Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.4.15.1 (ACE)
 18,300 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Patient compliance with antihypertensive therapy can be improved by minimizing drug-induced sexual dysfunction. Impotence, decreased libido, impaired ejaculation and gynecomastia are potential side effects, depending on the agent prescribed. Centrally acting antihypertensive agents such as methyldopa and clonidine, nonselective beta-adrenergic blockers and potassium-sparing diuretics are the drugs most often associated with sexual dysfunction. Thiazide diuretics cause impotence but may otherwise play a minimal role in sexual dysfunction. Alpha-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers have little adverse effect on sexual function. It is important to obtain an adequate history before and after initiating therapy. If sexual dysfunction develops in a patient, a different class of medication can be tried.
 ...
PMID:Effects of antihypertensive agents on sexual function. 168 81

The most common cause of death in hypertensive patients is myocardial infarction (MI), being three times more common than stroke. Lowering raised BP results in 40% fewer strokes, but only 14% fewer MIs. This may be because other coronary risk factors that often accompany hypertension (e.g. obesity, lipid and thrombotic disturbances, insulin insensitivity, increased plasma renin activity and increased sympathetic activity) are either unaffected or exacerbated by some of the traditional antihypertensive agents. Some of these risk factors show a diurnal rhythm peaking at 07.00-10.00 hours, thus this time constitutes a 'vulnerable period' for sudden death or death from MI. beta-blockers and diuretics have been effective in preventing stroke, but diuretics (at least potassium-losing diuretics) might actually increase the incidence of sudden death and MI in young to middle-aged hypertensive subjects (though elderly patients may benefit). Quality of life can be impaired by some beta-blockers, and diuretics can cause metabolic upset and male impotence. Thus, antihypertensive agents that are not only effective and well tolerated but are beneficial to the broader coronary risk profile are desirable. ACE inhibitors should prove particularly useful in terms of: good quality of life; non-exacerbation or improvement of coronary risk factors; treating patients with impaired left ventricular function; reversing left ventricular hypertrophy and vascular wall hypertrophy, thus improving coronary flow reserve; atheroma regression; renal protection, particularly in diabetes; and prevention or regression of LV dilatation (remodelling) following MI.
 ...
PMID:What does the future hold for ACE inhibitors? 179 18

Since their introduction in clinical practice in 1980, ACE inhibitors have been found useful in the treatment of hypertension and CHF. In hypertension, they are effective as monotherapy in 40% to 50% of the patients, and in combination with diuretics or calcium antagonists, they are effective in up to 85% of the patients. They are well tolerated, are not associated with depression, impotence, bronchospasm or metabolic derangements such as hypokalemia, hyperuricemia or hyperglycemia, and do not have adverse effects on the quality of life. As a result, they are preferred in hypertensive patients with CHF, left ventricular dysfunction, mental depression, older age, coronary artery disease, metabolic disorders, chronic destructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In CHF they cause long-lasting hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, improve exercise tolerance, and may lower mortality in certain patient subsets. Evolving new indications for ACE inhibitors include the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension, the prediction of surgical success, the treatment of scleroderma renal crisis, the reduction of proteinuria, renal protection, cardioprotection, the improvement of arterial compliance, in Bartter's syndrome and idiopathic edema, etc. ACE inhibitors are usually well tolerated but in some instances they may cause class-specific side effects such as hypotension; usually reversible azotemia or renal failure, especially in patients with renal artery stenosis or with CHF with low blood pressure; cough; angioedema; and hyperkalemia. Differences among ACE inhibitors are emerging and include chemical class (e.g., zinc ligand), biotransformation, potency, pharmacokinetics, prodrugs, tissue effects, additional pharmacologic properties, and drug interactions.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. II. Clinical use. 305 46

