Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: EC:3.1.6.1 (sulfatase)
 3,205 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The subendothelial basement membrane (BM) is regarded as an important barrier to the entry of leucocytes into inflammatory sites. This study compares the ability of leucocytes, platelets and endothelial cells (EC) to degrade a [35SO4]-labelled subendothelial extracellular matrix (ECM) and assesses the effect of PMA and various pro-inflammatory cytokines on this degradative activity. The different products of degradation, identified by fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) gel filtration chromatography, were indicative of protease, endoglycosidase (heparanase) and exoglycosidase and/or sulfatase activity. In terms of ECM degradation, EC and platelets were the most active, with PMA stimulation further enhancing the degradative activity of these two cell types. Platelets exhibited predominantly heparanase activity whereas the EC degradation products suggested a range of enzymic activities, namely proteases, heparanases and sulfatases. Interestingly, EC in suspension expressed these three enzymic activities whereas confluent EC monolayers only exhibited sulfatase activity, suggesting that the former situation might represent an angiogenic response. In the case of leucocytes, neutrophils and lymphocytes degraded the ECM to a much greater extent than monocytes. Each cell type also differed in the predominant enzymic activities it expressed, for example, heparanase activity by lymphocytes, protease activity by neutrophils and sulfatase activity by monocytes. Furthermore, PMA stimulation was shown to have differential effects on these enzymic activities. Some pro-inflammatory cytokines were found to be cell-type specific in their effects on ECM degradation. Thus, IL-1 + TNF enhanced neutrophil and EC degradation of the ECM but inhibited lymphocyte ECM degradation. In contrast, the chemokine IL-8 enhanced ECM degradation by neutrophils, lymphocytes and EC. Of particular interest was the unique sulfatase activity expressed by EC and monocytes which was induced in EC by TNF + IL-1 and IL-8, whereas in monocytes the sulfatase activity was exclusively induced by the chemokine monocyte chemotactic and activating factor (MCAF). Collectively, the results of this study show that leucocytes differ markedly in the enzymes they express to degrade the BM during extravasation and that PMA and cytokines are cell-type specific in their induction of hydrolytic enzyme activity. These results also indicate that EC may play an important role, not only in the recruitment of leucocytes, but also via sulfatase activity in the preparation of vascular BM for leucocyte extravasion.
 ...
PMID:Comparative analysis of the ability of leucocytes, endothelial cells and platelets to degrade the subendothelial basement membrane: evidence for cytokine dependence and detection of a novel sulfatase. 779 31

Recent studies suggest that heparin, mannose-6-phosphate (M6P), and castanospermine (CS) may mediate their anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the passage of leukocytes through the subendothelial basement membrane (BM). In order to test this hypothesis, heparin, M6P, and CS were examined for their ability to prevent the in vitro degradation of a 35SO4-labeled extracellular matrix (ECM) by neutrophils, lymphocytes, endothelial cells (ECs), and platelets, the labeled ECM degradation products being analyzed by gel filtration chromatography. All three compounds inhibited 35SO4-labeled ECM degradation, but M6P and CS were cell-type specific in their effects. Heparin inhibited the heparanase activity of all cell types examined, confirming the results of previous studies using similar in vitro techniques. M6P selectively inhibited lymphocyte heparanase but not that of platelets, neutrophils, or ECs. CS selectively inhibited phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-induced EC heparanase and sulfatase activity but did not affect the constitutive expression of degradative enzymes by non-stimulated ECs. These findings provide important clues to the mode of action of these compounds and the characteristic inflammatory pathology associated with the use of each anti-inflammatory agent. In particular, the data support the view that leukocytes markedly differ in the mechanisms they use to degrade BM/ECM to enable extravasation and that some degree of cooperation with EC is required in this process.
 ...
PMID:Differential effects of the anti-inflammatory compounds heparin, mannose-6-phosphate, and castanospermine on degradation of the vascular basement membrane by leukocytes, endothelial cells, and platelets. 785 34

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans cooperate with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF/FGF2) signaling to control osteoblast growth and differentiation, as well as metabolic functions of osteoblasts. FGF2 signaling modulates the expression and activity of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2/Cbfa1), a key regulator of osteoblast proliferation and maturation. Here, we have characterized novel Runx2 target genes in osteoprogenitors under conditions that promote growth arrest while not yet permitting sustained phenotypic maturation. Runx2 enhances expression of genes related to proteoglycan-mediated signaling, including FGF receptors (e.g., FGFR2 and FGFR3) and proteoglycans (e.g., syndecans [Sdc1, Sdc2, Sdc3], glypicans [Gpc1], versican [Vcan]). Runx2 increases expression of the glycosyltransferase Exostosin-1 (Ext1) and heparanase, as well as alters the relative expression of N-linked sulfotransferases (Ndst1 = Ndst2 > Ndst3) and enzymes mediating O-linked sulfation of heparan sulfate (Hs2st > Hs6st) or chondroitin sulfate (Cs4st > Cs6st). Runx2 cooperates with FGF2 to induce expression of Sdc4 and the sulfatase Galns, but Runx2 and FGF2 suppress Gpc6, thus suggesting intricate Runx2 and FGF2 dependent changes in proteoglycan utilization. One functional consequence of Runx2 mediated modulations in proteoglycan-related gene expression is a change in the responsiveness of bone markers to FGF2 stimulation. Runx2 and FGF2 synergistically enhance osteopontin expression (>100 fold), while FGF2 blocks Runx2 induction of alkaline phosphatase. Our data suggest that Runx2 and the FGF/proteoglycan axis may form an extracellular matrix (ECM)-related regulatory feed-back loop that controls osteoblast proliferation and execution of the osteogenic program.
 ...
PMID:The osteogenic transcription factor Runx2 regulates components of the fibroblast growth factor/proteoglycan signaling axis in osteoblasts. 1925 85

Cancer cells reside in a microenvironment comprising of fibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes, macrophages, and other immune cells. All these cells coevolve with the cancer cells into a clinically manifested tumor. The immune system of the host should eliminate the tumor but fails to do so until it develops into a deadly disease. Based on these facts, cancer is a system disorder caused by miscommunications among cancer cells, its microenvironment, and host immune system. Therefore, identifying communication-related biomarkers will be important for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Proteoglycans are important communication molecules made by all types of mammalian cells and present both at cell surfaces and in extracellular matrix. Proteoglycans consist of a core protein to which one or more glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains are covalently attached. GAGs are long linear anionic polysaccharides. They interact with hundreds of growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, proteases, protease inhibitors, and facilitate many signaling transduction pathways in a GAG composition and/or sequence-specific manner. When the GAG network goes awry, the problem cannot be defined by conventional genomic or proteomic approaches because GAGs are assembled without a genetic template. This review will summarize all GAG- and proteoglycan-related cancer biomarkers as well as GAG modification enzymes including sulfotransferase-, heparanase-, hyaluronidase-, and sulfatase-based biomarkers identified during the past 20 years. The published data demonstrate that the proteoglycan- and GAG-related cancer biomarkers are not produced by cancer cells alone, and they are indicators of a miscommunicated system during cancer development.
 ...
PMID:Proteoglycans as miscommunication biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. 3090 65