cardinal hemodynamic disorder in established essential hypertension is increased total peripheral resistance. During exercise, the increase in stroke volume of the heart is abnormal. A 20-year follow-up study of the hemodynamics in essential hypertension demonstrated a progressive increase in total peripheral resistance and deterioration of the heart pump function. Long-term treatment with antihypertensive agents modifies the circulatory system in different ways. Vasodilators (angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, alpha 1-blockers, and calcium antagonists) all reduce total peripheral resistance, and in general, cardiac output, heart rate, and stroke volume remain unchanged. Calcium antagonists like verapamil and diltiazem reduce the heart rate approximately 10% during exercise, but since stroke volume increases, cardiac output is unchanged. Chronic treatment with conventional beta-blockers induces a permanent reduction in cardiac output and heart rate during exercise. In contrast, carvedilol--a beta 1,beta 2-blocker with alpha 1-blocking activity--prevents the immediate increase in total peripheral resistance during acute beta-blockade. In 19 patients followed by hemodynamic measurements over 6-9 months, blood pressure was well controlled by carvedilol. During exercise, total peripheral resistance decreased 6% (P less than 0.05), and the reductions in heart rate and cardiac index were less than on conventional beta-blockade. Echo-Doppler studies showed a significant reduction in the intraventricular septum of 13%.
 ...
PMID:Long-term hemodynamic effects of antihypertensive treatment. 135 Apr 86


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>