Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.2.1.20 (alpha-glucosidase)
4,237 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The therapeutic goals in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the mechanisms of insulin resistance and secretion are discussed. Sulfonylureas improve glycemic control, restore the acute insulin response, and help improve beta-cell function in the short term. Meglitinides and phenylalanine derivatives and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors may be useful for elderly patients and others with normal fasting blood glucose levels and postprandial hyperglycemia, but they are less effective in achieving goal HbA1c levels in patients with marked fasting hyperglycemia. Metformin and thiazolidinediones act on hepatic, muscle, and adipose tissue through different mechanisms to improve glycemic control, beta-cell function, and the lipid profile. Thiazolidinediones have a greater impact on free fatty acids than metformin. They may have an additive effect with sulfonylureas, metformin, or insulin in improving glycemic control and the lipid profile. Many patients require combination therapy with one or more insulin sensitizers and an insulin secretagogue to achieve therapeutic goals. Insulin therapy should be initiated in patients in whom an HbA1c level less than 7.0% cannot be maintained with other therapies. This is vital in preventing diabetes complications. Insulin sensitizers should be continued during insulin therapy to reduce insulin resistance and treat the insulin resistance syndrome. Therapeutic goals for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus include improvement in glycemic control and prevention of diabetes complications. Elevated levels of fasting blood glucose should be addressed before postprandial levels to reduce HbA1c levels and glucotoxicity to the beta cell. Dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hypercoagulability should be treated to minimize the increased cardiovascular risk seen in people with diabetes, which is responsible for the majority of deaths.
...
PMID:Treating dual defects in diabetes: insulin resistance and insulin secretion. 1248 81

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is now regarded a worldwide epidemic with diabetes-related complications exacting a heavy toll on those with poor metabolic control. Although there is no cure currently, the therapeutic armamentarium has expanded over the last few years to five classes of oral agents--sulfonylureas, biguanides, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Sulfonylureas continue to be the mainstay oral hypoglycaemic agents for type 2 diabetics because they are potent insulin secretagogues and cost-effective. Metformin exerts its main effect by reducing hepatic glucose output and is proven to particularly benefit obese type 2 diabetics. Meglitinides are rapid-acting insulin secretagogues targeting a postprandial hyperglycaemia and this class of drug is useful for those who are at risk of hypoglycaemia with longer-acting sulfonylurea drugs. Thiazolidinediones constitute a new class of insulin sensitizers that work predominantly in improving glucose uptake by the adipose tissues and skeletal muscles. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors delay the digestion and absorption of polysaccharides, thus attenuating postprandial hyperglycaemia. This review article briefly examines the nature of these oral agents, including the role of combination therapy and insulin where clinically indicated.
...
PMID:Current therapeutic strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1252 Aug 25

