Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.4.15.1 (ACE)
18,300 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind comparator study was performed in 528 hypertensive patients [baseline sitting diastolic blood pressure (SitDBP) 95-114 mmHg]. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of drug-related cough in patients treated with enalapril and eprosartan. The secondary objective was to compare antihypertensive efficacy between treatments. This paper reports the results of a prespecified subgroup analysis performed in the patients under and over 65 years of age recruited into the study. Eprosartan was titrated from 200 mg b.i.d. to 300 mg b.i.d. and enalapril from 5 mg o.d. to 20 mg o.d. over 12 weeks. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5-25 mg o.d. could be added where required to the treatment for the final 6 weeks of the titration phase if SitDBP > or = 90 mmHg. Patients received the maximum titrated dosage during the maintenance phase. In the study overall, the incidence of cough at monotherapy endpoint was significantly higher in the enalapril-treated group than in the eprosartan-treated group (p = 0.018). Similar mean changes in blood pressure from baseline were evident with each treatment. The elderly subpopulation mirrored the response of the study as a whole. Both treatments lowered BP with a further reduction evident following the addition of HCTZ at week 18. In conclusion, eprosartan is effective and safe in elderly hypertensive patients. The combination of eprosartan and HCTZ is also well tolerated and provided additional efficacy in those patients not responding to eprosartan alone. Compared with eprosartan enalapril was associated with an increased risk of cough. These results suggest that, irrespective of age, patients may be less likely to discontinue treatment with eprosartan than with an ACE inhibitor.
...
PMID:Effect of eprosartan and enalapril in the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: subgroup analysis of a 26-week, double-blind, multicentre study. Eprosartan Multinational Study Group. 1021 6

Eprosartan is a potent and selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist. Results of large (n > 100) randomised double-blind studies in patients with mild, moderate or severe hypertension demonstrated that the antihypertensive efficacy of eprosartan (usually 400 to 800 mg/day as a single daily dose or in 2 divided doses) is significantly greater than that of placebo and at least as good as that of enalapril. In placebo-controlled trials, eprosartan achieved mean reductions from baseline in trough sitting systolic blood pressure of 6.3 to 15 mm Hg and in diastolic blood pressure of 4.1 to 9.7 mm Hg. Response rates associated with once daily administration of eprosartan 400 to 800 mg were approximately double those with placebo. Overall, eprosartan was well tolerated with a similar tolerability profile to that of placebo. In comparative trials, in which the incidence of persistent dry cough was evaluated as the primary end-point, enalapril was several-fold more likely to induce this adverse event than eprosartan (the difference being statistically significant regardless of study population and definition of cough). In conclusion, the angiotensin II receptor antagonist eprosartan is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent that is administered once or twice daily without regard to meals. Eprosartan has a low potential for serious adverse events, and the drug has not been associated with clinically significant drug interactions. Unlike ACE inhibitors such as enalapril, eprosartan does not have a high propensity to cause persistent nonproductive cough. Thus, eprosartan represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension.
...
PMID:Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. 1092 34

Improvements in the death rate from coronary heart disease and in the control of hypertension have leveled off in recent years, reversing a trend toward steady improvement that began in 1972. Of the roughly 20% of Americans who suffer from hypertension, only 29% achieve adequate control (<140/90 mm Hg) with treatment and nearly half receive no treatment at all. Poor adherence to therapy doubtless plays a key role in this failure. As a major cause of poor adherence, tolerability becomes an extremely important element in any discussion of effective antihypertensive treatment. Despite their efficacy in treating hypertension, diuretics, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers have all been associated with numerous side effects, including increased serum lipid levels, insulin resistance, and edema. With the introduction of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, patients were able to achieve blood pressure goals with fewer side effects. These agents, however, cause an irritating cough in up to 19% of patients. A newer class of drugs, the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), have similar effects to the ACE inhibitors, but their highly selective nature produces even fewer side effects. Eprosartan is a structurally unique ARB. Like the other ARB, this promising new agent has a side effect profile similar to placebo, and its response rate rivals or exceeds that of enalapril. Although it remains to be seen whether the ARB can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease, preliminary data from the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) trial appear to be promising.
...
PMID:Issues in hypertension: drug tolerability and special populations. 1145 11

