Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.4.15.1 (ACE)
18,300 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effects of calcium antagonists on psychological well-being, cognitive function, activity and physical symptoms in hypertensive patients are reviewed. Effects on these aspects of quality of life appear to differ according to whether a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist such as nifedipine is employed or verapamil, which is a phenylalkylamine derivative. Nifedipine has been associated with a self-assessment of impaired cognitive function in 2 clinical trials. Nifedipine was also associated with more symptomatic complaints than both atenolol and verapamil in different studies. The problems with nifedipine centred on oedema, flushing and palpitations. Verapamil was associated with constipation. Compared with other classes of antihypertensive drugs, the position of calcium antagonists with respect to the maintenance of patients' quality of life is presently unclear. Verapamil has been associated with improved quality of life compared with propranolol (a beta-blocker) and nifedipine. Verapamil appears to have similar effects on quality of life as atenolol and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, captopril. The position of nifedipine remains unclear.
...
PMID:Quality of life in the treatment of hypertension. The effect of calcium antagonists. 128 77

The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of diuretic-free antihypertensive therapy with a calcium antagonist and/or an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in patients with diabetes mellitus. 54 hypertensive [blood pressure (BP) above 140/90mm Hg] patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (n = 7) or 2 (n = 47) and normal serum creatinine levels (mean 82 +/- 6 mumol/L) received either verapamil or enalapril after a 2-week washout and a 4-week placebo phase. If BP remained elevated, both agents were combined. Verapamil or enalapril alone normalised diastolic BP (to less than 90mm Hg) in 36 patients; verapamil decreased BP from 159/98 to 147/87mm Hg (n = 19, p < 0.001) and enalapril decreased BP from 166/99 to 146/88mm Hg (n = 17, p < 0.001). In 18 patients who remained hypertensive after 10 weeks of monotherapy, a combination of both drugs decreased BP from 169/104 to 151/90mm Hg (p < 0.001). Overall, 87% of patients achieved a target BP response at 30 weeks. Urinary albumin as related to creatinine excretion (UAE; micrograms albumin:mg creatinine) was on average not significantly changed after verapamil or enalapril treatment, alone or combined. Nevertheless, in patients with initial microalbuminuria, UAE decreased (p < 0.05) during enalapril treatment. Serum potassium, total lipids, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated haemoglobin, serum C peptide and fructosamine levels were not significantly modified by treatment. Subjective tolerability of the drugs was also generally good. Thus, in hypertensive patients with diabetes, a diuretic-free therapy based on the calcium antagonist verapamil or the ACE inhibitor enalapril, alone or combined, can effectively decrease BP without adversely affecting carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.
...
PMID:Swiss hypertension treatment programme with verapamil and/or enalapril in diabetic patients. 128 88

Abnormalities in sodium homeostasis and in atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) behavior could play a role in determining and accelerating the development of glomerular hypertension, hypertension, and microalbuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetes. The aim of the present study was to investigate in 32 hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients (HD) with an altered albumin excretion rate the natriuretic response and ANP release to saline load (2 mmol/kg 90 min, and the effects angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy 2.5 to 5.0 mg cilazapril, once daily), and calcium antagonists (sustained release verapamil: 120 to 240 mg Isoptin Press, once daily, and long acting nifedipine: 20 to 40 mg Adalat AR, twice daily) on sodium homeostasis and albumin excretion rate. Eight normal subjects matched for sex, age, and weight served as controls. The 32 HD patients showed a blunted response in ANP release and sodium excretion during saline infusion in comparison with controls. The cilazapril and verapamil treatments were tested in 16 of the 32 HD patients and were both effective in ameliorating natriuretic and ANP response to saline load and in decreasing albumin excretion rate. The combined cilazapril and verapamil treatment further improved both these parameters in these patients, although blood pressure levels were comparable. The other 16 HD patients underwent sequential verapamil and nifedipine treatment. Verapamil was more effective than nifedipine in improving natriuresis and ANP release to saline load and in lowering the albumin excretion rate. The results of the present study demonstrate that sodium homeostasis and ANP release are altered in hypertensive nephropathic patients, and both cilazapril and verapamil are more effective than nifedipine in ameliorating natriuresis, ANP release, and albumin excretion rate.
...
PMID:Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists on atrial natriuretic peptide release and action and on albumin excretion rate in hypertensive insulin-dependent diabetic patients. 145 87