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive and complex disorder that is difficult to treat effectively in the long term. The majority of patients are overweight or obese at diagnosis and will be unable to achieve or sustain near normoglycaemia without oral antidiabetic agents; a sizeable proportion of patients will eventually require insulin therapy to maintain long-term glycaemic control, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with oral antidiabetic therapy. The frequent need for escalating therapy is held to reflect progressive loss of islet beta-cell function, usually in the presence of obesity-related insulin resistance. Today's clinicians are presented with an extensive range of oral antidiabetic drugs for type 2 diabetes. The main classes are heterogeneous in their modes of action, safety profiles and tolerability. These main classes include agents that stimulate insulin secretion (sulphonylureas and rapid-acting secretagogues), reduce hepatic glucose production (biguanides), delay digestion and absorption of intestinal carbohydrate (alpha-glucosidase inhibitors) or improve insulin action (thiazolidinediones). The UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) demonstrated the benefits of intensified glycaemic control on microvascular complications in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the picture was less clearcut with regard to macrovascular disease, with neither sulphonylureas nor insulin significantly reducing cardiovascular events. The impact of oral antidiabetic agents on atherosclerosis--beyond expected effects on glycaemic control--is an increasingly important consideration. In the UKPDS, overweight and obese patients randomised to initial monotherapy with metformin experienced significant reductions in myocardial infarction and diabetes-related deaths. Metformin does not promote weight gain and has beneficial effects on several cardiovascular risk factors. Accordingly, metformin is widely regarded as the drug of choice for most patients with type 2 diabetes. Concern about cardiovascular safety of sulphonylureas has largely dissipated with generally reassuring results from clinical trials, including the UKPDS. Encouragingly, the recent Steno-2 Study showed that intensive target-driven, multifactorial approach to management, based around a sulphonylurea, reduced the risk of both micro- and macrovascular complications in high-risk patients. Theoretical advantages of selectively targeting postprandial hyperglycaemia require confirmation in clinical trials of drugs with preferential effects on this facet of hyperglycaemia are currently in progress. The insulin-sensitising thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic agents has potentially advantageous effects on multiple components of the metabolic syndrome; the results of clinical trials with cardiovascular endpoints are awaited. The selection of initial monotherapy is based on a clinical and biochemical assessment of the patient, safety considerations being paramount. In some circumstances, for example pregnancy or severe hepatic or renal impairment, insulin may be the treatment of choice when nonpharmacological measures prove inadequate. Insulin is also required for metabolic decompensation, that is, incipient or actual diabetic ketoacidosis, or non-ketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycaemia. Certain comorbidities, for example presentation with myocardial infarction during other acute intercurrent illness, may make insulin the best option. Oral antidiabetic agents should be initiated at a low dose and titrated up according to glycaemic response, as judged by measurement of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, supplemented in some patients by self monitoring of capillary blood glucose. The average glucose-lowering effect of the major classes of oral antidiabetic agents is broadly similar (averaging a 1-2% reduction in HbA1c), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors being rather less effective. Tailoring the treatment to the individual patient is an important principle. Doses are gradually titrated up according to response. However, the maximal glucose-lowering action for sulphonylureas is usually attained at appreciably lower doses (approximately 50%) than the manufacturers' recommended daily maximum. Combinations of certain agents, for example a secretagogue plus a biguanide or a thiazolidinedione, are logical and widely used, and combination preparations are now available in some countries. While the benefits of metformin added to a sulphonylurea were initially less favourable in the UKPDS, longer-term data have allayed concern. When considering long-term therapy, issues such as tolerability and convenience are important additional considerations. Neither sulphonylureas nor biguanides are able to appreciably alter the rate of progression of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Preliminary data suggesting that thiazolidinediones may provide better long-term glycaemic stability are currently being tested in clinical trials; current evidence, while encouraging, is not conclusive. Delayed progression from glucose intolerance to type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with glucose intolerance has been demonstrated with troglitazone, metformin and acarbose. However, intensive lifestyle intervention can be more effective than drug therapy, at least in the setting of interventional clinical trials. No antidiabetic drugs are presently licensed for use in prediabetic individuals.
...
PMID:Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1566 80

Nursing home staff are well aware of the increasing number of residents who experience diabetes mellitus. These residents consume an inordinate amount of resources and often have major disabilities and co-morbidities. Although nonpharmacological therapies, such as consistent carbohydrate intake and increased activity levels, are always indicated in diabetes management, pharmacological therapies are often necessary to prevent the acute complications of diabetes and delay some of the long-term complications. Residents with type 2 diabetes may be managed with oral antidiabetic agents and insulin, whereas residents with type 1 diabetes will always require insulin. Oral antidiabetic agents include insulin secretagogues, which stimulate endogenous insulin secretion and are most effective in leaner persons with type 2 diabetes. Metformin is another oral antidiabetic agent; this decreases inappropriate hepatic glucose release and is most effective in obese residents with high fasting blood glucose levels. The thiazolidinediones, also called glitazones, are insulin sensitisers that enable peripheral tissues to utilise insulin more effectively. The alpha-glucosidase inhibitors delay intestinal absorption of ingested carbohydrates. In addition to oral antidiabetic agents, insulin is frequently used in diabetes management. Insulin is always indicated in type 1 diabetes and is often necessary for residents with type 2 diabetes to optimise glycaemic control. Insulin can be rapid, fast, intermediate or long acting. In addition, basal insulin is now available. These insulins can be combined with each other and, in type 2 diabetes, with oral antidiabetic agents. In order to use pharmacological therapies appropriately, the glycaemic patterns of nursing home residents should be identified, using capillary blood glucose monitoring. Once these patterns have been identified, nonpharmacological therapies can be used, usually in conjunction with the many oral antidiabetic agents and various insulins available, to optimise glycaemic control in each resident.
...
PMID:Management of diabetes mellitus medications in the nursing home. 1581 54

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a greater risk of cardiovascular disease than nondiabetic individuals. These patients are often insulin resistant and have an associated clustering of risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular disease. The risk factors include dyslipidemia, hypertension, altered hemostasis, and chronic inflammation. A primary objective in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus is normalization of blood glucose levels; however, some of the oral drugs used to control blood glucose levels have significant effects on these risk factors. In this article, we review the current data involving the modification of these cardiovascular risk factors by the biguanide (metformin), the thiazolidinediones (troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone), the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (miglitol, acarbose), and the insulin secretagogs (glyburide [glibenclamide], glipizide, chlorpropamide, tolbutamide, tolazamide, glimepiride, repaglinide, and nateglinide). Generally, the thiazolidinediones improve hemostasis and endothelial function and reduce blood pressure, while having variable effects on dyslipidemia. Metformin improves dyslipidemia and altered hemostasis and decreases plasma C-reactive protein levels with little or no effect on blood pressure. Data on the effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and insulin secretagogs are sparse; however, these drugs appear to have little or no effect on cardiovascular risk factors.
...
PMID:Cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance: effects of oral antidiabetic agents. 1590 Dec 7