The treatment of hypertension has become increasingly refined during the past decade. Although a variety of antihypertensive medication classes exist, drugs that interrupt the renin-angiotensin axis have gained a favored position in the treatment of hypertension and its attendant end-organ complications. In this regard, two drug classes, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, are most commonly used. Angiotensin receptor blockers have proven highly effective in the management of hypertension. This class is fairly heterogeneous with individual class members having somewhat distinctive pharmacologic properties. Eprosartan is a recent entry into this class. This compound compares favorably to others in this class relative to blood pressure reduction. In addition, preliminary studies indicate that this compound may uniquely interrupt the sympathetic nervous system and thereby preferentially reduce systolic blood pressure.
...
PMID:Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers. 1145 13

The ideal antihypertensive drug should be effective in reducing blood pressure, but have a low incidence of adverse effects. Angiotensin II receptor blockers, such as eprosartan, are as effective as ACE inhibitors in reducing blood pressure, but lack the main adverse effect of ACE inhibitors, namely cough. Eprosartan has been shown to be well tolerated with a placebo-like adverse-effect profile. When given as monotherapy it is effective in reducing blood pressure; however, some patients require additional blood pressure control, which may be provided by combination therapy. Indeed, the combination of eprosartan and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide has been shown to be effective in further reducing blood pressure in patients not optimally responding to eprosartan monotherapy. This article reviews the safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide from 17 studies of 1899 patients with hypertension and normotensive volunteers. Of these studies, four were controlled with patients receiving a fixed-dose combination, six were long-term, open-label, and another four were controlled studies with hydrochlorothiazide being given to eprosartan non-responders. The other three studies included healthy subjects receiving the combination of eprosartan and hydrochlorothiazide. There was a high completion rate in all studies evaluated. Most of the patients receiving eprosartan 600mg in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg daily completed the studies, which supports acceptance of this combination therapy by patients. The most frequently reported adverse events in these combination studies were headache, dizziness, myalgia, and upper respiratory tract infection in patients with hypertension. The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and were not considered to be related to study treatment. The adverse event that was more common in patients receiving combination therapy compared with those receiving monotherapy was dizziness. This adverse event may be due to hydrochlorothiazide as it has previously been observed in patients taking thiazide diuretics. In healthy volunteers, the most frequently reported adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory tract infection. However, none of these adverse events were considered related to study medication. In summary, the combination of eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide is well tolerated, both as short- and long-term therapy, with most adverse events occurring early. The most frequent adverse events were headache, dizziness, and upper respiratory infection, which would be expected based on the safety profile of each of the components. Therefore, the combination of eprosartan with hydrochlorothiazide can be effectively and safely used in patients not adequately responding to eprosartan monotherapy.
...
PMID:Safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. 1211 44

Angiotensin II (AII) receptor blockers offer an alternative means of blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Being highly selective for the AII receptor subtype AT(1), AII receptor blockers may avoid side-effects associated with ACE inhibitor treatment, such as cough. Eprosartan is a non-biphenyl, non-tetrazole competitive blocker that is chemically distinct from other AII receptor blockers, which may account for differences in its pharmacological properties. It induces dual blockade of AT(1) receptors both presynaptically and postsynaptically, reducing sympathetic nerve activity to a significantly greater degree than other AT(1) receptor blockers. At the recommended dose of 600 mg once daily, eprosartan effectively lowers blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients to a similar degree as seen with other AII receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors. However, a greater proportion of patients achieved adequate BP control compared with enalapril. When eprosartan is given in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), it provides a significantly greater BP reduction compared with eprosartan alone. Eprosartan has a side-effect profile that is similar to placebo and to other AII receptor blockers, but is better than that of enalapril because it lacks the propensity to cause dry cough. Eprosartan is not metabolized by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, and so has no interaction with drugs that affect this system. Eprosartan completely reverses renal vasoconstriction induced by AII and may, therefore, have further applications in situations where stimulation of the RAAS is a problem. In summary, eprosartan, alone or in combination with HCTZ, provides an effective and well-tolerated approach to lowering BP in patients with all grades of hypertension. Further development of eprosartan may offer therapeutic opportunities that go far beyond the current recommendations.
...
PMID:Clinical profile of eprosartan. 1276 89