The aim of the study was to investigate whether oxygen causes a further decrease in pulmonary artery pressure after administration of calcium channel blocker-verapamil-or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-captopril-in the secondary pulmonary hypertension. We studied 37 patients with the secondary pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure = 56.1 mm Hg) due to mitral stenosis. After having completed hemodynamic diagnostic procedures, basal oxygen test was performed and pulmonary artery pressure was recorded at 10 min of oxygen breathing. Then, 10 mg of verapamil was injected into the pulmonary artery of 16 patients and 21 patients received 75 mg of oral captopril. At the peak of vasodilation, 30 min after verapamil and 90 min after captopril administration, pulmonary artery pressure was recorded and oxygen test was repeated. Baseline oxygen test produced a statistically significant decrease in pulmonary artery pressure. Verapamil and captopril also lowered pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures. The second oxygen test did not cause a further decrease in the pulmonary artery pressure; mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure was 52.3 +/- 23.7 mm Hg, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure 22.7 +/- 10.6 mm Hg before and 49.1 +/- 23.8 mm Hg and 23.0 +/- 13.5 mm Hg, respectively after the test in verapamil group, and 47.0 +/- 15.5 mm Hg and 21.7 +/- 8.4 mm Hg before and 46.6 +/- 15.4 mm Hg, respectively in captopril subset. The results may support the thesis that vasodilating effect depends rather on the degree of pulmonary vascular changes than on the vasodilatory mechanism of particular drugs.
...
PMID:[Lack of additional action of oxygen on pulmonary artery pressure at the peak of verapamil or captopril action in pulmonary hypertension secondary to mitral stenosis]. 166 76

Treatment of patients with heart failure due to major ventricular systolic dysfunction should aim not only at symptomatic but also at prognostic improvement. If correction of the underlying problem is not possible, treatment should slow down the progression of cardiac failure and eliminate triggers for sudden cardiac death due to electromechanical dissociation or arrhythmias. In every patient with chronic congestive heart failure screening for myocardial ischemia and complete revascularization is mandatory, if possible. In patients with coronary artery disease and diminished systolic function, beta-blockade may improve prognosis by reducing ischemic events and sudden cardiac death. The incidence of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with heart failure may be reduced by eliminating facilitating factors like electrolyte disturbances, altered autonomic tone and raised intracardiac pressure rather than by antiarrhythmic medical treatment itself. One of the most important prognostic aspects in treatment is the interference with the development of the cardiomyopathy of overload, uniformly observed in chronic congestive heart failure. Modification of mechanical and neuroendocrine stimuli may postpone myocardial hypertrophy and interstitial hyperplasia as a consequence of altered gene expression. Early treatment with ACE inhibitors and in certain patients with betablockers are the most promising strategies to delay the progression of the disease. In contrast, positive inotropic drugs, including digitalis and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, do not improve prognosis. Calcium antagonists should also be used with restriction, as Verapamil and Diltiazem, but also Nifedipine may adversely affect the outcome in congestive heart failure patients.
...
PMID:[Prognostic aspects in the treatment of chronic heart insufficiency]. 173

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that systolic and systodisystolic hypertension constitute major risk factors for damaging or fatal cardiovascular accidents in the elderly as well as the young. Furthermore reducing the blood pressure also reduces the risk. In 1983 Fleckenstein investigated the Ca++ and MG++ contact of human arteries and clearly demonstrated that titres of both but especially Ca++ in the arterial wall increased progressively with age. The Authors themselves caused calcinosis of the arterial wall in rats treated with Vitamin D3 and Dihydrotachysterol and were able to prevent the occurrence with Verapamil. It is against this background that the present study compared the efficacy and tolerability of two anti-hypertensive drug groups in the calcium antagonists and the ACE inhibitors (Enalapril Maleate) used individually on two groups of elderly hypertensives. A group of 123 out patients with a mean age of 73 and all suffering from slight-to-moderate hypertension were monitored for 6 months being subjected to the following examinations: clinical assessment including blood pressure measurements lying and standing, biohumoral tests, remote heart X-rays, echocardiography (to establish the Reichek systolic wall stress index) and ECG. The clinical examination and ECG were repeated every 2 weeks for the first 6 months and once a month thereafter. The heart X-rays, echocardiogram and biohumeral tests were performed every 6 months. The patients were divided into two groups I and II and assigned to the selected treatment. The Group I patients were then divided into 3 subgroups and treated with 3 different calcium antagonists (Nifedipine R; Verapamil R and Diltiazem). All group II patients were treated with Enalapril Maleate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Calcium antagonists vs ACE inhibitors in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension in the aged]. 254 2

