Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound   Target Concepts: Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound

---

Query: EC:3.2.1.20 (alpha-glucosidase)
4,237 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In blind studies the effects of a new alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (BAY g 5421) were tested in normal weight and overweight male volunteers after oral application of 75, 150, or 300 mg of BAY g 5421 or placebo per os before three standardized main meals of one day. Before and three hours after each meal blood glucose, serum insulin, and serum triglyceride levels were determined. In addition, safety studies were performed. BAY g 5421 induced a statistically significant, in part dose-dependent inhibition of the postprandial increase of blood glucose- and serum insulin levels. The reduction of the postprandial increase of serum triglyceride levels was variable. Routine blood chemistry and hematology tests have revealed no adverse side effects; but the application of the drug was frequently associated with intestinal effects, such as flatulence and diarrhea, which were substrate (carbohydrate) and, in part, dose-dependent.
...
PMID:The effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor BAY g 5421 (Acarbose) on meal-stimulated elevations of circulating glucose, insulin, and triglyceride levels in man. 37 42

Obesity is common in NIDDM; in a cohort of 314 diabetics in Singapore, 44.3% are overweight. Management of obesity in diabetics differs from that in non-diabetics in that it is more urgent; weight maintenance is more difficult and hypoglycaemic medication may cause weight changes. Like in the non-diabetic, management of obesity in diabetic requires a pragmatic and realistic approach. A team approach is required: the help of the nurse educator, the dietitian, behaviour modification therapist, exercise therapist etc are required. A detailed history, careful physical examination and relevant investigations are required to assess the severity of the diabetic state and to exclude an occasional underlying cause of the obesity in the obese NIDDM. Weight loss is urgent in the obese NIDDM, especially those with android obesity. There must be a reduction in caloric intake. Weight loss leads to improvement in the glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, reduction in lipid levels and fall in blood pressure in the hypertensive. Exercise is of limited value except in the younger obese NIDDM. Metformin is the hypoglycaemic drug of choice as it leads to consistent weight reduction. The sulphonylureas may cause weight gain. Insulin should be avoided where possible as it causes further weight gain. Other hypoglycaemic agents include Glucobay (alpha-glucosidase inhibitor) and Troglitazone (insulin sensitizer) which do not alter the weight. Orlistat (lipase inhibitor) is promising as it causes reduction of weight, blood-glucose and lipid levels. Anti-obesity drugs (noradrenergic and serotonergic agents) have modest effects on weight reduction in the obese NIDDM; a widely use preparation, Dexfenfluramine (Adifax) has been withdrawn because of side effects. Surgery such as gastric plication is the last resort in treating the morbidly obese NIDDM. The discovery of leptin in 1994 has led to intense research into energy homeostasis in obesity; hopefully this will lead to better treatment of obesity in diabetics and non-diabetics.
...
PMID:Management of obesity in NIDDM (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus). 984 3

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of acarbose, an inhibitor of alpha-glucosidase, on glycemic control in elderly overweight type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled by oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or insulin. Our study included 22 overweight patients, 60-75-years-old, treated with OHA and/or insulin who, after a period of 4 weeks of controlled diet, showed a poor metabolic control. They were divided into two groups: Group I (nine patients) on OHA treatment; Group II (13 patients) undergoing treatment with insulin alone or in combination with OHA. Acarbose was administered to all the patients (100 mg three times a day at meal times) for 6 months in addition to their previous treatment. The addition of acarbose caused a significant reduction in both groups with regard to fasting glycemia (after 3 and 6 months, respectively, 20.7 and 21.9%, P<0.04 in Group I; 19.1 and 21.8%, P<0.04 in Group II), and postprandial glycemia (after 3 and 6 months, respectively, 41.6 and 42.5%, P<0.0001 in Group I; 35.6 and 38%, P<0.0006 in Group II). There was also a significant reduction in the values of HBA(1c) in Group I after 6 months of treatment (24.3%, P<0.05) and in Group II after 3 and 6 months (respectively 13.4%, P<0.02 and 20.6%, P<0.01). Three months after treatment with acarbose ended, fasting and postprandial glycemia and HBA(1c) values returned to original baseline values. In conclusion, the addition of acarbose to the OHA in elderly overweight type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled by OHA or insulin regimes improved metabolic control.
...
PMID:Effects of the treatment with acarbose in elderly overweight type 2 diabetic patients in poor glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin. 1098 61

