Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.15.1 (ACE)
 18,300 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Contrasting information has been reported concerning the course of renal function in NIDDM with hypertension alone or in association with renal damage. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the course of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in hypertensive NIDDM patients during antihypertensive therapy. Furthermore, we compared the effects of ACE inhibitors (cilazapril, Inibace, Roche, Milan, Italy) and Ca(2+)-channel blockers (amlodipine, Norvasc, Pfizer, Rome, Italy). Of the hypertensive NIDDM patients attending the outpatient's clinic of the internal medicine departments of the University of Padova and Sassari, 44 participated in the present study. Of these patients, 26 were normoalbuminuric and 18 microalbuminuric. They were randomly treated with either cilazapril or amlodipine. The target of antihypertensive treatment was a value < 140 mmHg for systolic and 85 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (BP). Microalbuminuria was defined as an albumin excretion rate (AER) between 20 and 200 micrograms/min. GFR was measured by plasma clearance of 51Cr-labeled EDTA at baseline and every 6-12 months during a 3-year follow-up interval. A significant decrease was observed in the values of GFR, AER, and systolic and diastolic BP in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients during antihypertensive therapy. The GFR fall in the overall population of NIDDM patients was significantly and inversely related to the decrease of mean BP (diastolic + 1/3 pulse pressure) (r = -0.80, P < 0.0001) but not to that of HbA1c, triglycerides, and BMI. The GFR decline (mean +/- SE) per year in the normoalbuminuric patient was 2.03 +/- 0.66 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.92-3.17) during cilazapril and 2.01 +/- 0.71 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.82-3.11) during amlodipine therapy. The GFR decline per year in the microalbuminuric patient was 2.15 +/- 0.69 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 (95% CI 0.86-3.89) during cilazapril and 2.33 +/- 0.83 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2 per year (95% CI 1.03-3.67) during amlodipine therapy. Cilazapril and amlodipine lowered AER to a similar extent in normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients. No significant changes were observed concerning other clinical and biochemical features between the two antihypertensive therapies and particularly HbA1c, BMI, triglycerides, and cholesterol plasma values. These results support the tenet that arterial hypertension plays a pivotal role in contributing to renal damage in NIDDM, even when AER is normal. However, the degree of BP control, with both cilazapril and amlodipine, can successfully delay the slope of GFR decline in hypertensive NIDDM patients with or without incipient nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:Effects of cilazapril and amlodipine on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM patients. 854 68

Hemodialysis as a therapeutic procedure in patients being in the end-stage of renal failure has been used since the sixties of the 20th century. Generally speaking, the conservative drug therapy in patients treated by hemodialysis is complex, and economically it consummes as great proportion of financial expenses. The aim of the study was to perform an economic analysis of 101 patients, both sexes (37 females and 64 males, aged from 22 to 81 years) treated by hemodialysis, in respect of drug treatment costs. The total average cost of treatment medication represented 161,589 SKK/patient/year. Eighty one percent of total expenses were linked with the consumption on antianemic drugs (102,298.40 SKK/patient/year). The second most expensive drug group (9% of the total cost) were medications used in coincidence with hemodialysis complications (14,981 SKK/patient/year). Diuretic--furosemid was the most frequently used drug out of the category of antihypertensive medications (68% of patients), followed by beta-blockers (preparation Concor), calcium channel blockers (preparations Norvasc and Plendil) and angiotensin converting enzyme tritace inhibitors (ACEI, preparations Trirace, Enap, Prestarium), respectively. Only 27% of patients were treated by hypolipidemic drugs mostly by the preparations of Gevilon and Innogen. In the majority of patients (93%) preparations for the correction of calcium and phosphorus metabolisms such as Vitacalcin and Rocaltrol were administered, the latter being most expensive. Antianemic drugs have been used in all patients. In this category of preparations, those composing acid folate and erythropoetin were used most frequently. Alkaline supplementation of NaHCO, (bicarbonate) was used in 88% of patients. In order to prevent the development of thrombosis and other vascular complications, the drugs with antiaggregative effects were used (Ibustrin, Curantyl, Anopyrin). To prevent the manifestation of gastrointestinal adverse reactions, the administration of H2-antagonists have been preferred (Famosan, Quamtel). The group of "Other drugs" was represented by vitamins and drugs with anti-uratic effects (ascorbic acid--preparation Celaskon, tocopherol--preparation E-vitamin and Milurit). When summed together, the costs of therapy in patients treated by hemodialysis are three times higher compared with those in the pre-dialysis phase. In addition to the latter hemodialysis is associated with a large number of medical, psychic and social complications. In the presented pilot study the authors analysed the financial expenses coinciding with drug costs (direct loads) which are significant, but represent only a part of the pharmacoeconomic complexity. In the future it is necessary to perform a more complex pharmacoeconomic analysis in order to evaluate also other factors, such as the costs of hospitalization, dialysate solutions, technologys, salaries of the staff, etc. (Tab. 6, Ref. 37.).
 ...
PMID:Pharmacoeconomic aspects of patients treated by hemodialysis. 1505 34

Amlodipine besylate (AML) is a long-acting calcium channel blocker used as an antihypertensive agent. Valsartan (VAL) is also used to treat hypertension, either alone or in combination with other agents. Two-component mixtures of AML and VAL were analyzed by HPLC and the ratio spectra of the first derivative spectrophotometric technique. The spectrophotometric method depends on the first derivative of the ratio-spectra by measurements of the amplitudes at 234.0 nm for VAL and 351.0 nm for AML. Calibration graphs were established for 0.5-20 microg/mL AML and 1-32 microg/mL VAL using the ratio spectra of the first derivative spectrophotometric method. In the HPLC method, an ACE 5 C18 (4.6 x 150 mm, 5 microm) RP column at 30 degrees C with the mobile phase methanol-acetonitrile-NaH2PO4.H2O buffer, including 5 mL/L triethylamine and adjusted to pH 3.0 (42 + 18 + 40, v/v/v) at 2.0 mL/min flow rate was used to separate both compounds with detection at 254.0 nm. Linearity was obtained in the concentration range of 0.5-500 microg/mL for AML and 5.0-900 microg/mL for VAL. The proposed methods have been extensively validated. These methods allow a number of cost- and time-saving benefits. They were successfully applied to the determination of AML and VAL in synthetic mixtures and in a pharmaceutical dosage form. There was no significant difference between the performance of the proposed methods regarding the mean and SD values. The proposed methods are simple, rapid, and suitable for QC applications.
 ...
PMID:High-performance liquid chromatographic and first derivative of the ratio spectrophotometric determination of amlodipine and valsartan in their binary mixtures. 2062 91