The demonstration that antihypertensive drug treatment reduces mortality and morbidity in persons with mild hypertension has extended the indications for treatment. Verapamil, nitrendipine, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs are equally effective in reducing blood pressure. The choice of which drug to use depends on the presence or absence of specific contraindications and the occurrence of adverse effects in the individual patient.
...
PMID:Comparison of calcium antagonists with other antihypertensive agents. 286 75

The demonstration that antihypertensive drug treatment reduces mortality and morbidity in mild hypertension has extended the indications for treatment. Verapamil, nitrendipine, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs are all equally effective in reducing blood pressure. The choice of drug depends on the presence or absence of specific contra-indications and the occurrence of side effects in individual patients.
...
PMID:Comparison of calcium antagonists with other antihypertensive agents. 290 21

The Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial is a randomized, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, two-arm, actively controlled, multicenter, international 5-year clinical trial involving 15,000 patients. CONVINCE will compare the incidence of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular-disease-related death in two antihypertensive treatment regimens. One treatment arm begins with controlled onset-extended release (COER)-verapamil, which has its major antihypertensive effect 6-12 hours after administration. The other arm (standard of care (SOC)) begins with either hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or atenolol, one of which is preselected by the investigator for an individual patient prior to randomization. Secondary objectives include comparisons of the regimens for each of the components of the primary endpoint (separately), death or hospitalization related to cardiovascular disease, efficacy in lowering blood pressure to goal, primary events occurring between 6 am and noon, all-cause mortality, withdrawals from blinded therapy, cancer, and hospitalizations due to bleeding. Patients may be enrolled if they are hypertensive and at least 55 years of age and have an established second risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Initial medications include COER-verapamil (180 mg/d), HCTZ (12.5 mg/d), or atenolol (50 mg/d). Initial doses are doubled if blood pressure (BP) does not reach goal (systolic BP < 140 mm and diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg). If BP is not controlled by the higher dose of the initial medication, HCTZ is added to COER-verapamil, or the SOC choice not initially selected is added in the SOC arm. An ACE-inhibitor is recommended (although nearly any open-label medication is allowed) as the third step for patients whose BP is not adequately controlled or who have a contraindication to one of the two SOC medications. Patients take two sets of tablets daily, one in the morning and one in the evening. Although most patients switch from an established antihypertensive medication to randomized treatment, untreated patients with stages I-III hypertension (SBP between 140 and 190 or DBP between 90 and 110 mm Hg) are eligible. Outcomes are monitored by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Enrollment began during the third quarter of 1996, and follow-up is to be completed in the third quarter of 2002.
...
PMID:Rationale and design for the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial. 968 12

The TEAM trial investigated the effectiveness and tolerance of a fixed combination of the ACE inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (2 mg trandolapril and 180 mg verapamil retard) (preparation Tarka) in an open multicentre prospective study of treatment of moderately severe hypertension (diastolic pressure at the end of the two-week wash-out period 100-115 mm Hg). The trial comprised 163 patients who were treated first for four weeks by a monotherapy with 2 mg trandolapril. After these four weeks patients who attained normal blood pressure proceeded with trandolapril treatment. Hypertensive patients who did not attain normal diastolic pressure levels were treated for another four weeks by a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR. After four weeks of treatment with trandolapril 62 patients of 163 (37%) had a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg. The fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR reduced the diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mm Hg in 71.6% of the patients resistant to treatment with 2 mg trandolapril and in another 15.6% of patients it reduced the diastolic blood pressure by 10 mm Hg or more. After two months of treatment 60 patients had a normal blood pressure due to trandolapril (37%) and another 73 patients (45%) treated by a combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR, i.e. a total of 133 patients (82%) who originally suffered from moderately severe hypertension, attained a normal diastolic blood pressure. The mean decrease of diastolic pressure after two months of treatment was 19.5 mm Hg in "non-respondents" to trandolapril monotherapy and 23.6 mm Hg in "respondents". The mean decrease of systolic pressure in "non-respondents" and "respondents" after trandolapril treatment was 19.5 mm Hg and 35.0 mm Hg resp. The fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil was not only effective but was associated with a minimum of undesirable effects. The incidence of headaches declined significantly. The combination of the above preparations is useful also because both preparations have a cardio- and nephroprotective effect and do not affect the lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Treatment with a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil SR is indicated in moderately severe hypertension not responding to monotherapy, in particular when associated with diabetes, hyperlipoproteinaemia, ischaemic heart disease or left ventricular hypertrophy.
...
PMID:[The TEAM study--a study of the effectiveness and tolerance of treatment of essential hypertension with a fixed combination of trandolapril and verapamil]. 982 54


1 2 Next >>

---