The efficacy and tolerability of the new ACE-inhibitor enalapril (MK 421) and the beta 1-selective adrenoceptor blocker atenolol for the treatment of primary hypertension were compared in a double blind parallel study. 12 patients were randomized to each drug. The doses of enalapril were 20 and 40 mg o.d. and of atenolol 50 and 100 mg o.d. for 4 weeks each, whereafter hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 or 50 mg o.d. was added if necessary to achieve a supine diastolic blood pressure (BP) less than 90 mm Hg 24 hours after drug intake. Supine BP was reduced from 160 +/- 7/111 +/- 4 mm Hg to 153 +/- 13/101 +/- 9 mm Hg (p less than 0.05/p less than 0.005) with enalapril and from 163 +/- 17/109 +/- 6 mm Hg to 145 +/- 11/95 +/- 7 mm Hg (p less than 0.005/p less than 0.001) with atenolol. The addition of HCTZ caused a profound additive BP reduction to 132 +/- 7/88 +/- 6 mm Hg with enalapril and to 130 +/- 10/88 +/- 7 mm Hg with atenolol. There was no significant difference between the efficacy of enalapril and atenolol alone or combined with HTCZ. The reduction in mean arterial pressure with enalapril tended to correlate with pre-treatment stimulated plasma renin activity and 24 hours urinary kallikrein excretion. Both drugs tended to reduce serum and urinary aldosterone and kallikrein excretion to the same extent. There was one drop-out in each group, one due to impotence on the combination of enalapril and HCTZ and one due to peripheral coldness during atenolol treatment. Other side effects were mild. No toxic adverse effects were registered.
 ...
PMID:Enalapril and atenolol in primary hypertension--a comparative study of blood pressure lowering and hormonal effects. 608 25

The understanding of pharmacology of impotence has shown a steady improvement over the last 15 years which has resulted in a better appreciation of the neurovascular mechanisms of the erectile process especially at the level of the corpora cavernosa; however, central mechanisms which control libido and erection are not yet completely elucidated. Frequent diseases most commonly encountered in elderly patients--i.e. diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, depression, etc--represent a frequent cause of erectile dysfunction (ED) and are treated with medications that can interfere with sexual functioning at the central and/or peripheral level. Antidepressants, including the tricyclics and the monoamine oxidase inhibitors, have been implicated in ED, decreased libido, and impaired ejaculation. Most antihypertensives have been associated with some erectile impairment, but diuretics seem to have little effect on erectile function. The calcium channel blockers and ACE inhibitors are associated with a low incidence of ED. Sympatholytic antihypertensives seldom cause importence but can cause retrograde ejaculation because of the relaxation of the smooth muscles in the prostatic urethra and bladder neck. The most commonly prescription drugs that can affect sexual function are briefly discussed and an integrated pharmacological approach to the patient with drug-induced ED is proposed.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacology of male sexual dysfunction]. 969 33

Spironolactone, a competitive aldosterone receptor antagonist (ARA), has traditionally been the treatment of first choice in idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) and for preoperative management of aldosterone producing adenoma (APA). Spironolactone is partially absorbed, is extensively metabolized mainly by the liver and its therapeutic properties are attributable to active metabolite canrenone. At therapeutic doses of 25 to 400 mg per day, spironolactone effectively controls blood pressure and hypokalemia in the majority of cases. Endocrine side effect are often associated and mainly consist of gynecomastia, decreased libido and impotence in man and menstrual irregularities in women. Canrenone and the K+ salt of canrenoate are also in clinical use: they avoid the formation of intermediate products with anti-androgenic and progestational actions, resulting in a decreased incidence of side effects. Furthermore, a relatively new selective ARA compound (eplerenone) with reduced affinity for androgen and progesterone receptors, is currently undergoing clinical trials. In essential hypertension aldosterone can contribute to hypertension and increases the incidence of myocardial hypertrophy and cardiovascular events. On the other hand, inhibition of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS) is associated with a decrease in blood pressure, with a regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and a reduction of target organ damage. Thus, ARA have been proposed as complementary treatment associated to ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists. Aldosterone is also known to play an important role in pathophysiolgy of congestive heart failure (CHF). In vitro and in vivo evidences suggest that aldosterone promotes myocardial fibrosis. This effect reflects direct, extra-epithelial actions of aldosterone via cardiac MR which are counteracted by ARAs in animal models. The RAAS is chronically activated in CHF. Non potassium-sparing diuretics further stimulate the RAAS and cause hypokalemia. Thus, use of ARAs in CHF was first proposed to correct potassium and magnesium depletion. At present ARAs are indicated in the management of primary hyperaldosteronism, in oedematous conditions in patients with CHF, in cirrhosis of the liver accompanied by oedema and ascites, in essential hypertension and in hypokalemic states. Its indication as adjunctive therapy of heart failure is currently under investigation. In fact, it is well known that even high doses of ACE inhibitors may not completely suppress the RAAS; aldosterone 'escape' may occur through non angiotensin II dependent mechanisms. Addition of spironolactone to an ACE inhibitor causes marked diuresis and symptomatic improvement. During the last few years, the RALES study (Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study) was organized to explore the efficacy of combination therapy with spironolactone and ACE inhibitor in patients with CHF, class III or IV NYHA. The study was stopped 18 months early because the results were so statistically and clinically significant that it would be unethical to continue the trial. It is reported a 30 percent decrease in mortality and hospitalisation for cardiac causes in spironolactone-treated group vs placebo group.
 ...
PMID:Aldosterone antagonists in hypertension and heart failure. 1079 May 93