Because management of type 2 diabetes mellitus usually involves combined pharmacological therapy to obtain adequate glucose control and treatment of concurrent pathologies (especially dyslipidaemia and arterial hypertension), drug-drug interactions must be carefully considered with antihyperglycaemic drugs. Additive glucose-lowering effects have been extensively reported when combining sulphonylureas (or the new insulin secretagogues, meglitinide derivatives, i.e. nateglinide and repaglinide) with metformin, sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives) with thiazolidinediones (also called glitazones) and the biguanide compound metformin with thiazolidinediones. Interest in combining alpha-glucosidase inhibitors with either sulphonylureas (or meglitinide derivatives), metformin or thiazolidinediones has also been demonstrated. These combinations result in lower glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting glucose and postprandial glucose levels than with either monotherapy. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interferences have been reported with some combinations, they do not appear to have important clinical consequences. No significant adverse effects, except a higher risk of hypoglycaemic episodes that may be attributed to better glycaemic control, occur with any combination. Challenging the classical dual therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin, there is a recent trend to use alternative dual combinations (sulphonylurea plus thiazolidinedione or metformin plus thiazolidinedione). In addition, triple therapy with the addition of a thiazolidinedione to the metformin-sulphonylurea combination has been recently evaluated and allows glucose targets to be reached before insulin therapy is considered. This triple therapy appears to be safe, with no deleterious drug-drug interactions being reported so far.Potential interferences may also occur between glucose-lowering agents and other drugs, and such drug-drug interactions may have important clinical implications. Relevant pharmacological agents are those that are widely coadministered in diabetic patients (e.g. lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive agents); those that have a narrow efficacy/toxicity ratio (e.g. digoxin, warfarin); or those that are known to induce (rifampicin [rifampin]) or inhibit (fluconazole) the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. Metformin is currently a key compound in the pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes, used either alone or in combination with other antihyperglycaemics. There are no clinically relevant metabolic interactions with metformin, because this compound is not metabolised and does not inhibit the metabolism of other drugs. In contrast, sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones are extensively metabolised in the liver via the CYP system and thus, may be subject to drug-drug metabolic interactions. Many HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are also metabolised via the CYP system. Even if modest pharmacokinetic interactions may occur, it is not clear whether drug-drug interactions between oral antihyperglycaemic agents and statins may have clinical consequences regarding both efficacy and safety. In contrast, a marked pharmacokinetic interference has been reported between gemfibrozil and repaglinide and, to a lesser extent, between gemfibrozil and rosiglitazone. This leads to a drastic increase in plasma concentrations of each antihyperglycaemic agent when they are coadministered with the fibric acid derivative, and an increased risk of adverse effects. Some antihypertensive agents may favour hypoglycaemic episodes when co-prescribed with sulphonylureas or meglitinide derivatives, especially ACE inhibitors, but this effect seems to result from a pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction rather than from a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction. No, or only modest, interferences have been described with glucose-lowering agents and other pharmacological compounds such as digoxin or warfarin. The effects of inducers or inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the glucose-lowering agents of each pharmacological class has been tested. Significantly increased (with CYP inhibitors) or decreased (with CYP inducers) plasma levels of sulphonylureas, meglitinide derivatives and thiazolidinediones have been reported in healthy volunteers, and these pharmacokinetic changes may lead to enhanced or reduced glucose-lowering action, and thus hypoglycaemia or worsening of metabolic control, respectively. In addition, some case reports have evidenced potential drug-drug interactions with various antihyperglycaemic agents that are usually associated with a higher risk of hypoglycaemia.
...
PMID:Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update. 1596 7

The worldwide increase of type 2 diabetes in youth is a critical problem. It is important to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals. In many patients with type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia can be reduced with appropriate changes in diet and exercise. However, some patients with persistent HbA1c levels >7.5% need pharmacological therapy to improve their metabolic control. A variety of oral hypoglycemic agents, including alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, sulfonylureas and metformin, are available. Metformin is widely used in pediatric patients and is considered to be the most effective oral agent. In some cases, combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylureas or use of insulin is more effective to stabilize glycemia. The approach to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes often differs from that used in type 1 diabetes. The therapeutic approach to childhood type 2 diabetes should be individually tailored.
...
PMID:How should we treat type 2 diabetes in youth? 1636 11