The renin-angiotensin system is the major contributor to development of hypertension, atherosclerosis, and many other cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin II, one of the main effectors of this system, contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension and plays an important role in monocyte, platelet, and endothelium interactions. The effects on platelet and endothelial function, either by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor antagonists, are still not well understood. A double-blind, randomized, prospective trial of either enalapril (10-20 mg daily) or eprosartan (400-800 mg daily) over a 10-week period was conducted in 42 patients (27 males, 15 females). Platelet activation was evaluated by measuring platelet factor 4 (PF-4), beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG), the ratio of platelet factor 4 to beta-thromboglobulin, and endothelial function by measuring total plasma nitrate levels, von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels, and blood flow using venous occlusive plethysmography. After a 10-week treatment with enalapril or eprosartan, the sitting blood pressure in both the enalapril group (from 152.2 +/- 18.7 mmHg to 141.9 +/- 23.5 mmHg, P < 0.05) and eprosartan group (from 151 +/- 10.0 mmHg to 142.3 +/- 12.9 mmHg, P < 0.05) was significantly reduced. Significant diastolic blood pressure (DPB) reduction (from 94 +/- 8.7 to 84.5 +/- 9.6 mmHg, P < 0.05) and a greater DBP reduction response were found in the eprosartan group (63% in eprosartan versus 25% in enalapril). Additionally, dose-dependent reductions in the indices of platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction were observed in patients administered high dose treatments of eprosartan and enalapril, and the beneficial effects of these agents were not correlated with the reduction of blood pressure using both agents. Eprosartan is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of mid-to-moderate hypertension, and the DBP response reduction to eprosartin was better than that to enalapril. A high dose of either eprosartan or enalapril significantly decreased the indices of platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients. The benefits of both agents cannot be explained solely by their antihypertensive effects and possibly may be mediated through their unique effect on angiotensin blockade.
...
PMID:A double blind randomized trial to compare the effects of eprosartan and enalapril on blood pressure, platelets, and endothelium function in patients with essential hypertension. 1535 73

Cerebrovascular disease is a major cause of mortality world-wide, and the prevalence is expected to increase as a result of projected demographic trends. Aggressive antihypertensive therapy is one intervention that has proven highly effective in reducing the risk of stroke, with relatively small blood pressure reductions affording measurable benefit even in patients not conventionally considered hypertensive. Comparative clinical trials are revealing evidence of differential impacts of antihypertensive classes on the incidence of cerebrovascular disease that will probably be important for therapeutic choice in patients with risk factors for stroke. In particular, the role of the renin-angiotensin system in cerebrovascular disease has come under scrutiny as a result of evidence that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), but perhaps not angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, can reduce the risk of a first stroke to a greater degree than might be expected from their effects on blood pressure alone. Although preclinical evidence suggests that there are differential effects of the type 1 and type 2 receptor activation, the clinical relevance of this is not yet known. Furthermore, the effect on the incidence of stroke conferred by blood pressure control in the early morning hours - the time when the incidence of strokes peaks--has not been tested. Some evidence for the beneficial effect of an ARB on secondary stroke prevention comes from the MOrbidity and mortality after Stroke --Eprosartan compared with nitrendipine in Secondary prevention study (MOSES), which showed that the ARB protected against cerebro- and cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients with a previous stroke over and above the protection offered by blood pressure control. These hypotheses are among those being examined in two current large-scale trials: the Prevention Regimen For Effectively avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS), and The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) Trial Programme.
...
PMID:Managing the patient at risk for a second stroke. 1582 51

The angiotensin II receptor antagonist eprosartan is approved for the treatment of essential hypertension and may be administered using a convenient once-daily regimen. The drug is a well tolerated and effective antihypertensive agent with benefit in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular events, independent of blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Eprosartan has a low potential for serious adverse events and has not been associated with clinically significant drug interactions, establishing it as a promising agent for combination antihypertensive strategies. Unlike ACE inhibitors such as enalapril, eprosartan does not have a tendency to cause persistent nonproductive cough. Accordingly, eprosartan represents a useful therapeutic option in the management of patients with hypertension, including those who have had a stroke and those with co-morbid type 2 diabetes mellitus.
...
PMID:Eprosartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. 1626 4

---