This review evaluates the current position of calcium channel blockers (CCB) in antihypertensive treatment in the light of three major comparative studies and two extensive meta-analyses. The latter both show that CCB are equivalent to conventional (initial beta-blocker or diuretic therapy) when total and cardiovascular mortality are the end points. Divergent points between the meta-analyses include stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). One meta-analysis compared CCB with conventional therapy, to find a small 13% reduction in stroke and a small, nonsignificant 12% increase in MI. The other meta-analysis found a 26% increase in MI when CCB were compared with all other therapies including the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. This increase was most robust (P < .001) when comparing CCB with ACE inhibitors, consonant with proposed protective effects of ACE inhibitors on cardiovascular risk. At present, only the comparison of CCB with conventional therapy, and not that with ACE inhibitors, rests on secure comparative data. When cost is compelling, conventional therapy is less expensive. For the individual patient, issues of quality of life (for example, impotence with diuretics and beta-blockers) might be decisive. Nonetheless, beta-blockers are preferred in postinfarct patients or in those with heart failure or unstable angina (a contraindication to dihydropyridines in the absence of beta-blockade). In others, the benefits of only a borderline stroke reduction with CCB versus an equally borderline increase in MI should be evaluated for each individual patient, taking into account the age group and the patient's preferences. In conclusion, overall CCB are neither better nor worse than conventional therapy, allowing for possible small differences in stroke and MI. The ACE inhibitors may protect better, although data are incomplete.
 ...
PMID:Calcium channel blockers in hypertension: reappraisal after new trials and major meta-analyses. 1171 Jul 89

The objectives of treating hypertension are to achieve adequate control of blood pressure (BP) and maintain it under tight control. Maintenance of tight control of BP will most likely prevent stroke, heart attack, and heart failure, cause regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and quite possibly preserve or improve renal function. The last two salutary effects combined will further reduce the morbidity and mortality in the treated hypertensive subjects. Choice of antihypertensive drugs is of significant importance so that our efforts to control hypertension do not grossly alter the quality of life. The cost of therapy is also an important consideration. Thus, thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, and central inhibitors that are relatively inexpensive and adequately lower BP should be a common choice. However, if drowsiness interferes with work, or impotence becomes a threat for the marital partner or significant other, adjustment has to be made. The metabolic abnormalities consisting mainly of impaired glucose tolerance, hypercholesterolemia, and insulin resistance often induced by these relatively inexpensive drugs have put calcium channel blocker and ACE inhibitor group of drugs on the top of the list for antihypertensive therapy. They are far more expensive, yet offer no greater antihypertensive advantage than a diuretic or central inhibitor, except in special circumstances.
 ...
PMID:Profiling Antihypertensive Therapy. 1185 Jul