Postprandial reactive hypoglycemia (PRH) can be diagnosed if sympathetic and neuroglucopenic symptoms develop concurrently with low blood sugar (<3.3 mmol). Neither the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) nor mixed meals are suitable for this diagnosis, due to respectively false positive and false negative results. They should be replaced by ambulatory glycemic control or, as recently proposed, an hyperglucidic breakfast test. PRH patients often suffer from an associated adrenergic hormone postprandial syndrome, with potential pathologic consequences such as cardiac arrhythmia. PRH could result from (a) an exaggerated insulin response, either related to insulin resistance or to increased glucagon-like-peptide 1; (b) renal glycosuria; (c) defects in glucagon response; (d) high insulin sensitivity, probably the most frequent cause (50-70%), which is not adequately compensated by hypoinsulinemia and thus cannot be measured by indices of insulin sensitivity such as the homeostatic model assessment. Such situations are frequent in very lean people, or after massive weight reduction, or in women with moderate lower body overweight. PRH is influenced by patient's alimentary habits (high carbohydrate-low fat diet, alcohol intake). Thus, diet remains the main treatment, although alpha-glucosidase inhibitors and some other drugs may be helpful.
...
PMID:Postprandial reactive hypoglycemia. 1111 13

Changes to nutritional habits, including the reduction of weight, are basic therapy principles for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. With overweight patients a reduction of energy intake is important. Patients with diabetes mellitus should eat plenty of carbohydrates, the intake of fat should be limited to a maximum of 35%. Patients treated with insulin must be made to calculate carbohydrate exchange units. Unless there are contraindications, diabetic patients should be encouraged to engage in physical exercise. Educating the patients is of major importance in the treatment of diabetics; this must be undertaken by trained personnel. All diabetic patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin should be encouraged to measure their blood glucose levels themselves, in cases of insulin therapy this is an absolutely necessity. If with the aid of basic therapy measures, which include the control of fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose and HbA1c levels, the aims of the therapy are not reached, this is an indication for the use of oral antidiabetic drugs. The drug should be chosen with the dominant pathophysiological disturbance in mind. In the case of increased fasting blood glucose values (hepatic insulin resistance leading to increased glucose production by the liver), after contraindications have been excluded, the use of metformin is recommended. If there are significantly increased postprandial blood glucose values (due to an early-insulin-secretion deficiency or severe insulin resistance), the use of alpha-glucosidase-inhibitors, metformin, sulphonylureas or glinides is indicated. With obese patients alphaglucosidaseinhibitors and metformin are the drugs of choice, with patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 these are sulfonylureas or glinides. In cases of severe insulin resistance the use of glitazones in conjunction with metformin or sulphonylureas may be indicated.
...
PMID:[Non-insulin therapy in diabetes mellitus]. 1201 63

In the recent years there has been increasing interest in the effects of oral hypoglycemic drugs on the cardiovascular system. This has arisen because of recognitions that thiazolidine-diones, peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-gamma), may have antiatherogenic actions and that sulphonylureas are capable of closing the ATP-dependent potassium channel. PPAR-gamma agonists exert antiatherogenic action by inhibition the production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines, inhibition of expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, inhibition of the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and have antioxidative effects. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), published in 1998, found that the use of sulphonylureas had no increase in cardiovascular mortality and that metformin therapy in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus was associated with reduced cardiovascular death. Recently, the STOP-NIDDM trial has been shown that patients with impaired glucose tolerance treated with the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose had a significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease. Currently, the results of the UKPDS trial are the only available clinical data on which to base the choice of treatment for type 2 diabetic patients. When a glucose-lowering oral drug is considered necessary and is not contraindicated, the firstline choice is a sulphonylurea or a glinide (repaglinide or nateglinide) for diabetics who are not overweight and metformin for those who are.
...
PMID:[Cardiovascular effects of oral hypoglycemie drugs]. 1534 Jul 37