Sulfonylureas, metformin, thiazolidinediones, and non-sulfonylurea secretagogues differ little in their ability to decrease glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) levels when used as initial monotherapy for diabetes mellitus type 2 (strength of recommendation [SOR]: A, based on systematic reviews); alpha-glucosidase inhibitors may also be as effective (SOR: B, based on systematic reviews with inconsistent results). Metformin is generally indicated in obese patients because it improves all-cause mortality and diabetes related outcomes (SOR: B, based on a single high-quality randomized controlled trial [RCT]). Insulin is generally not recommended as an initial agent (SOR: C, expert opinion).
...
PMID:Clinical inquiries. What is the best medical therapy for new-onset type 2 diabetes? 1709 Mar 63

In an attempt to prevent the complications of type 2 diabetes, particular attention should be paid to controlling postprandial glycemia (PPG): on the one hand, it contributes substantially to the HbAlc level in moderately controlled patients, on the other hand, the postprandial glucose peak induces oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, the first step toward accelerated atherogenesis. Metformin, glitazones, and insulin secretagogues have an additive effect on fasting blood glucose (FBG), and a significant impact on PPG. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors can reduce PPG by a mean 0.50 g/l, no matter what the insulin resistance or insulinopenia status or the other diabetes treatments already in use. After evolving for several years and the failure of oral antidiabetics to normalize fasting blood glucose, long-acting (slow-acting) insulin analogues, well titrated, can reach this goal. They will have no effect on PPG other than a simple level effect. At this stage, rather than overtreating high fasting blood glucose concentrations, systematic PPG exploration should be the rule so as to better define PPG treatment: the advantages of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and the role of GLP-1 analogs should be defined, the use of a rapid-acting insulin analog before the meal causing the highest postprandial blood glucose excursions, even systematically at all three meals, should be considered, or inhaled insulin. As natural life expectancy is on the rise, these active strategies designed to normalize the daily glycemic profile, necessary in a strict strategy to prevent the complications of diabetes, will need to be discussed for an increasing number of patients with type 2 diabetes.
...
PMID:How should postprandial glycemia be treated? 1737 3

Classical non-insulin antihyperglycemic drugs currently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) comprise five groups: biguanides, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, glitazones and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Novel compounds are represented by the incretin mimetic drugs like glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1), the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) agonists (glitazars) and amylin mimetic drugs. We review the cardiovascular effects of these drugs in an attempt to improve knowledge regarding their potential risks when treating T2DM in cardiac patients. Metformin may lead to lethal lactic acidosis, especially in patients with clinical conditions that predispose to this complication, such as recent myocardial infarction, heart or renal failure. Sulfonylureas exert their effect by closing the ATP-dependent potassium channels. This prevents the opening of these channels during myocardial ischemia, impeding the necessary hyperpolarization that protects the cell. The combined sulfonylurea/metformin therapy reveals additive effects on mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Meglitinides effects are similar to those of sulfonylureas, due to their almost analogous mechanism of action. Glitazones lower leptin levels, leading to weight gain and are unsafe in NYHA class III or IV. The long-term effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitors on morbidity and mortality rates is yet unknown. The incretin GLP-1 is associated with reductions in body weight and appears to present positive inotropic effects. DPP-4 inhibitors influences on the cardiovascular system seem to be neutral and patients do not gain weight. The future of glitazars is presently uncertain following concerns about their safety. The amylin mimetic drug paramlintide, while a satisfactory adjuvant medication in insulin-dependent diabetes, is unlikely to play a major role in the management of T2DM. Summarizing the present information it can be stated that 1. Four out the five classical oral antidiabetic drug groups present proven or potential cardiac hazards; 2. These hazards are not mere 'side effects', but biochemical phenomena which are deeply rooted in the drugs' mechanism of action; 3. Current data indicate that the combined glibenclamide/metformin therapy seems to present special risk and should be avoided in the long-term management of T2DM with proven CAD; 4. Glitazones should be avoided in patients with overt heart failure; 5, The novel incretin mimetic drugs and DPP-4 inhibitors--while usually inadequate as monotherapy--appear to be satisfactory adjuvant drugs due to the lack of known undesirable cardiovascular effects; 6. Customized antihyperglycemic pharmacological approaches should be implemented for the achievement of optimal treatment of T2DM patients with heart disease. In this context, it should be carefully taken into consideration whether the leading clinical status is CAD or heart failure.
...
PMID:A cardiologic approach to non-insulin antidiabetic pharmacotherapy in patients with heart disease. 1961 27


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>

---