The current prescription patterns for essential hypertension and the efficacy, safety, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of the newer antihypertensive drugs were evaluated in Nigerian patients. The findings were compared with that of a previous study conducted in the same tertiary hospital 10 years earlier. A cross-sectional evaluation of blood pressure (BP) control in a hypertension clinic was undertaken among 150 Nigerian patients aged 61 +/- 12 years (55% females), with a duration of treatment on a particular drug class or combination of 9 +/- 3 months. The initial blood pressure was 176 +/- 20/108 +/- 11 mmHg and 22% of the patient had concurrent diabetes mellitus. Thiazide diuretics (D) alone or in combination remained the most commonly prescribed drugs in 56% of all patients. There were significant increases in the prescriptions of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (51%), P < 0.0001, and ACE-inhibitors (ACEIs) (24%), P < 0.0001, but a slight reduction in the use of methyldopa, and fixed drug combinations (P < 0.01) compared to the previous study. The fall in systolic blood pressure on D (r = 0.65, P < 0.001) or CCB (r = 0.48, P < 0.02) was significantly correlated with the initial systolic blood pressure, but not age. More patients achieved normotension BP < 140/90 mmHg on CCB monotherapy (71%), than D monotherapy (56%). Combination therapy with ACEIs + D or methyldopa+thiazides normalized BP in 63 and 68%, respectively. Pulse pressure, a surrogate marker for cardiovascular complications and mortality in essential hypertension, was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) equally by all treatments, with 95% confidence intervals ranging from -28 to -1 mmHg. However, hypertensive-diabetic (HT-DM) patients (n = 33) exhibited no significant change in pulse pressure in response to treatment. Adverse drug reactions that occurred in 11% were impotence or postural dizziness with D, headache and pitting oedema with CCB, and dry cough with ACEI. Pharmaco-economic comparison of the drug classes revealed that for every US dollar (dollar) spent per month, the percentage of treated patients attaining normotension was 18.6 for D, 4.73 for CCB, 3.5 for ACEI + D and 13.6 for methyldopa + thiazides. A combination of ACEI + CCB or D was the preferred treatment for hypertensive-diabetic Nigerians, but only 24% attained a BP < 130/85 mmHg. These results demonstrate a shift in trend to a more rational and efficacious treatment of hypertension over a 10 year period. This may be associated, at least in part, with the intensive and continuous education of the prescribers in rational drug use and the introduction of a hospital formulary. Methyldopa is still a highly efficacious and cost-effective drug in this population. Black HT-DM Africans still constitute a subgroup who not only require more and costlier antihypertensive drugs, but whose BP control is suboptimal, and exhibit a poor therapeutic response to other risk factors (pulse pressure) that constitute a continuing risk for cardiovascular mortality.
 ...
PMID:Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs. 1271 73

Over the past decade, national and international guidelines have proposed beta-blockers to be used on an equal footing with diuretics for initial therapy of hypertension. This preferred status was supposedly based on evidence documenting a reduction in morbidity and mortality with beta-blocker therapy in hypertension. We systematically analyzed all available outcome studies and found no evidence that beta-blocker based therapy, despite lowering blood pressure, reduced the risk of heart attacks or strokes. Despite the inefficacy of beta-blockers, the incidence of adverse effects is substantial. In the MRC study, for every heart attack or stroke prevented, three patients withdrew from atenolol because of impotence, and another seven withdrew because of fatigue. Thus the risk/benefit ratio of beta-blockers is characterized by lack of efficacy and multiple adverse effects. Given that many thorough, prospective, randomized trials attest to efficacy and safety of diuretics, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor inhibitors, the time has come to admit that beta-blockers should no longer be considered appropriate for first-line therapy in uncomplicated hypertension.
 ...
PMID:beta-Blockers in hypertension-the emperor has no clothes: an open letter to present and prospective drafters of new guidelines for the treatment of hypertension. 1455 68


1 2 Next >>