Screening for diabetes makes good sense in particular in patients with overweight, hypertension or dyslipidemia. For type 2 diabetes is often not recognized until sequelae have put in an appearance. Consideration must be given to the possible presence of neuropathy, micro- and macroangiopathy and cardiovascular and cerebral disease. The primary therapy recommendations for type 2 diabetics comprise diet, weight loss and increased exercise. Depending on the success of these measures and the patient's constitution, medication with biguanides, sulfonylureas, glinides, glitazones alpha-glucosidase inhibitors or, where indicated, insulin, is then applied.
...
PMID:[Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus--what to look out for]. 1534 29

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a progressive and complex disorder that is difficult to treat effectively in the long term. The majority of patients are overweight or obese at diagnosis and will be unable to achieve or sustain near normoglycaemia without oral antidiabetic agents; a sizeable proportion of patients will eventually require insulin therapy to maintain long-term glycaemic control, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with oral antidiabetic therapy. The frequent need for escalating therapy is held to reflect progressive loss of islet beta-cell function, usually in the presence of obesity-related insulin resistance. Today's clinicians are presented with an extensive range of oral antidiabetic drugs for type 2 diabetes. The main classes are heterogeneous in their modes of action, safety profiles and tolerability. These main classes include agents that stimulate insulin secretion (sulphonylureas and rapid-acting secretagogues), reduce hepatic glucose production (biguanides), delay digestion and absorption of intestinal carbohydrate (alpha-glucosidase inhibitors) or improve insulin action (thiazolidinediones). The UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study) demonstrated the benefits of intensified glycaemic control on microvascular complications in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the picture was less clearcut with regard to macrovascular disease, with neither sulphonylureas nor insulin significantly reducing cardiovascular events. The impact of oral antidiabetic agents on atherosclerosis--beyond expected effects on glycaemic control--is an increasingly important consideration. In the UKPDS, overweight and obese patients randomised to initial monotherapy with metformin experienced significant reductions in myocardial infarction and diabetes-related deaths. Metformin does not promote weight gain and has beneficial effects on several cardiovascular risk factors. Accordingly, metformin is widely regarded as the drug of choice for most patients with type 2 diabetes. Concern about cardiovascular safety of sulphonylureas has largely dissipated with generally reassuring results from clinical trials, including the UKPDS. Encouragingly, the recent Steno-2 Study showed that intensive target-driven, multifactorial approach to management, based around a sulphonylurea, reduced the risk of both micro- and macrovascular complications in high-risk patients. Theoretical advantages of selectively targeting postprandial hyperglycaemia require confirmation in clinical trials of drugs with preferential effects on this facet of hyperglycaemia are currently in progress. The insulin-sensitising thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic agents has potentially advantageous effects on multiple components of the metabolic syndrome; the results of clinical trials with cardiovascular endpoints are awaited. The selection of initial monotherapy is based on a clinical and biochemical assessment of the patient, safety considerations being paramount. In some circumstances, for example pregnancy or severe hepatic or renal impairment, insulin may be the treatment of choice when nonpharmacological measures prove inadequate. Insulin is also required for metabolic decompensation, that is, incipient or actual diabetic ketoacidosis, or non-ketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycaemia. Certain comorbidities, for example presentation with myocardial infarction during other acute intercurrent illness, may make insulin the best option. Oral antidiabetic agents should be initiated at a low dose and titrated up according to glycaemic response, as judged by measurement of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, supplemented in some patients by self monitoring of capillary blood glucose. The average glucose-lowering effect of the major classes of oral antidiabetic agents is broadly similar (averaging a 1-2% reduction in HbA1c), alpha-glucosidase inhibitors being rather less effective. Tailoring the treatment to the individual patient is an important principle. Doses are gradually titrated up according to response. However, the maximal glucose-lowering action for sulphonylureas is usually attained at appreciably lower doses (approximately 50%) than the manufacturers' recommended daily maximum. Combinations of certain agents, for example a secretagogue plus a biguanide or a thiazolidinedione, are logical and widely used, and combination preparations are now available in some countries. While the benefits of metformin added to a sulphonylurea were initially less favourable in the UKPDS, longer-term data have allayed concern. When considering long-term therapy, issues such as tolerability and convenience are important additional considerations. Neither sulphonylureas nor biguanides are able to appreciably alter the rate of progression of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Preliminary data suggesting that thiazolidinediones may provide better long-term glycaemic stability are currently being tested in clinical trials; current evidence, while encouraging, is not conclusive. Delayed progression from glucose intolerance to type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with glucose intolerance has been demonstrated with troglitazone, metformin and acarbose. However, intensive lifestyle intervention can be more effective than drug therapy, at least in the setting of interventional clinical trials. No antidiabetic drugs are presently licensed for use in prediabetic individuals.
...
PMID:Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. 1566 80

Acarbose is an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acting specifically at the level of postprandial glucose excursion. This compound lowers HbA(1c) by 0.5-1% in patients with Type 2 diabetes, either drug naive or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs. In those with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), it reduces the incidence of newly diagnosed diabetes by 36.4%. Furthermore, it has beneficial effects on overweight, reduces blood pressure and triglycerides, and downregulates biomarkers of low-grade inflammation. In the Study To Prevent Non-Insulin-Dependent-Diabetes-Mellitus (STOP-NIDDM) trial, acarbose significantly reduced the progression of intima media thickness, incidence of cardiovascular events and of newly diagnosed hypertension. In a meta-analysis of patients with Type 2 diabetes (MERIA), acarbose intake was associated with a reduction of cardiovascular events by 35%. Acarbose is a very safe drug but in approximately 30% of patients, it can cause gastrointestinal complaints due to its mode of action, which in the majority disappear after 1-2 months. Acarbose is approved for treatment of IGT in 25 countries. It can be given alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetics and insulin. Acarbose is particularly effective in those with IGT and early diabetes and patients with comorbidities of the metabolic syndrome.
...
PMID:Acarbose: oral anti-diabetes drug with additional cardiovascular benefits. 1824 70

A public change to healthier lifestyles with more physical activity and better nutrition, including caloric restriction, is required to address the obesity epidemic. Weight loss can be achieved by caloric restrictions; current research suggests that this may be achieved by consumption of slowly absorbed carbohydrates owing to the resulting prolonged satiety. Our rationale was to prolong the satiety of overweight volunteers by supplementation with a proprietary formulation Glucaffect which delays absorption of carbohydrates. Glucaffect provides potent alpha-glucosidase inhibitors of herbal source such Pycnogenol, Madeglucyl and various others which obstruct absorption of carbohydrates, such as starch. Fifty overweight subjects received either Glucaffect or an inactive control product for eight weeks. Consumption of Glucaffect was found to statistically significantly lower blood-fasting glucose from baseline 145.3 mg/dL to 101.1 mg/dL (-30.4%) and Hba1c from 7.59% to 6.33% as compared to the control group where values decreased only marginally. The weight and the body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly from an average of 88.5 kg (BMI 26.8 kg/m2) to 81.3 kg (BMI 24.5 kg/m2) as compared to the control group. In conclusion, Glucaffect enabled subjects with metabolic syndrome to achieve healthy BMI and blood glucose levels. Glucaffect was well tolerated and no subject dropped out.
...
PMID:Daily consumption of Reliv Glucaffect for 8 weeks significantly lowered blood glucose and body weight in 50 subjects. 1940 40


1 2 Next >>

---